PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

About Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover Search Help Contact


Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 05 December at 18:21 - Around 79000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «defendant»:


Total: 1000 results - 0.051 seconds

031121949663 100%

Defendants lack sufficient information to either admit or deny the 23 allegations in paragraph 28 and on that basis Defendant deny the allegations in said 24 paragraph.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/07/031121949663/

07/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

GENERIC MOTION TO SEVER 99%

1 Name:______________________________ 2 Address:____________________________ 3 ___________________________________ 4 Phone:______________________________ 5 Fax:________________________________ 6 Email:______________________________ Defendant in proper person 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/15/generic-motion-to-sever/

15/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

rbcp 99%

This plea agreement is between this United States Attorney's Office (USAO) and defendant, and thus does not bind any other federal, state, or local prosecuting, administrative, or regulatory authority.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/07/21/rbcp/

21/07/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Smith Answer 99%

LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI ZOOLOGICAL PARK SUBDISTRICT OF THE METROPOLITAN PARK MUSEUM DISTRICT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/10/14/smith-answer/

14/10/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Stollznow Response to Complaint 2014Dec10 99%

1:14-CV-02620-JLK KAREN STOLLZNOW, Defendant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/12/stollznow-response-to-complaint-2014dec10/

12/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

USCOURTS-caed-2 08-cr-00350-22 98%

2:08CR00350-01 Dustin Gordon Defendant’s Attorney THE DEFENDANT:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/05/03/uscourts-caed-2-08-cr-00350-22/

03/05/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

031116371179 98%

Defendant akas:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/06/031116371179/

06/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

2 98%

(619) 374-7410 Attorneys for DEFENDANT WALTER SOLOMON 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 MICHELLE S., an individual, PLAINTIFF, v.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/26/2/

26/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

77 - PT's Reply re motion to sever 98%

22 Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion to Sever by the PT’S Defendants (“Opposition”) is 23 essentially based on the premise that if any defendant has allegedly infringed a trademark, 24 then that defendant can be properly joined in an action with any other defendant who has 25 allegedly infringed in the same trademark, regardless of the circumstances surrounding 26 each alleged infringement.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/06/12/77-pt-s-reply-re-motion-to-sever/

12/06/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Papadopoulos-Statement-Offense 98%

§ 1001 (False Statements) GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS, Defendant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/10/30/papadopoulos-statement-offense/

30/10/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

#1 - Complaint 98%

JESSE MATHIS, In his Individual and Official Capacities DEFENDANT NOV 21 2012 /Jfm '/1!JY RY DEMAND This case assigned to District Judge !f'!.1:5#4tL and to Magistrate Judge lrJif/1/t.;, ---...:.:.::::.:~- COMPLAINT Comes the Plaintiff, Pam Hicks (hereinafter "Ms.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/11/26/1-complaint/

26/11/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Manlove Lawsuit 98%

Defendant George Manlove began working for Vann’s Inc., an electronic appliance retail store, in 1986 doing operations and MIS.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/02/12/manlove-lawsuit/

12/02/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

69 - Slep-Tone's Response to Stations Motion to Dismiss 97%

4 Each of the Station Defendants has used counterfeit copies of Plaintiff’s tracks 5 in connection with karaoke entertainment shows at bars and restaurants owned and 6 operated by the Defendant Owners.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/69-slep-tone-s-response-to-stations-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

71- Slep-Tone's Response to TI's Motion to Dismiss 97%

4 Each of the Treasure Island Defendants has used counterfeit copies of Plaintiff’s 5 tracks in connection with karaoke entertainment shows at bars and restaurants owned 6 and operated by the Defendant Owners.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/71-slep-tone-s-response-to-ti-s-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Kiffin Complaint 97%

Defendant LANE KIFFIN is over the age of nineteen (19) years, and is believed to be a resident citizen of Boca Raton, Palm Beach County, Florida.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/03/22/kiffin-complaint/

22/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Sound Choice's Response to PT's Motion to Dismiss 97%

(2) use by defendant, without 21 authorization, of a copy, reproduction, counterfeit or colorable imitation of the moving 22 party’s mark in connection with the sale, distribution or advertising of goods and services 23 and (3) that defendant’s use of the mark is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake 24 or to deceive.” Toho Co., Ltd.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/sound-choice-s-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Upper Deck v Pirozzi 97%

The Upper Deck Company (“Plaintiff” or “Upper Deck”) by its counsel, Cervini Swanson LLP, as and for its complaint against defendants Joseph Pirozzi (“Judgment Debtor”), Jack Pirozzi (“Defendant Father”), Jonathan Pirozzi (“Defendant Son”) and Theresa DePietro (“Defendant Girlfriend”) (collectively, Defendant Father, Defendant Son and Defendant Girlfriend are referred to as “Defendant Family”) (collectively, Judgment Debtor and Defendant Family are referred to as “Defendants”), alleges as follows:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/11/16/upper-deck-v-pirozzi/

16/11/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

03318308155 97%

2:15CR00145-001 Defendant's Attorney: William Portanova, Retained THE DEFENDANT:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/06/03318308155/

06/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

DocumentFragment 58199646 97%

15 16 Plaintiffs Veronica and Eric McOmie (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendants 17 18 Cornelius Veterinary Clinic (“Defendant Cornelius”), Robert Bullard (“Defendant Bullard”), and 19 Hope Flint (“Defendant Flint”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) for both economic and non- 20 economic damages due to Defendants’ violations of Oregon statutes governing veterinary 21 malpractice and the following tort claim alleged below:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/01/13/documentfragment-58199646/

13/01/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

PT's Reply to Response to PT's Motion to Dismiss 97%

However, trademark 25 infringement requires that the defendant actually “use” the trademark in the offering of 26 goods or services for sale.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/26/pt-s-reply-to-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-dismiss-1/

26/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

75 - Slep-Tone's Response to PT's Motion to Sever 97%

17 Each of the PT’S Defendants has used counterfeit copies of Plaintiff’s tracks in 18 connection with karaoke entertainment shows at bars and restaurants owned and 19 operated by the Defendant Owners.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/06/03/75-slep-tone-s-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-sever/

03/06/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

68 - PT's Motion to Sever 97%

STATEMENT OF FACTS 20 Defendant Golden Tavern Group, LLC (“Golden Tavern”) owns and operates a 21 number of bar/restaurants in Las Vegas, Nevada, including PT’S Defendants, under the 22 “PT’S” brand, which is a popular and well known chain of bar/restaurants in Las Vegas, 23 Nevada specializing in serving Las Vegas residents.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/16/68-pt-s-motion-to-sever/

16/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

88- Caesar's non-opposition 97%

On May 4, 2012, the 27 1 28 Lewis and Roca LLP 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89109 Defendant Harrah’s Las Vegas was previously identified as “Harrah’s Las Vegas, Inc.” However, the proper Defendant is Harrah’s Las Vegas, LLC, the successor-in-interest to Harrah’s Las Vegas, Inc.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/07/24/88-caesar-s-non-opposition/

24/07/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Motion for Attorney's Fees and Sanctions 96%

1, 6 see ¶¶ 30, 36, and 42.] For the past 30 years, Defendant Kelly C.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/12/05/motion-for-attorney-s-fees-and-sanctions/

05/12/2012 www.pdf-archive.com