PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Send a file File manager PDF Toolbox Search Help Contact


Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 21 February at 23:22 - Around 230000 files indexed.

Search on pdf-archive.com All sites
Show results per page

Results for «defendant»:


Total: 1000 results - 0.035 seconds

Upper Deck v Pirozzi 98%

The Upper Deck Company (“Plaintiff” or “Upper Deck”) by its counsel, Cervini Swanson LLP, as and for its complaint against defendants Joseph Pirozzi (“Judgment Debtor”), Jack Pirozzi (“Defendant Father”), Jonathan Pirozzi (“Defendant Son”) and Theresa DePietro (“Defendant Girlfriend”) (collectively, Defendant Father, Defendant Son and Defendant Girlfriend are referred to as “Defendant Family”) (collectively, Judgment Debtor and Defendant Family are referred to as “Defendants”), alleges as follows:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/11/16/upper-deck-v-pirozzi/

16/11/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Stollznow Response to Complaint 2014Dec10 97%

1:14-CV-02620-JLK KAREN STOLLZNOW, Defendant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/12/stollznow-response-to-complaint-2014dec10/

12/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

4.Risk 97%

4.Risk 2015 Fall Computer Science I Program #5:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/22/4-risk/

22/02/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

what is the procedure for1776 96%

what is the procedure for1776 what is the procedure for post bailRight after someone will be imprisoned by law enforcement officers, the individual is actually 'booked.' This particular process includes getting mug shot photos of the defendant, fingerprinting the accused, and being asked from the law enforcement officials to make a statement about the criminal offense the defendant is actually charged with.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/10/07/what-is-the-procedure-for1776/

07/10/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

PSR Review Sample 95%

Susan Long, District Judge Defendant:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/16/psr-review-sample/

16/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Smith Answer 94%

LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI ZOOLOGICAL PARK SUBDISTRICT OF THE METROPOLITAN PARK MUSEUM DISTRICT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/10/14/smith-answer/

14/10/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Doc20-Expressway-SC-02-21-13 94%

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/03/07/doc20-expressway-sc-02-21-13/

07/03/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

APPENDIX FINAL 94%

TAUPIER Defendant-Appellant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/10/05/appendix-final/

05/10/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

texas drivers license suspension periods1437 93%

(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a magistrate shall require on release that a defendant charged with a subsequent offense under Sections 49.04-49.06, Penal Code, or an offense under Section 49.07 or 49.08 of that code:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/12/03/texas-drivers-license-suspension-periods1437/

03/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Stout v. State (Ark. 1968) 93%

Defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the Circuit Court, Crawford County, Carl K.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/02/04/stout-v-state-ark-1968/

04/02/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Mark Reed Defendant Superior Court Records 93%

Mark Reed Defendant Superior Court Records MARK REED’S CRIMINAL RECORD        The following pages are the public records from the Los Angeles Superior Court of cases in  which Republican candidate for Congress Mark Reed was a criminal defendant.    Also included is a status report from the California Secretary of State’s office on Mr. Reed’s  suspended corporation, Mark’s Pool Plumbing, Inc.    Summary pages introduce each set of records.  MARK REED ARRESTED, CONVICTED, ON PROBATION FOR POSSESSION OF A CONCEALED DANGEROUS WEAPON  Currently represented by a Bar Panel attorney from the   Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments Program    Case No. 9SR00526  The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed, Sr.  Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Foothill Area  Case filed on 01/29/09  Mark Reed charged with one count of possession of a concealed dangerous weapon [12020(A)(1)], on or about  01/08/09.  Case called for arraignment on 01/29/09. Mark Reed not present. Represented by Deputy Public Defender Peggy  Loveman.  Case called for further proceedings on 08/26/09. Court orders complaint amended to add violation of 12020(A)(1) as  count 02.  Case called for arraignment and plea on 08/27/09. Mark Reed pleads not guilty to both counts.  Case called for “traffic school completion” on 09/30/09. Mark Reed represented by Deputy Public Defender John H. Cho.  Case called for jury trial on 10/26/09. Public Defender’s Office declares a conflict; Alternate Public Defender’s Office is  appointed.  Case called for pre‐trial hearing on 11/04/09. Public Defender declares conflict of interest. Court appoints Bar Panel  attorney Murray Berns from the ICDA (Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments) office of the Los Angeles Bar  Association.  Case called for jury trial on 03/23/10. Mark Reed testifies. Court orders the testimony of the arresting officers.  Case called for jury trial on 03/24/10. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 01. The court finds the defendant  guilty. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 02. The court finds the defendant guilty.  Mark Reed placed on probation for 36 months under the following terms and conditions: “serve 1 day in the Los Angeles  County Jail, less credit for 1 day”; court security assessment of $30.00; “criminal conviction assessment” of $30.00; 

