PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact

Atrocities commited by the Zionist and its Agents .pdf

Original filename: Atrocities commited by the Zionist and its Agents.pdf
Author: Engku Hassan

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Office Word 2007, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 11/07/2014 at 23:53, from IP address 118.100.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 552 times.
File size: 1.5 MB (43 pages).
Privacy: public file

Download original PDF file

Document preview

A collection of 14 Articles
related to
Atrocities committed by
the Zionist and its Agents
in their efforts to annihilate Islam
confirmed by what has taken
place recently in the Middle East
compiled by a concerned being – 12 July 2014
to read, click the content of your choice

Table of Contents
Terror in Iraq: Roots and motivation of ISIL terrorists ................................................ 2
‘ISIL: Devil-dolls of the CIA’ ...................................................................................7
'Is ISIL really ‘Sunni’ ? Not at all’............................................................................ 9
ISIL: The gravest threat in Iraq and Syria ................................................................ 12
Iran commander insists US behind ISIL terrorism .................................................... 15
In Picture: Anti-Islamic acts by so-called Islamic State in Iraq ..................................... 16
Challenging the al-Saud dynasty ............................................................................ 19
Takfiris in Syrian on the run ................................................................................. 21
A cry for justice in Bahrain prisons; Violations at unbearable levels; ............................ 23
Zionist playing dirty role in Syrian crisis ................................................................. 26
Saudis to demolish Prophet Mohammad’s (SAWA) House in Mecca............................. 29
Saudis want Takfiristan in Syria and Iraq ............................................................... 32
Takfiri infighting in Syria troubles their sponsors ..................................................... 33
Global Terrorism and Saudi Arabia ( Bandar’s Terror Network ) ................................. 38

Page 1 of 43

Terror in Iraq: Roots and motivation of
Terrorism, directly or
sponsored, has long been
America’s weapon of mass
destruction – its weapon of
choice. As a strategy, it
outdates “human rights”
and “democracy
promotion” and has proven
itself to be far more
effective by creating mayhem and fear, removing resistance to intervention.
The events of 9/11 justified this age-old tactic. Although the tentacles of
America’s terror tactic reach back far and spread wide, this article seeks to
address the presence of ISIL (or ISIS).
As of writing this essay , it has become public knowledge that the group
referred to as ISIL was trained by the United States to topple Syria’s President
Assad. The purpose of this article is to give a comprehensive, chronological
overview of events leading to the present-day crisis, which by necessity may
repeat some of the points raised in various excellent articles on ISIL.
This essay will be in two parts.

Part I. Prologue: Terror in Iraq
Scholars have opined that America’s crisis began in the 1970s with the
“Vietnam Syndrome” and America’s efforts to curb third world countries
wishing to break away from the status quo system. None had the impact of the
1979 Iranian Revolution that ousted the American-backed Shah - the lynchpin
of US strategy in the Persian Gulf. In the following decades, the United States
sought to reestablish its hegemony, in particular in the Persian Gulf region.
It was due to America’s desire to establish sole control over the Persian Gulf
region that it showed no interest in the Soviet Union-proposed neutralization
of the Persian Gulf, with no alliances, no bases, no intervention in the region in
1980 and at the onset of the Iran-Iraq war. To the contrary, the United States
used the war as a lever to establish military bases in the Persian Gulf states.
The Saudi monarchy, threatened by the Iranian revolution, and reassured by
President Reagan that “we will not permit” Saudi Arabia “to be an Iran,” made
way for US bases on it is soil in 1985, making room for others to follow suit.
America’s efforts with the Shah’s cooperation to alienate Iranians and Arabs to
Israel’s benefit continued unabated.
Page 2 of 43

