PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 17 December at 11:24 - Around 76000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «failure»:

Total: 1000 results - 0.027 seconds

Skills Sheets Combined 100%

__________ TOTAL 18 Critical Criteria ___ Failure to take or verbalize appropriate body substance isolation precautions ___ Failure to immediately begin chest compressions as soon as pulselessness is confirmed ___ Failure to deliver shock in a timely manner ___ Interrupts CPR for more than 10 seconds at any point ___ Failure to demonstrate acceptable high quality, 1-rescuer adult CPR ___ Failure to operate the AED properly ___ Failure to correctly attach the AED to the patient ___ Failure to assure that all individuals are clear of patient during rhythm analysis and before delivering shock(s) [verbalizes “All clear” and observes] ___ Failure to immediately resume compressions after shock delivered ___ Failure to manage the patient as a competent EMT ___ Exhibits unacceptable affect with patient or other personnel ___ Uses or orders a dangerous or inappropriate intervention You must factually document your rationale for checking any of the above critical items on the reverse side of this form.


Heart Failure - Dr. Acosta 99%

HEART FAILURE November 20, 2013 Dr.


Young-Freudians-Volume-1 1 96%

this objection that what the individual brings is nothing but a failure.


Project 2 TMJ TJR Group 4 96%

BIOE/ME C117 Project II - Group 4 Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Leo Brossollet, Kristy Ip, Lulu Li, Josephine Wu March 17, 2016 i Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Introduction 1 3 Analysis of Load-Bearing Requirements 2 4 Stress Analysis of the Biomet Microfixation 4.1 Overview of Failure Mechanisms .


Dr. Steve Shaw 96%

Evening Symposium to GPs, providing them with an update about the management of patients with Heart Failure.


Weatherford WESC 2017 Program 92%

Colby Burns ForeSite Predictive Analytics Explore the possibilities of data analytics and failure predictions for reciprocating rod lift pumps.


hearing committee-HCJamesQButler31107etal (2) 92%

(Id.) The complainants alleged a lack of communication, neglect, intentional failure to pursue their lawful interests, failure to return unearned fees, failure to return files, dishonest advertising, 2 dishonest statements, and failure to supervise attorneys working for Respondent.



MELD WITH SOMETHI NG April 7th - May 1st, 2016 Ryerson Artspace at the Gladstone Hotel 1214 Queen Street West, Toronto BEAUTIFUL FAILURE:


Break The Legs Exhibition Broadsheet draft1 91%

As such, both pieces imply a sense of failure that can be revealing in the gallery context.


ER1030 91%

Bone Marrow Failure Disease Symposium:


AP test #1 outline #3 90%

It Describes the process of a contraction heart Davis Advantage (Online) Pathophysiology I Class Cardiac Function and Assessment Left and Right Heart Failure Nursing:


IDT00695500000000000isro08501 89%

The Launch Services Agreement with M/s Arianespace has a provision for a free relaunch to cover the risk of the launcher failure.


HIOKI PW3198 ENG 89%

Troubleshooting 4 Understand the actual power situation at the site where the problem is occurring (e.g., the equipment malfunction, failure, reset, overheating, or burning damage).


SBHS 89%

than Quality (Roll of 1 always a failure, roll of 6 is always a success) - Only one attack per activation  Failures:



JAMES TRENT GOODBAUDY Case Number 127136 Case Type Offense Misdemeanor Court Clatsop Case Status Inactive File Date 05/29/2012 Party Plaintiff State of Oregon Active Attorneys Lead Attorney ATTORNEY, CLATSOP CO DISTRICT Defendant GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT DOB XX/XX/1973 Charge Charges GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT Description Citation Statute Level Date Failure to Carry/Present License 52262 807.570 Misdemeanor Class C 05/09/2012 Disposition Events 06/19/2012 Plea Judicial Officer Unassigned, Judge Defendant GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT Failure to Carry/Present License Not Guilty 11/14/2012 Disposition Judicial Officer Unassigned, Judge Defendant GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT Failure to Carry/Present License Convicted 11/14/2012 Sentence Failure to Carry/Present License Sentence Converted Disposition Unitary Assessment $60.00 Fine $40.00 Converted Disposition Jail - Day(s):


TAJ Modular Acoustic Commercial Warranty 110115 88%

Failure of the adhesive to adhere to the subfloor, whether concrete or other material because of moisture migration or water vapor transmission through the subfloor;


howtomakeitems 88%

ITEM DETAILS EFFECT FAILURE EFFECT Yellow Drop Works for non-JC items below grade 6 (VI) Increase the item grade by 1 None Yellow Drop 2 Works for non-JC items below grade 8 (VIII) Increase the item grade by 1 None Yellow Drop 3 Works for Horus and above items Increase the item grade by 1 None 2 ITEM OPTION You can use the following items to add, increase, or remove options.


Safe assets and Sound Productivity 87%

If a generator fails so far off the grid, it can become a major problem for our customers—generators are costly to replace and a failure will cause expensive production delays that are a disaster when margins are razor-thin.



STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL THIRD CIRCUIT P O Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 337 433 9403 Hon Patrick Louis Michot Larry Lane Roy Judge 15th JDC Brown Sims P O Box 3075 600 Jefferson St Lafayette LA 70502 3075 Lafayette LA 70501 Suite 800 Shelton Dennis Blunt Phelps Dunbar P O Box 4412 Baton Rouge LA 70821 4412 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF MAILING May 10 2017 Docket Number CA 16 169 PAT COOPER VERSUS LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the attached judgment and written opinion was rendered this date and a copy was mailed to the trial judge all counsel of record and all parties not represented by counsel as listed above FOR THE COURT 1 4AA oft 4 Charles K McNeely Clerk of Court STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL THIRD CIRCUIT 16 169 Judgment rendered and mailed to all PAT COOPER parties or counsel on May 10 2017 VERSUS Applications for rehearing may be filed within the delays allowed by La Code Civ P art 2166 or La Code Crim P art 922 LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE NO C 20145941 HONORABLE PATRICK L MICHOT DISTRICT JUDGE ON REHEARING VAN H KYZAR JUDGE Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux Chief Judge John E Conry and Gl Van H Kyzar Judges J AFFIRMED IN PART REVERSED IN PART RENDERED AND REMANDED L Lane Roy Brown Sims P C 600 Jefferson Street Suite 800 Lafayette LA 70501 337 484 1240 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF APPELLANT Dr Pat Cooper Shelton Dennis Blunt Paul LeBlanc Jack B Stanley Phelps Dunbar LLP P O Box 4412 Baton Rouge LA 70821 4412 225 346 0285 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPELLEE Lafayette Parish School Board KYZAR Judge This matter is before us on rehearing from our previous decision Lafayette Parish School Board 16 169 La App 3 Cir 11 23 16 Cooper v 207 So 3d 1158 We now affirm the judgment of the lower court in part reverse in part render and remand the matter for proceedings consistent herewith DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD Dr Pat Cooper was hired by the Lafayette Parish School Board Board to a three year System term as superintendent of pursuant to a January 1 the Lafayette Parish School System 2012 written contract School Dr Cooper who has a Ph D in Education and previous experience as a superintendent in both Louisiana and Mississippi experienced was hired based on a five to four vote of the Board and difficulties with the Board from the outset In addition to the already strained relations between them the Louisiana Legislature passed 2012 La Acts I No 1 hereinafter Act 1 boards which totally changed the relationship between school and superintendents of schools in the By the middle of 2014 the state Board who had engaged outside counsel authorized an investigation into actions taken by Dr Cooper which resulted in formal disciplinary charges being levied against him The charges were as follows Charge No 1 Unworthiness Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper s refusal to comply with or enforce the Board s directive to terminate the of employment Special Assistant to the Superintendent Thad Welch Charge No 2 Unworthiness Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper s failure to abide by and enforce the Board s amendment of the approved budget to remove the line item authorizing the 2012 La Acts No 1 became effective on July 1 2012 payment of a salary for the special assistant to the superintendent Charge No 3 Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper directing that public School Board funds be used to pay an attorney Unworthiness that he hired the where purpose of such representation was to advise Dr Cooper regarding a dispute with and a possible action against the School Board Charge No 4 Unworthiness Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper s action in connection with the payment of select principals in an amount in excess of the Salary Schedule established by the School Board Charge No 5 Unworthiness relative to Cooper receiving a negative evaluation for his job performance for the 2013 2014 school year by a majority vote of the Board Following hearings on November 5 and 6 2014 the Board held that its counsel had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Dr Cooper was guilty of the facts Proven alleged charge in the first four constituted failure to comply with unworthiness Board policy It further held that the facts of each charges inefficiency and state law by breach Dr Cooper of contract and Thus the Board voted seven to two to terminate Dr Cooper s employment effective immediately on November 6 2014 Dr Cooper immediately sought review of the Board s decision from the Fifteenth Judicial District Court in Lafayette Parish at the conclusion of which the district court rejected three of the four charges relied upon by the Board to terminate Dr Cooper s employment but upheld the Board s decision as to Charge Number Four Following the denial of motions for new trial Dr Cooper appealed 2 Charge Number Five relative to Cooper receiving a negative evaluation failed to receive a two thirds majority of the vote as required by Section 15 D of Cooper s employment contract thus it was not an issue before either the district court or this court 2


data recovery software how1745 87%

Electronic failures - this can be a physical failure of the hard disk drive, and usually happens when the hard push encounters a power surge or perhaps a burst of static electrical energy.


Hadoop online Course Content (PDF) 87%

Show FsImage and edits.log in the cluster 13) NameNode is Single Point of Failure a.


vg-v-gm docket 7-12-16 1468375150-headed 86%

231 MOTION for Sanctions 37(b) &(c) for Failure to Comply with Court Order and Failure to Comply with Rule 26(a)..


DGS report new 86%



#1 Surgical Management of Congenital Heart Disease 86%

 Right side – insert at the femoral vein IVC RA RV PA  Left side – femoral artery aorta LV LA (unless your patient has VSD or ASD that you can measure from the right side to the left)  • • • • • • Identify risk - cardiac failure, respiratory compromise, chronic cachexia Adjust medications and therapies Digitalis must be withheld prior to surgery because of the possibility of cardiac failure post operatively.


Fowler Complaint 85%

Anyone who is caught driving with a suspended license (DWLS) because of failure to pay court costs faces an additional 30-day suspension and must pay a reinstatement fee of $125.