Panama 144 Order denying Paynter's Motion to Dismiss .pdf
Original filename: Panama 144 Order denying Paynter's Motion to Dismiss.pdf
This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Office Word 2007 / 䵩捲潳潦璮⁏晦楣攠坯牤′〰㜻潤楦楥搠畳楮朠楔數琠㈮ㄮ㜠批‱吳塔, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 03/08/2012 at 15:07, from IP address 24.253.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 610 times.
File size: 76 KB (1 page).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 144 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
In Re SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP.
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-32/RS-CJK
Before me are Defendant Robert L. Paynter’s Motion to Dismiss, filed pro se,
(Doc. 132) and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 142).
Granting a motion to dismiss is appropriate if it is clear that no relief could be
granted under any set of facts that could be proven consistent with the allegations of the
complaint. Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73, 104 S. Ct. 2229, 2232 (1984).
In making this determination, the court must accept all factual allegations in the
complaint as true and in the light most favorable to Plaintiff. Christopher v. Harbury,
536 U.S. 403, 406, 122 S. Ct. 2179, 2182 (2003).
Plaintiff has met its burden in alleging facts which state a claim for relief that is
plausible. For this reason, the Motion is DENIED.
ORDERED on April 30, 2012.
/S/ Richard Smoak
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE