PDF Archive: PDF Search

MENU PACK 2016 100%

CanapÉs Lime and coriander marinated prawns Spiced crab cakes, wasabi mayonnaise Tea smoked salmon, pickled cucumber Cured salmon, lemon Turkish delight Lincolnshire sausages, port and grain mustard glaze Black pudding fritters, homemade brown sauce Chicken liver parfait, Cumberland jelly Smoked ham and leek terrine Parmesan polenta bites, spiced avocado Lincolnshire poacher cheese spheres Ginger and chilli spiked melon Sour dough bruscetta, tomato chutney Unit 10 Deacon Business Park, Deacon Road, Lincoln, LN2 4JB info@blackpeppermint.com · 07583 858827 · www.blackpeppermint.com STARTERS Spiced carrot soup, coriander creme fraiche Marinated goat’s cheese, baby leaf, pickled beetroot and toasted pine nut salad Salt baked celeriac and root vegetable salad with pumpkin seeds Wild mushroom and Lincolnshire Poacher pate, crusty bread Skye crab cake, pickled cucumber, runny yoghurt Cured Wester Ross salmon, radish, lemon zest, watercress Salad of lap sang tea smoked trout, confit potato and wild rocket Smoked haddock cake, wilted leeks, grain mustard Parcel of Goosnargh duck, orange reduction, chervil salad Smoked ham terrine, black pudding ‘scotch egg’, pea flavours Unit 10 Deacon Business Park, Deacon Road, Lincoln, LN2 4JB info@blackpeppermint.com · 07583 858827 · www.blackpeppermint.com PICNIC SHARING STARTER All served with a selection of artisan breads The Classics Waldorf salad Poached salmon, pickled cucumber Smoked ham terrine, homemade Piccalilli A Little Different Parmesan polenta French fries, coriander yoghurt Hot smoked salmon, lemon and watercress salad Parcel of Goosnargh duck, orange reduction Unit 10 Deacon Business Park, Deacon Road, Lincoln, LN2 4JB info@blackpeppermint.com · 07583 858827 · www.blackpeppermint.com

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/09/19/menu-pack-2016/

19/09/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Bulletin-Nov06-2016 95%

May the May Love the of Love theof Lord the Lord (Simultaneous (Simultaneous Interpretation Interpretation in Cantonese in Cantonese by Terry byCheung Terry Cheung ) ) Deacon Deacon Nomination Nomination (Forms (Forms Due November Due November 13) 13) KIBC KIBC members members are asked are asked to recommend to recommend individuals individuals to serve to serve as as deacons.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/03/bulletin-nov06-2016/

