PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact



Moldova democracy.pdf


Preview of PDF document moldova-democracy.pdf

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6

Text preview


The last nail in the coffin of Moldovan democracy?
The final decision of the Moldovan Supreme Court on 25 June to invalidate the
Kishinev mayor election victory by a pro-Western candidate felt like the last nail in
the coffin of Moldovan democracy.
The brazen behaviour by the Moldovan “justice system” and its open servitude to the
oligarchic regime of Plahotniuc is so obvious that the ruling caused not only a wave
of harsh condemnations from the EU and US, but also a massive popular
demonstration against the regime on Sunday 24 June, the first of this size after a
long period of desperation and apathy. The central part of the city was full of people
– and, of course, large numbers of police, some of whom were even brought to the
capital from other towns.
The elections results in Baltsy and Kishinev have shown that the Plahotniuc regime‟s
popularity is falling, in spite of millions of euros spent and the use of government
resources. Plahotniuc‟s image and he personally are so odious and toxic that they
were even afraid to openly support their candidate for mayor, instead promoting her
as “independent”.
Plahotniuc and his “democratic party” are in disarray and appear to be starting to
show despair. They preside over a system that is so corrupt that they must fear that
if they lose power, they may end up facing real justice.
An wide-ranging EU parliament resolution [link here
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P8TA-2018-0303+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN] adopted on 5 July slammed the country‟s
rulers and urged the EU Commission to suspend financial support and condition it on
the reinstatement of the mayoral election result. It also said other funding should be
withheld until it is certain the upcoming parliamentary election has been held in line
with EU standards.
The statement expresses concern over “the concentration of economic and political
power in the hands of a narrow group of people”, “systemic corruption” and “selective
justice being used as a tool to exert pressure on political opponents”, among many
more issues.
That is why they are going all in to hold on to power.
The first evidence of this strategy was the promotion and adoption of changes to the
electoral law that introduced a new mixed voting system. It is worth noting that the
“democrats” worked together on this with the socialists, who in fact didn‟t need it,
because their rating was very high and they would have won the parliament under
the old electoral system.
This joint action is more vivid proof that the “democrats” are playing a double game
with the socialists and the Kremlin. The socialists know they would have swept out
the democrats forever under the old electoral system. But they went along with the
changes, in spite of total disapproval from local NGOs, Brussels and the Venice
Commission, among others.