Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 22 September at 14:05 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «coefficient»:


Total: 200 results - 0.061 seconds

Introduction to Matrices 100%

coefficient, then the coefficient is "1".

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/11/16/introduction-to-matrices/

16/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

introduction to chemical engineering ch (10) 98%

The increase in wind velocity increases the convection coefficient and increases the transfer by this mechanism.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/02/21/introduction-to-chemical-engineering-ch-10/

21/02/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Wing Optimization (1) 96%

1 From here, we know the sectional lift coefficient is as follows Cl = l qc (1) Where q is the fluid dynamic pressure, c is the chord length, and l is the lift force per unit span of the wing.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/10/18/wingoptimization-1/

18/10/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Haberman-Morton. An Experimental Investigation of the Drag and Shape of Air Bubbles Rising in Various Liquids 94%

Drag Coefficient as a Function of Reynolds number for Air Bubbles Rising at their Terminal Velocity in Various Liquids .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/09/26/untitled-pdf-document-4/

26/09/2019 www.pdf-archive.com

Questionnaire GPOLycee 94%

 Quelles sont les 3 matières les plus importantes en horaire et en coefficient :

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/12/08/questionnaire-gpolycee/

08/12/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

1140 Exam1Review v2 93%

Determine the requested coefficient in the expanded form of each expression below.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/22/1140-exam1review-v2/

22/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Day 13- Binomial Theorem 93%

Exercise 18 Find the coefficient of x3 in (1 + x)7 (1 − x)4 .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/01/24/day-13-binomial-theorem/

24/01/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Day 11-Pascals triangle 92%

Also, give the largest binomial coefficient.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/01/24/day-11-pascals-triangle/

24/01/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

report 92%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/12/09/report/

09/12/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

WT250-260M6B 91%

+86-021-62099100 Temperature Coefficient Nominal Operating Cell Temperature (NOCT) 47℃+/-2℃ Temperature Coefficient of Pmax -0.47%/K Temperature Coefficient of VOC -0.346%/K Temperature Coefficient of ISC +0.036%/K Email:info@wotechsolar.com www.wotechsolar.com

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/31/wt250-260m6b/

31/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

WT245-250P 91%

+86-021-62099100 Temperature Coefficient Nominal Operating Cell Temperature (NOCT) 47℃+/-2℃ Temperature Coefficient of Pmax -0.47%/K Temperature Coefficient of VOC -0.351%/K Temperature Coefficient of ISC +0.035%/K Email:info@wotechsolar.com www.wotechsolar.com

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/31/wt245-250p/

31/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

WT250-255M6S 91%

+86-021-62099100 Temperature Coefficient Nominal Operating Cell Temperature (NOCT) 47℃+/-2℃ Temperature Coefficient of Pmax -0.47%/K Temperature Coefficient of VOC -0.346%/K Temperature Coefficient of ISC +0.036%/K Email:info@wotechsolar.com www.wotechsolar.com

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/31/wt250-255m6s/

31/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

WT195-200M5S 91%

+86-021-62099100 10 20 30 40 50 Voltage(V) Temperature Coefficient Nominal Operating Cell Temperature (NOCT) 47℃+/-2℃ Temperature Coefficient of Pmax -0.46%/K Temperature Coefficient of VOC -0.356/K Temperature Coefficient of ISC +0.024/K Email:info@wotechsolar.com www.wotechsolar.com

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/31/wt195-200m5s/

31/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

WT195-200M5B 91%

+86-021-62099100 10 20 30 40 50 Voltage(V) Temperature Coefficient Nominal Operating Cell Temperature (NOCT) 47℃+/-2℃ Temperature Coefficient of Pmax -0.46%/K Temperature Coefficient of VOC -0.356%/K Temperature Coefficient of ISC +0.024%/K Email:info@wotechsolar.com www.wotechsolar.com