03/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

livingsynodofbishops 91%

HERESIES, SCHISMS AND UNCANONICAL ACTS REQUIRE A LIVING SYNODICAL JUDGMENT An Introduction to Councils and Canon Law The Orthodox Church, since the time of the Holy Apostles, has resolved quarrels or problems by convening Councils. Thus, when the issue arose regarding circumcision and the Laws of Moses, the Holy Apostles met in Jerusalem, as recorded in the Acts of the Apostles (Chapter 15). The Holy Fathers thus imitated the Apostles by convening Councils, whether general, regional, provincial or diocesan, in order to resolve issues of practice. These Councils discussed and resolved matters of Faith, affirming Orthodoxy (correct doctrine) while condemning heresies (false teachings). The Councils also formulated ecclesiastical laws called Canons, which either define good conduct or prescribe the level of punishment for bad conduct. Some canons apply only to bishops, others to priests and deacons, and others to lower clergy and laymen. Many canons apply to all ranks of the clergy collectively. Several canons apply to the clergy and the laity alike. The level of authority that a Canon holds is discerned by the authority of the Council that affirmed the Canon. Some Canons are universal and binding on the entire Church, while others are only binding on a local scale. Also, a Canon is only an article of the law, and is not the execution of the law. For a Canon to be executed, the proper authority must put the Canon in force. The authority differs depending on the rank of the person accused. According to the Canons themselves, a bishop requires twelve bishops to be put on trial and for the canons to be applied towards his condemnation. A presbyter requires six bishops to be put on trial and condemned, and a deacon requires three bishops. The lower clergy and the laymen require at least one bishop to place them on ecclesiastical trial or to punish them by applying the canons to them. But in the case of laymen, a single presbyter may execute the Canon if he has been granted the rank of pneumatikos, and therefore has the bishop’s authority to remit sins and apply penances. However, until this competent ecclesiastical authority has convened and officially applied the Canons to the individual of whatever rank, that individual is only “liable” to punishment, but has not yet been punished. For the Canons do not execute themselves, but they must be executed by the entity with authority to apply the Canons. The Canons themselves offer three forms of punishment, namely, deposition, excommunication and anathematization. Deposition is applied to clergy. Excommunication is applied to laity. Anathematization can be applied to either clergy or laity. Deposition does not remove the priestly rank, but is simply a prohibition from the clergyman to perform priestly functions. If the deposition is later revoked, the clergyman does not require reordination. In the same way, excommunication does not remove a layman’s baptism. It only prohibits the layman to commune. If the excommunication is later lifted, the layman does not require rebaptism. Anathematization causes the clergyman or layman to be cut off from the Church and assigned to the devil. But even anathematizations can be revoked if the clergyman or layman repents. There Is a Hierarchy of Authority in Canon Law The authority of one Canon over another is determined by the power of the Council the Canons were ratified by. For example, a canon ratified by an Ecumenical Council overruled any canon ratified by a local Council. The hierarchy of authority, from most binding Canons to least, is as follows: Apostolic Canons (Universal) refer to those compiled by the Holy Apostles and their immediate successors. These Canons were approved and confirmed by the First Ecumenical Council and again by the Quinisext Council. Not even an Ecumenical Council can overrule or overthrow an Apostolic Canon. There are only very few cases where Ecumenical Councils have amended the command of an Apostolic Canon by either strengthening or weakening it. But by no means were any Apostolic Canons overruled or abolished. For instance, the 1st Apostolic Canon which states that a bishop must be ordained by two or three other bishops. Several Canons of the Ecumenical Councils declare that even two bishops do not suffice, but that a bishop must be ordained by the consent of all the bishops in the province, and the ordination itself must take place by no less than three bishops. This does not abolish nor does it overrule the 1st Apostolic Canon, but rather it confirms and reinforces the “spirit of the law” behind that original Canon. Another example is the 5th Apostolic Canon which states that Bishops, Presbyters and Deacons are not permitted to put away their wives by force, on the pretext of reverence. Meanwhile, the 12th Canon of Quinisext advises a bishop (or presbyters who has been elected as a bishop) to first receive his wife’s consent to separate and for both of them to become celibate. This does not oppose the Apostolic Canon because it is not a separation by force but by consent. The 13th Canon of Quinisext confirms the 5th Apostolic Canon by prohibiting a presbyters or deacons to separate from his wife. Thus the 5th Apostolic Canon is not abolished, but amended by an Ecumenical Council for the good of the Church. After all, the laws exist to serve the Church and not to enslave the Church. In the same way, Christ declared: “The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath (Mark 2:27).” Ecumenical Canons (Universal) are those pronounced by Imperial or Ecumenical Councils. These Councils received this name because they were convened by Roman Emperors who were regarded to rule the Ecumene (i.e., “the known world”). Ecumenical Councils all took place in or around Constantinople, also known as New Rome, the Reigning City, or the Universal City. The president was always the hierarch in attendance that happened to be the first‐among‐equals. Ecumenical Councils cannot abolish Apostolic Canons, nor can they abolish the Canons of previous Ecumenical Councils. But they can overrule Regional and Patristic Canons. Regional Canons (Universal) refer to those ratified by Regional Councils that were later confirmed by an Ecumenical Council. This approval gave these Regional Canons a universal authority, almost equal to Ecumenical Canons. These Canons are not only valid within the Regional Church in which the Council took place, but are valid for all Orthodox Christians. For this reason the Canons of these approved Regional Councils cannot be abolished, but must be treated as those of Ecumenical Councils. Patristic Canons (Universal) refer to the Canons of individual Holy Fathers that were confirmed by an Ecumenical Council. Their authority is only lesser than the Apostolic Canons, Ecumenical Canons and Universal Regional Canons. But because they were