Thus, it is worthwhile recapping here that the cooperation among the Arab
states against Iran was fear of communism and the potential of an uprising
against the ruling monarchies.
The 1991 Persian Gulf War was an important and tragic war with heavy
casualties on the Iraqi side. However, for the sake of brevity, it will not be
discussed here other than to point out the most pertinent facts; the war was
based on deception, Saudi Arabia paid $36 billion of US $60 billion costs, and
US forces were deployed in Saudi Arabia. It is perhaps worthwhile pointing out
that shortly before the end of the war, the American government allowed Israel
to designate 100 targets inside Iraq for the coalition to destroy. Following the
war, Iraq was subjected to deathly immoral sanctions with a death toll of over
one million, half of them being children. The no-fly zone and its daily
bombings left a vulnerable and devastated country in its trail, with no room for
resistance to future incursions.
Not unrelated to current events is the fact that in the same year, The Jerusalem
Report published that the idea of the so-called "radical Islam" replacing
communism had taken seed among the Israeli right. The basis of the idea was
founded on the neoconservatives fear that with the demise of the Soviet Union,
and the splintering of the America’s right wing faction, there would no longer
be an unconditional support for a US-Israel alliance. Islam replaced
communism as ogre du jour and gave neocons in Washington a decade to
expand and promote the newfound ‘threat.’
The 90s would see the virtual completion of media take-over by neocons made
possible with the 1980s regulation changes in the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) that allowed mergers and acquisitions. Washington think
tanks became home to many more influential neoconservatives such as
Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, and Richard Perle, who had made their way to
the AEI from the Jerusalem-based think tank the Institute for Advanced
Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS). The IASPS has published numerous
strategy papers, chief among them “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm” in 1996 – viewed by scholars and activist as the blueprint
to the 2003 Iraq attack and invasion.
September 11, 2001 triggered the events years in the making.
Two short days later, on September 13, 2001, while the nation was recovering
from the shock of 9/11, Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA)
already had a statement available as to how the US should proceed. Saddam’s
fate, or rather Iraq’s fate, was already sealed. JINSA “recommended” that Iraq
be invaded militarily. The policy also called for America to be involved in
disputes far and wide for the unforeseen future not only in Afghanistan and
Iraq, but also in countries such as Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Sudan, the Palestinian
Authority, Libya, Algeria - and eventually, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. No doubt
the Saudis were not copied on the policy recommendations for even though
they were included in the list of target countries, the Saudi monarchy fully
Page 3 of 43

cooperated with advancing terrorism as a weapon of mass destruction and

PART II. Terror in Iraq: Invasion
It is common knowledge by now that Saudi Arabia partnered with the neocons
and pushed for the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Taking on their usual role of gas
station attendants, they pumped oil to fuel America’s war. “Bandar promised
President Bush that Saudi Arabia will lower oil prices in the months before the
election – to ensure the US economy is strong on election day.” Their
cooperation was not without its rewards. There is ample literature available on
the revelations made about the Carlysle Group and war profiteering.
Additionally, less than a month after the illegal attack on Iraq, American forces
were moved from Saudi Arabia to Qatar.
Saudis were further rewarded when in 2004, pro-Saudi, anti-Iranian Ayad
Allawi, the head of INA (Iraqi National Accord) backed by Saudi Arabia, the
UK and the US was appointed as prime minister. His first order of the day was
to re-establish diplomatic ties between Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Dubbed
‘Saddam without a moustache’ and accused of being a US puppet, he was voted
out in 2005. (In 2009, “Alawi launched al-Iraqiya (Iraqi National
Movement)). The Saudi/US/British backed Allawi is once again in vogue and a
platform is made readily available to him to comment on Iraq and promote
himself in opposition to the elected President Nouri al-Maliki.
In the “war on terror,” the first order of the day for the US-led occupation
forces was to give ‘special status protection’ to the terrorist group,
Mojahedeen-e Khalg (MEK). The US was grateful to the MEK for fighting
alongside Saddam Hussein. Thus, the US and Israel made long-term plans for
the terrorist group, which included fabricating information about Iran’s
civilian nuclear program, according to Gareth Porter.
The US also started building elaborate bases in occupied Iraq. Contrary to their
official narrative, the Washington elite had plans to stay. The Americans built
several ‘enduring’ bases soon upon arrival – each base arrogantly bearing an
English name in Arab land. These were mini-cities with their own country
club-style amenities -- swimming pools, theaters, golf, coffee shops, fast food
chains, and so on. This was clearly an occupation mission.
According to Karen Kwiatkowski, a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who
served in the office of the Secretary of Defense, “the neoconservative architects
of the Iraq invasion definitely foresaw a permanent, large-scale presence and
view the bases as vital both for protecting Israel and as launchpads for
operations in Syria and Iran.” Kwiatkowski was right – this timeline coincided
with Washington’s support of opposition groups in Syria and sending MEK
terrorists to Iran.
But Iran and Syria were only part of the equation. America had global designs.
As a former senior Defense Department official observed during the 8-year
Page 4 of 43

