Project meeting week 2 May 2018 EAG inputs .pdf

File information

Original filename: Project meeting week 2 May 2018 EAG inputs.pdf

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by , and has been sent on on 28/12/2018 at 11:07, from IP address 2.139.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 1226 times.
File size: 187 KB (3 pages).
Privacy: public file

Download original PDF file

Project meeting week 2 May 2018 EAG inputs.pdf (PDF, 187 KB)

Share on social networks

Link to this file download page

Document preview

Euan Grant Contributions
Articles on the website intended for quick transformation to inputs
for professional bodies, print and online press and for inclusion radio
and tv and encourage broadcasting interview invitations. These to be
condensed to PowerPoints and associated aide memoires for
delivery remotely or ideally face to face to law enforcers, military
bodies and professional groups esp. in the financial sector. And to
potentially agnostic or hostile academic groups and humanitarian
and tax reform groups (the latter re Russian role in dirty money / tax
avoidance and how responsibility for these, and their solutions,
involves cooperation in continental Europe and must be done
holistically. There will be an emphasis on the need to recognise the
legacy of the semi militarised nature of the Russian speaking
countries and their international links. How Russian linked
transnational organised crime can be better detected, understood
and highlighted to western and EU media, demonstrating its negative
impacts and posing questions about political patronage.
Delivery of workshops to all these bodies, or the offer of completed
packages which can be delivered within very short periods of times,
even down to a few days. British Bankers Association, Association of
British insurers, professional body for accountancy and auditors,
Global witness, transparency International, Tax Justice Network,
Oxfam, Christian Aid, equivalents in EU MS through clusters, Europol,
NATO via UK MOD and Armed Forces directly, (probably not
Interpol), CEPOL and to the Law Society and separately to a
combined grouping of NCA, City of London Police, HMRC, SFO, Police
Scotland and UK Border Force and UK V& I.
Half yearly looking ahead report on implications of current trends
AND upcoming events or potential scenarios.

Faster, more focused and more deductive and proactively
interpretative understanding of the role of Russian speaking linked
criminality in cyber, information and demoralisation campaigns.
Better informed and more complete responses by policy makers,
more thoroughly briefed media and by hitherto somewhat siloed law
enforcement nationally, in the anglosphere, EU MS and applicants,
and the EU/ EC and NATO collectively. Creation of an Information
fusion cell with strong links to academia, including agnostic or hostile
groups ( Manchester university reframing Russia project, University
of Kent European Faculty)

Reaching out in an integrated and holistic way to highlight Russian
methods and capabilities in information warfare to official and civil
society groups traditionally not familiar with such. Supporting
mainstream media in faster and better-informed responses,
including creating awareness of how to think like the protagonists.
Above all, improve the quality and quantity and timeliness of
reactions and anticipations of Russian linked actions, including use of
proxies within the EU. High levels of predictive material.

The obvious ones are lack of cooperation or appreciation ( e.g. no
cascading, cross agency or multinational discussions and
implementation). These risks can be significantly mitigated by
delivery, bilaterally and multilaterally, of similar or identical material
to multiple agencies and states’ institutions. In order to generate a
sense of competitiveness. By synergising content, outputs will be
increased in relation to time spent. The publication through multiple

channels will mean the material is available for publicization by the
F&CO and other Ministries and agencies, `even if professional bodies
or, perhaps only slightly less likely, law enforcement does not
cooperate. Close involvement of the clusters in other countries, esp.
South and East and Germany – a weak link – and Netherlands – a
potential key force multiplier – would possibly increase the likelihood
of UK agency cooperation, in order to avoid fear of being singled out
as uncooperative or unimaginative.

While the emphasis is on impacts on UK and Anglosphere entities,
the intention is certainly to provide examples for other clusters, and
to receive ideas from them. It is certainly a two-way street.
Note that the intention of much of the material is to be predictive,
and specific predictions will be made, including scenario hypotheses.

Euan Grant
0794 989 4643 (WhatsApp & Viber)
Skype: euan.g.grant
8th May 2018

Document preview Project meeting week 2 May 2018 EAG inputs.pdf - page 1/3

Document preview Project meeting week 2 May 2018 EAG inputs.pdf - page 2/3
Document preview Project meeting week 2 May 2018 EAG inputs.pdf - page 3/3

Related documents

project meeting week 2 may 2018 eag inputs
euan grant integrity initiative wr we 150718
euan grant integrity initiative wr we 150718
integrity2018moldovacluster 1

Link to this page

Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)


Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code

QR Code link to PDF file Project meeting week 2 May 2018 EAG inputs.pdf