Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 24 October at 14:38 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «hiroshima»:


Total: 33 results - 0.382 seconds

Flyer HUE ShortTermExchangeProgram 2014 100%

Living in Hiroshima The campus of Hiroshima University of Economics (HUE) is located eight kilometers from the center of Hiroshima City, the International City of Peace and Culture, just twenty minutes by car.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/30/flyer-hue-shorttermexchangeprogram-2014/

30/09/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

HiroshimaCranesSponsorship 99%

Hiroshima Cranes Australian Football Club Sponsorship Proposal 広島クレインズ オーストラリアンフットボールクラブ スポンサー募集要項 Contact information 連絡先 Jonathan Cooper hiroshimaafl@gmail.com 1 Index Executive Summary Australian Football in Japan Organisational Structure Club Goals Club Events How you can be involved 3 4 5 6 7-10 11 目次 概要  日本におけるオーストラリアンフットボール  組織について  クラブの目標  イベント   スポンサー募集                    2 3 4 5 6 7-10 11 Executive Summary The Hiroshima Cranes Australian Football Club is an Australian Football team that was established in the city of Hiroshima in 2014.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/03/02/hiroshimacranessponsorship/

01/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Bachelor-Ökotrophologie 12 102 78%

89 9.3 Hiroshima und Nagasaki:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/01/06/bachelor-kotrophologie-12-102/

06/01/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

UN and NPT 72%

BACKGROUND The United States nuclear attack on the two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which consequently ended the second world war (1939-1945) revealed the potentials of nuclear weapons and the need for its possession and control.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/11/24/un-and-npt/

24/11/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Wirr Wahr Entscheidung Mensch BBV 62MB 61%

Die amerikanischen Atombombenabwürfe auf Nagasaki und Hiroshima Die Einrichtung der beiden deutschen Staaten .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/02/wirr-wahr-entscheidung-mensch-bbv-62mb/

02/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

ComidaJapón 60%

la de Osaka y la de Hiroshima.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/15/comidajapo-n/

15/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

libya3 60%

Wenn Sie an ein solches Szenario nicht glauben können, dann rufen Sie sich doch bitte einmal in Erinnerung, was in Hiroshima und Nagasaki, Dresden und dem vietnamesischen Dorf My Lai sowie in unzähligen weiteren NATO- Opferländern im Laufe der kurzfristigen Geschichte passiert ist.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/08/25/libya3/

25/08/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

The Blood, The Marrow, The Giant Needle 55%

I've still got SOME good marrow left, mostly in my chest – so they will stick a giant needle straight into MY STERNUM, suck out the marrow stem cells, treat them, and put 'em in the freezer till the Hiroshima-ing of my body is done, then they will put it back, and voila!

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/24/the-blood-the-marrow-the-giant-needle/

24/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

20200210-20200328 LH Timetable de 20200211 48%

21 Hiroshima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Ho Chi Minh Stadt .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2020/05/05/20200210-20200328-lhtimetablede-20200211/

05/05/2020 www.pdf-archive.com

20200210-20200328 LH Timetable de 20200214 48%

21 Hiroshima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Ho Chi Minh Stadt .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2020/05/05/20200210-20200328-lhtimetablede-20200214/

05/05/2020 www.pdf-archive.com

20160606-20161029 LH Timetable de 48%

Hiroshima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hongkong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Honolulu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hurghada .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/10/20160606-20161029-lh-timetable-de/

10/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

20160613-20161029 LH Timetable de 48%

Hiroshima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hongkong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Honolulu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hurghada .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/14/20160613-20161029-lh-timetable-de/

14/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

20181112-20190330 LH Timetable de 20181113 48%

24 Hiroshima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Ho-Chi-Minh-Stadt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Hongkong .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/12/03/20181112-20190330-lhtimetablede-20181113/

03/12/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

20160606-20161029 LH Timetable en 48%

Hiroshima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Honolulu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Houston .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/10/20160606-20161029-lh-timetable-en/

10/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

20160613-20161029 LH Timetable en 48%

Hiroshima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hong Kong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Honolulu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Houston .

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/14/20160613-20161029-lh-timetable-en/

14/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

NuclearProliferationandSecurityConcerns 47%

      NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND SECURITY CONCERNS:   Accurately predicting future state proliferation by looking at various  factors outside the security model.                   Amanda Sewell  Sam Houston State University  September 2016              1  Why do states build nuclear weapons? This is the question that Scott  Sagan attempts to answer by in his research by looking at three different  theory models. In the past, the security concerns of the state were a positive  prediction to whether or not they would develop nuclear weapons, but the  same factors that pressured the states in the past, are no longer present  today. Without these factors, would security still be a reliable indicator?  Sagan argues that focusing only on the security considerations as the cause  of proliferation is “dangerously inadequate”.1  While the security model  accurately explains past cases of nuclear proliferation by states, it would not  be reliable in current times since the factors are no longer the same.  Therefore, if we want to predict which countries might develop nuclear  weapons in the future, underlying security concerns can not be the only area  we pay attention to. Recent proliferation cases have demonstrated that we  must take the other factors that play an important role in states decisions  regarding proliferation. These factors, along with security concerns, may  provide a much more accurate predictor of future proliferation.  First, let’s take a closer look at why the security model has  worked for past cases. Sagan describes the security model as “any state that  seeks to maintain its national security must balance against any rival state  that develops nuclear weapons by gaining access to a nuclear deterrent  itself.” 2 The overwhelming majority of nuclear programs were developed  1 2  Sagan, Scott D. 2012. Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. Pp.54   Ibid. pp 56      2  around WWII and the Cold War. The security model is better at predicting  these  behaviors of superpowers such as Russia and the United States where  there is an imminent threat to state’s security. The nuclear arms race  between the United States and the former Soviet Union provides a case  example of this security model and how it explains behavior towards nuclear  proliferation.  On July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested in the New  Mexico Desert.3  Less than a month later, an atomic bomb was dropped on  Hiroshima, Japan. The United States gained military superiority and a need  arose for other states to have acquire similar weaponry for security. “Stallin  wanted to be able to threaten the United States with atomic weapons, just  as the United States was able to threaten the Soviet Union”4   The Soviets  tested their first atomic bomb in 1949 after blueprints were leaked to them  by German physicist, ​Klaus Fuchs, who worked on the first United States  bomb.5   Now that the Soviet Union had comparable weapons, the United  States began tests on new types and designs of bombs in order to regain  their superiority. Each side continued to add to their arsenals as the tensions  rose. There was a verifiable need for the Soviets to gain a nuclear deterrent  to prevent an attack by the United States, thus the security model  accurately explains proliferation decisions by the state.    Davis, Watson. "Background of Atomic Bomb." ​The Science News­Letter 49.25 (1946): 394­395.   Zuberi, Matin. "Stalin and the bomb." ​Strategic Analysis 23.7 (1999): 1133­1153.  5  "Soviets explode atomic bomb ­ Aug 29, 1949 ­ HISTORY.com." 2010. 20 Sep. 2016  <​http://www.history.com/this­day­in­history/soviets­explode­atomic­bomb​>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/21/nuclearproliferationandsecurityconcerns/

