Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 08 March at 06:06 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «ordinance»:


Total: 400 results - 0.05 seconds

Ventura County Non Coastal Zoning Ordinance 100%

VENTURA COUNTY NON-COASTAL ZONING ORDINANCE DIVISION 8, CHAPTER 1 OF THE VENTURA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE LAST AMENDED 3-18-14 VENTURA COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION (This page intentionally left blank.) To purchase the Ventura County Non-Coastal Zoning Ordinance:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/16/ventura-county-non-coastal-zoning-ordinance/

16/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

2014 Damariscotta Comp Plan 2-15 vol 2 97%

II - Appendices APPENDIX A HISTORY OF LAND USE PLANNING IN DAMARISCOTTA FROM 1961 TO 2013  Land Use Ordinances In 1972, Maine developed a model ordinance requiring the towns with fresh and/or salt water bodies to adopt Shoreland Use standards.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/23/2014-damariscotta-comp-plan-2-15-vol-2/

23/01/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

itaxord 97%

INCOME TAX MANUAL PART I INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001 AMENDED UPTO 30TH JUNE, 2015 1 F.No.2(1)/2001—Pub.— The following Ordinance promulgated by the President is hereby published for general information:— AN ORDINANCE To consolidate and amend the law relating to income tax WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to income tax and to provide for matters ancillary thereto or connected therewith;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/12/22/itaxord/

22/12/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Team SG861 Meeting Minutes 091717 91%

Parent Meeting Minutes September 17, 2017 @ Tri Leisure:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/23/team-sg861-meeting-minutes-091717/

22/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Help Save Our Sea Turtles color.docx 89%

Other cities such as Madeira Beach have passed a “Leave no Trace” ordinance to deal with property left on the beach.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/02/help-save-our-sea-turtles-color-docx/

02/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Staff Report on changing CC election 101716.PDF 88%

REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager October 17, 2016 SUBJECT Ordinance Amending Municipal Code Section 2.27.6 for an Adjustment to City of Redwood City Elections to Adhere to the California Voter Participation Rights Act (California State Senate Bill 415) RECOMMENDATION Waive first reading and introduce an Ordinance amending Section 2.27.6 of the Redwood City Municipal Code regarding General Municipal Elections The SB 415 Council Ad Hoc Committee (Council Members Aguirre, Gee, and Masur) recommend that the City Council introduce an ordinance to extend the terms of each existing Council member by an additional 12 months, and move the November 2017 election to November 2018, and the November 2019 election to November 2020, to adhere to the requirements of SB 415 BACKGROUND On September 1, 2015, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), “The California Voter Participation Rights Act.” SB 415 was adopted to address waning civic engagement due to declining voter turnout in federal, state, and local elections.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/10/14/staff-report-on-changing-cc-election-101716/

14/10/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Drive Forward Rules Comments - May 5 87%

