Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 08 March at 15:58 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «results»:


Total: 6000 results - 0.07 seconds

O14 BT 5 Back 349 100%

Delhi Technological University Visit - http://exam.dce.edu (Formerly Delhi College of Engineering) Result Notification No.DTU/Results/BTECH/DEC/2014/ DEC/2014 THE RESULT OF THE CANDIDATES WHO APPEARED IN THE FOLLOWING EXAMINATIONS HELD IN DEC-2014 IS DECLARED AS UNDER :

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/03/09/o14-bt-5-back-349/

09/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

O14 BT 3 348 98%

Delhi Technological University (Formerly Delhi College of Engineering) Result Notification No.DTU/Results/BTECH/DEC/2013/ DEC/2013 THE RESULT OF THE CANDIDATES WHO APPEARED IN THE FOLLOWING EXAMINATIONS HELD IN DEC-2013 IS DECLARED AS UNDER :

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/03/09/o14-bt-3-348/

09/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

YBRR 2015 Results 97%

Under Results - Women 1 Dombroski, McKenzie W13 43:04.7 2 Sowich, Jada W14 1:01:10.1 16-19 Results - Women 1 Millner, Jasmine W19 50:06.1 20-29 Results - Women 1 Monk, Michelle W28 38:56.5 2 Burt, Kelley B W27 39:24.2 3 Dutta, Mita W27 39:47.3 4 Harosia, Kristin W26 40:07.2 5 Black, Kylie W28 40:21.3 6 Kraft, Courtney W23 40:25.1 7 Debbold, Jessica W29 47:57.4 8 Ewing, Alice W27 49:50.9 9 Harosia, Kimberly W28 51:30.5 10 Lefelhoc, Abby W27 55:52.4 11 Kapala, Ashley W29 1:00:22.6 30-39 Results - Women 1 Stratton, Hillary W34 38:40.1 2 McBane, Natalie W31 40:34.8 3 Slater, Kristin W31 40:50.7 4 Pratt, Ashley W30 41:01.7 5 Demars, Tonya W35 44:35.3 6 Drogo, Katie W32 44:49.4 7 Knapp, Jessica W31 46:02.2 8 Hills, Courtney W36 47:27.2 9 Ianello, Julia W39 52:48.6 10 Downs, Katie J W38 54:38.0 11 Morrissey, Erin W30 55:14.4 12 McMahon, Allison W33 55:24.1 13 Smith, Nina W37 56:33.5 14 Allen, Stephanie L W34 58:43.0 15 LaForte, Amy W35 58:51.8 16 Powers, Jessica W31 59:00.0 40-49 Results - Women 1 Rusch, Kara D W47 39:30.2 2 McIntosh, Traci W47 44:46.0 3 Markowicz, Amy W45 45:25.8 4 Eisenhut, Ellen M W48 46:28.3 5 Urban, Stephanie L W48 46:29.7 6 Ianello, Lisa W49 52:48.3 7 Meester, Deborah L W45 55:15.5 8 Montminy, Susan W46 56:33.9 9 Johnson, Kathy W48 57:50.9 10 Penfield, Jackie M W43 1:01:57.1 50-59 Results - Women 1 Bready, Jean W55 41:16.1 2 Pedersen, Victoria W59 45:28.3 3 English-Bowers, Molly M 4 Oswald, Marion L 5 Cigler, Marisue 6 Nemitz, Sharlene A 7 Kornbau, Susan L 60-69 Results - Women 1 Brennan, Rosalie 2 Crowley, Judy 70+ Results - Women 1 Rider, Carol 15 &

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/07/03/ybrr-2015-results/

03/07/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Davesne 97%

first results on finite nuclei Skyrme N2LO functionals:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/10/11/davesne/

11/10/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

473-2527-1-PB 97%

Nevertheless, the language should affect the sequence or the ranking of the retrieved results.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/08/13/473-2527-1-pb/

12/08/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

Calvin Baker in Wisconsin 12 Records Found! Spokeo 96%

11/21/2016 Calvin Baker in Wisconsin 12 Records Found! | Spokeo  Calvin Baker   12 Results Found Calvin Baker FILTERS  Calvin  Baker  Wisconsin  PERSON Calvin J Baker, age 59 Cal Baker Baker Baker LOCATIONS Appleton, WI, Kimberly, WI, Kaukauna, WI, Oshkosh, WI, Menasha, WI RELATIVES Patricia Baker, Richard Baker, Donald Baker, Aaron Baker, Ann Baker INCLUDES     SEE RESULTS PERSON Calvin J Baker, age 54 Cal Baker LOCATIONS Appleton, WI, Kimberly, WI RELATIVES Patricia Baker, Richard Baker, Donald Baker, Aaron Baker, Ann Baker INCLUDES     SEE RESULTS PERSON Calvin M Baker, age 83 LOCATIONS http://www.spokeo.com/Calvin­Baker/Wisconsin 1/4 11/21/2016 LOCATIONS Calvin Baker in Wisconsin 12 Records Found! | Spokeo Durand, WI RELATIVES Christine Baker, Jennifer Baker, Latonya Baker, Richard Baker, Evelyn Baker INCLUDES    SEE RESULTS FUN FACTS Calvin Baker STATISTICS FOR ALL 12 PEOPLE NAMED CALVIN BAKER 70 yrs $49k AVERAGE AGE INCOME AVERAGE 33% are in their 90s, while the average age is 70.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/21/calvin-baker-in-wisconsin-12-records-found-spokeo/

