PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 10 July at 22:07 - Around 220000 files indexed.
Results for «arrested»:
Total: 900 results - 0.047 seconds
The victim’s description of any non-arrested suspects will also be recorded on the crime complaint report.
The overall percentage of active caries that became arrested was 81% (95% confidence interval, 68% to 89%;
39 arrested, including women and children, raided 58 houses and torture of 7 citizens (Reports) 9 Bahrain Spring:
If an arrest order has been issued against the accused and he is caught outside the dominion of the investigating court, which might be a different Emirate than where he or she was initially arrested from, then he shall be reassigned and returned back to the Public Prosecution in the Emirate which primarily issued the warrant.
They self-reported on whether they had ever been arrested, sentenced to probation, incarcerated, and arrested multiple times.
legal info 92%
If you are arrested and told it's for breach of the peace, remember BREACH OF THE PEACE IS NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENCE!
24 Hour Best BAIL Bonds in san Anto nio McRae Bail Bon ds Arrested in San Antonio?
After getting the accused arrested, the Judicial Officers are most likely to refer them to the Public Prosecution within a period of maximum 48 hours.
Do you know what happens to your smart phone if you are arrested for a criminal offense?
Mark Reed Arrest Record Summary As of 3/28/12 MARK REED ARRESTED, CONVICTED, ON PROBATION FOR POSSESSION OF A CONCEALED DANGEROUS WEAPON Currently represented by a Bar Panel attorney for indigent defendants Case No. 9SR00526 The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed, Sr. Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Foothill Area Case filed on 01/29/09 Mark Reed charged with one count of possession of a concealed dangerous weapon [12020(A)(1)], on or about 01/08/09. Case called for arraignment on 01/29/09. Mark Reed not present. Represented by Deputy Public Defender Peggy Loveman. Case called for further proceedings on 08/26/09. Court orders complaint amended to add violation of 12020(A)(1) as count 02. Case called for arraignment and plea on 08/27/09. Mark Reed pleads not guilty to both counts. Case called for “traffic school completion” on 09/30/09. Mark Reed represented by Deputy Public Defender John H. Cho. Case called for jury trial on 10/26/09. Public Defender’s Office declares a conflict; Alternate Public Defender’s Office is appointed. Case called for pre‐trial hearing on 11/04/09. Public Defender declares conflict of interest. Court appoints Bar Panel attorney Murray Berns from the ICDA (Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments) office of the Los Angeles Bar Association. Case called for jury trial on 03/23/10. Mark Reed testifies. Court orders the testimony of the arresting officers. Case called for jury trial on 03/24/10. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 01. The court finds the defendant guilty. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 02. The court finds the defendant guilty. Mark Reed placed on probation for 36 months under the following terms and conditions: “serve 1 day in the Los Angeles County Jail, less credit for 1 day”; court security assessment of $30.00; “criminal conviction assessment” of $30.00; $2,297 in attorney fees; restitution fine of $100; total due, $2,457.00. In addition: “not own, use or possess any dangerous or deadly weapons, including any firearms, knives or other concealable weapons”; “the weapon involved in this case is ordered confiscated and destroyed by the arresting agency”; “defendant is ordered to pay a probation revocation restitution fine” of $100. Case called for further proceedings on 04/16/10. Defense attorney states that Mark Reed has found a gun dealer who will buy his firearms and asks to have firearms released to defendant for purpose of transporting them to gun dealer. Request is denied. Los Angeles Police Department will transport the firearms to the dealer. Court orders Mark Reed to pay $2,297 in attorney fees by 04/19/11. Case called on 04/16/10 for fines and fees. Mark Reed pays $245. Case called on 04/19/11 for fines and fees. Mark Reed fails to appear. Case referred to financial evaluator. Case called on 04/22/11 for proof of restitution. Mark Reed fails to appear. Notice of delinquency is mailed. Case called on 05/25/11 for attorney fees payment. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Case continued. Case called on 08/25/11 for attorney fees payment. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Mark Reed is told that if he does not pay the $2,297 in attorney fees by February 21, 2012, the matter will be referred to collections. On 09/12/11: Mark Reed appears for evaluation. Recommendation: “Defendant to pay total due at the rate of $25 per month on the 21st of every month beginning 10/21/11 and each month thereafter.” Case called on 09/21/11 for “miscellaneous.” Mark Reed’s motion to have attorney fees reduced is denied. Mark Reed paid $25 on 09/21/11, $25 on 10/20/11, $25 on 11/21/11, $25 on 12/15/11. Case called on 02/21/12 for fines and fees. Mark Reed is not present and not represented by counsel. Case called on 02/28/12 for fines and fees. Mark Reed is present, not represented by counsel. Payment of $50 is made. On 03/13/12, Mark Reed and his Bar Panel attorney, Murray S. Berns, file a motion for early termination of probation. Next scheduled event: 04/02/12, 8:30 a.m., motion for early termination of probation, San Fernando Courthouse Department 137. Custody status: On Probation. MARK REED ARRESTED TWICE FOR NARCOTICS Case No. LA003709 The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Narcotics Division Case filed on 05/07/90 Mark Reed charged with one felony count of possession of a controlled substance [11350(A)], on or about 04/25/90. Bail set at $2,500. Case called for Preliminary Hearing on 09/05/91. Probation memo forwarded. Mark Reed ordered to report to Probation Department within 24 hours. Case called for Diversion Hearing on 09/07/90. Court orders charge diverted as follows: For 24 months, Mark Reed may