Sets theory.pdf

Preview of PDF document sets-theory.pdf

Page 1 2 34533

Text preview

--They will be SCRAPPILY SETS when their elements in spite of being united forming group, they don't
have any relationship type or understanding among them.
--They will be SETS in RELATION when the elements or subsets that form them are united among them
with any type of relation or coordination.
--They will be SETS in FUSION when their elements unite closely forming with this union some new
elements, usually, with different properties to of their components.
In the sets of Relation and/or Fusion it is very interesting to know what it is the relationship type that unites
them because this relation gives them the decisive properties as set.
So it is not enough with saying that it is a relationship or fusion set, but rather the important thing is of
defining in all moment the relationship class that unites them, in such a way that, in general, the component
elements losses their own definition to acquire the name of the relationship and many times the resulting
body that conform this set.
With name of bodies:
--Brain, but not group of neurons in relationship.
--Mind, but not groups of sense-intelligent elements.
--Automobile, but not group of mechanical pieces.
With relationship types:
Mathematical succession,

But as I have said, in sets we can observe the quality or characteristic of the resultant body, which will be
the character and properties that any set takes for the reason of the conjunction and coordination of its
In the case of an automobile, the resultant set in the coordinated assembling of all the pieces of the same one
give us a body with all the properties and characteristics that we know, to which we already give its
appropriate noun: Automobile.
The same, an animal is a set with a great relationship among their elements forming a body of biochemical
type with some quite creative and spectacular resulting characteristics.