Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 16 May at 14:24 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «arrested»:


Total: 400 results - 0.069 seconds

NYC year-end-2018-enforcement-report 100%

The victim’s description of any non-arrested suspects will also be recorded on the crime complaint report.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/12/22/nyc-year-end-2018-enforcement-report/

22/12/2019 www.pdf-archive.com

CrimRecord 99%

Repository  Inquiry             To:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/04/25/crimrecord/

25/04/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

Bahrain Spring Magazine 97%

39 arrested, including women and children, raided 58 houses and torture of 7 citizens (Reports) 9 Bahrain Spring:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/07/06/bahrain-spring-magazine/

06/07/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

HollywoodandRecreatingHistory 96%

Who does this source identify as the 5 Members to be arrested?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/01/30/hollywoodandrecreatinghistory/

30/01/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Redbook pamphlet 26.08.09(Eng) 95%

If you disobey a Police Order, you cannot be arrested.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/27/redbook-pamphlet-26-08-09-eng/

27/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

legal info 93%

If you are arrested and told it's for breach of the peace, remember BREACH OF THE PEACE IS NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENCE!

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/04/14/legal-info/

14/04/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

JRonAtroplix (1) 90%

Sir.Atroplix has arrested a DPD officer.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/24/jronatroplix-1/

24/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

namechangeguide 88%

If you have been arrested or convicted, write the name you were using at the time in the blanks in case 1.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/namechangeguide/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Report on Human Rights violations on August 87%

The execution of a young man who was arrested as a child, Alireza Tajiki, attracted the attention of human rights communities.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/03/report-on-human-rights-violations-on-august/

03/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

asa200111991ar 86%

USE AND ABUSE OF THE LAW I) INTRODUCTION Thousands of people have been arrested by police and security forces in Punjab since 1983, when armed Sikh opposition groups emerged demanding an independent Sikh state ("Khalistan") in Punjab.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/26/asa200111991ar/

26/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

GBU Mountain News LXXI - August 20, 2014 86%

James Currie (28 January 1786) Getty photographer Scott Olson is arrested and taken away on West Florissant Avenue in Ferguson, Mo., on Monday, August, 18, 2014.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/08/21/gbu-mountain-news-lxxi-august-20-2014/

21/08/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Mitchell v City of Henderson, NV 84%

The officers eventually forced their way into Anthony Mitchell's home, shot him with pepperball rounds, and arrested him.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/23/mitchell-v-city-of-henderson-nv/

23/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

TaupierEdward AttyRachelBaird BriefPO 102414 2 84%

DOCKET NO. MMX-CR14-0675616-T MMX -CR13-0200821-T STATE OF CONNECTICUT V.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/03/21/taupieredward-attyrachelbaird-briefpo-102414-2/

21/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

LeeWebb1 83%

If you are arrested and refuse the test, your license will automatically be suspended, based on the chart below::

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/22/leewebb1/

21/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Hilfreiches bei Krebs 83%

Chlorophyllin Abstract der Studie auf Pubmed:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/13/hilfreiches-bei-krebs/

13/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

questions 83%

I've been following you for a long time.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/11/17/questions/

17/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

JAWAD 83%

both men were arbitrarily arrested on 2 May 2011 by security forces and taken to different detention centres, where they were ill-treated and denied access to family and legal counsel;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/07/jawad/