long Iraq-imposed war on Iran: ‘To all intents and purposes,[Persian] Gulf
waters now extend from the Straits of Malacca to the South Atlantic.’
But the occupation of Iraq would not be the predicted ‘cake walk.’ The “Mother
of all Bombs” dropped on Iraq, the indiscriminate killings, destruction of Iraq’s
ancient sites, and abuses such as the Abu Ghraib scandal pushed Iraqis to fight
against their “liberators.”
Narratives of crimes committed by US-led forces and their intentions had to be
stopped. Journalism became a hazardous occupation as US forces bombed,
killed, or shut down papers critical of their occupation and atrocities. Among
the most vocal was Muqtada al-Sadr, who, giving voice to the Iraqi people,
condemned the occupation and oppression in his newspaper al Hawza. The US
forces shut down his paper. He did not surrender his will to fight.
The rising death toll, abuse, and carnage united Iraqis against the American
occupiers. Reporting from Baghdad in May 2004, Dahr Jamail cites Imam AlAdhamy who told him, “what is happening is happening to all of Iraq. There is
no difference now between Sunni and Shia, Arab and Kurd. We have all been
Hence, it became pertinent to undermine their unity and have Iraqis turn on
each other instead of fighting the occupiers. This strategy is once again at play
with the emergence of ISIL. “[For] Many ordinary Sunni Baghdadis, the
advance of ISIL is cause for alarm mixed with a vague hope that somehow ISIL
and Shia Muslims may severely damage each other, to the general benefit of
moderate Sunnis.”
In this regard, none proved more helpful than King Abdullah of Jordan in
delivering a strategy for the division of Iraqis with his concept of a “Shia
Crescent” in late 2004. This inflammatory notion would lay the groundwork
for a Sunni-Shia (and Kurd) division. (To understand Jordan’s cooperation and
interests, it is important to read the aforementioned IASPS strategy paper “A
Clean Break…”) The mainstream media and collaborators in Iraq and the
region spread the concept like wildfire, burning bridges among the various
In 2005, as anti-war protests spread across America, under the direction of the
Bush State Department, the press was busy creating “happy” news to garner
support for the illegal occupation of Iraq. Meanwhile in Iraq, efforts were
underway to keep the Iraqis united. In October 2005, then Iraqi President Jalal
Talabani announced at a press conference a compromise plan that had been
applauded by Sunni, Shia, and Kurdish leaders alike. The threat of a united
resistance to the occupation was reemerging. Extraordinary events would once
again disrupt the fragile coalition.
Curiously (or not), in December 2005, it was announced that elite Israeli
military were training the Kurds in Northern Iraq. In January 2006, Saudi
Arabia planned on securing and upgrading a fence intended to seal the IraqPage 5 of 43

