PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 11 July at 06:44 - Around 220000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «preponderance»:

Total: 49 results - 0.058 seconds

KYIX & EROC KM Final Letter 100%

Mr.​ ​Marcus​ ​stated​ ​that​ ​the​ ​Office​ ​for​ ​Civil​ ​Rights​ ​should​ ​not​ ​have​ ​explicitly​ ​clarified​ ​that preponderance​ ​of​ ​the​ ​evidence​ ​was​ ​the​ ​appropriate​ ​standard​ ​for​ ​Title​ ​IX​ ​investigations—even though​ ​the​ ​OCR​ ​required​ ​schools​ ​to​ ​use​ ​the​ ​preponderance​ ​standard​ ​the​ ​last​ ​time​ ​he​ ​was​ ​in charge.​ ​Additionally,​ ​courts​ ​have​ ​long​ ​affirmed​ ​preponderance​ ​of​ ​the​ ​evidence​ ​is​ ​the​ ​appropriate standard​ ​for​ ​adjudicating​ ​civil​ ​rights​ ​violations,​ ​including​ ​Title​ ​IX,​ ​Title​ ​VI​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Civil​ ​Rights Act,​ ​and​ ​Title​ ​VII​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Civil​ ​Rights​ ​Act​ ​of​ ​1964.​ ​As​ ​the​ ​Supreme​ ​Court​ ​recognized​ ​in​ ​Cannon v.​ ​University​ ​of​ ​Chicago,​ ​the​ ​drafters​ ​of​ ​Title​ ​IX​ ​modeled​ ​the​ ​statue​ ​after​ ​Title​ ​VI​ ​and​ ​“explicitly assumed​ ​that​ ​[Title​ ​IX]​ ​would​ ​be​ ​interpreted​ ​and​ ​applied​ ​as​ ​Title​ ​VI​ ​had​ ​been.”​ ​As​ ​claims​ ​of discrimination​ ​and​ ​racially​ ​motivated​ ​harassment​ ​under​ ​Title​ ​VI​ ​are​ ​adjudicated​ ​using​ ​the preponderance​ ​standard,​ ​so​ ​too​ ​are​ ​claims​ ​of​ ​discrimination​ ​and​ ​sexual​ ​harassment​ ​(including sexual​ ​violence)​ ​made​ ​under​ ​Title​ ​IX.​ ​Beyond​ ​civil​ ​rights​ ​litigation,​ ​preponderance​ ​of​ ​the evidence​ ​is​ ​the​ ​standard​ ​employed​ ​in​ ​most​ ​civil​ ​actions.​ ​If​ ​the​ ​Department​ ​indicated​ ​its​ ​tolerance for​ ​other​ ​standards​ ​of​ ​proof,​ ​it​ ​would​ ​create​ ​a​ ​system​ ​where​ ​victims​ ​of​ ​gender-based​ ​harassment face​ ​uniquely​ ​high​ ​barriers​ ​while​ ​victims​ ​of​ ​harassment​ ​on​ ​the​ ​basis​ ​of​ ​all​ ​other​ ​protected characteristic​ ​do​ ​not.​ ​Such​ ​a​ ​system​ ​would​ ​be​ ​grossly​ ​inconsistent​ ​with​ ​case​ ​law​ ​as​ ​well​ ​as​ ​Title IX’s​ ​purpose​ ​of​ ​eliminating​ ​discrimination​ ​on​ ​the​ ​basis​ ​of​ ​sex.


11/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

CJA 354 Week 1 DQ 3 NEW 76%

How does reasonable doubt differ from preponderance of the evidence?


19/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

ACC 556 Week 5 DQ 1 76%

ACC 556 Week 5 DQ 1 How do financial accounting principles affect the preponderance of fraud?


27/05/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

CJA 354 Week 1 DQ 3 NEW 76%

How does reasonable doubt differ from preponderance of the evidence?


07/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

taupier brief re protective order-brendahans 72%

Fernando A, requires the court to hold a subsequent evidentiary hearing in which the state must prove “by a fair preponderance of the evidence” that the order is still needed provided the defendant requests a Fernando hearing “at the initial hearing.” Fernando A, 294 Conn 1, 7, 12- 13.


21/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

internal and external bleeding hemorrhoids1819 72%

The preponderance of those condition increases among aging adults and men are generally afflicted by such disorder than women of all ages.


27/11/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Peace making power sharing 69%

To Table of Contents Reflecting on his rich experience in the Duma, Vasili Maklalov stressed that the most durable achievements of a democratic system derive from the agreements between the majority and the minority, rather than from a preponderance of the former over the latter.