07/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Product Outline 83%

  Online​ ​Privacy  ​ ​ and​ ​the​ ​Dangers​​ ​of​ ​Surveillance              ​​​   What​ ​is​ ​Government​ ​Surveillance​ ​of​ ​Technology?  As​ ​the​ ​name​ ​suggests,​ ​Government​ ​Surveillance​ ​of​ ​Technology​ ​is​ ​when  the​ ​Government​ ​has​ ​the​ ​authority​ ​to​ ​monitor​ ​all​ ​types​ ​of​ ​technology.​ ​This  includes​ ​phone​ ​calls,​ ​emails​ ​and​ ​text​ ​messages,​ ​webcams​ ​or​ ​microphones,  keystrokes,​ ​web​ ​searches,​ ​gps​ ​and​ ​much​ ​more.​ ​Every​ ​type​ ​of​ ​privacy​ ​you  thought​ ​you​ ​had​ ​is​ ​all​ ​gone​ ​when​ ​you​ ​can​ ​be​ ​spied​ ​on​ ​you​ ​at​ ​any​ ​time.    This​ ​is​ ​Edward​ ​Snowden​,​ ​if​ ​that​ ​name​ ​sounds​ ​familiar​ ​that’s​ ​because​ ​a  movie​ ​was​ ​made​ ​about​ ​him​ ​in​ ​2016.​ ​He​ ​is​ ​relevant​ ​to​ ​this​ ​topic  because​ ​he​ ​worked​ ​with​ ​the​ ​CIA​​ ​during​ ​the​ ​Obama​ ​administration​ ​and  leaked​ ​data​ ​being​ ​assembled​ ​to​ ​track​ ​all​ ​forms​ ​of​ ​digital  communications​ ​by​ ​the​ ​NSA​.​ ​Not​ ​just​ ​foreign​ ​Governments​ ​and  terrorist​ ​groups​ ​were​ ​subject​ ​to​ ​this​ ​surveillance​ ​but​ ​also​ ​regular  American​ ​citizens.​ ​He​ ​fled​ ​to​ ​an​ ​undisclosed​ ​location​ ​ ​in​ ​Moscow  Russia​ ​after​ ​this​ ​leak​ ​due​ ​to​ ​multiple​ ​charges​ ​by​ ​the​ ​American  Government.​ ​To​ ​some​ ​he​ ​is​ ​seen​ ​as​ ​a​ ​hero​ ​but​ ​to​ ​others​ ​as​ ​a​ ​terrorist.    Does​ ​this​ ​occur​ ​in​ ​Canada?  Bill​ ​C-51​ ​is​ ​an​ ​anti​ ​terrorist​ ​legislation​ ​put​ ​in​ ​place​ ​by​ ​the​ ​Harper  administration​ ​which​ ​gives​ ​the​ ​CSIS​​ ​(​Canadian​ ​Security​ ​Intelligence  Service)​ ​expanded​ ​power​ ​to​ ​monitor​ ​technology.​ ​Under​ ​this​ ​bill  promoting​ ​terroristic​ ​acts​ ​becomes​ ​an​ ​offence​ ​under​ ​the​ ​criminal​ ​code.​ ​A  larger​ ​crackdown​ ​on​ ​terrorist​ ​propaganda​ ​in​ ​the​ ​form​ ​of​ ​online​ ​and  computer​ ​files​ ​will​ ​happen.​ ​Police​ ​can​ ​now​ ​arrest​ ​people​ ​for​ ​suspicion  without​ ​warrant.​ ​CSIS​​ ​can​ ​interfere​ ​with​ ​terror​ ​plots.​ ​And​ ​finally,​ ​your  personal​ ​information​ ​is​ ​shared​ ​with​ ​more​ ​departments.   What​ ​type​ ​of​ ​message​ ​can​ ​lead​ ​to​ ​an​ ​arrest?    The​ ​vagueness​ ​of​ ​this​ ​bill​ ​doesn’t​ ​specifically​ ​state​ ​what​ ​is​ ​against​ ​the  criminal​ ​code.​ ​What​ ​is​ ​considered​ ​promotion​ ​of​ ​terrorism​ ​can​ ​be  considered​ ​differently​ ​between​ ​what​ ​you​ ​think​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Government  thinks.​ ​Therefore​ ​if​ ​you​ ​make​ ​a​ ​sarcastic​ ​threat​ ​online​ ​you​ ​could​ ​be  arrested​ ​without​ ​a​ ​warrant​ ​under​ ​suspicion​ ​of​ ​terrorism.​ ​The​ ​Government  doesn’t​ ​know​ ​the​ ​true​ ​intent​ ​behind​ ​a​ ​message.