Saudi border to stop the flow of ‘terrorists.’ In February 2006, one of Shia
Islam’s holiest shrines, the Askariya Shrine in Samarra was bombed. Without
questioning or heeding witnesses, the bombing was quickly blamed on Sunnis.
Violence and revenge killing erupted.
In May 2006, Joe Biden suggested splitting Iraq into three parts. In August,
Vali Nasr, an adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations
released his book ‘The Shia Revival.’ The flames of a dangerous and
irreversible divide were being fanned. On December 30, 2006, Saddam
Hussein was hung on Eid ul-Adha inside the Green Zone. The timing of his
execution further exasperated the divide as it was a holy day of celebration for
the Sunnis, yet the timeline had not yet commenced for the Shiites – it would
commence the following day.
In 2007, President Bush ordered a ‘surge’ and 30,000 additional troops would
be housed in the bases in order to provide ‘security’ and to help create a
“...unified, democratic federal Iraq that can govern itself, defend itself, and
sustain itself, and is an ally in the War on Terror.” Askariya was bombed a
second time. The troops managed to drag the Iraqi Christians into the
sectarian division by pushing Christianity on Muslims.
In 2008, incumbent Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki opposed a permanent US
presence and instead signed an Agreement (SOFA) that would see the removal
of all US troops from Iraq by December 2011.
This timeline brings us to the arming of ISIL terrorists in Syria by the United
States and allies who have been engaged in terror activities both inside Syria
and Iraq. The motives are clear. To remove Assad, drag Iran (and Hezbollah)
into this quagmire with the intention of bleeding all sides. It would also justify
American presence to combat ‘terrorists’ and foreign fighters so that America
can re-occupy its bases and dominate the Persian Gulf region as planned.
To sum up, neoconservatives had long sought to dominate the Persian Gulf and
use it as a launch pad in their grand strategy of global dominance. When fear of
communism and inter-state wars ceased to justify this agenda, 9/11 came to
the rescue. Sectarian division eliminated resistance to the plan. As renowned
strategist Michael Porter said, “Finally, strategy must have continuity. It can’t
be constantly reinvented.” The ISIL is that continuation.
Finally, the brutal activities of the ISIL will also serve as a warning to
Afghanistan’s reluctance to sign a SOFA. It is imperative to point out here that
9/11 was a pretext for the invasion of Afghanistan.

Page 6 of 43

‘ISIL: Devil-dolls of the CIA’
ISIL militants.
Did you know that the CIA
manufactures terrorist

According to the
Washington Post, CIA
operatives have admitted
that they fabricated Osama
Bin Laden devil-dolls as part
of a psychological warfare
operation against Pakistan.
The dolls looked like Bin Laden – at first. But Bin Laden’s face was painted
with heat-dissolving material designed to peel off and reveal the face of the
Terrorizing Pakistani children with Osama Bin Laden devil dolls – it’s all in a
day’s work for the CIA.
But wait a minute – wasn’t Osama Bin Laden himself a sort of CIA devil-doll?
Bin Laden’s career as a self-professed jihadi began when he was recruited by
the CIA and its Saudi proxies to fight against the Soviet occupiers in
Afghanistan. Under the code name “Tim Osman” he toured US military bases
and received insurgency training from the CIA.
Later, during the 1990s, Osama Bin Laden was manipulated by the CIA (or its
Zionist faction) into becoming a plausible patsy for the coming wave of falseflag terrorism designed to ignite a clash of civilizations. As the Muslim world
listened to Bin Laden’s eloquent litany of grievances against the West, it was
shown a handsome, bearded face with large, soulful eyes. The Western world,
however, was shown a demonic caricature – a devil doll created for
propaganda purposes.
On September 11, 2001, when the World Trade Center skyscrapers were blown
up in explosive controlled demolitions, many observers claimed to see a
bearded, demonic face in the pyroclastic smoke and dust clouds billowing
from the exploding buildings. According to the ensuing wave of propaganda
from the Zionist-dominated corporate media, the face of the devil behind the
murder of 3,000 people on 9/11 was Osama Bin Laden.
The real Bin Laden repeatedly denied any involvement in the 9/11 attacks –
just as he swore on a Qur’an that he had nothing to do with the African
embassy bombings that preceded 9/11, according to Pakistani General Hamid
Gul. (Gul argues that the Israeli government perpetrated both crimes.) But in
the Western corporate media, the Bin Laden devil doll – the new icon of
Page 7 of 43