approved by an Ecumenical Council, these Patristic Canons binding on all Orthodox Christians. Pan‐Orthodox Canons (Universal) refer to those ratified by Pan‐ Orthodox Councils. Since Constantinople had fallen to the Ottomans in 1453, there could no longer be Imperial or Ecumenical Councils, since there was no longer a ruling Emperor of the Ecumene (the Roman or Byzantine Empire). But the Ottoman Sultan appointed the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople as both the political and religious leader of the enslaved Roman Nation (all Orthodox Christians within the Roman Empire, regardless of language or ethnic origin). In this capacity, having replaced the Roman Emperor as leader of the Roman Orthodox Christians, the Ecumenical Patriarch took the responsibility of convening General Councils which were not called Ecumenical Councils (since there was no longer an Ecumene), but instead were called Pan‐Orthodox Councils. Since the Ecumenical Patriarch was also the first‐among‐equals of Orthodox hierarchs, he would also preside over these Councils. Thus he became both the convener and the president. The Primates of the other Patriarchates and Autocephalous Churches were also invited, along with their Synods of Bishops. If the Ecumenical Patriarch was absent or the one accused, the Patriarch of Alexandria would preside over the Synod. If he too could not attend in person, then the Patriarchs of Antioch or Jerusalem would preside. If no Patriarchs could attend, but only send their representatives, these representatives would not preside over the Council. Instead, whichever bishop present who held the highest see would preside. In several chronologies, the Pan‐Orthodox Councils are referred to as Ecumenical. In any case, the Canons pertaining to these Councils are regarded to be universally binding for all Orthodox Christians. National Canons (Local) are those valid only within a particular National Church. The Canons of these National Councils are only accepted if they are in agreement with the Canons ratified by the above Apostolic, Ecumenical, Regional, Patristic and Pan‐Orthodox Councils. Provincial Canons are those ratified by Councils called by a Metropolitan and his suffragan bishops. They are only binding within that Metropolis. Prefectural Canons are those ratified by Councils called by a single bishop and his subordinate clergy. They are only valid within that Diocese. Parochial Canons are the by‐laws of a local Parish or Mission, which are chartered and endorsed by the Rector or Founder of a Parish and the Parish Council. These by‐laws are only applicable within that Parish. Monastic Canons are the rules of a local Monastery or Monastic Order, which are chartered by the Abbot or Founder of the Skete or Monastery. These by‐laws are only applicable within that Monastery. Sometimes Canons are only recommendations explaining how clergy and laity are to conduct themselves. Other times they are actually penalties to be executed upon laity and clergy for their misdeeds. But the penalties contained within Canons are simply recommendations and not the actual executions of the penalties themselves. The recommendation of the law is one thing and the execution of the law is another. Canon Law Can Only Be Executed By Those With Authority For the execution of the law to take place it requires a competent authority to execute the law. A competent authority is reckoned by the principle of “the greater judges the lesser.” Thus, there are Canons that explain who has the authority to judge individuals according to the Canons. A layman can only be judged, excommunicated or anathematized by his own bishop, or by his own priest, provided the priest has the permission of his own bishop (i.e., a priest who is a pneumatikos). This law is ratified by the 6th Canon of Carthage, which has been made universal by the authority of the Sixth Ecumenical Council. The Canon states: “The application of chrism and the consecration of virgin girls shall not be done by Presbyters; nor shall it be permissible for a Presbyter to reconcile anyone at a public liturgy. This is the decision of all of us.” St. Nicodemus’ interprets the Canon as follows: “The present Canon prohibits a priest from doing three things… and remission of the penalty for a sin to a penitent, and thereafter through communion of the Mysteries the reconciliation of him with God, to whom he had become an enemy through sin, making him stand with the faithful, and celebrating the Liturgy openly… For these three functions have to be exercised by a bishop…. By permission of the bishop even a presbyter can reconcile penitents, though. And read Ap. c. XXXIX, and c. XIX of the First EC. C.” Thus the only authority competent to judge a layman is a bishop or a presbyter who has the permission of his bishop to do so. However, those who are among the low rank of clergy (readers, subdeacons, etc) require their own local bishop to try them, because a presbyter cannot depose them. A deacon can only be judged by his own local bishop together with three other bishops, and a presbyter can only be judged by his own local bishop together with six other bishops. The 28th Canon of Carthage thus states: “If Presbyters or Deacons be accused, the legal number of Bishops selected from the nearby locality, whom the accused demand, shall be empaneled — that is, in the case of a Presbyter six, of a Deacon three, together with the Bishop of the accused — to investigate their causes; the same form being observed in respect of days, and of postponements, and of examinations, and of persons, as between accusers and accused. As for the rest of the Clerics, the local Bishop alone shall hear and conclude their causes.” Thus, one bishop is insufficient to submit a priest or deacon to trial or deposition. This can only be done by a Synod of Bishops with enough bishops present to validly apply the canons. The amount of bishops necessary to judge and depose a priest are seven (one local plus six others), and for a deacon the minimum amount of bishops is four (one local plus three others). A bishop must be judged by his own metropolitan together with at least twelve other bishops. If the province does not have twelve bishops, they must invite bishops from other provinces to take part in the trial and deposition. Thus the 12th Canon of Carthage states: “If any Bishop fall liable to any charges, which is to be deprecated, and an emergency arises due to the fact that not many can convene, lest he be left exposed to such charges, these may be heard by twelve Bishops, or in the case of a Presbyter, by six Bishops besides his own; or in the case of a Deacon, by three.” Notice that the amount of twelve bishops is the minimum requirement and not the maximum. The maximum is for all the bishops, even if they are over one hundred in number, to convene for the sake of deposing a bishop. But if this cannot take place, twelve bishops assisting