  May   5,   2017    City   of   Seattle  Department   of   Finance   and   Administrative   Services  Attn:   Mr.   Matthew   Eng  P.O.   Box   94689  Seattle,   WA   98124­4689  DriverRepresentation@seattle.gov      Dear   Mr.   Eng:    We,   the   undersigned   drivers   and   community   members   of   Drive   Forward   Seattle,   submit   the  following   public   comments   on   the   proposed   rule   changes   released   by   your   office   on   April   21,  2017.     First,   in   general,   we   are   increasingly   alarmed   by   the   City’s   clumsy   and   unprofessional  administration   of   this   flawed   ordinance.   Not   only   was   the   ordinance   originally   passed   with   no  public   dialogue   and   no   input   from   the   very   people   it   would   affect   most   ­  drivers   ­  but   the   City   has  ignored   our   voices   every   step   of   the   way.   Hundreds   of   us   have   offered   comments,   suggestions,  and   testimony   during   this   process,   but   we   have   been   ignored.   The   release   of   this   latest   set   of  rules   only   provides   further   confirmation   the   goal   of   this   effort   is   not   to   help   the   drivers.   This   is   not  the   progressive   City   we   know   that   claims   to   be   inclusive   and   to   care   about   people   like   us.    Second,   we   are   extremely   concerned   by   the   Department   of   Finance   and   Administrative  Services’   sudden   decision   to   make   changes   to   supposedly   “final”   rules   several   months   after  beginning   implementation   of   the   ordinance.   How   can   the   rules   change   after   they   were   already  final?   How   do   we   know   they   won’t   change   again?   Even   more   disturbing,   none   of   the   new  changes   reflect   the   extensive   feedback   you   have   received   from   drivers.   Where   did   these  proposed   changes   come   from?   Whose   interests   are   you   protecting   with   these   new   changes?   It  certainly   is   not   drivers.    Third,   now   that   you   have   re­opened   the   rules,   we   would   again   implore   you   to   listen   to   the   voices  of   drivers   like   us   and   make   the   following   changes   to   the   rules   that   we   have   previously   asked   for  on   many   occasions:    ● Every   driver   affected   by   this   ordinance   should   have   a  vote   on   union   representation.   The  City   has   been   working   on   this   ordinance   for   nearly   a  year   and   a  half,   and   we   have   not  once   heard   the   City   offer   any   logical   explanation   based   upon   any   reliable   evidence   or  fact   as   to   why   only   certain   drivers   get   a  vote   on   an   issue   that   will   impact   their   future.   Why  are   you   denying   thousands   of   drivers   this   fundamental   right?      ● Every   driver   that   would   be   bound   by   a  resulting   contract   should   get   a  final   vote   on  whether   to   approve   or   disapprove   that   agreement.   This   has   been   a  basic   part   of   labor  law   for   decades.   Why   won’t   you   guarantee   drivers   a  final   up   or   down   vote   on   the  contract.   Why   are   you   giving   the   right   of   approval   or   rejection   to   the   Director?  ● Drivers   should   have   real   protections   from   harassment   and   intimidation   from   any  organization   seeking   to   represent   us.   The   rules   currently   include   protections   against  harassment   by   other   parties   but   not   from   the   organization   that   has   the   most   to   gain   from  securing   our   signatures.   Why   won’t   you   provide   us   with   these   protections?      Please   do   not   ignore   these   objections   both   to   the   proposed   rules   and   to   the   City’s   flawed  rule­making   process   like   you   have   done   in   the   past.   We   cannot   understand   why   the   City   didn’t  offer   ANY   response   to   Drive   Forward’s   February   17,   2017,   letter   raising   a  number   of   major  objections   to   approving   the   Teamsters’   QDR   application.   Our   letter   laid   out   the   Teamsters’  massive   conflict   of   interest   in   trying   to   represent   independent   drivers   like   us   after   years   of  fighting   to   stop   us   from   earning   money   as   drivers   ­  including   fighting   to   keep   us   out   of   the  airport,   suing   to   kick   TNCs   out   of   Seattle   entirely,   and   capping   the   number   of   drivers   at   150.  How   could   an   organization   whose   interests   directly   conflict   with   the   interests   of   the   drivers   they  seek   to   represent   be   certified   as   a  QDR?   These   are   serious   questions   ­  but   we   received   no  answers.   The   City’s   defective   process   has   clearly   not   put   the   interests   of   drivers   first.    In   conclusion,   we,   the   drivers   and   community   members   of   Drive   Forward   Seattle   affected   by   this  ordinance,   implore   you   once   again   to   begin   protecting   the   interests   of   drivers   by   listening   to   our  concerns   and   revising   the   rules   so   that  o   ur   privacy   is   protected   and   that  e   very   driver   gets   a  vote   on   representation   and   any   final   contract.    Respectfully   submitted,    Ourang   Ahdifard David   Gilmore Steven   Muskovits  Belal   Ahmed Immanuel   Gitamo Yebeta   Mwiba  Greg   Allan Jordan   Goyne Mulugeta   Negash  Teshim   Awalom Eric   Grant Paul   Nelwan  Robert   Baird Anthony   Gray Ramon   Nunez  David   Baker Ali   Guireh Kari   Olson  Joseph   Beaumier Jawed   Hasham Mohamed   Omar  Kabir   Bello Harry   Hearns Gina   Opacki  Alejandro   Bey Chuck   Hinson William   Parfitt  Stephanie   Bloom Larry   Hirata Ryan   Peart  Kathryn   Bohot Carl   Hoffman Marianne   Pence  Elod   Boromisza Jon   Holley Bradley   Peterson  Leslie   Braggs Jesse   Itula Lao   Phan  Daniel   Bretzke Leonard   Jackson,   Jr.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/08/drive-forward-rules-comments-may-5/

