PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact


Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 06 July at 04:43 - Around 220000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «metric»:


Total: 900 results - 0.041 seconds

Tap clearance 100%

E25UNF1"1/4 E25UNF1/2 E25UNF1/4 E25UNF3/4 E25UNF5/16 E25UNF7/16 M10 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M10 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M10 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M2 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M2.5 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M3 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M3 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M4 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M4 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M4 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M4 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M4 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M5 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M5 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M5 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M5 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M6 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M6 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M6 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M6 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M8 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M8 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M8 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M8 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M10X1 Metric Fine Machine Taps M10X1.25 Metric Fine Machine Taps 6-32 UNC Machine Taps 832 UNC Machine Taps 10-32 UNF Machine Taps 1/4 UNF Machine Taps 6-40 UNF Machine Taps 8-36 UNF Machine Taps M12 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M12 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M12 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M12 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M12 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M14 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M14 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M14 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M14 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M14 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M16 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M16 LEFT HAND Metric Coarse Machine M16 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M16 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M18 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M18 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M20 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M20 Metric Coarse Machine Taps M12X1.5 Metric Fine Machine Taps M14X1.5 Metric Fine Machine Taps M27X1.5 Metric Fine Machine Taps UNC Machine Taps 1/2 UNC Machine Taps 3/4 UNC Machine Taps 5/16 UNC Machine Taps 7/16 UNC Machine Taps UNF Machine Taps UNF Machine Taps 1/2 UNF Machine Taps 1/4 UNF Machine Taps 3/4 UNF Machine Taps 5/16 UNF Machine Taps 7/16 UNF Machine Taps £19.99 £15.78 £10.48 £11.91 £11.91 £8.02 £9.54 £8.02 £13.62 £15.15 £12.33 £9.54 £8.02 £15.15 £13.18 £9.60 £8.02 £13.93 £15.15 £13.18 £8.18 £17.22 £13.26 £8.70 £13.39 £12.94 £10.54 £10.54 £11.73 £13.29 £11.58 £11.58 £13.49 £23.28 £25.72 £21.66 £14.10 £17.82 £29.70 £33.06 £26.84 £18.42 £33.45 £33.06 £29.86 £20.23 £40.69 £40.69 £35.16 £46.48 £15.54 £19.75 £75.93 £98.84 £20.82 £35.53 £12.17 £16.73 £64.34 £103.78 £22.91 £13.29 £39.05 £13.38 £18.42 £2.50 £1.97 £1.31 £1.49 £1.49 £1.00 £1.19 £1.00 £1.70 £1.89 £1.54 £1.19 £1.00 £1.89 £1.65 £1.20 £1.00 £1.74 £1.89 £1.65 £1.02 £2.15 £1.66 £1.09 £1.67 £1.62 £1.32 £1.32 £1.47 £1.66 £1.45 £1.45 £1.69 £2.91 £3.22 £2.71 £1.76 £2.23 £3.71 £4.13 £3.36 £2.30 £4.18 £4.13 £3.73 £2.53 £5.09 £5.09 £4.40 £5.81 £1.94 £2.47 £9.49 £12.36 £2.60 £4.44 £1.52 £2.09 £8.04 £12.97 £2.86 £1.66 £4.88 £1.67 £2.30 E60M10LH E60M10T E60M2.5T E60M2.5TXC E60M2T E60M2TXC E60M3 E60M3LH E60M3T E60M3TXC E60M4LH E60M4T E60M4TXC E60M5LH E60M5T E60M5TXC E60M6 E60M6LH E60M6T E60M6TXC E60M8 E60M8LH E60M8T E60M8TXC E60UNC10-24 E60UNC1/4 E60UNC6-32 E60UNC8-32 E60UNF10-32 E60UNF1/4 E60UNF6-40 E60UNF8-36 E61M12LH E61M12T E61M12TXC E61M14 E61M14LH E61M14TXC E61M16 E61M16LH E61M20 E61M20LH E61M30 E61MF12X1.25 E61MF22X1.5 E61MF27X1.5 E61UNC1"

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/05/29/tap-clearance/

29/05/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

05633842 96%

They used metric tools and methods to be able to get the software characteristics and compare them with other software applications or with standards.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/09/08/05633842/

08/09/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

NUPLicenseOracle 95%

NUP License Oracle Oracle Named User Plus License Metric NUP License Oracle In this place, so that you'll have the trust to license your Oracle environment economically and compliantly, we seek to demystify these metrics, including the NUP License for Oracle Databases and Applications.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/25/nuplicenseoracle/

25/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

IJWLTT Alsmadi 95%

They used metric tools and methods to be able to get the software characteristics and compare them with known standards.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/10/30/ijwltt-alsmadi/

30/10/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

inter1 94%

Definition and practical application of the metric.........................................32 3.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/12/19/inter1/

