PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 22 September at 04:19 - Around 220000 files indexed.
Results for «libertarian»:
Total: 70 results - 0.072 seconds
Libertarian values lined up neatly with some of sci-fi’s most fundamental tenets:
Lessons from Rothbard and The Libertarian Forum, Anonymous Capitalism Works:
Issue #9 November 2017 Progressivism and Conservatism and Their Approach to Power in Society, article by Non Facies Furtum (p. 2, 3) Why You Should Become a Libertarian Right Now, Article by Insula Qui (p. 3-5) Review of: Making Economic Sense, Murray Rothbard:
December 2nd, 2017 Political Compass All Samples 10 8 Libertarian - Authoritarian 79.1 100 24 71 23.5 83.1 0 52.7 45.8 37.7 70.7 66.2 47.2 44.7 68.2 77.6 79.6 55.4 66.2 70.1 71.6 38.8 84 79 67.3 70.7 33 85.6 81.3 42.2 68.5 58.1 33.2 61.7 70 93.5 80.9 78 87.4 68.6 76.6 67.4 88.6 66 80 40.1 6 4 2 0 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -4 -6 -8 -10 Left - Right Column B Political Compass Average 10 8 6 Authoritarian Traditionalism 4 2 0 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2-2 0 2 -4 -6 -8 -10 Right 1.3298148148 Page 3 4 6 8 10 Sheet1 8 Values Test Percentage of /pol/ that is "for"
Libertarian Philosophy and Open Borders Fallacy FILIPE FARIA • November 05, 2017 Contemporary libertarians agree on basic premises such as free market, private property, and the principle of voluntarism;
It might be considered an attempt to reconcile anarcho-capitalism with individualist anarchism and even the rest of libertarian socialism where possible.
Unlike the relativ stable mass social democratic parties that flourished elsewhere, libertarian organizations in Spain gave rise to a seething and radical political culture, one that was unparelleled in the rest of Europe' was in little-known Spain that Marxism, anarchism, syndicalisl collectivism, and libertarian individualism, with all their traditions, obliged ro answer to the challenges of a living history.
23-28) 1 Interview With Michael Huemer, by Non Facies Furtum Michael Huemer received his BA from UC Berkeley in 1992 and his PhD from Rutgers University in 1998. He is presently professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado at Boulder. He is the author of more than 60 academic articles in ethics, epistemology, political philosophy, and metaphysics, as well as four amazing books that you should definitely buy: Skepticism and the Veil of Perception (2001), Ethical Intuitionism (2005), The Problem of Political Authority (2013), and Approaching Infinity (2016). As he is a very influential libertarian philosopher active in the Front Range area, we contacted him for an interview and asked several questions related to the philosophy of liberty, and to his work. FRV: Can you outline your strongest argument for why the state lacks legitimate authority? MH: We don't need an argument that the state lacks authority. We would need an argument that the state has authority. If there's no reason why the state would be relevantly different from other agents, then we should assume the state is subject to the same moral principles as other agents. Now, there are several philosophical theories about why the state has authority. I discuss the most important ones at length in The Problem of Political Authority. But none of the theories is any good. All of them either (a) appeal to factually false claims, or (b) appeal to claims that, even if true, simply would not establish anyone's authority. An example of (a) is the claim everybody at some time agreed to establish a state (of course this never happened). An example of (b) would be the claim that a majority of people support the state (if a majority of people want something, that doesn't make that thing right). I can't fairly present all the theories of authority, nor the problems with them, here. I wrote a 350-page book to do that (among other things), and all of it needs to be read to understand the complete argument. But the basic reason I don't believe in authority is simply that no one has given any good reason why the state would have authority. In brief, no one has told me why 535 people in Washington have the right to tell everyone else what to do. If there was a good answer to that, someone would probably have thought of it by now. FRV: What do you think is the most practical path to achieving a stateless society? MH: I don't know. What I am doing is trying to get more people to understand anarcho-capitalism, in the hope that if enough people understand the theory and why it's a good idea, it will eventually come about. We could move toward anarchy gradually. For example, we could start with local governments outsourcing policing duties to private security guard companies. (Of course, there would need to be a number of competing security companies, and an easy mechanism for citizens to change companies.) Similarly, courts could start referring more cases to private arbitrators. If these experiments went well, they could be expanded, and the government shrunk at the same time. Of course, this probably would not happen until there was much greater understanding of and support for free markets. I don't know whether this is the best path. But it's one possible path that seems to me worth considering. FRV: You have written much on the subject of ethical intuitionism; can you explain this idea, and provide some examples of how applying it to moral situations leads to the conclusion that the state is an immoral institution? 