PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact


Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 20 September at 01:07 - Around 220000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «infringement»:


Total: 600 results - 0.064 seconds

cacdce-642108 100%

LTD., COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendants.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/15/cacdce-642108/

15/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Copyright Infringement - Stephen Masker 99%

Stephen Masker Photography PORTFOLIO PRINT SHOP ABOUT COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT – THE THEFT AND PURSUIT OF MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY by S T E V E M A S K E R on J A N U A R Y 1 1 , 2 0 1 6 in H O W T O , W R I T T E N with 0 R E P L I E S NOTE:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/11/copyright-infringement-stephen-masker/

11/01/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

DMCA 99%

Under US law a service provider, such as yourself, enjoys immunity from a copyright lawsuit provided that you act with deliberate speed to investigate and rectify ongoing copyright infringement.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/03/06/dmca/

06/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

COPYRIGHT POLICY v.1-07.29.17.docx 97%

COPYRIGHT​ ​POLICY NOTIFICATION​ ​OF​ ​COPYRIGHT​ ​INFRINGEMENT FELLOW​ ​HUNTER,​ ​INC.​ ​("FELLOW​ ​HUNTER")​ ​RESPECTS​ ​THE​ ​INTELLECTUAL​ ​PROPERTY RIGHTS​ ​OF​ ​OTHERS​ ​AND​ ​EXPECTS​ ​ITS​ ​USERS​ ​TO​ ​DO​ ​THE​ ​SAME.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/25/copyright-policy-v-1-07-29-17-docx/

25/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

acta digital chapter 96%

Each Party shall ensure that enforcement procedures, to the extent set forth in the civil and criminal enforcement sections of this Agreement, are available under its law so as to permit effective action against an act of, trademark, copyright or related rights infringement which takes place by means of the Internet, including expeditious remedies to prevent infringement and remedies which constitute a deterrent to further infringement.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/16/acta-digital-chapter/

16/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Acceptable Use Policy 94%

Copyright Infringement Viasat is committed to complying with U.S.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/12/10/acceptable-use-policy/

10/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

http- ghimiresandip com np 93%

SIGN IN / JOIN ABOUT Home Portfolio TRENDING NOW  CONTACT About Me Privacy Policy      Contact Me How to avoid copyright infringement &

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/12/02/http-ghimiresandipcomnp/

02/12/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

What is DMCA 93%

This enables the copyright holder to try to prevent the infringement besides by coping with the real infringer and making a demand.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/08/15/what-is-dmca/

15/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Doc198-Harrington-Statement-Of-Facts-7-13-12 93%

Introduction This is an action for trademark infringement, federal unfair competition, and state-law deceptive and unfair trade practices, in which the Defendants, Donovan’s Reef Lounge and Package Store, Inc.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/07/14/doc198-harrington-statement-of-facts-7-13-12/

14/07/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Treasure Island, Gilley's motion to dismiss, sever 92%

The 5 Treasure Island Defendants are entitled to dismissal of Plaintiff Slep-Tone Entertainment 6 Corporation’s (“Plaintiff”) claims for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition under the 7 Lanham Act pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), because Plaintiff’s allegations fail as a matter of law.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/treasure-island-gilley-s-motion-to-dismiss-sever/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Panama 78 Motion for Default against Big Bob 92%

5:10cv71,2 against a number of named defendants, including Jada, Paynter, and Big Bob’s, alleging trademark infringement involving counterfeiting and federal unfair competition.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/08/02/panama-78-motion-for-default-against-big-bob/

02/08/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

110 - Order granting motion to sever and dismiss 91%

14 Plaintiff claims trademark infringement and violations of the Lanham Act.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/15/110-order-granting-motion-to-sever-and-dismiss-1/

15/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Romano's Bio Notes 91%

Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by fines and federal imprisonment © Orgoman, LLC I have created these study notes to help you study for the DAT.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/07/04/romanos-bio-notes/

04/07/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Romano Bio Notes 1 91%

Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by fines and federal imprisonment © Orgoman, LLC I have created these study notes to help you study for the DAT.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/07/06/romano-bio-notes-1/

06/07/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

ITMA OCT15 30-31 91%

[2015] EWHC 1772 (IPEC), The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen and another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra), IPEC, 2 July 2015 30 Orchestras at odds Magdalena Borucka covers a musical case that emphasises the unitary character of a CTM T his case considers several legal issues – trade mark infringement, invalidity, passing off and copyright infringement – and emphasises the unitary character of a Community Trade Mark (CTM), and importance of fixation in copyright claims.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/10/20/itma-oct15-30-31/

20/10/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

120216-Actavis-v-Lilly-dextrose-judgment-redacted 91%

Contents Topic Paragraphs Introduction The procedural context of the Dextrose Remission Issue in more detail The witnesses Factual witnesses Oncologists Endocrinologist Pharmacists Foreign law experts The law with respect to the Dextrose Remission Issue Indirect infringement Negative declaratory relief Factual background to the Dextrose Remission Issue A note on terminology Alimta and the Alimta SmPC Actavis’ application for marketing authorisations The Actavis Products and UK SmPC Proposed variation to the UK SmPC for the Actavis Product Proposed variations to the CP SmPC for the Actavis Product The German SmPC for the Actavis Product Administration of pemetrexed Dexamethasone Preparation of cytotoxic drugs for administration The use of saline and dextrose solution as diluents for chemotherapy drugs Stability data available to pharmacists Storage as aseptic preparations Published stability data for Alimta Actavis’ stability for the Actavis Product Supply and distribution of the Actavis Product Steps taken by Actavis to prevent the Actavis Product from being diluted in saline Steps taken by Actavis in relation to the availability of stability data of its product in saline Steps taken by Lilly to prevent the Actavis Product from being diluted in saline Diabetes Assessment of the Dextrose Remission Issue The role of the oncologist The role of the endocrinologist The evidence of the pharmacists The importance of the SmPC Is it likely that stability data for the Actavis Product in saline 1-6 7-12 12-26 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-23 24-26 27-34 27-32 33-34 35-92 35 36-39 40 41-45 46-51 52 53 54 55 56-60 61 62 63 64 65 67-69 70-77 78-81 82-83 84-91 92-172 94 95 96 97-99 100-109 MR JUSTICE ARNOLD Approved Judgment will become available?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/08/10/120216-actavis-v-lilly-dextrose-judgment-redacted/

10/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Station Motion to Dismiss 91%

The Station Defendants 5 are entitled to dismissal of Plaintiff Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation’s (“Plaintiff”) claims 6 for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition under the Lanham Act pursuant to Rule 7 12(b)(6), as well as Plaintiff’s request for counterfeiting damages, because Plaintiff’s allegations 8 fail as a matter of law.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/14/station-motion-to-dismiss/

14/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Registering trademarks in the UAE 90%

In case of infringement Infringement may occur when one party uses a trademark which is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark owned by another party ‘the legal owner’.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/12/29/registering-trademarks-in-the-uae/

29/12/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

intellectual property solicitors why1088 89%

The lines between copyright or design right infringement along with the simple evolution of a design are very ill defined.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/10/21/intellectual-property-solicitors-why1088/

21/10/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

68 - PT's Motion to Sever 88%

Plaintiff alleges that KJs are making 7 unauthorized copies of Plaintiff’s compact disks and that the visual elements of these 8 unauthorized compact disks display Plaintiff’s SOUND CHOICE trademark during karaoke 9 performances, constituting trademark infringement and unfair competition.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/05/16/68-pt-s-motion-to-sever/

16/05/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Amazon’s Crackdown on Brand Registry 88%

The brands can now complain about the infringement of their intellectual property by other sellers.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/08/amazon-s-crackdown-on-brand-registry/

08/08/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

PT's Reply to Response to PT's Motion to Dismiss 88%

INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff’s entire action is premised on the assertion that certain Karaoke Jockey’s 19 (“KJs”) have committed an infringement by the unauthorized copying of Plaintiff’s karaoke 20 music tracks and lyrics.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/26/pt-s-reply-to-response-to-pt-s-motion-to-dismiss-1/

