Neurophilosophy (24) .pdf
Original filename: Neurophilosophy (24).pdf
Author: Patrick Coombe
This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Office Word 2007, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 05/10/2012 at 03:52, from IP address 98.254.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 931 times.
File size: 137 KB (1 page).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
Neurophilosphy and You
Neurophilosophy which is often otherwise known as philosophy of neuroscience is a branch of
philosophy which studies and focuses on explaining the behavior and tendencies of the mind,
it's natural functions, your consciousness, and other properties of the human mind and there
behavior, actions, and reactions with the actual human brain, that lean toward the more
elusive and not widely studied fringe sciences. Its the interdisciplinary study in the field that
looks to find the relationship between neuroscientific facts and philosophical insights that
relate to aspects of contention in the philosophical mind. This field of study is often broke off
into two specific areas of interest.
The study of neurophilosophy tries to use empirical facts as pertaining to neuroscience to help
to distinguish more broad range philosophical issues. Most of times these
issues are dealing with questions in the category of the philosophy of the
mind. The study of neurophilosophy also tries to clarify certain
neuroscientific methods and outcomes by using different methods of
philosophy of science. The science delves into how neuroscientific studies
pertains to different arguments in philosophy of mind. The difference
between the theories of neurophilosophy to others like dualism,
functionalism, and idealism is that these sciences try to explain the mental
aspect of the brain with reference to minds and ideas while neurophilosophy's theories focus
on the structure and function of the actual brain. These theories usually stand on opposite
ends of the scientific spectrum when it deals with brain function and philosophy of the mind.
They call the likeness between the neuroscience aspect and the philosophy aspect of
The brain part standing for the neuroscience and the mind part for the philosophy. The
brain-mind relationship is a topic of much debate, but when looking at it from the perspective
of neurophilosphy, there's an agreement that there must be some understanding of
philosophical applications of neuroscience and that their discoveries are extremely relevant.
Even if the relationship between brain and mind did not exist and it was known by the
neuroscientific community, the mind would still be an unknown area of the brain that makes us
everything we are and helps to shape everything we do. Therefore the study of neuroscience
would be just as important to the study of philosophy of the mind. On the other hand, if
there were to be discovered a complete overlap between brain function and mind phenomena,
the scientific study of neuroscience would be absolutely necessary in all aspects in the study of
the mind. No matter the debate between the two, the scientific realm of neuroscience is
necessary and relevant for the study of the philosophical mind. Neurophilosophy was birthed
from the growing use of philosophy of science over the past thirty years, the scientific practices
changed from having general features to extremely specific issues, concepts, and puzzles. It
was also fueled by the growth of the neuroscience field. Our website holds more information
on the subject, check it out.