PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 11 August at 04:58 - Around 220000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «discrimination»:

Total: 900 results - 0.062 seconds

Levine 2002 100%

Price Discrimination Without Market Power Michael E.


20/10/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

eeoc self print poster 99%

THE LAW Equal Employment Opportunity is Private Employers, State and Local Governments, Educational Institutions, Employment Agencies and Labor Organizations � Applicants to and employees of most private employers, state and local governments, educational institutions, employment agencies and labor organizations are protected under Federal law from discrimination on the following bases:


20/06/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

ContentServer.asp-6 99%

The Role of Perceived Discrimination Maria Medvedeva, University of Chicago Move2 This study examines the influence of perceived discrimination on proficiency in English and non-English step1 languages among adolescent children of immigrants.


12/11/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

j%2E1471-6402%2E1995%2Etb00086%2Ex 98%

FEATUREARTICLE THE SCHEDULE OF SEXIST EVENTS A Measure of fifetime and Recent Sexist Discrimination in Women’s fives Elizabeth A.


14/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

SOC 120 Week 2 Individual Prejudic 96%

SOC 120 Week 2 Individual Prejudice and Discrimination Article To purchase this material click below link www.assignmentcloud.com/SOC-120/SOC-120-Week-2-Individual-Prejudice-and-DiscriminationArticle For more classes visit www.assignmentcloud.com Imagine you are going on a 6-month expedition to a foreign country to experience the diversity of this country and study the affect of prejudice and discrimination within this country.


20/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

FinalDraftBinaryBathroomsTomkovicz 96%

It explains how the concept behind dividing bathrooms between men’s and woman’s bathrooms (binary) inevitably creates discrimination against transgender people.


13/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Workplace-Harassment-Poster 95%

Unfortunately harassment and discrimination may still occur.


23/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Final Draft (Offline Submission) 95%

The second objective is to critically analyse the definition and its interpretation and application in cases brought by employees under disability discrimination claims.


20/10/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Tresspassing7172015 93%

