PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 22 October at 03:49 - Around 76000 files indexed.
Verfügbare Zeit und eine voraussichtlich relativ stabile, viertägige Schönwetterperiode ermöglichten zunächst in der Woche vor Ostern, dass Joachim Feger und ich uns kurzfristig auf den Weg nach Grindelwald machten.
Friedrich Reichert, Stadtmuseum Pfarrer Klaus Vesting, Evangelisch-reformierte-Gemeinde  Rathaus und Evangelisch-reformierte Kirche 2  Englische Kirche Inhalt Vorwort Manfred Wiemer 6 Die St.-Pauli-Kirche Joachim Liebers 44 Einführung Prof.
The Apostolic Succession of the Matthewites Derives From A Freemason and Ecumenist “Patriarch” In his book “Elenchos Kai Anatrope” Mr. Gkoutzidis writes about the various ecclesiological books that were printed by the Zealot Athonite fathers: “At the very same time important documents of an ecclesiological nature are circulated by the Zealot Hieromonks who had departed Mt. Athos, the foremost of which was the then Hieromonk and later Bishop and Archbishop of the G.O.C., Matthew Karpathakis. From among these documents we mention the most important, namely, ‘Apostasias Elenchos,’ ‘Distomos Romphaia’ published in 1934 and ‘Phos tois en Skotei’ published in 1936, which widely shocked the innovative process of Chrysostom Papadopoulos…” From the last of these Athonite books, ‘Phos tois en Skotei’ of 1936, we provide the following quote: “…Therefore, the Official Church of Chrysostom Papadopoulos, recognized by the State, is naked and deprived of the grace and gift of God, because it betrayed the Faith of our Christ by its tolerance and collaboration with atheistic Judeo‐Masonry!!!...” Below is a photocopy of the actual page from which the quote is taken: We agree wholeheartedly with the above quote, that if a bishop enslaves himself to antichristian and satanic Judeo‐Masonry, his mysteries are invalid and his hierarchical status is “naked and deprived of the grace and gift of God.” But unfortunately, “Archbishop” Chrysostom of Athens was not the first, nor was he the last, of these Mason “hierarchs.” Among the masons of high rank also happened to be the Ecumenical Patriarch Joachim III, the first Masonic “Patriarch” of Constantinople. This information is derived firstly from the official website of the “Grand Lodge of Greece,” as well as from several books published by the Zealot Fathers themselves, many of which refer to Joachim III as “the first Mason Ecumenical Patriarch.” On the Greek version of Wikipedia, in the article regarding Joachim III, we read: “According to the official website of the Grand Lodge of Greece, he was a member of the Masonic Lodge called ‘Progress.’ (Πρόοδος).” And he wasn’t only a Mason, but also an Ecumenist. In the Patriarchal Encyclical of 1904 he asked of the Primates of the Autocephalous Orthodox Churches to discuss the following: “a) the meeting and strengthening by concordance and love, of the Holy Orthodox Churches of God, b) the possibility of relation and Christian love and rapprochement of our Churches with the two great branches of Christianity, namely, Catholicism and Protestantism, c) how it is possible for the Orthodox Church to approach the so‐called Old Catholics, who desire a union with us, and d) whether it is possible or not for us to formulate and better adjust our current Calendar.” He also wrote: “It is beloved of God and Evangelical for me to ask of the leadership of the Holy Autocephalous Churches regarding our present and future relations with the two great branches of Christianity, the Western Church and the Protestant Churches. And it is known that every genuine Christian must pray and petition, as is found in the texts of our Church, for the Evangelical Unity, a teaching constituting a pious and heartfelt desire in the Orthodox Faith, for the unity of them and all who believe in Christ…” Further down he writes: “Not without worth is our attention towards the issue of a common calendar, so that we can adequate document things said and written, using the same proposed systems of reform of our Julian Calendar, which has