21/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Can model averaging solve the ‘Meese-Rogoff puzzle’? 96%

Date 09/09/14 Signature 2 CONTENTS Abstract .........................................................................................................................................................1 Declaration ....................................................................................................................................................2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................5 1.1 The ‘Meese-Rogoff puzzle’ ...........................................................................................................5 1.2 The aim of this paper......................................................................................................................5 1.3 The main results of this paper ........................................................................................................7 Literature review ..................................................................................................................................8 2.1 International parity conditions .......................................................................................................8 2.2 The monetary approach to exchange rate determination ................................................................9 2.3 Theory ..........................................................................................................................................11 2.4 Evidence .......................................................................................................................................12 Data ......................................................................................................................................................15 3.1 Time-series data ...........................................................................................................................15 3.2 Limitations ...................................................................................................................................16 3.3 Descriptive statistics.....................................................................................................................17 Methodology........................................................................................................................................20 4.1 Hypotheses ...................................................................................................................................20 4.2 Multivariate cointegration ............................................................................................................20 4.3 Cointegrated regression ................................................................................................................21 4.3 Vector error correction models ....................................................................................................22 4.4 Univariate models ........................................................................................................................23 4.5 Lag length selection .....................................................................................................................24 4.6 Model averaging...........................................................................................................................25 4.7 Forecast evaluation.......................................................................................................................26 Empirical results .................................................................................................................................27 5.1 Unit root tests ...............................................................................................................................27 5.2 Cointegration tests........................................................................................................................27 5.2 Granger causality tests .................................................................................................................34 5.3 In-sample regression results .........................................................................................................34 5.4 Out-of-sample forecast results ..............................................................................................

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/08/07/can-model-averaging-solve-the-meese-rogoff-puzzle/

07/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2014 Sorted Resultsx 95%

Under Results - Women 1 #28 Dahlin, McKenzie E W12 46:29 2 #46 Fryman, Ella W14 59:13 3 #148 Dunn, Ryann N W9 1:08:01 20-29 Results - Women 1 #105 Sargis, Becky J W29 41:34 2 #17 Burt, Kelley B W26 41:44 3 #108 Scoblick, Francis W29 48:30 4 #90 Piraino, Lily W25 50:23 5 #149 Snepenger, Laura M W28 51:33 6 #102 Robidoux, Danielle W28 53:24 7 #77 Mullen, Laura E W28 54:49 8 #54 Grant, Kara W22 56:03 9 #6 Barton, Stephanie W28 56:47 30-39 Results - Women 1 #116 Stauffer, Kara W39 36:37 2 #65 Kingsley, Stacy L W37 37:26 3 #118 Stratton, Hillary W33 38:57 4 #151 Visconti, Katie L W30 41:52 5 #71 McBane, Natalie W30 44:54 6 #4 Ashe, Alison W38 46:13 7 #136 Reisman, Kimberly J W31 46:14 8 #82 Nemitz, Laura W31 50:29 9 #40 Elsbey, Kathryn W36 50:48 10 #56 Harrell, April L W35 52:05 11 #114 Sprole, Brianna W31 54:25 12 #9 Bellavia, Gina Mari W30 54:28 13 #34 Downs, Katie W37 54:53 14 #47 Fryman, Sabrina W34 55:28 15 #94 Powers, Jessica L W30 55:31 16 #72 McMahon, Allison W32 56:13 17 #110 Sharkey, Julie W33 57:15 18 #36 Dygert, Amy W34 59:46 19 #11 Bennett, Jolene W32 1:01:15 20 #66 LaForte, Amy W34 1:01:31 21 #68 Lewis, Trisa W34 1:08:21 22 #22 Cool, Kimberly W39 1:08:30 40-49 Results - Women 1 #124 Virginelli, Dea W40 34:44 2 #104 Rusch, Kara D W46 38:15 3 #147 Rainbow, Kathleen W43 39:05 4 #42 Fierros, Suzanne W41 41:57 5 #59 Igoe, Peggy K W42 43:49 6 #51 Giardina, Nancy L W49 45:06 7 #61 Isbell, Christine W49 46:54 8 #113 Snyder, Andrea W48 47:41 9 #21 Conrad, Alexia H W41 48:47 10 #69 MacDonald, Angela W41 49:28 11 #29 Danahy, Kimberly W45 12 #70 Maciag, