Strict Stance Diesel Rebates 24 June 16 .pdf

File information

This PDF 1.7 document has been generated by cairo 1.12.16 ( / Adobe Acrobat Pro 11.0.6 Paper Capture Plug-in, and has been sent on on 06/08/2017 at 23:58, from IP address 105.15.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 196 times.
File size: 279.82 KB (1 page).
Privacy: public file

Document preview

Strict stance on diesel rebates imperils farmers nd food security
FOLLOWING devastating
successive droughts over the past
three years, more than 42% of SA's
commercial farmers reportedly .
"have their backs to the wall" and
are considering selling their farms.
This would lead to huge job losses
and would have an enormous effect
on food security.
It would also retard the
industry's efforts to assist emerging
black farmers, as many potential
mentors and facilitators would be
forced to close shop. AgriSA, an
industry organisation representing
commercial farmers, is calling for
immediate intervention from the

government and banks until farmers
can generate profits again.
From a customs and excise
perspective, the government has an
immediate and obvious avenue to
ease the burden of farmers and help
their cash-flow and profit
generation. To encourage primary
production, such as farming, the
South African Revenue Service
(SARS) provides a refund to
qualifying farmers on the fuel and
Road Accident Fund levies charged
on diesel.
The diesel rebate is extremely
important for the viability of
commercial farming. Earlier in 2016
Grain SA, which represents almost
10,000 farmers, briefed the
Department of Agriculture, Forestry

and Fisheries on the effect of the
drought. The organisation said the
issue of diesel rebates was "a sore
point", and emphasised the
importance to food security of
ironing out administrative issues
holding up the payment of rebates
in some provinces.
For farmers to be eligible for the
rebate, SARS insists on onerous
record-keeping including purchase
and sales invoices and
comprehensive logbooks for the
storage and use of fuel for each
vehicle and piece of equipment.
The level of detail required in the
logbook includes the source of the
diesel; date of purchase, storage and
use; capacity of diesel storage tanks;
opening and closing balance in the

tanks; specifics of the equipment;
opening and closing meter readings
of distance, duration, or speed; the
activity the diesel was used for and
the location of the activity; and
details of any noneligible operations
performed by the equipment.
Unsurprisingly, farmers struggle

fTI If a logbook
I.I.I does not
comply strictly it is
disregarded and the
rebate denied

to comply with this level of detail,
and many have had their diesel
rebates reversed when audited by
SARS and have been issued with
penalties and interest.
Before April 2013, SARS could
allow 80% of the diesel rebate when
records were not sufficiently kept by
a farmer, which was deemed
sufficient to cover any potential
noneligible activities for which the
fuel may have been used.
This was a more practical and
flexible system that took account of
the real-world difficulties facing
farmers, such as the impracticalities
of ascertainil).g exact usage
figures for each activity; legacy
equipment not fitted with gauges to
record the required information;

and the training needed to fully
understana and comply with the
recording requirements.
The government amended the
applicable schedule and from April
2013 no discretion was allowed. If a
logbook does not comply strictly
with all the requiremei:its it is
disregarded and the rebate denied,
irrespective of the efforts of the
farmer to comply in good faith.
The government seems to have
recognised the value of the previous
discretion, as it amended the
schedule governing the rebates on
May 26 to support small-scale
sugarcane growers by reintroducing
the 80% eligibility for certain
farmers who failed to keep
logbooks. But many of the growers

will be unable to take advantage of
this due to other technicalities.
Swift legislative reform is
required that introduces a pragmatic
ยท and more lenient approach to diesel
rebates so that farmers and other
primary industries can fully benefit.
As Grain SA put it in its briefing:
"It is not fair that the people who
have the biggest effect on the
country's food security are having to
finance SARS." Fairness aside, it
is neither sustainable nor
economically prudent.

II Subban is a partner at Bowman

Gilfillan Africa Group specialising in
customs, excise and international
trade, and Sher is a candidate
attorney at the firm.

Document preview - Strict Stance Diesel Rebates - 24 June 16.pdf - Page 1/1

Download original PDF file

Strict Stance Diesel Rebates - 24 June 16.pdf (PDF, 279.82 KB)


Share on social networks

Link to this page

Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)


Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code to this page

QR Code link to PDF file Strict Stance Diesel Rebates - 24 June 16.pdf

This file has been shared publicly by a user of PDF Archive.
Document ID: 0000635056.
Report illicit content