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON    FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH      ,,​ In the matter of the of:  The State Oregon  Plaintiff    vs    Benjamin Barber  Defendant    )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )    Case# 13344695    Motion to Dismiss    The complaint provided to the plaintiff by the organizer(s) that I was trespassing at  a private event holds no bearing to the facts of this case. Despite the fact that this event  did indeed take place on private property, just as many events take place on private  property, does not preclude it from being a place of public accommodation as per in ORS  659A.400(e). The fact of the matter is that the ‘bone a fide’ club advertises to the public  on websites such as calagator.com and meetup.com, and does not require a membership  application or entry fee. Indeed the only distinctions that are being made in these clubs,  are distinctions based on protected classes in an employment sector, thus the ‘private’  nature only serves to circumvent anti­segregation and discrimination laws. [1]    Furthermore the organizer(s) purpose for blacklisting my participation in this  place is to inhibit my rights of free association, as a form of retaliation based upon  previous grievances raised with the Portland City Council on March 25th of this year.  This was  regarding blatant advertising of segregated events and labor discrimination,  and the legality of complicity by the Portland Development Commission on previous  occasions, in violation of section 46 of the Oregon Constitution which reads.  “(1)  Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the State of Oregon or  by any political subdivision in this state on account of sex.”    Rather than treating everyone equally under the strict scrutiny standard of which  the Oregon Law dictates, the PDC in conjunction with the events organizer(s) colluded to  systematically discriminate on the basis of race and gender under the guise of  “diversity”, by publishing a memorandum of understanding with the PDC that they were  going to “proactively support inclusivity and diversity” by “create and implement  strategies to increase hiring of women and communities of color”. Its important to note  that they’re not advocating the removal of discrimination, but rather using discrimination  to make up for what they consider problems “deep into our education system and  society”.[2]  It’s important to note that the Supreme court has indicated in previous cases  including one recently in ​ Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The  Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.    When courts do find liability under a disparate­impact theory, their remedial  orders must be consistent with the Constitution. Remedial orders in  disparate­impact cases should concentrate on the elimination of the offending  practice, and courts should strive to design race­neutral remedies. Remedial  orders that impose racial targets or quotas might raise difficult constitutional  questions.    Similarly other oregon statutes also expressly forbid many of the actions by the  organizer(s)  including:    Action for Trade Discrimination:    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/30.860    Aiding and Abetting Discrimination    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/659A.406    Discrimination prohibited    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/659A.030    Special Services to customers    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/646.080    Price Discrimination Prohibited    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/646.040    Inducing or receiving price discrimination    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/646.090  Notice that discrimination will be made in place of public accommodation prohibited    http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/659A.409  For example I had attended another of the organizer(s) event on July 9th, and tried  to clarify some items of confusion by reading the law, and by providing those laws to the  organizers. I indicated both the good parts, the bad parts, and the irrational parts, and  mentioned I was not looking for any monetary compensation, because I believed them to  be pathologically altruistic rather than malicious. Because I believe that people are born  of ignorance until the truth illuminates the contrasts between thoughts and reality, and I  would rather do the right thing by turning the other cheek.[3]    While I suspect this is still the case for many people [4], it is impossible to claim  ignorance, when someone has already tried to inform yourself of your negligence. Being  that there are indeed people who profit off of this enterprise of social outrage and  discontent, and are indeed receiving tax breaks from the same groups they are breaking  the law with, I can only conclude that this is a pattern of racketeering under ORS 166.715.  Furthermore I was warned by the organizer(s) that any attempt to complain, would ruin  my career chances in the future, just as another has come to my house to threaten me  with, on previous occasions leading up to this in the presence of others for previous  attempts to rectify what I thought was wrong through dialogue with other community  members [5]    It is my personal belief that this behavior is reflective of a pattern of racketeering  in Oregon, and I have been investigating connections between the current Kitzhaber  scandal and regime to these actions. I also had a good faith belief that my Civil Rights  were being infringed, and that the state had a compelling reason to protect those Rights,  just as the voters intended it to be from the last election, and just as the Oregon  Constitution and other laws seem to indicate. In order for there to be a conviction, one  has to have mens rea or guilty mind for his actions, and indeed I have not attempted to  infringe on anyone else’s rights, but simply to open a dialogue to discuss matters of  public importance. If the court wishes to pursue this case, I would like to plead not guilty  and request a jury trial, and to waive my rights to a speedy trial, and would like the court  to issue subpoenas to preserve all evidence to all groups listed below, for their  complicity in unlawful trade discrimination.     [1]http://calagator.org/events/1250468750    [2]​ http://www.pdc.us/news­and­events/all­news/all­news­detail/15­06­17/Portland_tech_C EOs_unite_to_take_Tech_Diversity_Pledge.aspx  [3]​ https://goo.gl/vepUD1  [4]​ https://goo.gl/PYHeX7  [5]​ https://archive.is/3Z6e3  Ada Initiative  FMYI  Land Rover  Flux Hackerspace  Instrument  Cloudability  Mozilla  Metal Toad  Google  New Relic  Lytics  Ctrl+H  Worksystems  Jama Software  Portland State University  Simple Inc  PuppetLabs  University of Oregon  O’reilly Media  Uncorked Studios  Oregon State University  Epicodus  Zapproved  Alterconf  Treehouse  Technology Association of  Oregon  Planet argon  Girls Inc.  Intel  ImpactFlow  ChickTech  Lesbians who tech  Portland Development  Commission  Opensesame  Business Oregon Commission  Elemental Technologies  Code fellows  City of Portland  Cozy    Under the authority of ORS 166.725(3)(a)    Specifically for official misconduct ORS 162.405 , due to blatant disregard for the law. I  wish to compel testimony from:    Brad Avakian: Bureau of Labor and Industries  Patrick Quinton: Director of the Portland Development Commission.    Under the authority of ORS 166.725(6)(b)  


