PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

About Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover Search Help Contact


Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 04 December at 20:59 - Around 79000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «complaint»:


Total: 700 results - 0.058 seconds

Complaint Handling Policy v1.02 100%

V1.02 Date Issued 10 February 2016 Page 1 of 2 Complaint Handling Policy 1.1 General SSI is committed to providing a high quality service to all our stakeholders.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/25/complaint-handling-policy-v1-02/

25/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Mental Health Complaints Partnership Agreement web 99%

Context / Legislative Framework Partnership Agreement When services are not provided to the level of satisfaction that is expected, it is important for community members to be able to make a complaint.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/14/mental-health-complaints-partnership-agreement-web/

14/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Stollznow Response to Complaint 2014Dec10 98%

Syra, P.A., hereby submits her Answer to Plaintiff Benjamin Radford’s Amended Complaint for Defamation, Fraud, and Interference with Beneficial Contractual Relations (“Complaint”).

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/12/stollznow-response-to-complaint-2014dec10/

12/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Eu Phoenix Stats 98%

Lannister/Jerusalem Complaint 160 Pleb Complaint 250 200 140 139 120 100 209 150 112 100 80 60 50 40 0 Lannister/Jerusalem complaint Vs Pleb (139) 6 24 0 20 Pleb Complaint Vs Lannister/Jerusalem (209) Lannister/Jerusalem banned after a Pleb Complaint (24) Pleb banned after a Lannister / Jerusalem Complaint (112) Pleb Banned by his own complaint (6) 112 ÷ 139 = 0,805 = 80 % Lannister / Jerusalem Complaint 24 ÷ 209 = 0,114 = 11 % Pleb Complaint 11% Complaint accepted, pleb banned 20% Complaint invalid 80% 89% Complaint accepted, lannister/jerusalem banned Complaint invalid or lannister/jerusalem just take a warning If a Lannister / Jerusalem makes a complaint on a pleb, the pleb have 8/10 lucks to be banned.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/15/eu-phoenix-stats/

15/02/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

EU PHOENIX 2 98%

Lannister/Jerusalem Complaint agaisnt Pleb 160 Pleb Complaint agaisnt Lannister /Jerusalem 250 140 200 139 120 100 112 80 209 150 100 60 50 40 0 6 24 0 20 Pleb Complaint Vs Lannister/Jerusalem (209) Lannister/Jerusalem complaint Vs Pleb (139) Pleb banned after a Lannister / Jerusalem Complaint (112) Lannister/Jerusalem banned after a Pleb Complaint (24) Pleb Banned by his own complaint (6) 112 ÷ 139 = 0,805 = 80 % Lannister / Jerusalem Complaint agaisnt pleb 24 ÷ 209 = 0,114 = 11 % Pleb Complaint agaisnt Lannister / Jerusalem Complaint accepted, pleb banned 20% 11% Complaint invalid 80% 89% Complaint accepted, lannister/jerusalem banned Complaint invalid or lannister/jerusalem just take a warning If a Lannister / Jerusalem makes a complaint on a pleb, the pleb have 8/10 lucks to be banned.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/15/eu-phoenix-2/

15/02/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

65 - Slep-Tone's response to Hot Shots' Motion to Dismiss 97%

Tavern, DDRT, LLC, Starmaker Karaoke, and Debbie Harm shall be collectively referred to herein as “Hot Shots Defendants” -1- Case 2:12-cv-00239-KJD -RJJ Document 65 Filed 05/10/12 Page 2 of 19 1 attempt to direct the court’s attention away from the Complaint’s well-pled allegations of 2 their infringing conduct and unfair competition by suggesting that the purpose of 3 Plaintiff’s litigation is to “coerc[e] settlements rather than protecting legitimate intellectual 4 property rights.” Although they suggest that Plaintiff has not filed this action to protect 5 its legitimate intellectual property rights, the Hot Shots Defendants do not actually 6 challenge the legitimacy of Plaintiff’s intellectual property rights in its registered 7 trademarks.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/11/65-slep-tone-s-response-to-hot-shots-motion-to-dismiss/

11/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

69 - Slep-Tone's Response to Stations Motion to Dismiss 97%

The Station Defendants 25 attempt to direct the court’s attention away from the Complaint’s well-pleaded allegations 26 of their infringing conduct and unfair competition by suggesting that the purpose of 27 28 1 Defendants NP BOULDER LLC and NP PALACE LLC shall be collectively referred to herein as “Station Defendants” -1- Case 2:12-cv-00239-KJD -RJJ Document 69 Filed 05/21/12 Page 2 of 27 1 Plaintiff’s litigation is to “elicit quick settlements” rather than protecting Plaintiff’s 2 legitimate intellectual property rights.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/69-slep-tone-s-response-to-stations-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