been kept by the Orthodox Church for a long time. [This reform shall take place] either by adopting the Gregorian Calendar, since [the Julian Calendar] is scientifically lacking, whereas this one is more accurate. We must consequently also consider the transformation of our ecclesiastical Paschalion. Regarding this topic, the opinions are divided, as we can see from the resulted specific opinions of our Orthodox people…” Thus, ‘Ecumenical Patriarch’ Joachim III was not only a Mason (member of the Lodge called ‘Progress’), but he was also a branch theory Ecumenist (he called Catholicism and Protestantism ‘branches of Christianity’ and he expressed a desire for unity with them). Additionally he was also in favour of the reform of the ecclesiastical calendar, either by the adoption of the Gregorian Calendar or the creation of a new calendar. In any case his purpose is spelled out quite clearly as “common calendar,” meaning a single calendar for Westerns and Orthodox, to better promote their unity. In other words, ‘Patrarch’ Joachim III was the forerunner of ‘Archbishop’ Chrysostom Papadopoulos! He was the ‘Metaxakis’ before Meletius Metaxakis!!! But this very Mason, Ecumenist and very‐well‐would‐have‐been New Calendarist ‘Patriarch’ is the very bishop who consecrated Metropolitan Chrysostom Kavouridis of Florina in 1909, who in turn consecrated Bishop Matthew of Bresthena in 1935! In other words, the Apostolic Succession of the Matthewites derives from a Mason, Ecumenist and Modernist ‘Patriarch’!!! So by what means does Bp. Kirykos Kontogiannis and Mr. Eleutherius Gkoutzidis preach to us that supposedly Bishop Matthew offered a “pure” line of Apostolic Succession, whereas all other lines (Russian Church Abroad, etc) are looked upon as “unclean”? What could be more unclean than a consecration derived from a Mason, Ecumenist and Modernist ‘Patriarch’ such as Joachim III??? Such a line of Apostolic Succession is by far as “unclean” as one can possibly get! Yet Bp. Kirykos presents it as some kind of “spotless bastion” of Apostolic Succession! The fact that Joachim III was a Mason is enough to disqualify the validity of this line, without even mentioning the fact he was also a ‘branch‐theory’ believing Ecumenist heretic, and was also in favour of the reformation of the ecclesiastical calendar! But the hypocrisy doesn’t stop there. This Mason, Ecumenist and Modernist ‘Patriarch’ Joachim III did not only pass on the Apostolic Succession to the Matthewites. He was also the very ‘Patriarch’ who blessed the Holy Chrism in 1903 and again in 1912, the very Holy Chrism that the Matthewites were using until as late as 1958! Thus the Matthewites were rechrismating converts from New Calendarism by anointing them with the Holy Chrism blessed by a Freemason, Ecumenist and Modernist ‘Patriarch’!!! Behold a photograph of ‘Patriarch’ Joachim III and the Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate shortly after the blessing of the Holy Chrism on Holy Thursday, 1912: The consecration of Holy Chrism by Patriarch Joachim III in 1912 Now let us again read the quote from “Phos tois en Skotei” published in 1936: “…Therefore, the Official Church of Chrysostom Papadopoulos, recognized by the State, is naked and deprived of the grace and gift of God, because it betrayed the Faith of our Christ by its tolerance and collaboration with atheistic Judeo‐ Masonry!!!...” What does this mean? This means that according to their own ecclesiology, the Matthewites THEMSELVES are “naked and deprived of the grace and gift of God” because they derive not only their Apostolic Succession but even their Holy Chrism from a ‘Patriarch’ who “betrayed the Faith of our Christ by his tolerance and collaboration with atheistic Judeo‐Masonry!!!...” Alas! But let the Matthewites rethink as to whether they truly do have “pure” Apostolic Succession and “valid mysteries” before they dare to judge or doubt the Apostolic Succession and Valid Mysteries of the historic Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, and the Acacian hierarchy it founded in Greece.