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/06/12/mark-reed-defendant-superior-court-records/

12/06/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Mark Reed Arrest Record Summary 93%

Mark Reed Arrest Record Summary Mark Reed Arrest Record  Summary   As of 3/28/12    MARK REED ARRESTED, CONVICTED, ON PROBATION FOR POSSESSION OF A CONCEALED DANGEROUS WEAPON  Currently represented by a Bar Panel attorney for indigent defendants    Case No. 9SR00526  The People of the State of California vs. Mark Steven Reed, Sr.  Law enforcement Agency effecting arrest: LAPD – Foothill Area  Case filed on 01/29/09  Mark Reed charged with one count of possession of a concealed dangerous weapon [12020(A)(1)], on or about  01/08/09.  Case called for arraignment on 01/29/09. Mark Reed not present. Represented by Deputy Public Defender Peggy  Loveman.  Case called for further proceedings on 08/26/09. Court orders complaint amended to add violation of 12020(A)(1) as  count 02.  Case called for arraignment and plea on 08/27/09. Mark Reed pleads not guilty to both counts.  Case called for “traffic school completion” on 09/30/09. Mark Reed represented by Deputy Public Defender John H. Cho.  Case called for jury trial on 10/26/09. Public Defender’s Office declares a conflict; Alternate Public Defender’s Office is  appointed.  Case called for pre‐trial hearing on 11/04/09. Public Defender declares conflict of interest. Court appoints Bar Panel  attorney Murray Berns from the ICDA (Indigent Criminal Defense Appointments) office of the Los Angeles Bar  Association.  Case called for jury trial on 03/23/10. Mark Reed testifies. Court orders the testimony of the arresting officers.  Case called for jury trial on 03/24/10. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 01. The court finds the defendant  guilty. Mark Reed pleads Nolo Contendere to count 02. The court finds the defendant guilty.  Mark Reed placed on probation for 36 months under the following terms and conditions: “serve 1 day in the Los Angeles  County Jail, less credit for 1 day”; court security assessment of $30.00; “criminal conviction assessment” of $30.00;  $2,297 in attorney fees; restitution fine of $100; total due, $2,457.00. In addition: “not own, use or possess any  dangerous or deadly weapons, including any firearms, knives or other concealable weapons”; “the weapon involved in  this case is ordered confiscated and destroyed by the arresting agency”; “defendant is ordered to pay a probation  revocation restitution fine” of $100.  Case called for further proceedings on 04/16/10. Defense attorney states that Mark Reed has found a gun dealer who  will buy his firearms and asks to have firearms released to defendant for purpose of transporting them to gun dealer.  Request is denied. Los Angeles Police Department will transport the firearms to the dealer. Court orders Mark Reed to  pay $2,297 in attorney fees by 04/19/11.  Case called on 04/16/10 for fines and fees. Mark Reed pays $245. 

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/06/12/mark-reed-arrest-record-summary/

12/06/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

jon motion to dismiss 9-18-13 91%

13:4989 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEFENDANT JONATHAN K.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/19/jon-motion-to-dismiss-9-18-13/

19/09/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Panama 207 motion to dismiss defendant Kevin Shorette 91%

Panama 207 motion to dismiss defendant Kevin Shorette Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 207 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION In re SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT Civil Action No.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/07/30/panama-207-motion-to-dismiss-defendant-kevin-shorette/

30/07/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Runyon vs Thomas A Mix COUNTERCLAIM FOR DEFAMATION 91%

Runyon vs Thomas A Mix COUNTERCLAIM FOR DEFAMATION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA THOMAS MIX, Case No 31-2015-CA-000961 Plaintiff, COUNTER-CLAIM FOR DEFAMATION AND INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF DISTRESSADMENDED vs JEANETTE TYE RUNYON, Defendant __________________________/ PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/15/runyon-vs-thomas-a-mix-counterclaim-for-defamation/

15/08/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

49-main 91%

Nominal Defendant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/06/24/49-main/

24/06/2014 www.pdf-archive.com