26/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

trademark-investigation 88%

Associates         You are in receipt of this letter because you and/or your establishment have been reported as  possible violators of trademarks owned by our client Sound Choice®, Sound Choice Studios, Inc.   Sound Choice Studios, Inc. (SCS), and Slep‐Tone Entertainment Corporation (Slep‐Tone) are the  creators  of  the  popular  line  of  karaoke  music  sold  under  the  brand  name  Sound  Choice®.    Our  firm  represents  SCS  and  Slep‐Tone  (together,  Sound  Choice)  in  trademark  infringement  audits  and  investigations.    Having been reported to APS & Associates as a possible violator of the Sound Choice trademark,  APS on behalf of Sound Choice® has conducted an investigation/audit of your operations resulting in  overwhelming evidence that substantiates the before mentioned claims of trademark violations.  Based upon the recent investigation, we believe that you have been using pirated/unauthorized  copies of Sound Choice songs in your karaoke shows, music that our clients spent a great deal of time,  effort, and money to create and market.  Our investigators and witnesses also observed you displaying  the well known Sound Choice® logo during a recent karaoke show.  As a result of that investigation and  your actions, you may be named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in Federal District Court on the behalf  of our client Sound Choice®, Sound Choice Studios, Inc. pursuant to an investigation for trademark  infringement and unfair competition arising under §§ 32 and 43 of the Lanham Trademark Act of 1946,  15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125.     You may contact a representative of APS & Associates to resolve this matter prior to moving  forward to litigation if you wish to bring this to a full resolution in the fastest and least expensive  manner.  You have 10 business days from the date of this letter to respond.  Call: 623‐434‐1838  This letter does not constitute service of the lawsuit.  However, if you do not contact our firm to  discuss this matter, we will file in Federal Court and have the complaint served upon you.  Any and all  communication with you, your legal representative and or staff/employees past and present will be  documented and recorded and may be used against you in a court of law.            APS & Associates  3120 W. Carefree Hwy. Ste‐1‐#301  Phoenix, Arizona 85086  office: 623‐434‐1838              This message is designed to help you understand why, in our view; your actions are outside the  law, and to encourage you to discuss a prompt and reasonable settlement in regard to this matter.  Slep‐Tone  distributes  karaoke  accompaniment  tracks  on  compact  discs,  primarily  in  a  format  called CD+G, or "compact disc plus graphics." It does not distribute tracks on any other medium. If you  obtained  your  Sound  Choice  tracks  by  downloading  them,  or  by  buying  a  preloaded  hard  drive  or  karaoke machine (generally referred to as a CAVS system), then you did not legally obtain your Sound  Choice tracks.  Another way that you can infringe Slep‐Tone's rights is by copying your CD+Gs to a hard drive in  a way that violates our media‐shifting policy. The Sound Choice trademarks are protected under federal  law. If you have infringed Sound Choice’s rights, your actions are punishable under federal law.  If you  play an illegal copy of a Sound Choice® song, the Sound Choice logo, which is a registered trademark, is  displayed on your monitors.  Because that illegal copy wasn’t produced by Sound Choice, displaying that  logo  is  trademark  counterfeiting.    Federal  law  imposes  damages  of  up  to  $200,000  for  use  of  a  counterfeit  trademark  and  ten  times  that  amount  if  the  infringement  was  willful.    The  Court  can  also  order your equipment to be seized and can stop you from running karaoke shows using Sound Choice  songs.    You  may  also  be  liable  for  copyright  infringement  if  you  did  not  pay  royalties  to  the  owner  of  copyright in the underlying musical work for the copies you made or acquired.     Make no mistake, if you are playing a Sound Choice song and you do not own an original legal  copy of the CD+G disk then you are committing trademark infringement. Additionally you must have a  set of disks for each and every system in operation.    Sound Choice does not want or intend to destroy your karaoke business.  In fact, Sound Choice  wants to help you get legal and stay legal, and we are creating an environment where legal KJs will have  the  advantage.    For  that  reason,  we  are  providing  you  with  one  opportunity  to  resolve  this  situation  before we formally begin the lawsuit.    If  you  respond  to  us  within  ten  (10)  days  of  the  date  on  this  letter,  Sound  Choice  is  willing  to  offer  to  settle  with  you  on  favorable  terms  that  will  allow  you  to  continue  to  operate  your  karaoke  business without violating Sound Choice’s rights.    If you do not respond, we will arrange to have you served with the complaint.  The more work  we have to do and the more expenses we incur to prosecute this lawsuit, the more it will cost you to  settle.  Stated another way, it will never be as inexpensive to settle this matter and to get legal as it is  right now.  Your competitors are being offered the same deal, so it is important that you move quickly.    Sound  Choice  wants  the  karaoke  community  to  know  that  it  has  taken  this  step  reluctantly.   Despite the company’s reputation for the highest quality karaoke music available, it is a small company  that  has  been  hit  hard  by  this  piracy.    Our  only  goal  is  to  do  what  is  necessary  to  help  Sound  Choice  continue  to  produce  the  top‐quality  music  that  is  the  lifeblood  of  karaoke.    Without  revenue,  Sound  Choice  cannot  make  new  music.    Without  new  music,  karaoke  will  die  a  slow  death.    In  that  sense,  karaoke piracy is a theft not just from Sound Choice, but from everyone from the karaoke fan, to the KJ,  to the venue.        We  encourage  you  to  call  today  to  begin  resolving  this  situation,  while  you  still  have  the  opportunity to settle on favorable terms.  If you have questions about your liability, you should consider  consulting an attorney of your choice, since we cannot give you legal advice about this matter. 

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/18/trademark-investigation/

18/09/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Gmail - Second Copyright Infringement Alert – please read 88%

Gmail - Second Copyright Infringement Alert – please read 1 of 3 Second Copyright Infringement Alert – please read ccuk-admin@virginmedia.co.uk <ccuk-admin@virginmedia.co.uk>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/16/gmail-second-copyright-infringement-alert-please-read/

16/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

GENERIC MOTION TO SEVER 87%

(Figuring 28 one singer every five minutes and taking into account the possibility that sixty percent of the 3 1 tracts are from Sound Choice karaoke disks.) For the alleged infringement to arise from the same 2 series of transactions and occurrences, then all plays of all copies of the Sound Choice karaoke 3 accompaniment tracks witnessed by Slep-Tone’s investigator would have to be the same which is 4 highly unlikely since there are thousands of different tracts.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/04/15/generic-motion-to-sever-1/

15/04/2012 www.pdf-archive.com