2 MH: The theory holds that we have intuitive awareness of some objective ethical truths, and this is the basis for the rest of our knowledge of ethics. I've written a book on the subject (Ethical Intuitionism), as well as a number of academic articles. You're basically asking me, "Hey, could you summarize your 300-page book in a couple of minutes?" To which the most accurate answer would be, "No, I can't." There's nothing I could say in a brief space that wouldn't be misleading. (The book is 300 pages because there is a complex set of ideas and arguments that require that amount of space to fairly present.) But I can give you some examples of the moral problems with the state. One example is about taxation. Suppose that I personally decided to start "taxing" people. I go around to people's houses demanding a cut of their total income, which I plan to use for a charity that I run to help the poor. I threaten to kidnap and imprison my neighbors if they don't give me the money. This would be regarded as clearly wrong, and no one would think they owed me the money. I would be called a thief and an extortionist. But that is like the government's behavior when it collects taxes. The difference between "extortion" and "taxation" is just that one is done by a private agent, and the other is done by the government. A second example concerns military intervention. What if I announced, one day, that a certain foreign country might be building weapons of mass destruction, and that they had to be stopped? What if I got a group of friends together, flew to that country, and started shooting people and blowing up buildings, in an effort to change that country's government? Most would consider my behavior wrong even if the foreign government was really bad. I would be labelled a terrorist and a mass murderer. But this is like the government's behavior when it goes to war. The chief difference between "terrorism"
Need team to focus writing opinion on legislation to post on Libertarian Website – Headed by Lamont Region 5 Report:
then as ceremonial shrouds to bury the dead.” - Arundhati Roy This particular Manifesto is based on ideals from all notions of Anarchism, but should be heavily tied to Anarcho-Syndicalism and Libertarian Socialism with the exception of “anarchocapitalism” WE NEED YOUR HELP EDITING!
Libertarian Party of Washington State Annual Convention Business Session Minutes 5/31/2015 – Drafted by Steven Nielson/David Traynor, Secretary of the Libertarian Party of Washington State.
Schmidt memo 73%
The origins of this flaw, lying as they do in the apartheid system, cannot, however, disguise the fact that it has rendered most blacks incapable of other than the basest service to the Revolution – and because a libertarian socialist Revolution requires full-fledged individuals in possession of these faculties, any activism naturally reverts to authoritarian, leader-led, anti-autonomous modes of behaviour.
An easy way to judge (from a libertarian The current Marriage Act is used to identify perspective) whether an action should be couples who are eligible for exclusive government benefits- welfare benefits, tax illegal is to refer back to JS benefits, subsidised marriage counselling Mill’s harm principle.
Ellington Shines 66%
As for Paxton, she's a Libertarian who made it clear that her priority is to vote against anything that would increase taxes or make government bigger, and vote for anything that would cut taxes or make government smaller.
Philosophy of Funds Distribution Introduced Libertarian Leadership Magazine.
President of the Refined Spanish Society (SER) of the University of the Bahamas [2015-2016] Youth in Parliament, member for Garden Hills  External Director of Public Relations for the College of the Bahamas CHMI Student Steering Committee [2015-2016] WORK EXPERIENCE Design Board, United States Libertarian Party [2010-present] 2015 – 2017 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE QBC Electronics (Mall at Marathon) 2016 – 2017 BAHAMAS A SUS ORDENES Interpreter [Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch] KEY SKILLS Personal Team Building and Leadership Planning and Strategy EDUCATION Language &
PublicfuncLionsceasedto be the privateproperty of the tools of the CentralGovemment.Not only municipal administration, but the whole initiative hitherto exercisedby the Statewas laid into the hands of the Commune.4 Marx was careful not ro claim that the Commune had abandonedall the functionsof a state-quite to the contrary,he took note of its statistfeaturesbut the libertarian ambienceof his description is evident, contrasting sharply with his normally centralisticstatistviews.So deprecatoryof the stategenerally was this book, however, and so ebullient was it about the Commune's anarchisticdemand for communal liberties that JamesGuillaume,Bakunin's dosest collaboratorin the Intemational,ironicallyregardedit as evidenceof a capitularionto anarchistsin the IWMA LaterMarxistleadersevencitedMarx's description of the Commune as the model par excellenceof a proletarian dictatorship.
Three Tiers for Tyranny, article by Nick Weber (15, 16) Karl Marx, Conflict Theory, and the Coming Battle Between Libertarians and Socialists, Libertarian Sociology 101 Column, By Richard G.
If the election for President were held today and the candidates were Donald Trump the Republican, Hillary Clinton the Democrat, and Gary Johnson the Libertarian- for which candidate would you vote?