PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact


Preview of PDF document 457180780a4770b329fa6805e31ca05a58ee.pdf

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Text preview

K. Tamaki, A.J. Jeffreys / Legal Medicine 7 (2005) 244–250

stutter bands often observed at dinucleotide repeat loci can
make interpretation difficult; for this reason, current typing
systems use microsatellites with repeat units 4 bp long, to
reduce the incidence of stuttering. The STR approach allows
very high throughput via multiplex PCR (single-tube PCR
reactions that amplify multiple loci) and fluorescent detection
systems have been developed to allow substantial automation
of gel electrophoresis and DNA profile interpretation [52].
STR analysis is more sensitive than other methods and can
recover information even at the level of a single cell. The
unambiguous assignment of alleles makes the method suitable
for the development of databases. In the United Kingdom, 10
autosomal STR loci plus the amelogenin sex test, typed using
the ‘second-generation multiplex’ (SGM) Plus system, are
used in forensic practice (Table 1). The SGM Plus loci
generate random match probabilities of typically 10K11
between unrelated two individuals in the three UK racial
groups (Caucasian, Afro-Caribbean, and Asian) [53]. The US
FBI CODIS (Combined DNA Index System) uses 13 STRs
plus amelogenin. These loci produce extremely low random
match probabilities. For example, around 60% of Japanese
individuals show match probabilities of 10K14–10K17 (estimated from [54,55]). The Japanese Police Agency introduced
in 2003 a 9 STR locus system, which uses some of the CODIS
loci (the AmpFlSTRw Profilerw kit), for analysing forensic
specimens. From allele frequencies at these loci [54], around
60% of Japanese individuals have match probabilities of
10K9–10K11. This system also detects the XY-homologous
amelogenin genes to reveal the sex of a sample. Recently, new
multiplexes that amplify 16 loci in a single reaction, including
amelogenin, have been commercially developed
(AmpFLSTRw Identifilerw PCR Amplification Kit, PowerPlexw 16 System). This system produces even lower match
probabilities without losing sensitivity, and it is likely that
such systems will remain standard for analysing forensic
specimens and in paternity testing. Detailed information of
forensic STR can be obtained at STRBase [56].
In the future, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
might provide an alternative typing platform; while large
numbers of loci (w100) would need to be typed to obtain
the discrimination power of current STR systems, they do
offer the potential for DNA typing without electrophoresis,
conceivably using miniaturised devices (‘lab on a chip’) that
could greatly accelerate typing and offer the potential for
DNA analysis at the scene of crime.

[1] International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001;409:860–921.
[2] Royle NJ, Clarkson RE, Wong Z, Jeffreys AJ. Clustering of
hypervariable minisatellites in the proterminal regions of human
autosomes. Genomics 1988;3:352–60.
[3] Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL. Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’
regions in human DNA. Nature 1985;314:67–73.


[4] Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL. Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of
human DNA. Nature 1985;316:76–9.
[5] Jeffreys AJ, Turner M, Debenham P. The efficiency of multilocus
DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of
family relationships, determined from extensive casework. Am J Hum
Genet 1991;48:824–40.
[6] Jeffreys AJ, Brookfield JF, Semeonoff R. Positive identification of an
immigration test-case using human DNA fingerprints. Nature 1985;
[7] Gill P, Werrett DJ. Exclusion of a man charged with murder by DNA
fingerprinting. Forensic Sci Int 1987;35:145–8.
[8] Herrin Jr G. A comparison of models used for calculation of RFLP
pattern frequencies. J Forensic Sci 1992;37:1640–51.
[9] National Research Council. DNA technology in forensic science.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1992.
[10] National Research Council. The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1996.
[11] Nakamura Y, Carlson M, Krapcho K, White R. Isolation and mapping
of a polymorphic DNA sequence (pMCT118) on chromosome 1p
[D1S80]. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:9364.
[12] Kasai K, Nakamura Y, White R. Amplification of a variable number
of tandem repeats (VNTR) locus (pMCT118) by the polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) and its application to forensic science. J Forensic Sci
[13] Member of TWGFDM. Reassessment on frequency distribution of
MCT118 and HLADQ( alleles and genotypes in Japanese population
along with the comparison with other population data (in Japanese).
Kakeiken Houkoku 1995;48:171–85.
[14] Peterson BL, Su B, Chakraborty R, Budowle B, Gaensslen RE. World
population data for the HLA-DQA1, PM and D1S80 loci with least
and most common profile frequencies for combinations of loci
estimated following NRC II guidelines. J Forensic Sci 2000;45:
[15] Wong Z, Wilson V, Patel I, Povey S, Jeffreys AJ. Characterization of a
panel of highly variable minisatellites cloned from human DNA. Ann
Hum Genet 1987;51:269–88.
[16] Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R, Wilson V. Repeat unit sequence variation in
minisatellites: a novel source of DNA polymorphism for studying
variation and mutation by single molecule analysis. Cell 1990;60:
[17] Jeffreys AJ, MacLeod A, Tamaki K, Neil DL, Monckton DG.
Minisatellite repeat coding as a digital approach to DNA typing.
Nature 1991;354:204–9.
[18] Jeffreys AJ, Monckton DG, Tamaki K, Neil DL, Armour JAL,
MacLeod AA, Collick A, Allen M, Jobling A. Minisatellite variant
repeat mapping: application to DNA typing and mutation analysis. In:
Pena SDJ et al, editor. DNA fingerprinting, state of the science.
Birkha¨user-Verlag: Basel; 1993. p. 125–39.
[19] Rodriguez-Calvo MS, Bellas S, Soto JL, Barros F, Carracedo A.
Comparison of different electrophoretic methods for digital typing of
the MS32 (D1S8) locus. Electrophoresis 1996;17:1294–8.
[20] Hau P, Watson N. Sequencing and four-state minisatellite variant
repeat mapping of the D1S7 locus (MS1) by fluorescence detection.
Electrophoresis 2000;21:1478–83.
[21] Tamaki K, Monckton DG, MacLeod A, Neil DL, Allen M,
Jeffreys AJ. Minisatellite variant repeat (MVR) mapping: analysis
of ‘null’ repeat units at DlS8. Hum Mol Genet 1992;1:401–6
[Erratum: Hum Mol Genet, 1992; 1: 558].
[22] Tamaki K, Monckton DG, MacLeod A, Allen M, Jeffreys AJ. Fourstate MVR-PCR: increased discrimination of digital DNA typing by
simultaneous analysis of two polymorphic sites within minisatellite
variant repeats at D1S8. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2:1629–32.
[23] Tamaki K, Yamamoto T, Uchihi R, Kojima T, Katsumata Y,
Jeffreys AJ. DNA typing and analysis of the DlS8 (MS 32) allele in
the Japanese population by the minisatellite variant repeat (MVR)
mapping by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Jpn J Legal Med