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/09/23/livingsynodofbishops/

23/09/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

BULLETIN 2 19 12 89%

(919) 480-8820 Deacon:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/02/20/bulletin-2-19-12/

20/02/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

October 8, 2017 83%

Mandy Kan, Joyce Lau, Boaz Nit Deacon Nomination—Church Roll Please check the KIBC membership roll posted in the foyer.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/10/06/october-8-2017/

06/10/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

letter of invite health fair 82%

Sincerely, Brooks ,8X* Goordinato Kay Rops Erois Event j ffi-*ub - Youth and Gommunity Gare Direc*"t Jennifer Roach Deacon Board-President ,4 ,.r"

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/01/09/letter-of-invite-health-fair/

09/01/2019 www.pdf-archive.com

Bulletin-Nov13-2016 81%

Deacon Nominations—Due TODAY!

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/08/bulletin-nov13-2016/

08/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

graty z chaty 80%

Deacon) Tie Your Mother Down (B.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/02/07/graty-z-chaty/

07/02/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

May06 80%

6 20 20 22 27 18 VBS registration (continues throughout May) Nametag Sunday Ray Jones preaching in all worship services Deacon’s retreat May Church Conference | 11:50am Dragon boat race | Shatin will you worship?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/05/02/may06/

02/05/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Poppy-May Jakes - CV - 9.9.2013 (1) 78%

Deacons’ School/Thomas Deacon Academy, Peterborough Dates attended:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/12/03/poppy-may-jakes-cv-9-9-2013-1/