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/31/wt195-200m5b/

31/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Panel 1 90%

1hr       Self weight of slab m m mm 2 N/mm 3.6 KN/m 2 1.2 KN/m 2 1 KN/m 2  cover Fire resistance OK 5.8 KN/m2 gk 3 KN/m2 qk 12.92 Design load [1.4gk +1.6qk] DESIGN MOMENTS AND REINFORCEMENTS 1.659 Aspect ratio of slab SHORT SPAN [SUPPORT] 0.084 Support moment coefficient 10.738 Support moment 124 Effective depth of beam , [d] M 0.0279 K bd2 fcu 0.95 Lever arm, z, 117.80 KN/m2    n 20 mm 2 5.8 KN/m 2 3 KN/m 2 12.92 KN/m  Table 3.14 Table 3.14 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4         Area of steel required, As   Minimum reinforcement area SHORT SPAN [MIDSPAN] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Midspan moment coefficient Midspan moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 BS8110 REF Table 3.14 Table 3.14 K  [d] M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, Area of steel required, LONG SPAN [SUPPORT] Support moment coefficient Support moment Effective depth of beam , As         KNm mm d mm M 0.95 f y z 234 mm 2 195 mm2 [d] Y 12 at 250  2 453 mm 0.063 8.046 KNm 124 mm 0.0209 0.95 d 117.80 mm M 0.95 f y z 175 mm 2 Provide  CALCULATIONS    Provide 0.045 5.769 KNm 112 mm Y 12 OUTPUT at 300 2 377 mm 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 K  M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, As Area of steel required, LONG SPAN [MIDSPAN] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Midspan moment coefficient Midspan moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 K  [d] M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, Area of steel required, As     0.0184 0.95 d 106.40 mm M 0.95 f y z   139 mm        2 Provide Y 12 at 300 Provide Y 12 2 377 mm 0.034 4.359 KNm 112 mm 0.0139 0.95 d 106.40 mm M 0.95 f y z  105 mm 2 377 at 300 mm2 2 377 mm BS8110 REF Table 3.9 DEFLECTION CHECK CALCULATIONS  Basic minimum effective depth for short span Moment redistribution factor   Tension reinforcement area required Table 3.10 Modification factor 3.12.11.2.7 Modified minimum effective depth CRACKING Cracking is controlled by limiting bar spacing.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/11/panel-1/

11/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Panel 3 90%

1hr  Self weight of slab Partitions [minimum] Characteristic imposed load   Design load [1.4gk +1.6qk]  Characteristic dead load  cover Fire resistance OK 20 mm 3.6 KN/m2   Finishes 3.2.1.2.2 6.23 m 5.23 m 150 mm 2 25 N/mm 1.2 KN/m2 1 KN/m2 5.8 KN/m2 gk 3 KN/m2 qk 12.92 KN/m2  2 5.8 KN/m   n 2 3 KN/m 2 12.92 KN/m DESIGN MOMENTS AND REINFORCEMENTS 1.191 Aspect ratio of slab          SHORT SPAN [SUPPORT] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Support moment coefficient Support moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 K  [d] M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, As Area of steel required, 0.0508 0.94 d 116.55 mm M 0.95 f y z 430 mm2 Provide Y12 at  195 mm2 Minimum reinforcement area BS8110 REF 0.055 19.540 KNm 124 mm CALCULATIONS 200 2 566 mm OUTPUT SHORT SPAN [MIDSPAN] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Midspan moment coefficient Support moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 K 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4  [d] M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, Area of steel required, As                 0.041 14.632 KNm 124 mm 0.0381 0.95 d 117.80 mm M 0.95 f y z 319 mm2 Provide Y 12 at 250 2 453 mm  BS8110 REFthis PDF from an application thatCALCULATIONS OUTPUT You created is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) LONG SPAN [SUPPORT] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Support moment coefficient Support moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 K 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4  Lever arm, z, [d] M bd2 fcu Area of steel required, As       0.037 13.051 KNm 112 mm  0.0416 0.95 d 106.40 mm M 0.95 f y z  315 mm2 Provide Y12 at Provide Y12 250 2 453 mm LONG SPAN [MIDSPAN] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Midspan moment coefficient Support moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 K 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 Lever arm, z,  [d] M bd2 fcu Area of steel required, As        0.028 9.876 KNm 112 mm 0.0315 0.95 d 106.40 mm M 0.95 f y z  238 mm2 at 300 2 377 mm DEFLECTION CHECK Table 3.9 Basic minimum effective depth for short span Moment redistribution factor    Tension reinforcement area provided Tension reinforcement area required Design service stress 201.0 mm 1.0   fs  Table 3.10 Modification factor 3.12.11.2.7 Modified minimum effective depth CRACKING Cracking is controlled by limiting bar spacing.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/11/panel-3/