19/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

9A0-381 Exam Questions Updated Demo 2018 93%

8.0 Question 1 Yiu waot ti access Cioteot Ciosumptio (Page Views/Visits) per Pages, Site Sectios aod Site Sub Sectioss Yiu have a separate custim trafc variable reserved fir each if the repirtss What is the best way ti eosure that the Cioteot Ciosumptio calculated metric is available fir all three repirts?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/01/22/9a0-381-exam-questions-updated-demo-2018/

22/01/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

9A0-381 Exam Dumps - Try Latest 9A0-381 Demo Questions 93%

8.0 Question 1 Yiu waot ti access Cioteot Ciosumptio (Page Views/Visits) per Pages, Site Sectios aod Site Sub Sectioss Yiu have a separate custim trafc variable reserved fir each if the repirtss What is the best way ti eosure that the Cioteot Ciosumptio calculated metric is available fir all three repirts?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/01/22/9a0-381-exam-dumps-try-latest-9a0-381-demo-questions/

22/01/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

2015 Mitsubishi Hitachi US 93%

3 NEW ITEMS 0” 10” | IASPV/ASPV Face Mill Style Shank Style 3.0 PAGE Modular Style | 2.0” - 2.5” SIZE RANGE 2.0” - 6.0” PROJECTION 0.625” - 1.5” SIZE RANGE 1.25” - 2.0” PROJECTION 0.625” - 1.5” SIZE RANGE 2.0” - 7.0” PROJECTION 39 0” 10” | 6.0 Face Mill Style | SIZE RANGE 2.5” - 6.0” PROJECTION 2.0” - 6.0” 10° ∼  30° IASDF 3.0 IASM/ASM IRV/RV IASM/ASM POCKET MILLING APPLICATION POCKET MILLING APPLICATION PAGE 49 metric only Shank Style PAGE PAGE PAGE 59 59 r5 r6 PAGE PAGE PAGE SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE | MODULAR IARPF/ARPF IARPF/ARPF SHANK || || 0.375” -|- 0.75” 0.75” | |0.375” || | PROJECTION PROJECTION SIZE RANGE || || || || | | | | | 0.394” - 0.787” SIZE RANGE PROJECTION | 1.5” - 3.0” 1.75” -- 7.0” 7.0” 1.75” 1.0” - 1.5” 5.5” - 6.0” PROJECTION metric only | 2.0” - 6.0” 1.75” - 7.0” SIZE RANGE Modular Style 10”| | 10” 10” 0.75” - 4.0” 0.394” -- 0.787” 0.787” 0.394” PROJECTION SIZE RANGE RANGE PROJECTION SIZE PROJECTION PROJECTION || 0.75” -- 4.0” 4.0” 0.75” 0.375” - 0.75” PROJECTION 0” SIZE RANGE RANGE | SIZE 1.0” - 1.5” 2.0” - 7.0” 76 62 76 0” 0” ||| 0” Face Mill Style Face Mill Style metric only Style Face Mill SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE SIZE RANGE | PROJECTION PROJECTION SIZE RANGE PROJECTION Shank Shank Style Style metric Shank Style metric only only metric only PROJECTION SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE SIZE RANGE PROJECTION PROJECTION SIZE RANGE PROJECTION metric only Modular Modular Style Style metric Modular metric only onlyStyle PROJECTION SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE SIZE RANGE PROJECTION PROJECTION SIZE RANGEN PROJECTIO metric only || || || || | | | | || || 1.969” | - 3.937” | 1.969” - 3.937” 2.0” - 4.0” || || || | | | Shank Style Shank Style Modular Style metric onlyStyle Modular Modular Style metric only | 2.0” - 6.0” 2.0” - 6.0” 0.984” - 1.575” 0.984” --1.575” 0.984” 1.575” 1.0” -- 4.0” 4.0” 1.0” 0.984” - 1.575” 1.0” - 4.0” 1.0” - 4.0” 0.984” -- 1.260” 1.260” 0.984” 0.984” - 1.260” 5.5” -- 7.0” 7.0” 5.5” 0.984” - 1.260” 5.5” - 7.0” 5.5” - 7.0” 0” 10” 0” || 0” 10” || 10” | SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE 10” 10” || 10”| 2.0” -- 6.0” 6.0” 1.969” - 3.937” 2.0” PROJECTION FINISHING FINISHING APPLICATION APPLICATION 4 || 53 SIDE SIDE MILLING MILLING APPLICATION APPLICATION AHU IAHU/AHU AHU Shank Style Shank Style Modular Style metric only Modular Face MillStyle Style 0” || 0” | | || || || || || || || || 0.375”| -- 1.0” 1.0” | | 0.375” || | | | | | | PROJECTION PROJECTION SIZE RANGE 0.375” - 1.0” PROJECTION SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE SIZE RANGE RANGE PROJECTION PROJECTION SIZE 0.787” -- 0.984” 0.984” 0.787” | 2.0” -- 5.0” 5.0” 2.0” 2.0” - 5.0” 0.25” - 1.5” 0.787” - 0.984” 2.0” -- 7.0” 7.0” 2.0” 3.0” 2.0” - 7.0” PROJECTION PROJECTION - 8.0” 163 PAGE PAGE PAGE 86 86 Shank Style Shank Style Modular Style SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE 0” || 0” || || || || || || || || || 10” || 10” 0.313” 1.0” | | 0.313” | -- 1.0” | | | | | | Ltd.| ©| 2015 Mitsubishi Hitachi Tool Engineering, PROJECTION SIZE RANGE PROJECTION PROJECTION SIZE RANGE RANGE SIZE 0.313” - 1.0” 0.787”- 0.984” 0.984” 0.787”- 2.0” -- 7.0” 7.0” 2.0” 2.0” - 7.0” APPLICATION TOOL LIST FACE MILLING APPLICATION 0” IASF/ASF Face Mill Style PAGE 10” | | PROJECTION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 70 07 Face Mill Style Shank Style | | | 1.25” - 1.5” SIZE RANGE PROJECTION 1.75” - 2.75” 17 80 IASRT Face Mill Style | | | | | | | 2.0” - 4.0” PROJECTION 2.0” - 6.0” 21 84 | Face Mill Style Shank Style IASR/ASR MULTI 10” | SIZE RANGE 0” Modular Style metric only SIZE RANGE | | | | | | PROJECTION SIZE RANGE 2.0” - 6.0” 0.625” - 1.5” PROJECTION SIZE RANGE | 2.0” - 2.5” 2.0” - 5.0” 0.630” - 1.575” PROJECTION 2.0” - 7.0” 25 88 Multi Flute High Feed Type Economical Type Programming Radius Long Projection High Precision Multi Flute | 2.0” - 6.0” PROJECTION | PAGE 10” 2.0” - 4.0” SIZE RANGE 0” PAGE | 4.0” - 8.0” | IASRF | 2.5” - 10.0” SIZE RANGE 0” PAGE | High Feed Type Economical Type Projection High Precision 2013 Programming © 2009 Hitachi ToolRadius Engineering, Ltd.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/10/23/2015-mitsubishi-hitachi-us/