03/12/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

pamphlet2eng 74%

SPIRITUAL PATH REMEMBERING SACRED TRADITION AND REFERRING TO THE HOLY FATHERS OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH Canons of the Holy Apostles 8. If any Bishop, or Presbyter, or Deacon, or anyone else in the sacerdotal list, fail to partake of communion when the oblation has been offered, he must tell the reason, and if it is good excuse, he shall receive a pardon. But if he refuses to tell it, he shall be excommunicated, on the ground that he has become a cause of harm to the laity and has instilled a suspicion as against the offerer of it that the latter has failed to present it in a sound manner. Interpretation. It is the intention of the present Canon that all, and especially those in holy orders, should be prepared beforehand and worthy to partake of the divine mysteries when the oblation is offered, or what amounts to the sacred service of the body of Christ. In case any one of them fail to partake when present at the divine liturgy, or communion, he is required to tell the reason or cause why he did not partake: then if it is a just and righteous and reasonable one, he is to receive a pardon, or be excused; but if he refuses to tell it, he is to be excommunicated, since he also becomes a cause of harm to the laity by leading the multitude to suspect that that priest who officiated at liturgy was not worthy and that it was on this account that the person in question refused to communicate from him. 9. All those faithful who enter and listen to the Scriptures, but do not stay for prayer and Holy Communion must be excommunicated, on the ground that they are causing the Church a breach of order. (Canon LXVI of the 6th; c. II of Antioch; cc. Ill, XIII of Tim.). Interpretation. Both exegetes of the sacred Canons — Zonaras, I mean, and Balsamon — in interpreting the present Apostolical Canon agree in saying that all Christians who enter the church when the divine liturgy is being celebrated, and who listen to the divine Scriptures, but do not remain to the end nor partake, must be excommunicated, as causing a disorder to the church. Thus Zonaras says verbatim: “The present Canon demands that all those who are in the church when the holy sacrifice is being performed shall patiently remain to the end for prayer and holy communion.” For even the laity then were required to partake continually. Balsamon says: “The ordainment of the present Canon is very acrid; for it excommunicates those attending church but not staying to the end nor partaking.” Concord. Agreeably with the present Canon c. II of Antioch ordains that all those who enter the church during the time of divine liturgy and listen to the Scriptures, but turn away and avoid (which is the same as to say, on account of pretended reverence and humility they shun, according to interpretation of the best interpreter, Zonaras) divine communion in a disorderly manner are to be excommunicated. The continuity of communion is confirmed also by c. LXVI of the 6th, which commands Christians throughout Novational Week (i.e., Easter Week) to take time off for psalms and hymns, and to indulge in the divine mysteries to their hearts’ content. But indeed even from the third canon of St. Timothy the continuity of communion can be inferred. For if he permits one possessed by demons to partake, not however every day, but only on Sunday (though in other copies it is written, on occasions only), it is likely that those riot possessed by demons are permitted to communicate even more frequently. Some contend that for this reason it was that the same Timothy, in c. Ill, ordains that on Saturday and Sunday that a man and his wife should not have mutual intercourse, in order, that is, that they might partake, since in that period it was only on those days, as we have said, that the divine liturgy was celebrated. This opinion of theirs is confirmed by divine Justin, who says in his second apology that “on the day of the sun” — meaning, Sunday — all Christians used to assemble in the churches (which on this account were also called “Kyriaka,” i.e., places of the Lord) and partook of the divine mysteries. That, on the other hand, all Christians ought to frequent divine communion is confirmed from the West by divine Ambrose, who says thus: “We see many brethren coming to church negligently, and indeed on Sundays not even being present at the mysteries.” And again, in blaming those who fail to partake continually, the same saint says of the mystic bread: “God gave us this bread as a daily affair, and we make it a yearly affair.” From Asia, on the other hand, divine Chrysostom demands this of Christians, and, indeed, par excellence. And see in his preamble to his commentary of the Epistle to the Romans, discourse VIII, and to the Hebrews, discourse XVIII, on the Acts, and Sermon V on the First Epistle to Timothy, and Sermon XVII on the Epistle to the Hebrews, and his discourse on those at first fasting on Easter, Sermon III to the Ephesians, discourse addressed to those who leave the divine assemblies (synaxeis), Sermon XXVIII on the First Epistle to the Corinthians, a discourse addressed to blissful Philogonius, and a discourse about fasting. Therein you can see how that goodly tongue strives and how many exhortations it rhetorically urges in order to induce Christians to partake at the same time, and worthily, and continually. But see also Basil the Great, in his epistle to Caesaria Patricia and in his first discourse about baptism. But then how can it be thought that whoever pays any attention to the prayers of all the divine liturgy can fail to see plainly enough that all of these are aimed at having it arranged that Christians assembled at the divine liturgy should partake — as many, that is to say, as are worthy? 10. If anyone pray in company with one who has been excommunicated, he shall be excommunicated himself. Interpretation. The noun akoinonetos has three significations: for, either it denotes one standing in church and praying in company with the rest of the Christians, but not communing with the divine mysteries; or it denotes one who neither communes nor stands and prays with the faithful in the church, but who has been excommunicated from them and is excluded from church and prayer; or finally it may denote any clergyman who becomes excommunicated from the clergy, as, say, a bishop from his fellow bishops, or a presbyter from his fellow presbyters, or a deacon from his fellow deacons, and so on. Accordingly, every akoinonetos is the same as saying excommunicated from the faithful who are in the church; and he is at the same time also excommunicated from the Mysteries. But not everyone that is excommunicated from the Mysteries is also excommunicated from the congregation of the faithful, as are deposed clergymen; and from the peni‐ tents those who stand together and who neither commune nor stay out of the church like catechumens, as we have said. In the present Canon the word akoinonetos is taken in the second sense of the word. That is why it says that whoever prays in company with one who has been excommunicated because of sin from the congregation and prayer of the faithful, even though he should not pray along with them in church, but in a house, whether he be in holy orders or a layman, he is to be excommunicated in the same way as he was from church and prayer with Christians: because that common engagement in prayer which he performs in conjunction with a person that has been excommunicated, wittingly and knowingly him to be such, is aimed at dishonoring and condemning the excommunicator, and traduces him as having excommunicated him wrongly and unjustly.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/09/23/pamphlet2eng/

23/09/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Christmas Eve 2016 73%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/12/20/christmas-eve-2016/

20/12/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

DivLitAltarEdition 69%

The priest or deacon takes the censer in the customary manner and performs the great censing.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/02/16/divlitaltaredition/

16/02/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Labor Day Music Festival Sponsorship Deck 64%

