PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 04 March at 08:30 - Around 76000 files indexed.
bis 17.05.2014 • Freiburg Senioren Damen / Senior ladies • Result Compulsory Figures / Resultado Figuras Obligatorias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Name Mariangeles Mantuano Elizabeth Soler Anabella Mendoz Beatrice Wachter Silvia Lambruschi Katia Montini Valeria Barossi Luz Cristina Urrea Angela Preis Juliana Giraldo Fabienne Bachmann Johanna Blom Verena Preis Júlia Marco Romero Roberta Delvy Rieko Iwakata Veronika Brešar Xantal Ramirez de Pablo Sonia Muñoz Costa Ramona Geissbühler Colet Claessens Cornelia Müller Brigitte Lopez Nation Points ARG ARG ARG GER ITA ITA ITA COL GER COL SUI GER GER ESP USA JPN SLO ESP ESP SUI NED SUI BEL 179.400 168.700 171.100 167.000 157.200 155.000 152.300 151.800 152.900 150.100 149.500 143.200 142.800 141.600 137.400 136.200 138.300 137.700 135.400 133.300 130.100 126.000 119.100 Referee Marco Faggioli CEPA Assistant Margaret Brooks CEPA Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 M.V.
The judge’s decisions will be informed by analysis of financial information - statutorily published by the banks, coupled with information provided in your entry documents.
Palafox Miguel Suazo JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT, PLACE 2 Steven Kirkland JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT, PLACE 4 DISTRICT JUDGE, 120TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Maria Salas Mendoza DISTRICT JUDGE, 168TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT R.K.
• The panel of judges will judge the qualified Applications using the following judging criteria:
10 BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, et al., 11 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM G.
4:15-CV-384 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
(Sorry ladies!) Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – firstname.lastname@example.org Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – email@example.com Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – firstname.lastname@example.org Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – email@example.com Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – firstname.lastname@example.org Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – email@example.com Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – firstname.lastname@example.org Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – email@example.com Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – firstname.lastname@example.org Search “Be the Judge” on SONA – email@example.com 20-30 minutes New quick study on SONA.
JAMES TRENT GOODBAUDY Case Number 127136 Case Type Offense Misdemeanor Court Clatsop Case Status Inactive File Date 05/29/2012 Party Plaintiff State of Oregon Active Attorneys Lead Attorney ATTORNEY, CLATSOP CO DISTRICT Defendant GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT DOB XX/XX/1973 Charge Charges GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT Description Citation Statute Level Date Failure to Carry/Present License 52262 807.570 Misdemeanor Class C 05/09/2012 Disposition Events 06/19/2012 Plea Judicial Officer Unassigned, Judge Defendant GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT Failure to Carry/Present License Not Guilty 11/14/2012 Disposition Judicial Officer Unassigned, Judge Defendant GOODBAUDY, JAMES TRENT Failure to Carry/Present License Convicted 11/14/2012 Sentence Failure to Carry/Present License Sentence Converted Disposition Unitary Assessment $60.00 Fine $40.00 Converted Disposition Jail - Day(s):
Additionally, on or before APRIL 30, 2012, each party must provide to the office of the Magistrate Judge, via hand-delivery, mail or e-mail, marked “confidential”, a settlement statement.
The following is the recommended scoring system for competition. For each of the 15 items, judges award 0, ½ point or one point. Associations may choose to use or develop their own scoring system for Lodge, District and Association competitions, but the scoring system outlined below is the system that will be used during the International competition finals at the 2015 International Convention in Nashville: Vocal Performance (maximum 6 points) Was the singer on pitch? Did the singer hit high notes without sounding weak or straining? Did the singer choose a song suited to his/her ability? Did the singer stay in time with the track/music? Was the singer able to sustain notes and phrases without losing his/her breath? Did the singer show knowledge/mastery of the song? Song Interpretation (maximum 4 points) Was the singer’s phrasing well done (ex. – no breathing at inappropriate times)? Did the singer have his/her own style, or did he/she mimic the original well (either is fine)? Did the singer use loud and/or soft dynamics to make the song come alive? Was the singer’s vocal rendition suited to the song? Stage Presence (maximum 5 points) Did the singer perform the song in an entertaining manner? Did the singer draw the crowd and you as a judge into the performance? Was the singer enthusiastic/emotionally in sync with the song? Was the singer confident on stage? Did the singer show unusual talent, range or skill? A perfect score would be 15 points. Judges will be provided blank score sheets for each competitor. Each judge will circle the appropriate point value for each of the 15 criteria on the score sheet. District Competition Page 3 2016‐2017 Moose International Karaoke Competition General Guidelines and Competition Rules 20.
In the event that a tie still remains, a new judge, selected by the Sponsor in its sole discretion, will judge the tied entries based on the judging criteria set forth above.
RUF-DEN-JUDGE-AKTION Als Schiedsrichter erlebt man kaum ein Turnier ohne »Du, in Runde X hat mein Gegner das und jenes gemacht, war das okay?« oder »Boah, dieser blöde Typ hat mich die ganze Zeit voll drausgebracht!«, und meist ist es für den Judge ähnlich ärgerlich wie für den Spieler, weil die Frage/Beschwerde erst kommt, wenn man nichts mehr machen kann.
Junéia Mallas A yara had to hurry to hang the hammock before Judge Darcinta de Pedro Tomaia ordered her to turn off the light.
1999CR2028(Di s tri ct) Summary Judge Thoma s Ri cha rd Ens or Court Ada ms County Division F EFiled Y Appealed Case Closed 12/02/2003 Date Case Status Judge or Magistrate Agency Related Cases Participants Date Filed: