Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 17 December at 11:24 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «cited»:


Total: 500 results - 0.054 seconds

Stout v. State (Ark. 1968) 99%

Most Cited Cases Criminal Law 110 1166(10.10) 110 Criminal Law 110XXIV Review 110XXIV(Q) Harmless and Reversible Error 110k1166 Preliminary Proceedings 110k1166(10.10) k.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/02/04/stout-v-state-ark-1968/

04/02/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Cyagen Text 98%

Generally speaking, an impact factor (IF) is a metric used to gauge the amount of times articles in a given scientific journal are cited, thereby serving as a proxy for the journal’s importance within its field of study.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/08/14/cyagen-text/

14/08/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

HighSchoolRubric 97%

*Works are not cited in MLA format.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/24/highschoolrubric/

24/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Frankenstein Critical Analysis Evaluation Essay Update Final 90%

Using proper MLA2 style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/20/frankenstein-critical-analysis-evaluation-essay-update-final/

20/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Graded2 90%

Font:12 pt Works Cited "What Is SOVEREIGNTY?"

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/28/graded2/

28/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

HARPOONTANG Response to Office Action 4-29-2015 90%

Examiner’s Cited Evidence Supports Applicant’s Argument that the Mark is Not Scandalous A mark is scandalous if it is vulgar to the relevant audience.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/04/30/harpoontang-response-to-office-action-4-29-2015/

30/04/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

ENGG1110 Assessment+Rubric+for+Final+Report (1) 89%

  Assessment Rubric for Final Report  Team:    Category/  Criteria  Formulation of  the challenge    Exemplary (5) Challenge is developed and  articulated in an excellent manner.  Effective thinking is clearly and  creatively expressed.  Develops logical and consistent plan  to meet the challenge, articulates the  Depth and  reasons. Develops clear connections  thoroughness of  between solutions and supporting  analysis  details. Excels at sophistication in  thought and thoroughness.  Actively seeks out and follows through  Innovativeness  in untested directions. Extends a  and feasibility  novel or unique idea to create a  of proposed  feasible new solution that is  solutions  technically creative.  Language  Wide variety of sentence structures.  Excellent word usage and precise  word choices, spelling, correct  grammar and punctuation, technically  accurate. Sources correctly cited.   Report is clearly structured around  the relevant theme. Each component  of the report is clear and relates to  Overall  others in a well‐planned framework.  presentation  Excellent integration of information.    Style of presentation is professional  and attractive.  Strengths of the report:    Competent (3)  Date:    Needs Work (1) Challenge is clearly developed  with  some supporting details and there is  evidence to support a central theme in  the challenge.  Challenge is poorly developed with  supporting details that are absent  or vague. Simple ideas and unclear  wording reflect a lack of  understanding of the challenge.  Considers various approaches and  develops a plan to solve the challenge.  Less acceptable approaches are rejected  with little consideration or justification.  Uses only a single approach to  consider and solve the challenge.   Presents the solution with  insufficient supporting details.  Experiments with creating a novel idea  to the challenge. Does not explore in  depth. Attempts to connect ideas and  solutions in novel ways.  Reformulates a collection of  available ideas without offering  new insights.  The solution is  unimaginative.  Some sentence variety; adequate usage  of wording, grammar and punctuation  with acceptable technical accuracy.  Some cited sources used.  Writing lacks sentence variety.  Significant deficiencies in wording,  spelling, grammar, or presentation.  Technical wording inaccurate.  Sources poorly cited    The structure of the report  demonstrates some form of organization  related to the relevant theme. Not all  components are logically presented, but  some theme is evident throughout.   Style of presentation is professional.  Report is unfocused and poorly  structured with the main theme  and details presented in a  disorganized and unrelated  manner.   Style of presentation is  unattractive.  Score     Areas for improvement:               

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/10/21/engg1110-assessment-rubric-for-final-report-1/

21/10/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

imperialism essay (1) 89%

Must have a works cited/ bibliography page (10 pts) a.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/10/30/imperialism-essay-1/

30/10/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

Kitchen v. Burge 86%

Because Kitchen has stated a viable Brady claim against ASA Lukanich, and ASA Lukanich has not cited any other grounds for why he is entitled to qualified immunity, I find that defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity on Kitchen's claim that ASA Lukanich suppressed evidence of torture.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/02/09/kitchen-v-burge/

09/02/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

How to prepare your technical paper 85%

 this  is  a  change  from  SPE's  previous  reference  style,  which  required   references  to  be  numbered  in  the  order  in  which  they  were  cited.]    Information  should  be  as  complete  as  possible  and  in  the  following  order:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/10/20/how-to-prepare-your-technical-paper/

20/10/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Reply Brief 84%

LINDE4AAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DEPUTY CLERK/ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES REPLY 1 Bar Counsel misleads this Honorable Court regarding Kossack's alleged plea 1 The direction of the fact finding hearing changed 1 Kossack never benefitted, knew of, or encouraged any of Michelle's actions which caused one client a $4,000.00 3 Bar Counsel's cited cases are not on point but do suggest Kossack's sanction be less than a suspension 10 No suspension may be imposed absent proof of the concurrence of four Panel members 13 Kossack committed no wrong entrusting Sharon with Michelle's keys 14 The public will not be "protected"

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/06/21/reply-brief/

21/06/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Smith Thesis 83%

1 1.2 LITERATURE CITED .........................................................................................................

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/11/smith-thesis/

11/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

3rd medical research conference 83%

Be sure that each table is cited in the text.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/28/3rd-medical-research-conference/

28/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

AIS160 BoyerKelly SecAL Assignment4 83%

You are not required to research outside of these articles, but if you find it is necessary, you are encouraged to do so – just make sure to include any additional sources in your works cited page.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/28/ais160-boyerkelly-secal-assignment4/

28/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2009 Sponsored Links Enforcement Past and Present 81%

 The sponsored links cited in these letters were considered to be misleading because they made representations and/or suggestions about the efficacy of the products, but failed to communicate any risk information associated with the use of these drugs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/07/27/2009-sponsored-links-enforcement-past-and-present/

27/07/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

DOJ Assessment Salinas PD (2016) 80%

It may not be quoted or cited and should not be disseminated further without the express permission of the Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR) or the U.S.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/26/doj-assessment-salinas-pd-2016/

26/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

1b Citation Referencing Sem1 2013 80%

Type three periods with a space before and after each period … (3) Citing same author(s) several times in the same paragraph When the same author is cited multiple times in the same paragraph and the author’s name is part of the narrative, you do not have to include the year in subsequent authorfocus (non-parenthetical) citation.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/11/27/1b-citation-referencing-sem1-2013/

27/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com