O S T IS T R A K N U F THE TOP FE AT UR IN G TH E SH EI LA E TH E WAI LE RS RI CK EY M IN OR American Idol Band Director S JA M ES AN DR EW BA ND AR L ST NE W OR LE AN S AL TH E 4 TH A N N UA L L A B O R D AY James Andrews Deacon John Cyril Neville C O N C E URMT ’S AT LA COLISE EXPOSITION PARK Leo Nocentelli Deacon John Rockin Doopsie SA LE TI C K ET S O N TH 12 11:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/08/06/labor-day-music-festival-sponsorship-deck/

06/08/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

50650 Hearing Statement Cover Letter 07 10 2016 NLP 64%

The Hearing Statement is in relation to the former Sunblest Bakery site on Deacon Road in Lincoln.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/10/20/50650-hearing-statement-cover-letter-07-10-2016-nlp/

20/10/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Prayer & Fasting 2017 inside 64%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/04/prayer-fasting-2017-inside/

04/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Let the Readers Understand! 64%

I am a deacon of a Presbyterian church that has a half-a-century history and is affiliated with Tong-Hap (Presbyterian) Denomination.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/03/15/let-the-readers-understand/

15/03/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

AFH Director Resume 64%

Alexharrisdirector@gmail.com Education: Graduated (2013) Bachelors of Science Bachelor of Science in Communications (Video Production) from Southern Oregon University Work‐Related Experience: • Master Control Operator at Rogue Valley Community Access Television ( 2007‐2009 ) • Directing RVTV’s Weekly In‐Studio Live 3‐Camera Television Shows ( 2007‐2009 ) • Assistant Camera Prep‐Tech at T‐Stop Camera Rentals ( 2014 ) Drama Shake The Sky Chimera Episode One (2017) Webseries Pilot Action Shake The Sky Denizen (2016) 48 Hour Film Project Thriller Trippy Tran / Escape West Films Past Directing Work: Millennial (2017) Short Film A Symphony of Acceptance (2016) Acting Student’s Thesis Drama Shake The Sky We Are Legion (2016) Short Film Crime Shake The Sky Safety First (2015) 48 Hour Film Project Action Shake The Sky / Siren Royskopp™ “Running to the Sea” Music Video Action Shake The Sky Unhappily Ever After (2015) Sketch Video Comedy Cognitive Ignorance A Silent Affair (2014) 48 Hour Film Project Drama Shake The Sky Plot Ten (2013) 48 Hour Film Project Thriller Shake The Sky Ghostbox (2012) 48 Hour Film Project Drama Shake The Sky The Obtainer (2012) Spec TV Pilot Action Shake The Sky Rocky Parody Video* (2011) Viral Marketing Video Comedy S.D. Deacon Construction Scratch It (2011) Short Film Dark Comedy Shake The Sky Dauntless Legends* (2010) Student Capstone Film Action Shake The Sky / SOU Vampire Showdown (2009) Short Film Action Southern Oregon University Ambivalence (2009) Student Short Drama Southern Oregon University Penance for the Slain (2009) Student Feature Crime Southern Oregon University Honest Betrayal (2008) Student Short Drama Southern Oregon University Awards: • 2013 Query Pros Winner: Best Action / Adventure Screenplay: “Burner” • 2011 Astral Award: Society of Marketing Professionals (Rocky Parody Video) • 2010 Southern Oregon Film Festival: Best Picture & Best Actor (Dauntless Legends) References: Trevor Doyle ‐ Producer | Sales Agent | Distributor with Frozen Flame Pictures™ (971)‐201‐8075 Leonardo Ibanez ‐ Director of Photography | Key Grip | Camera Operator (626)‐529‐4930 Spencer T. Watson ‐ Actor: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm5028287/ (323)‐632‐4161

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/03/05/afh-director-resume/

04/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

LEADERSHIP COMMITMENT 64%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/03/19/leadership-commitment/

19/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

John taylor 64%

He attends Antioch Missionary Baptist Church where he serves as a deacon.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/21/john-taylor/

21/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

jerusalem 63%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/09/23/jerusalem/

23/09/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Bulletin-Nov20-2016 63%

November November 27—Deacon 27—Deacon Election Election (during (during morning morning services) services) November November 27—November 27—November Church Church Conference Conference (12:15pm) (12:15pm) November November 27—Usher 27—Usher Training Training Session Session (12:15pm) (12:15pm) December December 18—Combined 18—Combined Worship Worship at A.C.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/15/bulletin-nov20-2016-1/

15/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com