This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by TeX / MiKTeX pdfTeX-1.40.14, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 19/10/2015 at 20:16, from IP address 109.77.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 577 times.

File size: 158.4 KB (4 pages).

Privacy: public file

STAT20110–Homework #2

Florian Maire

due for the 29th of October 2015

Note: the parts of the problem are not independent BUT many

Questions can be attempted even if the previous ones have not

been answered. It is recommended to start with a complete

and thorough reading of the problem.

A mobile phone manufacturer is concerned by two essential electronical components, without which the touch-sensitive screen does not work. If one of them

dies the phone becomes unusable. We denote by X and Y the two random variables defined as the lifetime of each component. X and Y are measured in

days and are assumed to be independent. Moreover, they follow the same distribution, a geometric distribution with parameter p ∈ (0, 1), such that, for all

k ∈ N∗ :

PX (X = k) = PY (Y = k) = (1 − p)k−1 p .

1

Preliminary

1-

(i) Let (S, E, P) be the probability space related to the random experiment

consisting in the observation of the lifetime of the two electronical components. Specify S and give a possible event space E.

(ii) What is the cumulative distribution functions FX and FY of the random

variables X and Y ?

(iii) How do you interpret the parameter p in such a model?

2-

(i) Show that the events {X = 1}, {X = 2}, ..., {X = ∞} form a partition

of S and that for all k > 0

{X = Y } ∩ {X = k} = {X = Y } ∩ {X = k} ∩ {Y = k} .

(ii) Using 2-(i), show that the probability of the event {X = Y } is:

p

P({X = Y }) =

.

2−p

[hint: think of the law of total probability]

(iii) Interpret the probability of this event in the limit cases p & 0 and

p % 1.

1

2

Lifetime of the touching–screen technology

The manufacturer has a strong interest in knowing the distribution of the following random variable

U = min(X, Y ) .

1-

(i) What is the sample space SU of U ? How do you interpret the random

variable U ?

(ii) Five realizations of X and Y , {xi }5i=1 and {yi }5i=1 , have been recorded

in the table below. Give the corresponding realizations of U , {ui }5i=1 .

i

xi

yi

1

347

67

2

41

302

3

780

218

4

861

41

5

644

645

Table 1: Record of five different realizations of X and Y , expressed in days.

(iii) Let x1 < x2 and y1 < y2 four positive integers. Express the probability

P ({X ∈ [x1 , x2 ]} ∩ {Y ∈ [y1 , y2 ]})

as a function of the two CDFs FX and FY and (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2 ).

2-

(i) Let u ∈ SU . Can you find two events EX (u) and EY (u) that only

depend on (X, u) and (Y, u) respectively, so that:

{U = u} ∩ {X > Y } = EX (u) ∩ EY (u) .

(ii) Using the total law of probability and a well chosen partition of S, show

that:

PU (U = u) = p(2 − p)(1 − p)2u−2 .

(iii) Show that their exists some constant α ∈ (0, 1) such that U is actually

a random variable whose distribution is geometric with parameter α.

(iv) Can you give an equivalent model for the time to default of a system

consisting in the series of two components whose lifetime is modeled as

a geometric random variable with same parameter? Comment on the

value of α.

(v) What is the life expectancy of the touch–screen technology?

3- The manufacturer can order components with an arbitrary low parameter

p to its supplier. What should be the quality p = p0 requested by the

manufacturer, if he wants that 8 times out of 10, the lifetime for the touch–

screen technology goes beyond one year.

2

3

Survival component

The manufacturer is also interested in the life–expectancy of the survival component, defined as the component that does not die at first. He considers a

second random variable, V defined as follows:

V = |X − Y | .

1-

(i) What is the sample space SV of V . How do you interpret the random

variable V ?

(ii) For the five realizations of X and Y provided in Table 1, give the

corresponding realizations of V , {vi }5i=1 .

2-

(i) Show that the probability P(V = 0) has already been derived before in

the assignment.

(ii) Having noticed that {{X = Y }, {X > Y }, {X < Y }} form a partition

of S, derive for u ∈ SU and v > 0, the probability

P({U = u} ∩ {V = v}) .

(iii) Conclude that for v > 0 we have

PV ({V = v}) =

2p

(1 − p)v .

2−p

(iv) Is V a random variable with geometric distribution?

(v) Derive E(V ).

[hint: for any q ∈ (0, 1),

P∞

k=1

kq k−1 = 1/(1−q)2 ]

3- Based on the previous analysis, can you derive the life–expectancy of the

survival component?

3

4

Two strategies

The process of replacing the faulty component is expensive as the phone needs

to be opened. The manufacturer is hesitating between two strategies:

S-1 Leave the survival component as it is: after all, if it has lasted so long,

maybe he will still be working for a long time.

S-2 Replace both components by new ones once the first component dies, as

this might allow to delay the next repair time.

Of course, the second strategy is relevant only if it allows to delay the next

repair.

1- Assume that throwing away the survival component costs the manufacturer

r = .001 euro per wasted day of lifetime of the component. Using the value

p = p0 , what is the expected loss if the manufacturer choses S-2?

2- Let us consider the following random variable

W = min(V, Z)

where Z is a random variable with geometric distribution (independent of X

and Y and with parameter p). What is the sample space SW of W ? Show

that the time to second reparation with the strategy S-1 is modeled by the

following random variable

T1 = U + W .

3- Assume the following:

P(W = w) =

p/(2 − p)

2p(1 − p)2w−1

if w = 0

if w > 0 .

(1)

[you have everything to prove it, so you can try!]

Derive the expected time of the second reparation with the strategy S-1, i.e.

E(T1 ). Using the value of p = p0 , what is the expected number of days to

the second reparation using the first strategy?

4- Show that the time to second reparation with the strategy S-2 is modeled by

the following random variable

T2 = 2U .

5- Derive the expected time of the second reparation with the strategy S-2, i.e.

E(T2 ). Using the value of p = p0 , what is the expected number of days to

the second reparation using the second strategy?

6- Comment on the previous questions. Isn’t the result somewhat counterintuitive? What strategy would you recommend to the manufacturer?

4

Probability Theory.pdf (PDF, 158.4 KB)

Download PDF

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)

Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

This file has been shared publicly by a user of

Document ID: 0000309174.