​ ​Because​ ​of​ ​this,​ ​society  has​ ​to​ ​conform​ ​to​ ​a​ ​restriction​ ​on​ ​free​ ​speech​ ​to​ ​avoid​ ​being​ ​imprisoned.              ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​Is​ ​the​ ​Government​ ​morally  justified​ ​when​ ​monitoring​ ​online  ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​activity​ ​and​ ​messages?                            ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​I​ ​feel​ ​as​ ​if​ ​the​ ​results​ ​of​ ​my​ ​research​ ​questions​ ​will   prove​ ​ ​that​ ​government​ ​surveillance​ ​of​ ​technology​ ​is​ ​on   average​ ​immoral​ ​and​ ​harmful.​ ​People​ ​don’t​ ​act​ ​the​ ​same   ​ ​ ​way​ ​they​ ​do​ ​online​ ​as​ ​in​ ​person.​ ​There​ ​for​ ​legal​ ​action   ​ ​ ​should​ ​not​ ​be​ ​put​ ​in​ ​place​ ​when​ ​people​ ​exercise​ ​their   ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​right​ ​to​ ​free​ ​speech​ ​online.​ ​For​ ​that​ ​reason​ ​it​ ​is   ​ ​ ​ ​ineffective​ ​in​ ​finding​ ​the​ ​actual​ ​criminals​ ​but​ ​instead   puts​ ​regular​ ​citizens​ ​at​ ​risk​ ​which​ ​is​ ​immoral​ ​and​ ​harmful.            Puts​ ​regular​ ​citizens​ ​at​ ​risk  With​ ​more​ ​power​ ​being​ ​put​ ​in​ ​the​ ​hands​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Government​ ​in​ ​terms​ ​of  online​ ​activity,​ ​the​ ​margin​ ​of​ ​error​ ​goes​ ​up​ ​as​ ​well.​ ​Whatever​ ​the  authorities​ ​deem​ ​“suspicious”​ ​online​ ​gives​ ​them​ ​the​ ​authority​ ​to​ ​now  arrest​ ​you​ ​immediately.​ ​These​ ​lack​ ​of​ ​precautions​ ​will​ ​cause​ ​a​ ​influx​ ​in  innocent​ ​citizens​ ​getting​ ​in​ ​trouble​ ​with​ ​the​ ​law​ ​even​ ​if​ ​not​ ​guilty​ ​in  intent.    The​ ​majority​ ​of​ ​citizens​ ​don’t​ ​want​ ​to​ ​be​ ​monitored   If​ ​most​ ​citizens​ ​don’t​ ​want​ ​laws​ ​inhibiting​ ​their​ ​privacy​ ​uselessly,​ ​it​ ​is  immoral​ ​to​ ​force​ ​legislation​ ​upon​ ​them.​ ​There​ ​hasn’t​ ​been​ ​shown​ ​to​ ​be​ ​a  need​ ​for​ ​Bill-C51​ ​in​ ​Canada​ ​and​ ​yet​ ​the​ ​Harper​ ​government​ ​in​ ​2015​ ​put​ ​it  in​ ​place.​ ​Because​ ​it​ ​isn’t​ ​needed​ ​and​ ​citizens​ ​disagree​ ​with​ ​it,​ ​it​ ​is  immoral.​ ​However​ ​if​ ​there​ ​was​ ​a​ ​clear​ ​problem​ ​with​ ​terrorism​ ​and​ ​there  was​ ​a​ ​strong​ ​correlation​ ​between​ ​terrorists​ ​and​ ​online​ ​activity​ ​then​ ​it  would​ ​be​ ​moral.   A​ ​random​ ​sample​ ​of​ ​1500​ ​Canadian​ ​adults​ ​of​ ​different​ ​races​ ​and​ ​provinces​ ​that  were​ ​phoned​ ​for​ ​these​ ​surveys.      92%​ ​of​ ​the​ ​participants​ ​are​ ​somewhat​ ​to  more​ ​concerned​ ​about​ ​their​ ​personal  privacy.            74%​ ​of​ ​the​ ​participants​ ​feel​ ​as​ ​if​ ​they​ ​have  less​ ​protection​ ​of​ ​personal​ ​info​ ​now​ ​than  they​ ​did​ ​10​ ​years​ ​ago.     

