Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 17 June at 11:24 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «factual»:


Total: 200 results - 0.023 seconds

Ryan P Factual Programme Compnents 100%

Unit 27 – Factual Programme Production for TV FACTUAL PROGRAMME COMPONENTS Factual TV programmes such as documentaries, news reports and reality TV follow a number of codes and conventions that make up a programme.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/14/ryan-p-factual-programme-compnents/

14/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

AtkinsCTArticleforJune2004new 96%

1 The Role of Critical Thinking in Students’ Acquisition of Foundational and Factual Knowledge Steve Atkins, Vice President and Chief Academic Officer The purpose of this article is to argue that critical thinking concepts and strategies should not be absent from students’ acquisition of factual knowledge and basic skills.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/18/atkinsctarticleforjune2004new/

18/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

jon motion to dismiss 9-18-13 95%

Conclusory allegations, legal conclusions couched as factual allegations, or mere recitation of the elements of a cause of action, are not entitled to such presumption.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/19/jon-motion-to-dismiss-9-18-13/

19/09/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Allegations-Redacted-5.26.15 92%

3 __________ Factual Information (FI) on which the enforcement staff relies for Allegation No.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/05/27/allegations-redacted-5-26-15/

27/05/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

dimissal order 91%

A claim has the requisite “facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Ashcroft v.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/12/25/dimissal-order/

25/12/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

031121949663 88%

To the extent any factual allegation is implied, Defendants deny the 4 allegations in said paragraph.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/07/031121949663/

07/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

75 - Slep-Tone's Response to PT's Motion to Sever 84%

and GOLDEN TAVERN GROUP, LLC shall be collectively referred to herein as the “PT Defendants” -1- Case 2:12-cv-00239-KJD -RJJ Document 75 Filed 05/31/12 Page 2 of 16 1 trademarks being displayed upon playback of the counterfeit tracks during karaoke 2 shows at the eating and drinking establishments of the venue owner defendants, 3 including the PT’S Defendants.2 The factual allegations which explain how Plaintiff’s 4 Marks are displayed in conjunction with the playback of its karaoke tracks, how 5 counterfeit copies of its tracks are made and the factual basis upon which Plaintiff 6 contends that the tracks are counterfeit are common to all defendants.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/06/03/75-slep-tone-s-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-sever/

03/06/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

WanderingMedicineMolloyOrder32614 82%

A facial challenge contests the adequacy ofthe allegations of the complaint, whereas a substantive challenge contests the factual merits of the asserted federal jurisdiction.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/09/21/wanderingmedicinemolloyorder32614/

21/09/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Slep's answer 81%

12(b)(6) CASE 0:14-cv-04737-PJS-FLN Document 17 Filed 03/03/15 Page 2 of 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................6 FACTUAL BACKGROUND...........................................................................................6 A.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/04/15/slep-s-answer/

15/04/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Dahlstrom v. Dawkins report and recommendation 20-Nov-2015 81%

74 factual allegations “to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Twombly, 550 U.S.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/11/24/dahlstrom-v-dawkins-report-and-recommendation-20-nov-2015/

24/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

69 - Slep-Tone's Response to Stations Motion to Dismiss 81%

7 The defendants are properly joined since the claims against the defendants are similar 8 in factual background and arise out of a systematic pattern of events with a logical 9 relationship.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/69-slep-tone-s-response-to-stations-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

71- Slep-Tone's Response to TI's Motion to Dismiss 81%

7 The defendants are properly joined since the claims against the defendants are similar 8 in factual background and arise out of a systematic pattern of events with a logical 9 relationship.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/22/71-slep-tone-s-response-to-ti-s-motion-to-dismiss/

22/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Panama 142 Opposition to Paynter Motion to Dismiss 79%

“To this very day, Sound choice has failed to prove one ounce of factual or physical evidence of any alleged wrong doing by me.” Slep-Tone produced evidence—both “factual” and “physical”—of Mr.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/03/panama-142-opposition-to-paynter-motion-to-dismiss/

03/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

2014 WCSFP MEMBER LIST EBOOK 79%

15, Rr #1, Owen Sound ON Canada N4K 3N5 T 519-371-6673 E michaelallder@gmail.com Trevor Almeida Producer Geonewmedia.com 20 Martin Place, Glen Waverley Victoria VIC Australia 3150 T +61-3-9773 8472 E trevor@geonewmedia.com W www.geonewmedia.com Catherine Alvaresse Deputy Director of the Specialist Factual Department ARTE France 8 rue Marceau Issy les Moulineaux France 92513 T +33 1 55 00 74 81 F +33 1 55 00 7408 E c-alvaresse@artefrance.fr W www.arte.tv Paula S.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/05/07/2014wcsfpmemberlistebook/

