EM testimony 2 9 15 HB883 (2) .pdf

File information

Original filename: EM_testimony_2-9-15_HB883 (2).pdf
Title: EM_testimony_2-9-15_HB883 (2)

This PDF 1.3 document has been generated by Pages / iPhone OS 9.2.1 Quartz PDFContext, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 20/05/2016 at 14:04, from IP address 72.234.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 312 times.
File size: 45 KB (2 pages).
Privacy: public file

Download original PDF file

EM_testimony_2-9-15_HB883 (2).pdf (PDF, 45 KB)

Share on social networks

Link to this file download page

Document preview

February 9, 2015
RE: Testimony in Opposition
Aloha County Council Members,
I am writing in opposition to Bill 883 regarding aquarium fish.
For my master’s research at Washington State University, I studied the West Hawaii aquarium
trade from 2010-2012. My study focused on venting, decompression, holding, and transport of
live Yellow Tang in the West Hawaii aquarium fishery.
In addition, I now would like to specifically address Section 2 Chapter 188:
Section 188 – (e)(1)
My research on barotrauma in Yellow Tang showed that there was no tissue damage detected
in Yellow Tang subjected to surfacing at a rate of 0.25m/s (SCUBA ascent rate), and there
was no mortality when venting was implemented following surfacing. To quote our study,
“Histopathologic examination of heart, liver, head kidney, and swim bladder tissues in fish 0d
and 21d post-collection revealed no significant barotrauma- or venting-related lesions in any
treatment group.”
Section 188 – (e)(2)
My research on venting (piercing the swimbladder with a hypodermic needle to release
expanded swimbladder gas) indicates that the venting implemented by Hawaiian fishers does
not cause mortality in Yellow Tang. In June-July of 2011, I collaborated with fishers in Kona,
and caught 360 Yellow Tang from the reef, and held them for 21 d at the Natural Energy
Laboratory Hawaii Authority (NELHA). My study shows that when fishers implemented venting
there was a 100% survival rate of these fish during collection and holding at NELHA. To quote
our study, “Common collection methods in the fishery, ascent without decompression stops
coupled with venting, or one long decompression stop coupled with venting, resulted in no
mortality.” (Munday, et al. 2015).
Section 188 – (e)(4) & Section 188 – (e)(5)
My research on fish holding and transport indicated that the practices implemented by
Hawaiian fish exporters do not cause mortality in yellow tang. In June of 2012, I collaborated
with fishers and exporters in Kona, and caught 60 yellow tang from the reef, held them in a
working export facility, and shipped them from Kona, HI to Portland, OR. The fish were then
transported to the Hatfield Marine Science Center in Newport, OR where they resided for 6
months. My study shows 100% survival rate of these tangs during collection, holding in the
export facility, air transport, and after a 6-month holding period. In fact, the fish have now
become part of an exhibit at the Hatfield Marine Science Center about sustainability in the
aquarium trade and I have received no reports of mortality after 2.5 years.
In my study, fish were withheld food in the export facility and during transport. Withholding
food serves a very important purpose for fish transport. Withholding food prevents fish from
fouling their bags. If they are unable to “clean out” their system prior to transport, they will
foul their bags, creating a buildup of ammonia, which is toxic to fish. Therefore, withholding
food is a best practice to be used prior to shipping fish and any regulation prohibiting food
withholding is uninformed and would be detrimental to fish health.
In my study, aquarium exporters used the standard volume of water to transport the tang, and
discussed above, no mortality occurred. The requirement of a gallon of water for fish
transport is unnecessary and unfounded.

I would also like to speak to the sustainability of the Hawaii aquarium trade. The exhibit I
helped create at the Hatfield explains the practices of the Hawaii aquarium trade, and how
Hawaii’s trade differs from other areas of the world. If we take a global perspective, Bill 883
is damaging to the ocean. This is because the demand for aquarium fish is not decreasing, and
such a bill would simply shift the demand for aquarium fish from Hawaii where they are
collected using nondestructive methods, to places like the Philippines where fishers regularly
use cyanide to stun and capture fish and have a tremendously negative impact on reefs there.
Though this might seem like just a local or state issue, the reality is that the aquarium trade
is a global trade and Hawaii contributes a sustainably sourced product to aquarium fish
Thank you for hearing my testimony.
Emily S. Munday, M.S.

Document preview EM_testimony_2-9-15_HB883 (2).pdf - page 1/2

Document preview EM_testimony_2-9-15_HB883 (2).pdf - page 2/2

Related documents

em testimony 2 9 15 hb883 2
ar hrs188 2015
whi aq background paper 2015
wrcresearchnews8 5
recharte et al 2008
logistics index brazl 1

Link to this page

Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)


Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code

QR Code link to PDF file EM_testimony_2-9-15_HB883 (2).pdf