Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 22 October at 03:49 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «allegations»:


Total: 600 results - 0.058 seconds

031121949663 100%

The allegations in paragraph 1 assert contentions of law, as to which no 3 response is offered.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/07/031121949663/

07/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Stollznow Response to Complaint 2014Dec10 99%

All allegations not explicitly admitted herein are hereby expressly denied.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/12/stollznow-response-to-complaint-2014dec10/

12/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Smith Answer 98%

Defendant denies that “immediate and irreparable injury, damage or loss will result,” as alleged if,” visitors are permitted to carry firearms on the Zoo property.” The remainder of Paragraph 1 of Plaintiff’s Petition is multiplicious and conclusory and cannot be either admitted or denied and Defendant is without sufficient information to either admit or deny any remaining allegations and, therefore, all remaining allegations in Paragraph 1 are, therefore, denied.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/10/14/smith-answer/

14/10/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Allegations-Redacted-5.26.15 97%

NOTICE OF ALLEGATIONS to the Chancellor of the University of Mississippi A.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/05/27/allegations-redacted-5-26-15/

27/05/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

BRIAN JOHN BOGART - BrokerCheck 97%

Date 11/21/2016 Customer Dispute Pending Allegations Claimant alleged, inter alia, unsuitability with respect to investments in managed accounts - 2015 to 2016.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/11/brian-john-bogart-brokercheck/

11/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

2 96%

FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 11 (Waiver and Estoppel) 12 As a fifth, separate and distinct affirmative defense, this answering Defendant alleges that 13 Complainant has waived and is otherwise estopped from pursuing the allegations contained in Its 14 Complaint.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/26/2/

26/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

jon motion to dismiss 9-18-13 96%

Conclusory allegations, legal conclusions couched as factual allegations, or mere recitation of the elements of a cause of action, are not entitled to such presumption.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/19/jon-motion-to-dismiss-9-18-13/

19/09/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Sound Choice's Response to PT's Motion to Dismiss 96%

INTRODUCTION 22 The PT’s Defendants’ have ignored material allegations of the complaint, 23 apparently believing that if they simply pretend that the allegations of Plaintiff which state 24 a claim do not exist, then the Court will not look at the entire complaint when ruling on 25 their motion.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/sound-choice-s-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Tera King Production Requests 95%

Produce a copy of all documents you reserve the right to introduce into evidence in support of the allegations made in the Complaint filed in the above-entitled action.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/26/tera-king-production-requests/

26/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Generic requests for production 95%

Produce a copy of all documents you reserve the right to introduce into evidence in support of the allegations made in the Complaint filed in the above-entitled action.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/01/08/generic-requests-for-production/

08/01/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Kitchen v. Burge 95%

I denied plaintiff's motion to reconsider that decision, explaining that the allegations in the complaint were insufficient to allege ASA Lukanich's knowledge and participation in the coercion of plaintiff's confession.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/02/09/kitchen-v-burge/

09/02/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Caesar's Motion to Dismiss 95%

Slep-Tone’s empty, conclusory allegations and its failure to sufficiently 2 differentiate between the defendants does not meet even the liberal notice pleading standards 3 under Iqbal and Twombly.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/caesar-s-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Columbia Opinion 94%

If the complaint is found to be sufficient to state a legal claim, the 3 opposing party will then have ample opportunity to contest the truth of the 4 plaintiff’s allegations and to offer its own version.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/29/columbia-opinion/

29/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

329756252-State-of-Capture-14-October-2016 94%

(v) In essence the allegations are as follows:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/02/329756252-state-of-capture-14-october-2016/

02/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

136592NCJRS 93%

\3bBq~ lrv Slott lAY 18 1992 INVESTIGATOR'S GUIDE TO ALLEGATIONS OF "Rl1UAL- CIDLD ABUSE January 1992 Kenneth V.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/23/136592ncjrs/

23/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

PT's Reply to Response to PT's Motion to Dismiss 93%

These are the only plausible allegations made by the Plaintiff - 8 that the KJs are copying its disks and displaying Plaintiff’s trademarks in commerce without 9 permission.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/26/pt-s-reply-to-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-dismiss-1/

26/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

LaCognata Opinion[1] 92%

When reviewing a motion to dismiss, a court must accept all factual allegations contained in the complaint as true, and view the facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/10/15/lacognata-opinion-1/

15/10/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

PT's Motion to Dismiss 92%

8 As such, Plaintiff’s claims against the PT’S Defendants are baseless and legally 9 insufficient allegations and fail to allege any wrongful or culpable conduct by the PT’S 10 Defendants and the Complaint should be dismissed against PT’S Defendants in its entirety.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/15/pt-s-motion-to-dismiss/

15/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

GENERIC MOTION TO SEVER 91%

18 Although Slep-Tone has alleged that its, “right to relief...arises out of the same series of 19 transactions and occurrences” (see, Complaint, ¶ 235) and that its, “action raises substantial 20 questions of law and fact common to all of the defendants...” (see, Complaint, ¶ 236), Slep- 21 Tone’s allegations in this respect do not have to be assumed true for purposes of a motion to 22 sever.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/15/generic-motion-to-sever-1/

15/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

65 - Slep-Tone's response to Hot Shots' Motion to Dismiss 91%

Tavern, DDRT, LLC, Starmaker Karaoke, and Debbie Harm shall be collectively referred to herein as “Hot Shots Defendants” -1- Case 2:12-cv-00239-KJD -RJJ Document 65 Filed 05/10/12 Page 2 of 19 1 attempt to direct the court’s attention away from the Complaint’s well-pled allegations of 2 their infringing conduct and unfair competition by suggesting that the purpose of 3 Plaintiff’s litigation is to “coerc[e] settlements rather than protecting legitimate intellectual 4 property rights.” Although they suggest that Plaintiff has not filed this action to protect 5 its legitimate intellectual property rights, the Hot Shots Defendants do not actually 6 challenge the legitimacy of Plaintiff’s intellectual property rights in its registered 7 trademarks.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/11/65-slep-tone-s-response-to-hot-shots-motion-to-dismiss/

11/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Treasure Island, Gilley's motion to dismiss, sever 91%

The 5 Treasure Island Defendants are entitled to dismissal of Plaintiff Slep-Tone Entertainment 6 Corporation’s (“Plaintiff”) claims for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition under the 7 Lanham Act pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), because Plaintiff’s allegations fail as a matter of law.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/treasure-island-gilley-s-motion-to-dismiss-sever/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Station Motion to Dismiss 91%

The Station Defendants 5 are entitled to dismissal of Plaintiff Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation’s (“Plaintiff”) claims 6 for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition under the Lanham Act pursuant to Rule 7 12(b)(6), as well as Plaintiff’s request for counterfeiting damages, because Plaintiff’s allegations 8 fail as a matter of law.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/station-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

69 - Slep-Tone's Response to Stations Motion to Dismiss 91%

The Station Defendants 25 attempt to direct the court’s attention away from the Complaint’s well-pleaded allegations 26 of their infringing conduct and unfair competition by suggesting that the purpose of 27 28 1 Defendants NP BOULDER LLC and NP PALACE LLC shall be collectively referred to herein as “Station Defendants” -1- Case 2:12-cv-00239-KJD -RJJ Document 69 Filed 05/21/12 Page 2 of 27 1 Plaintiff’s litigation is to “elicit quick settlements” rather than protecting Plaintiff’s 2 legitimate intellectual property rights.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/69-slep-tone-s-response-to-stations-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

71- Slep-Tone's Response to TI's Motion to Dismiss 91%

The Treasure Island 25 Defendants attempt to direct the court’s attention away from the Complaint’s well- 26 pleaded allegations of their infringing conduct and unfair competition by suggesting that 27 28 1 Defendants GILLEY’S LAS VEGAS and TREASURE ISLAND, LLC shall be collectively referred to herein as “Treasure Island Defendants” -1- Case 2:12-cv-00239-KJD -RJJ Document 71 Filed 05/21/12 Page 2 of 27 1 the purpose of Plaintiff’s litigation is to “elicit quick settlements” rather than protecting 2 Plaintiff’s legitimate intellectual property rights.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/71-slep-tone-s-response-to-ti-s-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com