WhyChanges to MtDavidson MattrerToYou .pdf

File information

Original filename: WhyChanges-to-MtDavidson-MattrerToYou.pdf
Author: BSutton

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Word 2016, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 26/02/2017 at 20:20, from IP address 73.202.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 360 times.
File size: 350 KB (1 page).
Privacy: public file

Download original PDF file

WhyChanges-to-MtDavidson-MattrerToYou.pdf (PDF, 350 KB)

Share on social networks

Link to this file download page

Document preview

Whether you like trees or not, or certain types of vegetation or not, there are some very real consequences to radically
altering the landscape in a residential area, as compared to a mountain in the wilderness. The plan to remove trees and
replace them with shrubbery and grass classified as native, will create some problems:
1. Runoff and flooding: Removing 1,600 trees on Mount Davidson will greatly increase the water and rain runoff
from the mountain, into our surrounding area. The trees and supporting vegetation currently work like giant
sponges to absorb and slow much of this runoff now. A mix of 3’ tall bushes, poison oak, and grass do not come
close to replacing the benefits of a forest of 200’ tall trees and their associated vegetation, in this regard.
Increased and accelerated runoff will result in more flooded yards, streets, and basements during wet periods.
2. Mud, rockslides, erosion: Large networks of integrated living tree roots below the surface, currently help to
hold the soil of the mountain together and stabilize it, along with the rocks. The tree covered portion of the
mountain is much more stable and currently experiences fewer mudslides and rockslides, compared to the open
and exposed side with fragile vegetation. Sections of dirt and rock easily cleave and separate with heavy rains,
and both come down the mountain more frequently, without a network of roots to hold it together. This also
increases potential for compromised retaining walls, footings, and foundation failure of houses on slopes.
3. Less wind protection: The current forest canopy makes a huge difference in buffering the wind in a windy area
for users of the mountain and nearby houses. Visit both halves of the mountain and compare. Removing the
trees will remove this wind taming buffer that makes the area more pleasant.
4. Toxic chemicals in our backyards, streets, children’s and pets play areas: The toxic herbicides from all these repurposed parklands wash into the areas below the sprayings and contaminate our yards and parks. It exposes
children and pets to health dangers, who are especially vulnerable due to rapidly developing cells and close
surface proximity, and a tendency to put things in their mouths. Garlon and Glyphosate are listed as probable
carcinogens, cause cellular and reproductive damage with very small doses, and are banned in many countries.
They are used heavily in SF because they claim they are needed to protect native plants against other species.
Don’t be misled by the arguments that only a few quarts or gallons of the pure ingredient are used, since this
gets mixed with many other chemicals and carrier fluids before spraying, which can mean hundreds of gallons.
5. Contaminated drinking water: In mid-2017, the SFPUC begins mixing our local groundwater into our household
water supply, up to 15%. These dangerous, cancer-causing herbicides used by SF Rec and Park to re-colonize and
regularly maintain the native plant areas, contaminate the soil and also run off the mountain in rains. This
tainted water works its way into our local aquifers all along the way through the permeable layers of soil and
sand in our area. A few ounces of this stuff can contaminate thousands of gallons of water beyond the level safe
for drinking. These chemicals are not filtered out like bacteria are, and you will drink them.
Regardless of ideological stance on the debate of native plants and open mountains, compared to forested areas and
established local eco-systems that are here, there are real-world issues, dangers, and environmental impacts that need
to be addressed and have not been. Before a radical re-purposing of local areas and land takes place, these risks to us
and the environment should be mitigated. Not to mention spending taxpayer money and park funds, that should be
used for the benefit of the parks and users. Voters, residents, and taxpayers who will be paying for these changes,
should also have a say in what is done. As residents, contact the mayor and supervisors to tell them what you think.
Mt Davidson, Miraloma Park, St Francis Wood, and Sunnyside concerned neighbors

Document preview WhyChanges-to-MtDavidson-MattrerToYou.pdf - page 1/1

Related documents

whychanges to mtdavidson mattrertoyou
gbu mountain news xlvii february 15 2014
miles all spec 40w
nrs 522 final project
vail water ccr 2015

Link to this page

Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)


Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code

QR Code link to PDF file WhyChanges-to-MtDavidson-MattrerToYou.pdf