Hans-Joachim Engelhardt | DBE TECHNOLOGY GmbH DBE TECHNOLOGY GMBH Eschenstraße 55, 31224 Peine Telefon:
Die unterschriebene Anmeldung senden Sie per Post oder eMail an Hans-Joachim Fach Buch 4a 91350 Gremsdorf Tel.:
THE PAN‐HERESY OF ECUMENISM EXISTED AMONG THE ORTHODOX PRIOR TO 1924 In 1666‐1667 the Pan‐Orthodox Synod of Moscow decided to receive Papists by simple confession of Faith, without rebaptism or rechrismation! At the beginning of the 18th century at Arta, Greece, the Holy Mysteries would be administered by Orthodox Priests to Westerners, despite this scandalizing the Orthodox faithful. In 1863 an Anglican clergyman was permitted to commune in Serbia, by the official decision of the Holy Synod of the Serbian Orthodox Church. In the 1800s, Metropolitan Philaret of Moscow wrote that the schisms within Christianity “do not reach the heavens.” In other words, he believed that heresy doesn’t divide Christians from the Kingdom of God! In 1869, at the funeral of Metropolitan Chrysanthus of Smyrna, an Archbishop of the Armenian Monophysites and a Priest of the Anglicans actively participated in the service! In 1875, the Orthodox Archbishop of Patras, Greece, concelebrated with an Anglican priest in the Mystery of Baptism! In 1878 the first Masonic Ecumenical Patriarch, Joachim III, was enthroned. He was Patriarch for two periods (1878‐1884 and 1901‐1912). This Masonic Patriarch Joachim III is the one who performed the Episcopal consecration of Bp. Chrysostom Kavouridis, who in turn was the bishop who consecrated Bp. Matthew of Bresthena. Thus the Matthewites trace their Apostolic Succession in part from this Masonic “Patriarch.” In 1903 and 1912, Patriarch Joachim III blessed the Holy Chrism, which was used by the Matthewites until they blessed their own chrism in 1958! Thus until 1958 they were using the Chrism blessed by a Masonic Patriarch! In 1879 the Holy Synod of the Patriarchate of Constantinople decided that in times of great necessity, it is permitted to have sacramental communion with the Armenians. In other words, an Orthodox priest can perform the mysteries for Armenian laymen, and an Armenian priest for Orthodox laymen! In 1895 the Ecumenical Patriarch Anthimus VII declared his desire for al Christians to calculate days according to the new calendar! In 1898, Patriarch Gerasimus of Jerusalem permitted the Greeks and Syrians living in Melbourne to receive communion in Anglican parishes! In 1902 the Patriarchal Encyclical of the Ecumenical Patriarchate refers to the heresies of the west as “Churches” and “Branches of Christianity”! Thus it was an official Orthodox declaration that espouses the branch theory heresy! In 1904 the Patriarchal Encyclical of the Ecumenical Patriarchate refers to the heretics as “those who believe in the All‐Holy Trinity, and who honour the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and hope in the salvation of God’s grace”! In 1907 at Portsmouth, England, there was a joint doxology of Russian and Anglican clergy! Prior to 1910 the Russian Bishop Innokenty of Alaska, made a pact with the Anglican Bishop Row of America, that the priests belonging to each Church would be permitted to offer the mysteries to the laymen of one another. In other words, for Orthodox priests to commune Anglican laymen, and for Anglican priests to commune Orthodox laymen! In 1910 the Syrian/Antiochian Orthodox Bishop Raphael (Hawaweeny) permitted the Orthodox faithful, in his Encyclical, to accept the mysteries of Baptism, Communion, Confession, Marriage, etc, from Anglicna priests! The same bishop took part in an Anglican Vespers, wearing his mandya and seated on the throne! In 1917 the Greek Orthodox Exarch of America