Islamophobia – would always be blamed, even though the FBI still insists that
Bin Laden was never wanted for 9/11 because there was never any evidence of
his involvement.
Today, it appears that the Zionist wing of the CIA is still in the business of
manufacturing terrorist devil dolls. The latest set of devil dolls is ISIL, the socalled Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
These devil dolls come nattily dressed in brand new identical black uniforms
and ski masks, sort of like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles only much darker.
They appear to have been manufactured by Central Casting in Hollywood,
which specializes in the fabrication of villains who are as perfectly-attired as
they are utterly despicable.
The stunningly photogenic devil-doll villains of ISIL are perfect for their parts.
They play the role of “evil radical Muslim extremists” with aplomb: They
indiscriminately lop off heads, rip internal organs out of corpses and devour
them for the cameras, enthusiastically engage in mass executions and other
war crimes, and impose a harsh misinterpretation of “Islamic law” on the
miserable people who are unlucky enough to fall under their jurisdiction.
The ISIL devil dolls are a walking, talking psychological warfare operation
against Islam in general, and the Islamic duty of jihad in particular. Most
Westerners do not realize that the term “jihad” simply means struggle or
striving – both the struggle to be a better person, and the struggle to defend the
community against aggression. The military dimension of jihad comes with a
long list of conditions, restrictions, and requirements for good behavior. The
Islamic rules of jihad are very similar to the “just war” doctrines of Christianity
: Noncombatants must not be harmed, property must not be damaged or
destroyed, the war must clearly have a just cause (such as defense against an
aggressor) and so on.
Thanks to the CIA’s “jihadi” devil dolls, most of the Western public now
believes that “jihad” means raping nuns, crucifying priests, devouring the livers
of corpses, mass-executing people whose only crime is to profess a different
religion or school of thought, and generally engaging in criminal aggression
and wildly un-Islamic battlefield behavior. No wonder much of the West thinks
Muslims are crazy. No wonder much of the West supports an endless war on
Islam whose only beneficiary is global Zionism.
By manufacturing “jihadi” devil dolls, the Western masters of psychological
warfare hope to delegitimize jihad. They want to disarm the world’s Muslims.
They want to convince the world that “defending oneself while Muslim” is a
crime, just like “driving while black” is a crime in some racist US jurisdictions.
They want to create a world in which any Muslim who even thinks about
defending Islam or the Muslim community or any Islamic country against
aggression will be a legitimate target for a drone strike.

Page 8 of 43

The CIA’s terrorist devil dolls will never succeed in defending Islam. They will
never succeed in creating a viable Islamic state. They will never succeed in
winning the hearts and minds of either the Muslim or the non-Muslim global
population. Their role is to create fitna (bloody chaos) in Islamic lands, which
actually reduces the ability of those countries to defend themselves against
Perhaps the world’s Muslims should manufacture a new toy for mass
distribution in the United States of America: A doll representing a Takfiri
kharajite terrorist, like ISIL or the so-called Pakistani Taliban. The “jihadi” face
would consist of heat-dissolving paint. It would peel off to reveal the face of a
CIA agent like Raymond Davis, the false-flag terrorist captured in Pakistan; or
better yet, the face of Benjamin Netanyahu, the man who launched the phony
“war on terror” in 1979 at the Jerusalem Conference on International
Terrorism (JCIT).
Imagine the surprise of American children who, while playing with their new
“jihadi” dolls, would suddenly witness the dolls’ faces peeling off to reveal the
hideous visage of Netanyahu.
But this plan would be cruel and unfair to American children. It is American
adults who need to see who is really behind the wave of devil-doll “jihadi”
terrorism that is laying waste to the Middle East.

‘Is ISIL really ‘Sunni’?
Not at all’
ISIL terrorists transport dozens
of Iraqis to an unknown location
in the Salaheddin province ahead
of executing them.
The Western media describes
ISIL – the ultra-extremist
terrorists destabilizing Iraq and
Syria – as “Sunni militants.”
Headlines read: “Sunni Islamist
Militants Seize Mosul.” “Sunni
militants capture northern Iraqi town.” “Iraq Army Tries to Roll Back Sunni
Militants’ Advance.”
The corporate media casts the fighting in Iraq as a Sunni vs. Shia conflict. The
Sunni side, according to these reports, is led by ISIL – a group that was
expelled from al-Qaeda for being too extreme.
Page 9 of 43

Related documents

atrocities commited by the zionist and its agents
the muslim world denouncing terrorism
research report scandmun 2018
icc complaint jamesryan

Related keywords

Copy tag