Water Memory .pdf
Original filename: Water Memory.pdf
This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Word 2013, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 18/04/2016 at 09:27, from IP address 203.100.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 227 times.
File size: 78 KB (3 pages).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
The ‘memory of water’ could be a fashionable phrase that's largely related to
homoeopathy and therefore the magnetic Jacques Benveniste following his and
others’ allergic reaction analysis work. At the time Benveniste was a number one
French medical scientist World Health Organization headed an outsized INSERM
laboratory, directed at medicine, allergic reaction and inflammation analysis. He
reportable that once white blood cells with an explicit substance on their surfaces
area unit exposed to an explicit protein, they unharness amino alkane in a very
manner which will be visibly monitored employing a magnifier. This work generated
a polemic however 'in smart faith' paper reviewed and revealed naturally once
referees might notice no flaws with the process and that they had delayed publication
for 2 years whereas awaiting freelance confirmation from by impartial laboratories
in Israel, Italy, and Canada.
These analysis groups reportable that although the number of that protein was
subjected to serial physical process and was apparently diluted several billions of
times, till there was basically none left, it still had Associate in Nursing evident
biological impact totally different from those apparent exploitation simply the water
utilized for the dilutions (the 'memory of water' a the topic has drawn lots of dispute
with several 'scientists' merely rejecting it outright while not learning the proof.
Also, it's not been a lot of usually accepted once the results were reportable naturally
as not consistent by Nature's self-acknowledged biased observers (the Editor of
Nature, a magician (!) and a malpractice investigator, none of whom had any relevant
scientific experience) and underneath oppressive, overly-demanding (with over
double the conventional weekly load of tests) and unsympathetic, conditions, in a
very restricted and hurried five-day trial (of five years and 5 laboratories work) with
negative results from solely the one laboratory being cherry-picked from amongst
otherwise positive results.
The initial results were, however, confirmed in a very blind study by the statistician
king Spire and additionally in a very rather unconventional Nature paper purporting
to prove the alternative. They were later on comprehensively confirmed by a blind
multi-centre trial, and new results ensure similar phenomena. In spite of this apparent
confirmation by these many laboratories, there are a unit still doubts (expressed by
some) over whether or not the experiments area unit really consistent and whether
or not the noted effects could also be because of the origin of the biological samples
or human operator effects. Any support for an impact has been found exploitation
The subject space was the topic of variety of peer-reviewed papers within the
journal homoeopathy (July, 2007) and therefore the field has been over-viewed.
though there's a lot of support for water showing properties that rely upon its
previous process (that is, water having a memory effect), the experimental proof
indicates that such changes area unit due primarily to matter and surface changes
occurring throughout this process. Certainly, merely stirring an answer could have
pronounced effects on the vessel's surface charge and chemistry which might last for
many minutes once the stirring has ceased. Another memory situation considerations
individual O: H–O chemical bond possessing memory of their physical temperature
and pressure history that lasts over periods of minutes. This hypothesis, though well
revealed in peer-reviewed journals, wants any substantiation. The by
experimentation supported memory phenomena can't be taken as supporting the
essential tenets of homoeopathy though they will justify some effects.