PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact



Muslim Statistics .pdf



Original filename: Muslim Statistics.pdf
Title: U.S. Muslims make up only one percent of the population, but file 40% of workplace discrimination complaints
Author: craig

This PDF 1.7 document has been generated by / Microsoft: Print To PDF, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 29/05/2019 at 04:38, from IP address 70.178.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 88 times.
File size: 190 KB (3 pages).
Privacy: public file




Download original PDF file









Document preview


U.S. Muslims make up only one percent of the
population, but file 40% of workplace
discrimination complaints
Muslims make up only one percent of the population, but file 40% of workplace
discrimination complaints.

Islamic terror attacks have taken the world by storm the last several months. From Orlando
and Istanbul, to Karrada and Nice, these and many other attacks have made fearful citizens
eager to avoid becoming a target of Muslim radicals. Instead of seeing the need to get tough
with jihadism, some individuals see it as a time to make frightened concessions to the Muslim
community. These individuals tend to blame the political environment and the rhetoric of
people like Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for the alleged hostility
from Muslims. Carol Hymowitz and Jeff Green wrote an article for Bloomberg about
corporate America’s response titled The Rise of Muslim-Friendly Workplaces in Corporate
America. Even though the authors say the motivations for the more Muslim-friendly working
environment are principled, they allude to the pragmatism that undergirds much of the
business world.
Even outside of fear of drawing an Islamist attack, avoiding conflict with Muslim employees
affects both the company’s ‘inclusive’ image, and its liability to lawsuits by activist groups like
the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). When special interest activist groups put

pressure on businesses to give into their demands businesses often (depending on the issue/s)
concede rather than face bad publicity. Businesses placating to Muslim demands is one of the
objectives of the Hamas-affiliated CAIR. Masquerading as a civil liberties organization for
Muslims, CAIR, as mentioned in the video, pressures businesses into accommodating the
most trivial of Muslim practices advocated for in sharia law.
For example, defending Muslim taxi drivers that refuse service to individuals with seeing-eye
dogs because dog saliva is considered unclean or impure in Islam. In addition, dogs get
blamed for repelling angels, annulling prayers, and other stigmas that are inherent in Islamic
texts, such as:
Narrated Abu Talha: The Prophet said, “Angels do not enter a house witch [sic] has either a
dog or a picture in it.” –Sahih Bukhari 4.54.539
Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said,
“Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying
people).” I said, “You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I saw the Prophet praying while I
used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I
would slip away. for I disliked to face him.” –Sahih Bukhari 1.9.490
The authors in the Bloomberg article reveal information that shows the strength of Muslim
activism in trying to transform America through litigation – especially that of the workplace
to become more sharia compliant. The Bloomberg article states:
While people who practice Islam make up only about 1 percent of the U.S. population, some
40 percent of religion-based workplace complaints filed with the U.S. Equal Opportunity
Employment Commission last year were related to Muslims. The agency has pursued a wide
range of disputes, including whether Muslims can be fired for refusing to handle pork or
alcohol at work. In many instances, the courts have said they cannot.
It’s shocking that such a small fraction of the U.S. population are exerting so outsized an
influence. What should businesses do – cater to Muslim religious demands in order to avoid
complaints? The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) states, “An
employer does not have to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs or practices if doing
so would cause undue hardship to the employer.” Furthermore, trying to pacify sharia
compliant Muslims is useless, since sharia is an all-encompassing ideology that dictates not
just clothing and diet but includes rules for speech, prayer, banking, commerce, etc. The
Bloomberg article gives a short list of how some companies are furthering this gradual sharia
agenda:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. provides transportation to mosques, and other places of worship, for
employees in offices not big enough to have prayer rooms. Alcohol wasn’t served at a recent
party at a New York architecture firm because a new staff member who’s [sic] Muslim
wouldn’t feel comfortable attending if it were, according to the office manager, asking not to
be named because he’s not authorized to speak publicly about the firm. At Accenture Plc, the
corporate calendar is organized to prevent events from conflicting with Muslim holidays, as
well as those of other faiths.
In addition, “[o]ne goal of the Horizon Blue Cross and Blue Shield Q&A session in Newark last
year was to dispel concerns that Islam is a dangerous faith[.]” Since, when did it become the
job of a health insurance network to advocate for Islamic apologetics? Is that not the job of
clerics and believers of the faith? For that matter, when did employers become a free taxi
service to the local “place of worship”?

We have seen accommodations for Muslim employees played out in businesses such as prayer
rooms, prayer breaks, reassignments when faced with pork and alcohol products, permitting
Islamic clothing and facial hair, and in many other areas. Some U.S. companies are willing to
go to outstanding lengths to appease one percent of the U.S. population because some Muslim
activists shout the loudest. Corporate America needs to say “No!” to more sharia.


Muslim Statistics.pdf - page 1/3
Muslim Statistics.pdf - page 2/3
Muslim Statistics.pdf - page 3/3

Related documents


muslim statistics
religious america and secular holland
criminal law alcohol licenses are mandatory in the uae
responsegovtgreenpaperjun18
validity of pre and post nuptial agreements
challenges of social work practice with muslims in india


Related keywords