PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact



dialogue hh.pdf


Preview of PDF document dialogue-hh.pdf

Page 1 2 3 45661

Text preview


That being said, I will attempt to answer your questions as honestly and openly as is permissible for me. I
will check back and respond as time allows.
ATS: How many generations back does your bloodline extend, or, perhaps more accurately, who does your
family consider its earliest ancestor in a position of power?
HH: Our Lineage can be traced back beyond antiquity. From the earliest times of your recorded "history",
and beyond, our Family has been 'directing' the 'play' from behind the scenes, in one way or another. Before
the rise and fall of Atlantis. (Yes, that was indeed perfectly real). We are 'born to lead'. It is part of the design
for this current paradigm.
ATS: To what extent has selective breeding been used to preserve the purity of the line? and what
becomes of children of unapproved unions? (They would naturally still be raised with privilege, but not,
perhaps "given the keys to the castle" as it were?)
HH: The breeding is generally case specific, dependant upon the role that the Family members in question
are due to grow into. I will touch more on this in answer to the next poster's question that you rephrased.

There are no unapproved unions. Our Family will always intermarry between lines, or, what we would term
'Houses' [1]. Marriages are arranged. In all my years alive, I have never seen or heard of a Family member
breaking this code, as far as marriage goes. You do as you are told. One cannot 'join' the Family. One is 'born',
or incarnated into it.
On the rare instances of a child being born that could be seen as bringing 'difficulties', you are correct in your
premise, that it would be raised as part of the Family, though would not grow up in the house or community of
either of it's parents.
ATS: If one were to imagine a scale, perhaps as a triangle with Political, Religious and Corporate power at the
three points, how would you categorize the power your family yields? (Balanced? Leaning more towards one
or two than a third? Heavily favoring one of the three above the others?) And has that position shifted over
time?
HH: You need to first understand the structure of the Family. In the grand scheme of things, the Line is not as
important as the House, the House, is not as important as the Family. The Family is all. No matter the House
or Line, we are One (truly international) Family.
Imagine if you will, a body. A House would represent a vital organ or body part within the Body itself. Each
part has an important role to play in the functioning of the whole, and to each of us, the 'whole' has our
undivided loyalty. As I say, many lines, (far more than you are aware of), One Family.
Our realms of influence do not fit as comfortably into the three boxes of your triangle as you may imagine.
There are six disciplines of training within the Family, and each member of the Family is schooled
extensively in all of them, from early childhood. We all have an area of specialty, though we have
experience in all spheres. The six spheres or 'schools' of learning are Military, Government, Spiritual,
Scholarship, Leadership, and Sciences. In practice, out there on the 'stage' of public life, we hold key
positions in all of these main areas of importance. With the addition of a complicit Media machine and
ownership of your Financial establishments, all bases are covered.
I will have to reply in parts, due to the restriction of characters per post.