21/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

NuclearProliferationandSecurityConcerns-AmandaSewell (3) 47%

      NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND SECURITY CONCERNS:   Accurately predicting future state proliferation by looking at various  factors outside the security model.                   Amanda Sewell  Sam Houston State University  Political Science 5367­International Relations  September 2016              1  Why do states build nuclear weapons? This is the question that Scott  Sagan attempts to answer by in his research by looking at three different  theory models. In the past, the security concerns of the state were a positive  prediction to whether or not they would develop nuclear weapons, but the  same factors that pressured the states in the past, are no longer present  today. Without these factors, would security still be a reliable indicator?  Sagan argues that focusing only on the security considerations as the cause  of proliferation is “dangerously inadequate”.1  While the security model  accurately explains past cases of nuclear proliferation by states, it would not  be reliable in current times since the factors are no longer the same.  Therefore, if we want to predict which countries might develop nuclear  weapons in the future, underlying security concerns can not be the only area  we pay attention to. Recent proliferation cases have demonstrated that we  must take the other factors that play an important role in states decisions  regarding proliferation. These factors, along with security concerns, may  provide a much more accurate predictor of future proliferation.  First, let’s take a closer look at why the security model has  worked for past cases. Sagan describes the security model as “any state that  seeks to maintain its national security must balance against any rival state  that develops nuclear weapons by gaining access to a nuclear deterrent  itself.” 2 The overwhelming majority of nuclear programs were developed  1 2  Sagan, Scott D. 2012. Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. Pp.54   Ibid. pp 56      2  around WWII and the Cold War. The security model is better at predicting  these  behaviors of superpowers such as Russia and the United States where  there is an imminent threat to state’s security. The nuclear arms race  between the United States and the former Soviet Union provides a case  example of this security model and how it explains behavior towards nuclear  proliferation.  On July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested in the New  Mexico Desert.3  Less than a month later, an atomic bomb was dropped on  Hiroshima, Japan. The United States gained military superiority and a need  arose for other states to have acquire similar weaponry for security. “Stallin  wanted to be able to threaten the United States with atomic weapons, just  as the United States was able to threaten the Soviet Union”4   The Soviets  tested their first atomic bomb in 1949 after blueprints were leaked to them  by German physicist, ​Klaus Fuchs, who worked on the first United States  bomb.5   Now that the Soviet Union had comparable weapons, the United  States began tests on new types and designs of bombs in order to regain  their superiority. Each side continued to add to their arsenals as the tensions  rose. There was a verifiable need for the Soviets to gain a nuclear deterrent  to prevent an attack by the United States, thus the security model  accurately explains proliferation decisions by the state.    Davis, Watson. "Background of Atomic Bomb." ​The Science News­Letter 49.25 (1946): 394­395.   Zuberi, Matin. "Stalin and the bomb." ​Strategic Analysis 23.7 (1999): 1133­1153.  5  "Soviets explode atomic bomb ­ Aug 29, 1949 ­ HISTORY.com." 2010. 20 Sep. 2016  <​http://www.history.com/this­day­in­history/soviets­explode­atomic­bomb​>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/21/nuclearproliferationandsecurityconcerns-amandasewell-3/

21/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Dissertation 43%

When the news broke after Hiroshima the employees of Manhattan Project were as startled as the rest of the nation.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/09/dissertation/

09/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

August 2012 Newsletter PDF 43%

- Pope Benedict XVI 
Building
Bridges
Since
2011
 Volume 2, Issue 1 Important Dates/ Birthdays (* Denotes Fallen Raven) Taryn Frank, 1 Dominic Paolucci (’11), 1 Keenan Martin, 1 Kel Martin, 1 Coast Guard Day, 4 Carissa Gregory, 4 Work Like a Dog Day, 5 Sister’s Day, 5 Aaron Kautsky, 6 Atomic Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima (1945), 6 Blake Bell, 7 Lisa Yoneyama, 7 Abbie Hausmann (’10), 7 Amanda Burns, 8 Atomic Bomb Dropped on Nagasaki (1945), 9 Molly Foltz, 9 Alisha Hafner, 12 Kelsey Mueller (’12), 12 Scott Serrico (’11), 12 Phil Loughman, 12 Ben Loughman, 13 Nicole Papageorgiou, 13 JoEllen Keyser (’12), 13 Katherine Friend, 14 Special Thanks To Our Sponsors Atchison Dental, Paolucci’s, Rosie’s Bar, Hausmann Restoration, Kentwood Real Estate, Mr.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/24/august-2012-newsletter-pdf/

24/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

EIS Newsletter 09.09.2014 - 42%

During their 10 day excursion, students developed leadership and communication skills as they traveled to cities such as Tokyo and Hiroshima.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/09/11/eis-newsletter-09-09-2014/

10/09/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Magdalena Montpellier - Pre-prog - ENG 40%

Aksana Haiko SAKURA - REQUIEM FOR HIROSHIMA / Keiin Yoshimura (Japan) Performer, choreographer and director :

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/08/13/magdalena-montpellier-pre-prog-eng/

13/08/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

CV2016 Updated 38%

Kenzo Hiroshima, Department of Pathology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan Kenji Morinaga, MD PhD, Department of Asbestos-related Health Damage Relief, Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan, SaiwaiKu, Kawasaki-Shi, Kanagawa, Japan Prof.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/22/cv2016-updated/

22/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

CNA-42 Chomsky 2015 38%

From Hiroshima to Drone Warfare,” with Andre Vltchek.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/28/cna-42-chomsky-2015/

28/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com