PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 16 May at 14:24 - Around 76000 files indexed.
The victim’s description of any non-arrested suspects will also be recorded on the crime complaint report.
39 arrested, including women and children, raided 58 houses and torture of 7 citizens (Reports) 9 Bahrain Spring:
If you are arrested and told it's for breach of the peace, remember BREACH OF THE PEACE IS NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENCE!
If you have been arrested or convicted, write the name you were using at the time in the blanks in case 1.
The execution of a young man who was arrested as a child, Alireza Tajiki, attracted the attention of human rights communities.
USE AND ABUSE OF THE LAW I) INTRODUCTION Thousands of people have been arrested by police and security forces in Punjab since 1983, when armed Sikh opposition groups emerged demanding an independent Sikh state ("Khalistan") in Punjab.
James Currie (28 January 1786) Getty photographer Scott Olson is arrested and taken away on West Florissant Avenue in Ferguson, Mo., on Monday, August, 18, 2014.
The officers eventually forced their way into Anthony Mitchell's home, shot him with pepperball rounds, and arrested him.
DOCKET NO. MMX-CR14-0675616-T MMX -CR13-0200821-T STATE OF CONNECTICUT V.
Online Privacy and the Dangers of Surveillance What is Government Surveillance of Technology? As the name suggests, Government Surveillance of Technology is when the Government has the authority to monitor all types of technology. This includes phone calls, emails and text messages, webcams or microphones, keystrokes, web searches, gps and much more. Every type of privacy you thought you had is all gone when you can be spied on you at any time. This is Edward Snowden, if that name sounds familiar that’s because a movie was made about him in 2016. He is relevant to this topic because he worked with the CIA during the Obama administration and leaked data being assembled to track all forms of digital communications by the NSA. Not just foreign Governments and terrorist groups were subject to this surveillance but also regular American citizens. He fled to an undisclosed location in Moscow Russia after this leak due to multiple charges by the American Government. To some he is seen as a hero but to others as a terrorist. Does this occur in Canada? Bill C-51 is an anti terrorist legislation put in place by the Harper administration which gives the CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service) expanded power to monitor technology. Under this bill promoting terroristic acts becomes an offence under the criminal code. A larger crackdown on terrorist propaganda in the form of online and computer files will happen. Police can now arrest people for suspicion without warrant. CSIS can interfere with terror plots. And finally, your personal information is shared with more departments. What type of message can lead to an arrest? The vagueness of this bill doesn’t specifically state what is against the criminal code. What is considered promotion of terrorism can be considered differently between what you think and the Government thinks. Therefore if you make a sarcastic threat online you could be arrested without a warrant under suspicion of terrorism. The Government doesn’t know the true intent behind a message. Because of this, society has to conform to a restriction on free speech to avoid being imprisoned. Is the Government morally justified when monitoring online activity and messages? I feel as if the results of my research questions will prove that government surveillance of technology is on average immoral and harmful. People don’t act the same way they do online as in person. There for legal action should not be put in place when people exercise their right to free speech online. For that reason it is ineffective in finding the actual criminals but instead puts regular citizens at risk which is immoral and harmful. Puts regular citizens at risk With more power being put in the hands of the Government in terms of online activity, the margin of error goes up as well. Whatever the authorities deem “suspicious” online gives them the authority to now arrest you immediately. These lack of precautions will cause a influx in innocent citizens getting in trouble with the law even if not guilty in intent. The majority of citizens don’t want to be monitored If most citizens don’t want laws inhibiting their privacy uselessly, it is immoral to force legislation upon them. There hasn’t been shown to be a need for Bill-C51 in Canada and yet the Harper government in 2015 put it in place. Because it isn’t needed and citizens disagree with it, it is immoral. However if there was a clear problem with terrorism and there was a strong correlation between terrorists and online activity then it would be moral. A random sample of 1500 Canadian adults of different races and provinces that were phoned for these surveys. 92% of the participants are somewhat to more concerned about their personal privacy. 74% of the participants feel as if they have less protection of personal info now than they did 10 years ago.
