dahlstrom v dawkins order 2016 01 06 .pdf

File information


Original filename: dahlstrom-v-dawkins-order-2016-01-06.pdf
Title: Microsoft Word - U 415cv384 Dahlstrom v Dawkins - Memo Adopting No Objections.docx
Author: broadwam

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2 / Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows); modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 09/01/2016 at 06:58, from IP address 75.50.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 1587 times.
File size: 474 KB (2 pages).
Privacy: public file


Download original PDF file


dahlstrom-v-dawkins-order-2016-01-06.pdf (PDF, 474 KB)


Share on social networks



Link to this file download page



Document preview


Case 4:15-cv-00384-ALM-CAN Document 14 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION

KARL L. DAHLSTROM
v.
RICHARD DAWKINS AND
THE RICHARD DAWKINS
FOUNDATION FOR REASON
AND SCIENCE.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-384
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On November 20, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #11) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Richard Dawkins and The
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal
Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (Dkt. #7) and Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a
Claim Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #8) be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Richard Dawkins and The Richard Dawkins
Foundation for Reason and Science’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (Dkt. #7) and Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant
to Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #8) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice.

Case 4:15-cv-00384-ALM-CAN Document 14 Filed 01/06/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 89
.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 6th day of January, 2016.

___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2


Document preview dahlstrom-v-dawkins-order-2016-01-06.pdf - page 1/2

Document preview dahlstrom-v-dawkins-order-2016-01-06.pdf - page 2/2

Related documents


dahlstrom v dawkins order 2016 01 06
dahlstrom v dawkins report and recommendation 20 nov 2015
bundy dismissal
document 16
2010 tammi fisse judge decision 2010
84 pt s discovery plan and scheduling order

Link to this page


Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)

HTML Code

Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code

QR Code link to PDF file dahlstrom-v-dawkins-order-2016-01-06.pdf