23/10/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

10.1.1.133.5904 93%

Metric tools achieve this by gathering and analyzing the software or the application through a metric tool.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/09/14/10-1-1-133-5904/

14/09/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

bare conf 90%

E XTENDED R ESULTS 0.95 Specificity In Table I we present the sensitivity and specificity for each studied correlation metric.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/07/28/bare-conf/

28/07/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

A Guide to Oracle License Audits 89%

Many of the issues related to metric misuse come about because of improper counting.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/03/23/a-guide-to-oracle-license-audits/

23/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

22N19-IJAET0118673 v7 iss1 183-192 89%

In this paper a new quality metric ‘Modified PSNR-B’ is proposed, it is an extension/ modification of well-established still image quality metrics PSNR-B which is specifically tuned for blocking artifacts.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/07/04/22n19-ijaet0118673-v7-iss1-183-192/

04/07/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

final report on personal site assignment 87%

 I   am  unsure  as  to  the  reasoning  why  Google’s  metric  system  did  not  track  correctly,  but  I  will  be  analyzing   Alex Osborne MC3504;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/05/02/final-report-on-personal-site-assignment/

02/05/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

J M T - Hero Synergies - DOTABUFF - Dota 2 Stats 86%

7/31/2015 J M T - Hero Synergies - DOTABUFF - Dota 2 Stats  DOTABUFF  errgh  JMT Hero Synergies 19 minutes ago 877 ‑ 785 ‑ 31 51.80% LAST MATCH RECORD  GIFT  FOLLOW Overview Matches WIN RATE  ESPORTS PROFILE Matchups More ▾ LAST 3 MONTHS, ALL SKILL BRACKETS, ALL LOBBIES, ALL MODES, ANY FACTION, ANY DURATION, SIGNIFICANT Last 3 Months ▾ Any Faction ▾ All Lobbies Hero Synergies ▾ All Heroes ▾ All Modes ▾ All Skill Brackets Any Duration ▾ ▾ More ▾ Hero Win Rate With Matches Played Visage 100.00% 3 Brewmaster 100.00% 1 Shadow Shaman 85.71% 7 Phantom Assassin 83.33% 6 Crystal Maiden 81.82% 22 Enchantress 80.00% 5 Chaos Knight 80.00% 5 Treant Protector 80.00% 5 Sand King 77.78% 9 Drow Ranger 75.00% 4 Alchemist 75.00% 4 Terrorblade 75.00% 4 Bristleback 71.43% 14 http://www.dotabuff.com/players/119608468/matchups?metric=hero_synergies 1/6 7/31/2015 J M T - Hero Synergies - DOTABUFF - Dota 2 Stats Disruptor 70.00% 10 Centaur Warrunner 66.67% 9 Templar Assassin 66.67% 12 Spectre 66.67% 9 Kunkka 66.67% 6 Elder Titan 66.67% 3 Lycan 66.67% 3 Oracle 66.67% 3 Morphling 66.67% 3 Wraith King 66.67% 9 Vengeful Spirit 64.71% 17 Naga Siren 62.50% 16 Viper 62.50% 8 Lifestealer 62.50% 8 Phoenix 61.54% 13 Ember Spirit 61.54% 13 Leshrac 61.29% 31 Night Stalker 60.00% 5 Axe 60.00% 15 Tusk 60.00% 