22/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

a rhone cruise will be1835 67%

The preponderance of your trip will be on that southern tour, with one of several highlights being the old walled town of Avignon, where 7 consecutive popes resided from 1309 to 1378 rather than Rome.


26/07/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

2 Ortolano final SJEL Vol 5.1 2015 2 65%

This defense would shield against liability as a potentially responsible party (PRP) under CERCLA for developers acquiring contaminated real property after January 11, 2002.11 This defense requires the purported BFPP to establish eight criteria by a preponderance of the evidence.12 One of the BFPP defense’s eight criteria requires showing an exercise of “appropriate care with … hazardous substances … by taking reasonable steps to” stop additional releases of hazardous substances, and preventing or limiting exposure of the hazardous substances to humans, the environment, or natural resources after acquiring the property.13 Prior to the amendments, the main defense against PRP liability was for a party to claim status as an innocent landowner.14 This defense required the party to show an exercise of “due care” by a preponderance of the evidence with respect to the release or threat of release of any hazardous substance.15 There was little to no explanation at the time of the Amendments as to whether “appropriate care” and “due care” impose different standards of care.


22/07/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

motoring and sending text messages1519 63%

As motor vehicle drivers, we all know that it is unsafe to allow our-self to become preoccupied while on the streets, yet still it seems that the preponderance of us believe that we can multi-task and drive carefully at the identical time.


12/12/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

food apartheid 60%

Why exactly are activists equating a preponderance of golden arches in South L.A.


09/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com


STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL THIRD CIRCUIT P O Box 16577 Lake Charles LA 70616 337 433 9403 Hon Patrick Louis Michot Larry Lane Roy Judge 15th JDC Brown Sims P O Box 3075 600 Jefferson St Lafayette LA 70502 3075 Lafayette LA 70501 Suite 800 Shelton Dennis Blunt Phelps Dunbar P O Box 4412 Baton Rouge LA 70821 4412 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF MAILING May 10 2017 Docket Number CA 16 169 PAT COOPER VERSUS LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the attached judgment and written opinion was rendered this date and a copy was mailed to the trial judge all counsel of record and all parties not represented by counsel as listed above FOR THE COURT 1 4AA oft 4 Charles K McNeely Clerk of Court STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL THIRD CIRCUIT 16 169 Judgment rendered and mailed to all PAT COOPER parties or counsel on May 10 2017 VERSUS Applications for rehearing may be filed within the delays allowed by La Code Civ P art 2166 or La Code Crim P art 922 LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE NO C 20145941 HONORABLE PATRICK L MICHOT DISTRICT JUDGE ON REHEARING VAN H KYZAR JUDGE Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux Chief Judge John E Conry and Gl Van H Kyzar Judges J AFFIRMED IN PART REVERSED IN PART RENDERED AND REMANDED L Lane Roy Brown Sims P C 600 Jefferson Street Suite 800 Lafayette LA 70501 337 484 1240 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF APPELLANT Dr Pat Cooper Shelton Dennis Blunt Paul LeBlanc Jack B Stanley Phelps Dunbar LLP P O Box 4412 Baton Rouge LA 70821 4412 225 346 0285 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPELLEE Lafayette Parish School Board KYZAR Judge This matter is before us on rehearing from our previous decision Lafayette Parish School Board 16 169 La App 3 Cir 11 23 16 Cooper v 207 So 3d 1158 We now affirm the judgment of the lower court in part reverse in part render and remand the matter for proceedings consistent herewith DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD Dr Pat Cooper was hired by the Lafayette Parish School Board Board to a three year System term as superintendent of pursuant to a January 1 the Lafayette Parish School System 2012 written contract School Dr Cooper who has a Ph D in Education and previous experience as a superintendent in both Louisiana and Mississippi experienced was hired based on a five to four vote of the Board and difficulties with the Board from the outset In addition to the already strained relations between them the Louisiana Legislature passed 2012 La Acts I No 1 hereinafter Act 1 boards which totally changed the relationship between school and superintendents of schools in the By the middle of 2014 the state Board who had engaged outside counsel authorized an investigation into actions taken by Dr Cooper which resulted in formal disciplinary charges being levied against him The charges were as follows Charge No 1 Unworthiness Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper s refusal to comply with or enforce the Board s directive to terminate the of employment Special Assistant to the Superintendent Thad Welch Charge No 2 Unworthiness Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper s failure to abide by and enforce the Board s amendment of the approved budget to remove the line item authorizing the 2012 La Acts No 1 became effective on July 1 2012 payment of a salary for the special assistant to the superintendent Charge No 3 Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper directing that public School Board funds be used to pay an attorney Unworthiness that he hired the where purpose of such representation was to advise Dr Cooper regarding a dispute with and a possible action against the School Board Charge No 4 Unworthiness Inefficiency Breach of Contract Failure to Comply with Board Policy and State Law relative to Cooper s action in connection with the payment of select principals in an amount in excess of the Salary Schedule established by the School Board Charge No 5 Unworthiness relative to Cooper receiving a negative evaluation for his job performance for the 2013 2014 school year by a majority vote of the Board Following hearings on November 5 and 6 2014 the Board held that its counsel had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Dr Cooper was guilty of the facts Proven alleged charge in the first four constituted failure to comply with unworthiness Board policy It further held that the facts of each charges inefficiency and state law by breach Dr Cooper of contract and Thus the Board voted seven to two to terminate Dr Cooper s employment effective immediately on November 6 2014 Dr Cooper immediately sought review of the Board s decision from the Fifteenth Judicial District Court in Lafayette Parish at the conclusion of which the district court rejected three of the four charges relied upon by the Board to terminate Dr Cooper s employment but upheld the Board s decision as to Charge Number Four Following the denial of motions for new trial Dr Cooper appealed 2 Charge Number Five relative to Cooper receiving a negative evaluation failed to receive a two thirds majority of the vote as required by Section 15 D of Cooper s employment contract thus it was not an issue before either the district court or this court 2


