Fatal Police Shootout How NOT to Interact With the Police .pdf
Original filename: Fatal Police Shootout - How NOT to Interact With the Police.pdf
This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by / Skia/PDF m71, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 29/09/2018 at 17:31, from IP address 90.199.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 192 times.
File size: 93 KB (3 pages).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
Fatal Police Shootout - How NOT to
Interact With the Police
The law is very clear in how it treats police shootings that end in wrongful death or catastrophic
injury. The U.S. Constitution protects Americans from unwarranted violence, including
shootings, from police officers. The rules on when shootings overstep the law are clear.
Witness a Fatal Police Shootout and see How NOT to Interact With the Police.
The infamous Rodney King beating case (1991) was an example of where the "due process"
clause of the 14th Amendment affects how police treat suspects in a crime. Certainly, the police
sometimes need to use batons, guns and Tasers to apprehend suspects to bring them before a
court. But the police are human beings who often overstep the bounds of their authority.
For example, in 2012 an individual was shot dead in Anaheim after running from an
approaching police officer. The victim was unarmed and not suspected of any particular crime,
which led to community protests.
That practice constitutional law have added wrongful police shootings to their areas of practice.
They call themselves "wrongful police shootings lawyers".
A series of Supreme Court rulings before and since Rodney King have established how the 14th
Amendment is interpreted:
• What compelled the officer to shoot or otherwise use force on the individual? If a gun was
fired, there needs to have been a good reason to do so, such as a crime suspect presenting a
danger to the officer or others.
• What connected the officer's need to use force and the amount of force he or she actually
used? It's wrong, for example, when a suspected thief fleeing a crime scene is hit by a barrage
of bullets when the suspect has no weapon, particularly if apprehension might occur by other
• How injured (including fatal injuries) was the individual as a result of the application of force? A
single bullet wound grazing the leg is considerable less injurious than multiple shots to the head
and torso, leaving the person dead or permanently disabled.
• Was forced applied in good faith or was it maliciously and sadistically shot with the intent to
inflict harm? For example, bullets aimed at the legs to reduce a crime suspect's ability to run
might seem reasonable, but multiple rounds of fire that kill or injure unnecessarily (e.g., at close
range) suggest the officer might have overstepped his or her bounds of duty.
This last point, whether or not force was applied in "good faith," is of course very subjective.
When shooting victims and their families seek recourse from the police in a lawsuit, the
attorneys representing the family need to conduct an investigation with the help of ballistics and
other experts to determine if due process was not served.
In large cities, like Los Angeles, so often are suspects shot and killed by police that some Los
Angeles personal injury attorneys. Contact a wrongful shooting lawyer if you or a loved one
were the victim of an overzealous or perhaps malicious police officer.
In this video we witness a Fatal Police Shootout and see How NOT to Interact With the Police.
You’ll see a traffic stop gone wrong where a police officer was forced to defend himself from an
aggressive and combative driver, firing at least 6 rounds at a 63-year-old armed man.
How should you behave when stopped by the police?
If you're carrying a firearm, how and when should you notify the officer?
If you'd like to remain safe at your next traffic stop, watch our recap and follow our simple steps.