ASH ECE 430 Week 5 Discussion 1 Week .pdf
Original filename: ASH ECE 430 Week 5 Discussion 1 Week.pdf
This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Microsoft® Office Word 2007, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 20/02/2018 at 10:23, from IP address 103.6.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 138 times.
File size: 306 KB (2 pages).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
ASH ECE 430 Week 5 Discussion 1 Week Five Case
Study Analysis NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
For more classes visit
In the Week 5 Case Study: Dispositions/Closure,
we learn that the parents of Mrs. Ashland's student
nominate her for Golden Apple Award. In their
nominations the parents express what she has
done for their child and each child’s storyline is
wrapped up through these explanations. You will
find Week Five Case Study in the Course Materials
section of your online course.
After reading Week Five Case Study, imagine you
are a judge on the panel who determines which
teachers receive the Channel 6 Golden Apple
Award. As you do with each submission you
receive, you need to analyze the letter you
received about Mrs. Ashland using the dispositions
of effective early childhood educators (Chapter 9)
and NAEYC’s Statement of Commitment to
determine if she possesses the necessary qualities
to receive the award. Defend your position to
recommend or decline Mrs. Ashland for this award
by clearly identifying which dispositions she does
or does not possesses and whether or not she
displays the characteristics stated in NAEYC’s
Statement of Commitment.
Guided Response: After completing your own
review of Mrs. Ashland’s submission you are
required to meet with at least two other members
of the panel to collaborate on your findings.
Respectfully critique your fellow panel member’s
decision about Mrs. Ashland’s nomination by
providing at least two pieces of evidence as to why
you agree or disagree with their decision.