Alexander of Rodostolus took part in an Anglican Vespers. The same hierarch also took part in the ordination of an Anglican bishop in Pensylvania. In 1918, Archbishop Anthimus of Cyprus and Metropolitan Meletius mataxakis of Athens, took part in Anglican services at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London! In 1919, the leaders of the Orthdoxo Churches in America took part in Anglican services at the “General Assembly of Anglican Churches in America”! In 1920 the Patriarchal Encyclical of the Ecumenical patriarchate refers to the heresies as “Churches of God” and advises the adoption of the new calendar! In 1920, Metropolitan Philaret of Didymotichus, while in London, serving as the representative of the Ecumenical Patriarchate at the Conference of Lambeth, took part in joint services in an Anglican church! In 1920, Patriarch Damian of Jerusalem (he who was receiving the Holy Light), took part in an Anglican liturgy at the Anglican Church of Jerusalem, where he read the Gospel in Greek, wearing his full Hierarchical vestments! In 1921, the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury took part in the funeral of Metropolitan Dorotheus of Prussa in London, at which he read the Gospel! In 1022, Archbishop Germanus of Theathyra, the representative of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in London, took part in a Vespers service at Westminster Abbey, wearing his Mandya and holding his pastoral staff! In 1923, the Ecumenical Patriarchate recognized the mysteries of the “Living Church” which had been anathematized by Patriarch Tikhon of Russia! In 1923, the Ecumenical Patriarchate recognized Anglican mysteries as valid! In 1923, the Patriarchate of Jerusalem recognized Anglican mysteries as valid! In 1923, the Church of Cyprus recognized Anglican mysteries as valid! In 1923, the “Pan‐Orthodox Congress” under Ecumenical Patriarch Meletius Metaxakis proposed the adoption of the new “Revised Julian Calendar.” In December 1923, the Holy Synod of the Church of Greece officially approved the adoption of the New Calendar to take place in March 1924. Among the bishops who signed the decision to adopt the new calendar was Metropolitan Germanus of Demetrias, one of the bishops who later consecrated Bishop Matthew of Bresthena in 1935. Thus the Matthewites trace their Apostolic Succession from a bishop who was personally responsible (by his signature) for the adoption of the New Calendar in Greece.
Manuela Schmidinger Francesco Cognetti Pierpaolo Graziotti Richard Hautmann Alberto Mandressi Vincenzo Mirone Francesco Montorsi Giovanni Muto Vito Pansadoro Paolo Puppo Mark Emberton Arnulf Stenzl Cora Sternberg Joachim Thuroff Manfred Wirth Walter Artibani Giuseppe Carrieri Michele Gallucci U.S.
GUNTHER BITTNER JOACHIM KINSCHER SITZ DER GESELLSCHAFT:
Auswertungsprogramm 1 von 5 Talagova 2002 ERGEBNISLISTE - Historical Bow ScoreX2 ©2015 programmed by Hannes Gailer email@example.com Allgemeine Klasse Männlich Gesamtscore NAME Verein 20 Score 1 Zendulka Andreas ASKÖ Luftenberg 10 652 2 Meinschad Rainer BSC-Rietz 6 608 3 Gascho Berni UBSC Flachgau 5 576 4 Laimer laru HSV SAALFELDEN 6 500 5 köck günter mohawk 3 488 6 Pöllner Peter UBSC Flachgau 1 482 7 Kosa Hannes Mohawk 0 478 8 Hager Andreas 9 Geislmaier Manfred 5 420 mohawk 3 402 NAME Verein 20 Score 1 Posch Anton BSV Glemmerhof 7 624 2 Etzer Hans BAW Gochberg 10 572 3 beranek hubert mohawk 8 550 4 Ecker Willi SBC Bad Goisern 5 542 5 Rißlegger Anton JBC Rauris 4 430 6 Baumann Irene ATSV Salzburg 6 368 7 Mayer Erich BSV Salzkammergut 1 156 Veteranen Männlich Gesamtscore ERGEBNISLISTE - Langbogen ScoreX2 ©2015 programmed by Hannes Gailer firstname.lastname@example.org Allgemeine