PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact



Local Roche units sue pharmacies .pdf


Original filename: Local Roche units sue pharmacies.pdf
Author: Strandlund, Lauren

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Word 2013, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 06/04/2017 at 21:34, from IP address 96.82.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 210 times.
File size: 155 KB (1 page).
Privacy: public file




Download original PDF file









Document preview


Local Roche units sue pharmacies over alleged test-strip scheme
March 31, 2017

John Russell

Two Indianapolis-based subsidiaries of Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche Group are accusing a group of pharmacies and
supply houses of engaging in an elaborate scheme to defraud Roche of millions of dollars worth of sales on diabetes test strips.
Roche Diagnostics Corp. and Roche Diabetes Care, both headquartered in the Hague Road campus on the northeast side, say in
a federal lawsuit that the pharmacies arbitraged the difference between the wholesale price and the insurance reimbursement
rate on two types of diabetes test strips
That action caused Roche to wrongfully pay millions of dollars in rebates and deprived it of millions of dollars in legitimate
sales, Roche said in a 44-page complaint filed this week in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis. The scheme damaged Roche to
the tune of at least $89 million, the complaint said.
Named as defendants are six pharmacies and medical supply companies, mostly based in Michigan, along with their owners and
officers. One company is located in Wyoming. Roche is accusing them of fraud, criminal deception, negligent
misrepresentation, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and conspiracy.
According to the complaint, the defendants conspired to obtain blood glucose strips manufactured by Roche and intended for
sale only to people covered by certain insurance plans known as durable medical equipment, or DME, plans. The defendants
diverted the test strips for retail sale to people covered by a different kind of insurance plan known as pharmacy benefits.
Test strips paid for by pharmacy plans have a substantially higher list price and are reimbursed by insurance at a higher rate than
test strips paid for by DME plans. But unlike DME plans, pharmacy plans receive large rebates from Roche.
“By purchasing strips from Roche at the lower DME list price and diverting them to sale in channels where they would be
reimbursed at the much higher pharmacy plan rate, defendants and their co-conspirators made millions of dollars in illicit
profits,” the Roche lawsuit said.
It continued: “Importantly, defendants’ profits did not result from offering lower prices to customers, the vast majority of whom
pay a fixed out-of-pocket amount set by their insurance plans. Rather, the profits resulted from causing Roche to pay substantial
rebates to pharmacy plans for products that were intended for sale through DME plans.”
Roche said several of the defendants, including Binson’s Hospital Supplies of Centerline, Michigan, and J&B Medical Supply
of Wixom, Michigan, had promised to sell the DME test strips only through DME channels, but broke their promise.
Binson’s covered up its wrongdoing by providing Roche with fraudulent quarterly sales reports, the lawsuit said. Instead of
delivering the test strips to DME patients, it sold them them all to J&B, which diverted them to retail pharmacies, according to
the complaint.
J&B, through a spokesman, denied it purchased any Roche strips from Binson’s and added it has not purchased strips through
Roche since 2009.
Furthermore, J&B said it believed the lawsuit was “retaliatory” due to its decision in 2009 to drop Roche from its list of
approved drugs, which it said it did at the request of insurance companies.
“Ironically, Roche continues to pursue J&B for additional business and for years has aggressively encouraged J&B to purchase
their diabetic testing strips,” J&B said in an email.
Binson’s could not be reached for comment.
Other defendants named in the suit were Northwood Inc. of Centerline; Olympus Global of East Lansing, Michigan; Delta
Global of Flint, Michigan; and Alpha XE of Cheyenne, Wyoming.


Document preview Local Roche units sue pharmacies.pdf - page 1/1

Related documents


local roche units sue pharmacies
636223551366076403
canada pharmacy online
top 9 benefits of generic pharmacy
cystic acne treatments that are1150
china pharmacy automation systems market 2017


Related keywords