Final Bar Complaint against Mark Lindquist 06 11 15.pdf


Preview of PDF document final-bar-complaint-against-mark-lindquist-06-11-15.pdf

Page 123103

Text preview


BEFORE THE WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
In re: The Matter of the Disciplinary
Proceeding Against
MARK E. LINDQUIST
DAWN FARINA
JOHN SHEERAN
JARED AUSSERER
LORI KOOIMAN
TIMOTHY LEWIS
JAMES RICHMOND
Attorneys at Law

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
OF FILED GRIEVANCE

COMES NOW
, Attorney at Law and citizen of this
state, and hereby files a professional grievance against the attorneys above named. Prosecutor
Lindquist, individually and through his deputies, has engaged in misconduct to include
withholding evidence, obstructing justice and gross abuse of authority. Prosecutor Lindquist,
individually and through his deputies filed serious criminal charges against Lynn Dalsing to
cover up his own wrong doing and to gain strategic and tactical advantage in a civil lawsuit. This
motion in support of filed grievance is supported by Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7, 1.10, 3.2,
3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 4.1, 4.4, 5.1, 5.2, 8.4 and the following statement of facts, authority and
memorandum:
SYNOPSIS
In December of 2010, the Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney filed charges of child sex
abuse against Lynn Dalsing. (Lynn Dalsing’s husband was charged and convicted in July 2010
of child sexual abuse of their daughter). The sole basis of the charges against Lynn Dalsing was
one photograph depicting a sex act between an unidentifiable adult female and a prepubescent
female child. The photograph was recovered from a computer in the Dalsing residence. The
prosecutor’s theory of the case was that the photograph depicted Dalsing committing a crime of
sexual abuse. Dalsing was held in custody pending her trial.

1