71- Slep-Tone's Response to TI's Motion to Dismiss 97%

The Treasure Island 25 Defendants attempt to direct the court’s attention away from the Complaint’s well- 26 pleaded allegations of their infringing conduct and unfair competition by suggesting that 27 28 1 Defendants GILLEY’S LAS VEGAS and TREASURE ISLAND, LLC shall be collectively referred to herein as “Treasure Island Defendants” -1- Case 2:12-cv-00239-KJD -RJJ Document 71 Filed 05/21/12 Page 2 of 27 1 the purpose of Plaintiff’s litigation is to “elicit quick settlements” rather than protecting 2 Plaintiff’s legitimate intellectual property rights.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/71-slep-tone-s-response-to-ti-s-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Sound Choice's Response to PT's Motion to Dismiss 96%

INTRODUCTION 22 The PT’s Defendants’ have ignored material allegations of the complaint, 23 apparently believing that if they simply pretend that the allegations of Plaintiff which state 24 a claim do not exist, then the Court will not look at the entire complaint when ruling on 25 their motion.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/sound-choice-s-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Rulings Panel decision solar city 96%

BEFORE THE ELECTRICITY RULINGS PANEL BETWEEN Solar City New Zealand Ltd, and Unison Networks Limited, and The Electricity Authority UNDER The Electricity Industry Participation Code 2010, and The Electricity Industry Act 2010, and The Electricity Industry (Enforcement )Regulations 2010 IN THE MATTER OF A preliminary issue arising in a complaint to the Rulings Panel by Solar City New Zealand Ltd against Unison Networks Limited _____________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ELECTRICITY RULINGS PANEL DATED:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/01/16/rulings-panel-decision-solar-city/

16/01/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Tera King Production Requests 96%

Produce a copy of all documents you reserve the right to introduce into evidence in support of the allegations made in the Complaint filed in the above-entitled action.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/26/tera-king-production-requests/

26/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Generic requests for production 96%

Produce a copy of all documents you reserve the right to introduce into evidence in support of the allegations made in the Complaint filed in the above-entitled action.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/01/08/generic-requests-for-production/

08/01/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

dismissed 96%

In this case, however, Plaintiff pleads both narratives in his Case 9:16-cv-80655-RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2016 Page 2 of 22 complaint.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/12/16/dismissed/

16/12/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Warning Letters PDF 95%

Los Angeles District Office AG Industries LLC Device master record [181] • Purchasing controls [50a1] • Complaint files [198a] • Production and process controls [70g1] • Management responsibility [20e] • PMA Product(s):

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/29/warning-letters-pdf/

29/01/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2 95%

37-2016-00004683-CU-PO-CTL ANSWER TO COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 16 17 Defendant Walter Solomon (hereafter, “Defendant,” “this Defendant” or “this answering 18 Defendant”), an individual, hereby Answers the Complaint filed in this action as follows:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/26/2/

26/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Columbia Opinion 95%

KOELTL, District Judge.1 Plaintiff John Doe appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Furman, J.), which granted Defendant Columbia University’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a sufficient claim.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/29/columbia-opinion/

29/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

LAWSUIT HUNT NSBDE 94%

2:17-CV-859 ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) ) 17 For their Complaint against Defendants JOHN HUNT, ESQ., an individual;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/03/24/lawsuit-hunt-nsbde/

24/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Track Complaint Status 94%

13/12/2017 Track Complaint Status You are here Home>>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/12/13/track-complaint-status/

13/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Shepler.Motion for extension of time 93%

SUMMONS ANH COMPLAINT mummy To FED, R.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/04/07/sheplermotion-for-extension-of-time/

07/04/2019 www.pdf-archive.com

Vex Complaint 93%

90914 BLACK GARDEN, LLP 1 Atheon Blvd., Suite 5900 Meridian Bay, Mars T || 555-4279 E || gary@hezen.vex 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE VEX MIND 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF THE CITY 7 EASTERN DIVISION 8 9 10 13 14 15 Complaint for:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/02/12/vex-complaint/

12/02/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Panama 78 Motion for Default against Big Bob 93%

Each of the Defaulting Defendants failed to file an answer or other response to the Complaint, timely or otherwise, and the Plaintiff applied (Doc.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/02/panama-78-motion-for-default-against-big-bob/

02/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Assignment 3 Memo of Points and Authorities 948647754 92%

For reasons 20 21 more fully set forth below, Morty Smith now moves the Court for an order quashing 22 service of the summons and complaint for alleged defects in service and failure of 23 Plaintiff Rick Sanchez to abide by strict statutory compliance in unlawful detainer 24 actions.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/02/18/assignment-3-memo-of-points-and-authorities-948647754/

18/02/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Baylor Lawsuit3 92%

§ COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff Jane Doe, by and through her attorneys, submits this Complaint and states the following:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/21/baylor-lawsuit3/

21/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

NYC year-end-2018-enforcement-report 92%

Crime Complaint Reports contain information on the crime victims’ race and ethnicity as recorded by the officers or precinct clerical staff interviewing the victim or complainant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/12/22/nyc-year-end-2018-enforcement-report/

22/12/2019 www.pdf-archive.com