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/11/03/product-outline/

03/11/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

SavCopWatchGuide 82%

2- In Case Of Right's Violations 3- Police Confrontation 4- Police Confrontation in a Vehicle 5- Drug Checkpoints (It's A Trap!) 6- Being Arrested:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/02/25/savcopwatchguide/

25/02/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Mark Reed Defendant Superior Court Records 82%

MARK REED’S CRIMINAL RECORD        The following pages are the public records from the Los Angeles Superior Court of cases in  which Republican candidate for Congress Mark Reed was a criminal defendant.    Also included is a status report from the California Secretary of State’s office on Mr. Reed’s  suspended corporation, Mark’s Pool Plumbing, Inc.    Summary pages introduce each set of records.  MARK REED ARRESTED, CONVICTED, ON PROBATION FOR POSSESSION OF A CONCEALED DANGEROUS WEAPON  Currently represented by a Bar Panel attorney from the   Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments Program    Case No. 9SR00526  The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed, Sr.  Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Foothill Area  Case filed on 01/29/09  Mark Reed charged with one count of possession of a concealed dangerous weapon [12020(A)(1)], on or about  01/08/09.  Case called for arraignment on 01/29/09. Mark Reed not present. Represented by Deputy Public Defender Peggy  Loveman.  Case called for further proceedings on 08/26/09. Court orders complaint amended to add violation of 12020(A)(1) as  count 02.  Case called for arraignment and plea on 08/27/09. Mark Reed pleads not guilty to both counts.  Case called for “traffic school completion” on 09/30/09. Mark Reed represented by Deputy Public Defender John H. Cho.  Case called for jury trial on 10/26/09. Public Defender’s Office declares a conflict; Alternate Public Defender’s Office is  appointed.  Case called for pre‐trial hearing on 11/04/09. Public Defender declares conflict of interest. Court appoints Bar Panel  attorney Murray Berns from the ICDA (Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments) office of the Los Angeles Bar  Association.  Case called for jury trial on 03/23/10. Mark Reed testifies. Court orders the testimony of the arresting officers.  Case called for jury trial on 03/24/10. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 01. The court finds the defendant  guilty. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 02. The court finds the defendant guilty.  Mark Reed placed on probation for 36 months under the following terms and conditions: “serve 1 day in the Los Angeles  County Jail, less credit for 1 day”; court security assessment of $30.00; “criminal conviction assessment” of $30.00;  $2,297 in attorney fees; restitution fine of $100; total due, $2,457.00. In addition: “not own, use or possess any  dangerous or deadly weapons, including any firearms, knives or other concealable weapons”; “the weapon involved in  this case is ordered confiscated and destroyed by the arresting agency”; “defendant is ordered to pay a probation  revocation restitution fine” of $100.  Case called for further proceedings on 04/16/10. Defense attorney states that Mark Reed has found a gun dealer who  will buy his firearms and asks to have firearms released to defendant for purpose of transporting them to gun dealer.  Request is denied. Los Angeles Police Department will transport the firearms to the dealer. Court orders Mark Reed to  pay $2,297 in attorney fees by 04/19/11.  Case called on 04/16/10 for fines and fees. Mark Reed pays $245.  Case called on 04/19/11 for fines and fees. Mark Reed fails to appear. Case referred to financial evaluator.  Case called on 04/22/11 for proof of restitution. Mark Reed fails to appear. Notice of delinquency is mailed.  Case called on 05/25/11 for attorney fees payment. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Case continued.  Case called on 08/25/11 for attorney fees payment. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Mark Reed is told  that if he does not pay the $2,297 in attorney fees by February 21, 2012, the matter will be referred to collections.  On 09/12/11: Mark Reed appears for evaluation. Recommendation: “Defendant to pay total due at the rate of $25 per  month on the 21st of every month beginning 10/21/11 and each month thereafter.”  Case called on 09/21/11 for “miscellaneous.” Mark Reed’s motion to have attorney fees reduced is denied.  Mark Reed paid $25 on 09/21/11, $25 on 10/20/11, $25 on 11/21/11, $25 on 12/15/11.  Case called on 02/21/12 for fines and fees. Mark Reed is not present and not represented by counsel.  Case called on 02/28/12 for fines and fees. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Payment of $50 is made.  On 03/13/12, Mark Reed and his Bar Panel attorney, Murray S. Berns, file a motion for early termination of probation.  Next scheduled event: 04/02/12, 8:30 a.m., motion for early termination of probation, San Fernando Courthouse  Department 137.  Custody status: On Probation.       

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/06/12/mark-reed-defendant-superior-court-records/

12/06/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

TG 80%

Worked at Harvey’s in high school Worked at Modern Dispersions Incorporated for a time a few years after Grinstead's disappearance Talked about joining the military, but not confirmed if he ever joined 2005 ● Alleged to have killed Tara Grinstead 2007 ● Comes into contact with Bo Dukes for allegedly the last time 2008 ● Arrested in Tifton in 2008 on suspicion of DUI.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/03/06/tg/

06/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Scales Brothers Letter 78%

One of the arriving officers quickly grabbed Devin’s camera, threw him to the ground and arrested him without any inquiry.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/05/14/scales-brothers-letter/

14/05/2015 www.pdf-archive.com