Ash SOC 331 Week 5 DQ 1 Retributive Justice .pdf
Original filename: Ash SOC 331 Week 5 DQ 1 Retributive Justice.pdf
This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Office Word 2007, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 10/03/2016 at 06:04, from IP address 43.224.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 170 times.
File size: 309 KB (3 pages).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
Ash SOC 331 Week 5 DQ 1 Retributive Justice
and Mandatory Life Imprisonment for
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
In Chapter 5 of the textbook, the author
examines retributive justice from the
standpoint of the means of punishment
(Section 5.2). He calls attention to the length
of prison sentences and, in particular, the
issue of mandatory life sentences for juvenile
In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declared laws
that require judges to impose life-withoutparole sentences for juveniles to be in
violation of the Eighth Amendment’s
prohibition of “cruel and unusual
punishments.” The decision (Miller v.
Alabama) was a 5-4 split in the Court – which
is typical of many such decisions that apply
the cruel and unusual punishment provision.
Your initial post must analyze the retributive
justice issues of mandatory, life-withoutparole sentences. Consider the facts of Miller
v. Alabama: Defendant Miller, a 14-year old
boy, with an accomplice beat the victim with a
baseball bat and set his trailer on fire with the
victim inside. Defendant Miller was tried as an
adult for capital murder while committing
Is a mandatory, life-without-parole sentence
just in such circumstances? Remember that
“just” may or may not be the same as
“constitutional.” Summarize both the pros and
the cons of your answer to this question, and
critically evaluate these pros and cons,
applying principles of retributive justice
discussed in the text. Your evaluation must
respond to the pros and cons, giving
persuasive reasons why you agree with some
and disagree with some.
For more classes visit