11/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Panel 4 90%

1hr       Self weight of slab Finishes Partitions [minimum] Characteristic dead load Characteristic imposed load 3.2.1.2.2 3.15 m 2.23 m 150 mm 2 25 N/mm 3.6 KN/m  cover Fire resistance OK 20 mm 2 1.2 KN/m2 1 KN/m 2 2 5.8 KN/m 3 KN/m2 12.92 Design load [1.4gk +1.6qk] DESIGN MOMENTS AND REINFORCEMENTS 1.416 Aspect ratio of slab SHORT SPAN [SUPPORT] 0.075 Support moment coefficient 4.773 Support moment 124 Effective depth of beam , [d] M 0.0124 K bd2 fcu 0.95 Lever arm, z, 117.80 M Area of steel required, As 0.95 f y z KN/m2    gk qk n 2 5.8 KN/m 2 3 KN/m 2 12.92 KN/m  Table 3.14 Table 3.14 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4         Minimum reinforcement area SHORT SPAN [MIDSPAN] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Midspan moment coefficient Midspan moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 K  [d] M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, Area of steel required, As KNm mm d mm   104 mm2        0.056 3.558 KNm 124 mm  195 mm Provide Y 12 at 300  2 2 377 mm 0.0093 0.95 d 117.80 mm M 0.95 f y z 78 mm2 Provide Y 12 at 300 2 377 mm  BS8110 REF CALCULATIONS OUTPUT LONG SPAN [SUPPORT]  0.045 Table 3.14 Support moment coefficient 2.878 KNm Table 3.14 Support moment You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)  Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 K  [d] M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, As Area of steel required,       112 mm 0.0092 0.95 d 106.40 mm M 0.95 f y z   69 mm2 Provide Y 12 at 300 377 mm 2 LONG SPAN [MIDSPAN] Table 3.14 Table 3.14 Midspan moment coefficient Midspan moment Effective depth of beam , 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 3.4.4.4 K  [d] M bd2 fcu Lever arm, z, Area of steel required, As        0.034 2.175 KNm 112 mm 0.0069 0.95 d 106.40 mm M 0.95 f y z  Provide 52 mm2 Y 12 at 300 mm 377 2 2 377 mm BS8110 REF CALCULATIONS OUTPUT DEFLECTION CHECK Table 3.9 Basic minimum effective depth for short span Moment redistribution factor     Tension reinforcement area provided Tension reinforcement area required Design service stress 85.6 mm 1.0 fs  377 mm 78 mm2 2 f y Asreq  Table 3.10 Modification factor 3.12.11.2.7 Modified minimum effective depth CRACKING Cracking is controlled by limiting bar spacing.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/11/panel-4/

11/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

SFRAPStatsProject 89%

5) Correlation and Coefficient of Variation The correlation of our data is indicated by our r value of approximately 0.155.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/10/12/sfrapstatsproject/

11/10/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

FundThmAlgebraGalois 89%

Any polynomial has the same set of roots as any of its non-zero multiples, so we may assume that the leading coefficient of f is 1.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/14/fundthmalgebragalois/

14/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

PID4631333 88%

Robustness To test the similarity between the original watermark W and the extracted watermark W*, the normalized correlation coefficient (NC) is calculated which is represented as follows:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/06/pid4631333/

06/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

ESS 88%

viewers Coefficient AVC 765 13,423 401 267 123 1,005 582 2,702 4,518 66 640 12,607 2,175 1.667 1.842 1 1.339 1 1.704 1.339 1 1.745 1.704 1.745 1.250 1 1,275 24,725 401 357 123 1712 779 2,702 7,885 112 1,117 15,758 2,175 The following players either have streamed League of Legends for less than 10 hours within 30 days.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/26/ess/

26/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

course-description 87%

coefficient 1.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/11/course-description/

11/09/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

PV Mono 87%

Series Fuse (A) PACKAGING CONFIGURATION 270Wp 16,6% 17,2% 12A Temperature Coefficient of Pmax -0,45%/°C Tempeature Coefficient of Voc -0,34%/°C Temperature Coefficient of Isc 0,05%/°C Nominal Operating Cell Temperature 45± 2 °C * STC Conditions (1000W / m²;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/04/pv-mono/

04/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com