07/05/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

LaCognata Opinion[1] 79%

When reviewing a motion to dismiss, a court must accept all factual allegations contained in the complaint as true, and view the facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/10/15/lacognata-opinion-1/

15/10/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Sound Choice's Response to PT's Motion to Dismiss 76%

The Court must 7 accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true, and must construe the facts alleged 8 in the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/sound-choice-s-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

65 - Slep-Tone's response to Hot Shots' Motion to Dismiss 75%

FACTUAL SUMMARY 18 Plaintiff is the manufacturer and distributor of karaoke accompaniment tracks sold 19 under the trademark “Sound Choice” and marked with the Sound Choice display 20 trademark.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/11/65-slep-tone-s-response-to-hot-shots-motion-to-dismiss/

11/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Caesar's Motion to Dismiss 72%

2d 868 (2009) 5 (stating that “a claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the 6 court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged”)).

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/caesar-s-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Letter to Canary Mission 71%

To whom it may concern, The Tufts American Israel Alliance has spotted a factual error on your website, and we are deeply troubled by Adam Rapfogel’s inclusion on the Canary Mission.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/11/letter-to-canary-mission/

11/08/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

PSR Review Sample 71%

The reduction “is not intended to apply to a defendant who puts the government to its burden of proof at trial by denying the essential factual elements of guilt.” However, “conviction by trial...does not automatically preclude a defendant from consideration for such a reduction.” A reduction may still be warranted such as “where a defendant goes to trial to assert and preserve issues that do not relate to factual guilt (e.g., to make a constitutional challenge to a statute or a challenge to the applicability of a statute to his conduct).” In such cases, a determination that a defendant has accepted responsibility will be based primarily upon pre-trial statements and conduct.” Following Cosmos’s arrest on January 11, 2012, Cosmos admitted to agents that he sold large amounts of cocaine to Paul Drake describing Drake as one of his “biggest customers” (PSR Paragraph 19).

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/16/psr-review-sample/

16/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

120216-Actavis-v-Lilly-dextrose-judgment-redacted 71%

Contents Topic Paragraphs Introduction The procedural context of the Dextrose Remission Issue in more detail The witnesses Factual witnesses Oncologists Endocrinologist Pharmacists Foreign law experts The law with respect to the Dextrose Remission Issue Indirect infringement Negative declaratory relief Factual background to the Dextrose Remission Issue A note on terminology Alimta and the Alimta SmPC Actavis’ application for marketing authorisations The Actavis Products and UK SmPC Proposed variation to the UK SmPC for the Actavis Product Proposed variations to the CP SmPC for the Actavis Product The German SmPC for the Actavis Product Administration of pemetrexed Dexamethasone Preparation of cytotoxic drugs for administration The use of saline and dextrose solution as diluents for chemotherapy drugs Stability data available to pharmacists Storage as aseptic preparations Published stability data for Alimta Actavis’ stability for the Actavis Product Supply and distribution of the Actavis Product Steps taken by Actavis to prevent the Actavis Product from being diluted in saline Steps taken by Actavis in relation to the availability of stability data of its product in saline Steps taken by Lilly to prevent the Actavis Product from being diluted in saline Diabetes Assessment of the Dextrose Remission Issue The role of the oncologist The role of the endocrinologist The evidence of the pharmacists The importance of the SmPC Is it likely that stability data for the Actavis Product in saline 1-6 7-12 12-26 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-23 24-26 27-34 27-32 33-34 35-92 35 36-39 40 41-45 46-51 52 53 54 55 56-60 61 62 63 64 65 67-69 70-77 78-81 82-83 84-91 92-172 94 95 96 97-99 100-109 MR JUSTICE ARNOLD Approved Judgment will become available?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/08/10/120216-actavis-v-lilly-dextrose-judgment-redacted/

10/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Kitchen v. Burge 69%

Because I presume familiarity with my April 19, 2011, opinion, which set forth the allegations of the original complaint in significant detail, I now focus, in the context of analyzing the parties' competing arguments, on the factual material alleged for the first time in the FAC.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/02/09/kitchen-v-burge/

09/02/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Manlove Lawsuit 67%

FACTUAL OUTLINE OF THE CASE.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/02/12/manlove-lawsuit/

12/02/2014 www.pdf-archive.com