not “use or possess any narcotics, dangerous or restricted drugs or associated paraphernalia”; may not “associate with persons believed to be or known to be narcotic or drug users”; must “stay away from places where users, buyers or sellers congregate”; and must “obey all rules and regulations of the Probation Department.” Case called for Probation Supplemental Report on 03/06/91. Count 01 is dismissed. _________________________________________ Case No. 90P09063 The People of the State of California vs. Mark S. Reed Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Narcotics Division Case filed on 08/21/90 Mark Reed charged with one count of soliciting another person to commit a drug offense [653f(D)], one count of driving on a suspended or revoked license [14601.1(A)] and one count of driving without a license [12500(A)] on or about 08/16/90. Bail set at $8,000. Case called for jury trial on 10/22/90. Continued. Case called for jury trial on 11/29/90. Mark Reed not present in court. Bench warrant issued in the amount of $8,000. Case called on 12/3/90. Mark Reed pleads guilty to count 01 and count 03; count 02 “dismissed due to plea negotiation.” Mark Reed placed on probation for 18 months, ordered to pay a fine of $500 or serve 16 days in jail less credit for 1 day, with penalty assessment and restitution costs, total due is $1,113.50. Ordered not to drive without proper license and insurance; ordered not to possess or seek to purchase any controlled substance or drug paraphernalia; ordered to “submit to urine analysis testing if requested to do so by a police officer.” Case called for fines and fees on 03/04/91. Mark Reed not present in court. Bench warrant issued in the amount of $8,000. Case called for probation violation hearing on 05/29/91. Probation revoked. Bail forfeiture. June 1991 – September 1992: A series of hearings on probation violation, substance abuse treatment, community service, Cal Trans work. MARK REED ARRESTED MULTIPLE TIMES FOR DRIVING ON A SUSPENDED OR REVOKED LICENSE Case No. 91F07244 The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Valley Traffic Division Case filed on 07/17/91 Defendant charged with having committed, on or about 5/23/91, one count of driving on a suspended or revoked license [14601.1(A)] and one count of driving without a license [12500(A)] Case called for jury trial on 09/05/91 Complaint amended to add one count of driving at an unsafe speed which endangers the safety of persons or property  Mark Reed pleads guilty to count 03, counts 01 and 02 “dismissed due to plea negotiation.” Sentenced to pay a fine of $75 or perform 33 hours of community service and pay a state penalty fund assessment of $108. Proof of completed community service filed on 11/21/91. _________________________________________ Case No. 91F07262 The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Foothill Area Case filed on 07/17/91 Defendant charged with having committed, on or about 4/20/91, one count of driving on a suspended or revoked license [14601.1(A)] and one count of driving at an unsafe speed which endangers the safety of persons or property  Case called for jury trial on 09/05/91 Mark Reed pleads guilty to count 02, count 01 “dismissed in furtherance of justice” per section 1385 of the California penal code. Sentenced to pay a fine of $100 or perform 42 hours of community service and pay a state penalty fund assessment of $135. Proof of completed community service filed on 11/21/91. MARK REED, “RANCHER,” ARRESTED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Case No. 1PN04865 The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: Cal Dept of Fish and Game Case filed on 10/03/01 Mark Reed charged with one count of possession of a dangerous species , on or about 06/05/01. Case called for arraignment on 10/30/01. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere. The court finds the defendant guilty. Mark Reed placed on summary probation under the following terms and conditions: “shall pay a restitution fine in the amount of $100”; “ordered not to own, possess or maintain any animals without obtaining all proper permits”; “make a $500 charitable contribution to SPCALA, deliver contribution to City Attorney.” Case called for progress report on 11/15/01. Mark Reed is not present in court. Probation revoked. Bench warrant issued in the amount of $1,000. Case called for progress report on 11/26/01. Mark Reed stipulates to violation of probation. Court revokes and reinstates probation under same terms and conditions, charitable contribution made through City Attorney’s office. On 09/19/08: “By order of the supervising judge of criminal, case file ordered destroyed pursuiant to government code section 69153.” On 12/15/08 at 5:30 a.m., “Case file destroyed.” MARK REED, “BUSINESSMAN,” HAS CORPORATION SUSPENDED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA On August 1, 1991, the Franchise Tax Board of the State of California suspended Corporation No. C1071382, Mark’s Pool Plumbing, Inc.; Mark S. Reed, Chief Executive Officer; for “failure to meet franchise tax requirements (e.g. failure to file a return, pay taxes, etc.).” Currently the Yellowbook directory for the San Fernando Valley lists “Pete’s Pool Plumbing” at the same address, which is Mr. Reed’s home address in Shadow Hills, California.
drug crime lawyer in orange Zero fee consultation for wrongful termination (714) 288-7300 Again and again people are arrested for drunk driving, or served with a domestic violence restraining order.
10 Steps You Should Take If You Are Arrested for a DUI in Kansas City Getting arrested for a DUI in Kansas is frightening and serious.
• In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely.
The fact that NZ has Identified SAVERS of VIDEO of the CHRISTCHURCH LIVE STREAM and ARRESTED them w/o BAIL means they have SOMETHING TO HIDE Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist http://18.104.22.168/.wo9.html New Zealand has identified people who saved the Christchurch shooting live stream and is going around arresting them now.
If you have been arrested or convicted, write the name you were using at the time in the blanks in case 1.