Klasse Männlich Gesamtscore NAME Verein 20 1 Geyer Joachim Bowhunter Moosburg 11 706 2 Ziegelin Frank TB Winhöring 4 632 3 Neuhofer Felix Ubsc-Flachgau 10 630 4 Haselsberger Hans BSC Final Target 9 592 5 Schmidt Bernhard SpVgg Höhenkirchen 4 580 6 Ruckendorfer Andi Bogensport Wadenfels 4 562 7 Schweiberer Marcel UBSC Flachgau 5 514 8 Weiß Franz 3D Bogenplatz Riedersbach 7 502 9 Fahrnberger Erich UBSC Flachgau 3 502 10 Tenhalter Joachim Club 3D 2 498 11 Lindowski David Ubsc-Flachgau 4 462 12 Nagora Joachim tsv Spandau Berlin 2 414 13 Aichriedler Robin UBSC Flachgau 0 324 Talagova 2002 Score 24.04.2017 00:03 Auswertungsprogramm 2 von 5 Talagova 2002 Allgemeine Klasse Weiblich Gesamtscore NAME Verein 1 Gründauer Moni BSV Glemmerhof 2 Wagenbrenner Pia TB Winhöring 6 546 3 Franz Simone BSV Glemmerhof 4 540 4 Mischkulnig Sonja BSC Wörthersee 2 406 5 Schmidt Sabine SpVgg Höhenkirchen 0 264 Veteranen Männlich NAME 20 Score 8 560 Gesamtscore Verein 20 Score 1 Tarmann Helmut BSC Wörthersee 8 600 2 Koller Herbert Ubsc-Flachgau 5 600 3 Obradovits Seppo UBSC-Flachgau 8 586 4 Aichriedler Matthias UBSC Flachgau 5 480 5 Heyn Sven-Peter PSV Berlin 1 406 ERGEBNISLISTE - Recurve Holz ScoreX2 ©2015 programmed by Hannes Gailer email@example.com Schüler Männlich Gesamtscore NAME Verein 20 1 Foidl Fabian Final Target 26 764 2 Rapold Niklas Keiner 9 640 3 Dubsky Marcel BSV Riedersbach 7 586 4 Dubsky Nina BSV Riedersbach 4 498 Jugend Männlich Score Gesamtscore NAME Verein 20 1 Larcher Lea Score BSC Rietz 1 368 2 Theil-Pföß Dominik Talagova 2002 0 0 Allgemeine Klasse Männlich Gesamtscore NAME Verein 20 Score 1 Depauli Benno Final target 13 724 2 Klose Thomas Bsp Hallaich 16 696 3 Wabnegg Andreas kein verein 13 686 4 Hueber Max Talagova 2002 7 676 5 Hofer Karl UBSC Flachgau 8 662 6 Maretschläger Martin Bogensport Wadenfels 6 658 7 Papp Antal "Toni"
(FH) (FH) Thomas Edathy Thomas Edathy Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender Joachim Schulze Joachim Schulze Ihr Thomas firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com www.stadtwerke-celle.de www.stadtwerke-celle.de Edathy Geschäftsführer Stadtwerke Celle Telefon 05141 .
DONNERSTAG 22.09.2016 20 UHR Galerie Café Brel LESUNG Bram DeHouck Der Psychopath Gelesen von Joachim Bliese.
Michael Hockenhull, Sanne Bergh, Catherine Berg, Chihiro Aoyagi, Lasse Rindom (represented by Michael Hockenhull through written authority), Mette Sejersen (represented by Michael Hockenhull through written authority), Joachim Skanderby (represented by Michael Hockenhull through written authority), Morten Lund Hansen (represented by Michael Hockenhull through written authority).
Joachim Cigan Facharzt f. ... Hans-Joachim Rohrberg Psychologischer Psychotherapeut Brühlsbachstr.
Joachim Bargon Prof.
Joachim Negel, Ord. ... Joachim Negel Workshop: ... Joachim Negel:
Zwischen 18 und 35 Prozent wurden dort von Joachim Hahn, Leiter des Amtes für Stadtentwicklung und Statistik, vorgetragen.
verlost 10x das Buch „Der Dresdner SemperOpernball“ von Hans-Joachim Frey und 1x 2 Eintrittskarten für die Semperoper im kommenden Jahr 2015.
PUMA Old Grudges Die Hard BY JOACHIM HOFER Adidas and Puma are battling for control of a design that could revolutionize athletic shoes and generate billions of euros in new sales.
Die Autoren Wolfgang Kohlhaase und Joachim Walther, der die Kontrolle des Staates über die Kultur in mehreren Büchern aufarbeitete, werden den ehemaligen Redakteuren der Rundfunk-Dramatik Peter Gugisch und Jochen Hauser unter ganz anderen Bedingungen sprechen.
Nickenig, Professor Dr Hakan Özyuvaci, PD Dr Dr Daniel Rothamel, Dr Witold Tomkiewicz, Dr Jairo Vargas, Professor Dr Andrzej Wojtowicz, Professor Dr Dr Joachim E.