22/08/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

EssayQuarryingAgainstHB2Legislation 93%

Essay Quarrying Against HB2 Legislation    Dear North Carolina General Assembly and North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory,    Attached to the following essay are the signatures of parents, students, teachers, and staff  members of Lake Norman Charter School in Huntersville, North Carolina.1  We, signed below, extend our belief in the principles of acceptance, inclusion, and  equality to all people, with the perception that regardless of religion, ethnicity, race, age, sex,  gender identity, sexual orientation or any future trait of marginalization, all people should be free  to lead full and happy lives. We assert that the Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act or House  Bill 2, passed on March 23, 2016, is a direct threat to these principles and the well­being of all  North Carolina citizens, particularly transgender citizens, and has no place in our state and our  school.   We hold belief that:     The sections of the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act and the results of said  sections are contradictory to the justifications for the law listed within in the document itself.  House Bill 2 is designed to protect North Carolina citizens from discrimination.2 However, the  language of the bill discriminates against transgender people by defining gender purely on  biological grounds and by allowing businesses and schools to discriminate against their workers  and students, specifically in regards to public restrooms and facilities. In addition, the presidency  of this law over local governments denies the ability of towns and cities to protect their residents  from discrimination and undue hardship. House Bill 2 is intended to aid in the operation of  intrastate business and attract new venues to this state.3 However, the nullification of the freedom  to sue for unjust discrimination in the workplace harms businesses and the people that run them.  These rights revoked from all North Carolina citizens and discrimination towards transgender  people has resulted in business being lost in the state. We maintain that the sections of the Public  Facilities Privacy and Security Act and the results of those sections directly undermine the  justifications for House Bill 2 which are as follows: to protect North Carolinians from  discrimination and to improve the flow of business within our state. Our perception holds that  House Bill 2 targets vulnerable transgender citizens, denies discrimination protection for all  citizens, and damages state business at a hazardous level.    1  ​ The opinions stated in this address are personal and do not represent the school or district of those that hold them.   ​ Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act​ , Page Four, Part III, Section 3.1, lines 24­27; Page Five, Part III, Section 3.3, lines 6­9  3  ​ Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act​ , page one, lines 14­20  2 We believe that House Bill 2 is an unjust law that defies our strongly held personal  beliefs of acceptance, inclusion, and equality for all people. It denies North Carolina citizens the  right to lead full and happy lives with equal protection and without undue hardship. We believe  the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act discriminates against transgender people and is  detrimental to the well­being of all North Carolina citizens and its businesses. We hold these  sincere personal beliefs in our hearts and our minds, and therefore will not in good conscience  support House Bill 2 in ​ any form whatsoever ​ within the walls of our school and the borders of  our state.    Signed,                                                        Bibliography    ABC11. "CEOs, Governments Speak against North Carolina Law." ​ ABC11 Raleigh­Durham​ .     ABC 11 Eyewitness News, 2 Apr. 2016. Web. 12 Apr. 2016. <​ http://goo.gl/CR7Kq5​ >.      Bishop, Stam, Howard, and Steinburg. ​ GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA     SECOND EXTRA SESSION 2016 H 1 HOUSE BILL 2​  V1 (2016): 1­5. North Carolina     General Assembly, 23 Mar. 2016. Web. 12 Apr. 2016.<​ http://goo.gl/kR1PaH​ >.      Boffetta, Elena. "Being Transgender in North Carolina: Reaction to HB2."​ Newsobserver​ . The     News & Observer, 10 Apr. 2016. Web. 12 Apr. 2016. <​ http://goo.gl/g62qIY​ >.      The Charlotte Observer. "North Carolina's Discriminatory House Bill 2 Will Hurt Transgender     Youth." ​ Charlotteobserver​ . The Charlotte Observer, 6 Apr. 2016. Web. 12 Apr. 2016.     <​ http://goo.gl/vxYxKl​ >.      Triad Business Journal. "Report: LabCorp Joins Call to Repeal HB2." Triad Business Journal, 6     Apr. 2016. Web. 12 Apr. 2016. <​ http://goo.gl/oFlzDW​ >.      WBTV Web Staff. "PayPal Nixes Planned Charlotte Expansion over HB2." WBTV, 5 Apr.  2016.     Web. 12 Apr. 2016. <​ http://goo.gl/ARZ0cq​ > 


17/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

econ490merged 93%

Discrimination in the Canadian Labour Market:


28/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Client Alert Newsletter 92%

Identification The administration of student discipline can result in unlawful discrimination based on race in two ways:


14/02/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

To Combat Racial Bias By Airbnb Hosts 92%

12/13/2015 To Combat Racial Bias By Airbnb Hosts, Try Blind Reservations FRONT PAGE  Search The Huffington Post Edition: US  POLITICS ENTERTAINMENT WHAT'S WORKING HEALTHY LIVING WORLDPOST To Combat Racial Bias By Airbnb Hosts, Try Blind Reservations HIGHLINE HUFFPOST LIVE ALL SECTIONS FOLLOW HUFFPOST Discrimination by Airbnb hosts is a challenge we need to solve.


14/12/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

On Second Thought by Jessica Zietz 91%

Post-Acquisition Housing Discrimination in Light of Bloch v.


02/02/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Over current realys 91%

1) Time grading 2) Current grading 3) Combination of current and time grading The common aim of all three methods is to give correct discrimination.


25/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

cqr20151106c 91%

www.cqresearcher.com Housing Discrimination Should government do more to reduce residential segregation?


05/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Educo Catalog 2015 91%

result, they develop specific, important skills in a natural way Measuring Words Speech Vocabulary Communication Discrimination Auditive discrimination Visual discrimination Tactile discrimination Motor play Learn Motor development Educo forms a solid base for learning.


23/05/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

article 90%

Existing research, however, tends to focus on individual forms of racial discrimination using self-report measures.


10/03/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Rutgers disability study 90%

The rise of Internet-based platforms for some services threatens to perpetuate and possibly increase their exclusion, both because people with disabilities are less likely to have Internet access, and because many of the newly-available services are not fully accessible and may create more opportunities for the practice of both intentional and unintentional discrimination.


11/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

GeekyBugle08 90%

The same in-group that keeps asking for more discrimination, and disguises it as “affirmative action” as “positive discrimination”.


01/10/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

What Does a Labor and Employment Lawyer Do 90%

Some of the issues, which are likely to cause controversy in the labor market include collective bargain, discrimination, wage and hourly regulation, immigration, health, and pension plan.


21/12/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

How SAD 89%

“How SAD” Stigma and Discrimination of People with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) Stigma is a mark of disgrace associated with a particular circumstance, quality or person.


23/05/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

sdarticle 89%

We show that, contrary to expectations, the Ambon damselfish (Pomacentrus amboinensis) is able to use these patterns for species discrimination.


06/03/2011 www.pdf-archive.com