PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 21 April at 11:28 - Around 76000 files indexed.
14‐42 ACLU v. Clapper UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: September 2, 2014 Decided: May 7, 2015) Docket No. 14‐42‐cv ________________ AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs‐Appellants, — v. — JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence, MICHAEL S. ROGERS, in his official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service, ASHTON B. CARTER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, LORETTA E. LYNCH, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and JAMES B. COMEY, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants‐Appellees.* * The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the official caption in this case to conform with the caption above. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
Spring 2017 - Issue 8 PURSUING a nation where all chaplains, and those whom they serve, freely exercise their God-given and constitutionally protected religious liberties without fear of reprisal.
Event Dining Event Packages 2017 7630 Gibson St.
12/13/2015 Law Enforcement is Using a 226YearOld Law to Force Tech Companies to Unlock Mobile Phones | American Civil Liberties Union GIVE TO THE ACLU TODAY AND YOUR GIFT WILL BE MATCHED DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR DONATE SPEAK FREELY Law Enforcement is Using a 226Year-Old Law to Force Tech Companies to Unlock Mobile Phones Eliza Sweren-Becker, Attorney, ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project &
INCIDENT I CRIMINAL REPORT Alameda County Sherifrs Office Agency:
of respect for the Our only help under these circumstances is in God, who submission to divine law, and mutual love and respect for will give us the spirit— disposition— of a sound mind, if, in the rights and liberties of fellow-creatures.
a publicly traded company, article dated May, 21, 2015 entitled:’ IsoRay Takes Liberties With Lung Cancer Study Results to Prop Up Stock Price ’1 specifically states:‘ In their conclusion, the study authors do not endorse IsoRay's Cesium-131… ‘ may be a false and possibly a slanderous statement as demonstrated by empirical evidence herein and if subsequently proven to be false and slanderous by court(s) and or a regulatory body(s) may additionally be demonstrative of gross negligence and or possibly willful and illegal manipulation of the market price of IsoRay’s stock in a way that furthers the interests of short sellers by Adam Feuerstein and The Street, Inc.