2- In Case Of Right's Violations 3- Police Confrontation 4- Police Confrontation in a Vehicle 5- Drug Checkpoints (It's A Trap!) 6- Being Arrested:
MARK REED’S CRIMINAL RECORD The following pages are the public records from the Los Angeles Superior Court of cases in which Republican candidate for Congress Mark Reed was a criminal defendant. Also included is a status report from the California Secretary of State’s office on Mr. Reed’s suspended corporation, Mark’s Pool Plumbing, Inc. Summary pages introduce each set of records. MARK REED ARRESTED, CONVICTED, ON PROBATION FOR POSSESSION OF A CONCEALED DANGEROUS WEAPON Currently represented by a Bar Panel attorney from the Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments Program Case No. 9SR00526 The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed, Sr. Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Foothill Area Case filed on 01/29/09 Mark Reed charged with one count of possession of a concealed dangerous weapon [12020(A)(1)], on or about 01/08/09. Case called for arraignment on 01/29/09. Mark Reed not present. Represented by Deputy Public Defender Peggy Loveman. Case called for further proceedings on 08/26/09. Court orders complaint amended to add violation of 12020(A)(1) as count 02. Case called for arraignment and plea on 08/27/09. Mark Reed pleads not guilty to both counts. Case called for “traffic school completion” on 09/30/09. Mark Reed represented by Deputy Public Defender John H. Cho. Case called for jury trial on 10/26/09. Public Defender’s Office declares a conflict; Alternate Public Defender’s Office is appointed. Case called for pre‐trial hearing on 11/04/09. Public Defender declares conflict of interest. Court appoints Bar Panel attorney Murray Berns from the ICDA (Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments) office of the Los Angeles Bar Association. Case called for jury trial on 03/23/10. Mark Reed testifies. Court orders the testimony of the arresting officers. Case called for jury trial on 03/24/10. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 01. The court finds the defendant guilty. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 02. The court finds the defendant guilty. Mark Reed placed on probation for 36 months under the following terms and conditions: “serve 1 day in the Los Angeles County Jail, less credit for 1 day”; court security assessment of $30.00; “criminal conviction assessment” of $30.00; $2,297 in attorney fees; restitution fine of $100; total due, $2,457.00. In addition: “not own, use or possess any dangerous or deadly weapons, including any firearms, knives or other concealable weapons”; “the weapon involved in this case is ordered confiscated and destroyed by the arresting agency”; “defendant is ordered to pay a probation revocation restitution fine” of $100. Case called for further proceedings on 04/16/10. Defense attorney states that Mark Reed has found a gun dealer who will buy his firearms and asks to have firearms released to defendant for purpose of transporting them to gun dealer. Request is denied. Los Angeles Police Department will transport the firearms to the dealer. Court orders Mark Reed to pay $2,297 in attorney fees by 04/19/11. Case called on 04/16/10 for fines and fees. Mark Reed pays $245. Case called on 04/19/11 for fines and fees. Mark Reed fails to appear. Case referred to financial evaluator. Case called on 04/22/11 for proof of restitution. Mark Reed fails to appear. Notice of delinquency is mailed. Case called on 05/25/11 for attorney fees payment. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Case continued. Case called on 08/25/11 for attorney fees payment. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Mark Reed is told that if he does not pay the $2,297 in attorney fees by February 21, 2012, the matter will be referred to collections. On 09/12/11: Mark Reed appears for evaluation. Recommendation: “Defendant to pay total due at the rate of $25 per month on the 21st of every month beginning 10/21/11 and each month thereafter.” Case called on 09/21/11 for “miscellaneous.” Mark Reed’s motion to have attorney fees reduced is denied. Mark Reed paid $25 on 09/21/11, $25 on 10/20/11, $25 on 11/21/11, $25 on 12/15/11. Case called on 02/21/12 for fines and fees. Mark Reed is not present and not represented by counsel. Case called on 02/28/12 for fines and fees. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Payment of $50 is made. On 03/13/12, Mark Reed and his Bar Panel attorney, Murray S. Berns, file a motion for early termination of probation. Next scheduled event: 04/02/12, 8:30 a.m., motion for early termination of probation, San Fernando Courthouse Department 137. Custody status: On Probation.
Worked at Harvey’s in high school Worked at Modern Dispersions Incorporated for a time a few years after Grinstead's disappearance Talked about joining the military, but not confirmed if he ever joined 2005 ● Alleged to have killed Tara Grinstead 2007 ● Comes into contact with Bo Dukes for allegedly the last time 2008 ● Arrested in Tifton in 2008 on suspicion of DUI.
One of the arriving officers quickly grabbed Devin’s camera, threw him to the ground and arrested him without any inquiry.