15 Silencer 60.00% 10 Lone Druid 60.00% 5 Undying 58.82% 17 Jakiro 58.33% 12 http://www.dotabuff.com/players/119608468/matchups?metric=hero_synergies 2/6 7/31/2015 J M T - Hero Synergies - DOTABUFF - Dota 2 Stats Windranger 58.33% 36 Timbersaw 58.33% 12 Lina 57.69% 26 Anti‑Mage 57.63% 59 Ogre Magi 57.14% 14 Omniknight 57.14% 7 Tiny 57.14% 7 Magnus 56.25% 16 Shadow Fiend 55.88% 34 Earth Spirit 55.56% 9 Dazzle 55.56% 9 Spirit Breaker 55.00% 20 Necrophos 54.55% 11 Zeus 53.85% 13 Bloodseeker 53.85% 39 Mirana 52.38% 21 Meepo 50.00% 4 Dragon Knight 50.00% 8 Phantom Lancer 50.00% 20 Weaver 50.00% 10 Abaddon 50.00% 10 Tinker 50.00% 8 Beastmaster 50.00% 4 Storm Spirit 49.25% 67 http://www.dotabuff.com/players/119608468/matchups?metric=hero_synergies 3/6 7/31/2015 J M T - Hero Synergies - DOTABUFF - Dota 2 Stats Legion Commander 47.83% 23 Rubick 47.37% 19 Skywrath Mage 47.06% 17 Lion 46.43% 28 Earthshaker 46.43% 28 Faceless Void 46.15% 13 Huskar 46.15% 13 Techies 45.95% 37 Witch Doctor 45.45% 11 Bounty Hunter 44.44% 36 Ancient Apparition 44.44% 9 Ursa 43.75% 16 Broodmother 42.86% 7 Clockwerk 42.86% 21 Riki 42.86% 7 Nature's Prophet 42.11% 19 Pudge 41.67% 24 Enigma 40.00% 10 Sniper 40.00% 5 Outworld Devourer 40.00% 5 Medusa 40.00% 10 Sven 40.00% 10 Slark 38.89% 18 Juggernaut 38.89% 18 http://www.dotabuff.com/players/119608468/matchups?metric=hero_synergies 4/6 7/31/2015 J M T - Hero Synergies - DOTABUFF - Dota 2 Stats 37.50% 8 Lich 37.50% 16 Invoker 36.36% 11 Keeper of the Light 36.36% 11 Clinkz 36.36% 11 Queen of Pain 35.71% 28 Gyrocopter 33.33% 30 Batrider 33.33% 6 Luna 33.33% 3 Nyx Assassin 30.77% 13 Winter Wyvern 28.57% 14 Bane 28.57% 7 Warlock 25.00% 4 Venomancer 25.00% 8 Slardar 20.00% 5 Pugna 20.00% 5 Tidehunter 16.67% 6 Dark Seer 12.50% 8 Troll Warlord 0.00% 2 Death Prophet 0.00% 2 Puck 0.00% 2 Doom 0.00% 1 Shadow Demon 0.00% 4 Io http://www.dotabuff.com/players/119608468/matchups?metric=hero_synergies 5/6

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/08/01/j-m-t-hero-synergies-dotabuff-dota-2-stats/

01/08/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

End of Semester 1 Evaluation - Andrew Rausch 86%

Werner H. Kirsten Student Intern Program Student Evaluation Intern:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/02/10/end-of-semester-1-evaluation-andrew-rausch/

10/02/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

kbs 86%

2 IC(LCS)/(IC(term1) + IC(term2) Feature based measures Adapted Lesk (LESK) [16] Gloss Vector (vector) [2] The similarity score is the sum of the squares of the overlap lengths This method works by forming second-order co-occurrence vectors from the glosses or WordNet definitions of concepts This metric forms separate vectors corresponding to each of the adjacent glosses Gloss Vector, pairwise modified (vector_pairs) [20] We have designed an algorithm which provides a floating point number.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/24/kbs/

24/08/2017 www.pdf-archive.com