08/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

City Counicil Regular Meeting Agenda - September 26, 2017 86%

Ordinance Annexing Two Parcels of Property Located at 2413 Boundary Street on Port Royal Island - 2nd Reading Ordinance Zoning Two Parcels of Property Located at 2413 Boundary Street T5Urban Corridor - 2nd Reading Ordinance Revising Section 3.6.2.C.2 of the Beaufort Code Pertaining to Short Term Rentals - 2nd Reading FY 2017 Budget Amendment #6 - 2nd Reading Amend Section 7-13003 of the Hospitality Fee Ordinance - 2nd Reading VIII.NEW BUSINESS A.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/21/city-counicil-regular-meeting-agenda-september-26-2017/

21/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Psalm 119 85%

Psalm 119 (NASB) ‫א‬ Aleph.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/07/29/psalm-119/

29/07/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

CodeNEXT Petition (Instructions and 3-line - 9.20.17) 85%

Do​ ​I​ ​have​ ​to​ ​print​ ​out​ ​all​ ​pages​ ​or​ ​just​ ​the​ ​signature​ ​page?​​ ​We​ ​need​ ​you​ ​to​ ​print​ ​out​ ​all pages​ ​and​ ​attach​ ​it​ ​to​ ​the​ ​signature​ ​page.​ ​That​ ​way​ ​the​ ​city​ ​knows​ ​that​ ​you​ ​were​ ​not​ ​just shown​ ​the​ ​signature​ ​page​ ​but​ ​the​ ​entire​ ​ordinance.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/20/codenext-petition-instructions-and-3-line-9-20-17/

20/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Dario-Piampiani-TGS-BN 84%

Beat. Issue One Poetry.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/02/13/dario-piampiani-tgs-bn/

13/02/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

O-40-16 Short Term Rentals 83%

..Body CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of Annapolis 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Ordinance 40-16 Introduced by:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/08/o-40-16-short-term-rentals/

08/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

OPLEG-OrdinanceListII 82%

­ PHOTON LIGHTING GROUP ­  ­ OFFICIAL SERVER ORDINANCE ­      THIS SERVER IS PROTECTED BY THE FOLLOWING SAFETY MODIFICATIONS:  ULX & NADMOD    PHOTON SERVER TEAM:  ● SCHMAL  ● THESENDEST  ● JOHN BLAKE  ● RAPTOR JESUS  ● UMPY    OFFICIAL ROLEPLAY POLICE OFFICERS:  ● THESENDEST  ● JOHN BLAKE  ● SCHMAL  ● STRUDEL  ● DALAX  ● UMPY      THIS DOCUMENT PROVIDES THE MOST UP­TO­DATE ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION FROM  THE PHOTON LIGHTING GROUP’S OFFICIAL SANDBOX ROLEPLAY SERVER. IF YOU HAVE ANY  QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE, DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ANY OF  THE MEMBERS OF THE PHOTON SERVER TEAM      ­ PHOTON LIGHTING GROUP ­  ­ OFFICIAL SERVER ORDINANCE ­    ALPHA CLASS RULES A1:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/18/opleg-ordinancelistii/

18/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

17718301507 82%

Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief preventing the enforcement of the City of Arlington’s ordinance prohibiting interactions between pedestrians and occupants of vehicles at particular intersections in Arlington, asserting the ordinance unconstitutionally prohibits Plaintiffs’ free speech rights.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/07/17/17718301507/

16/07/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Proposed Wind Ordinance incorporation 092116 82%

2016 Moore Township Planning Board Proposed Ordinance Revision DRAFT 9.21.16 Randy Filkins, Planning Board Chairman This document is the most recent works of the Moore Township Planning Board as a result of several years of work.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/10/06/proposed-wind-ordinance-incorporation-092116/

06/10/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Formulario [Mignano A] 82%

Rappresentazione in variabili di stato:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/21/formulario-mignano-a/

21/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

p24784 82%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/04/18/p24784/

18/04/2015 www.pdf-archive.com