10/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Test 56%

WHEREFORE, If - after a full investigation - it is shown by a preponderance of evidence that the Commissioner, as an officer of the partnership of PSAS, was grossly negligent – whether through acts of commission or omission - in his duty of loyalty to either MATSUO OR BUNGE, by recklessly failing to provide ample notice and opportunity to attend the Draft, as well a fair and impartial opportunity to be heard if not attending the Draft, OR was grossly negligent in not acting with the requisite due care required towards the PSAS at-large, as far as the commissioner’s rights, duties, and responsibilities, by recklessly failing to ensure that the PSAS Draft was conducted fairly and within the aesthetic standards demanded by the PSAS-concept established over the course of the partnership’s five year history, thereby irreparably affecting said partner’s statutorily protected equity rights, property rights, intellectual or otherwise, or voting rights, then the Commissioner is GROSSLY NEGLIGENT of breaching his fiduciary duties, subjecting the Commissioner to civil penalty to the full extent of the law.


04/09/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Doc198-Harrington-Statement-Of-Facts-7-13-12 54%

Elements of Trademark Infringement In order to prove up a claim for trademark infringement, a plaintiff must show, by the preponderance of evidence, that the asserted trademarks are valid and protectable, that the plaintiff owns the asserted trademarks, and that the mark used by the defendant was used in commerce without the plaintiff’s consent, in a manner that is likely to cause confusion in the consuming public as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the goods or services.


14/07/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

amish 52%

(The site reports that the clinic was founded on the initiative of mothers who, for unspecified reasons were unsatisfied with services at Holmes Morton's Clinic for Special Children.) This preponderance of “alternative health” sources raises questions not only about the objectivity of the article, but also the extent of Olmstead's personal research.


08/02/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

The Power of Now 51%

Yet the preponderance of evidence suggests that indeed it does.


28/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

BundySantilliDetention 51%

A finding that a defendant is a flight risk need only be supported by a preponderance of the evidence.


30/01/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Shillinglaw 50%

That same month, a McLennan County jury convicted football player Sam Ukwuachu of sexual assault using the criminal standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Following the criminal conviction, the Regents asked why Baylor's Judicial Affairs Office had previously cleared Ukwuachu of sexual assault using a lower “preponderance of the evidence” burden of proof under Title IX.


03/02/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

PSS 50%

Although the preponderance of evidence is on the side of a multidimensional measure, the issue has not been fully resolved owing in part to limitations in the methodological knowledge available in distinguishing between substantive and method variance.


28/03/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Patriarchy and our Ancient Images of God 48%

2 It is conjectured that the condition of human reproduction originated male preponderance.


15/04/2019 www.pdf-archive.com

arsnap analysis 48%

A full reworking designed to be submitted to department heads was stopped midway through when the preponderance of evidence pointed to an agency-wide malaise.


24/02/2018 www.pdf-archive.com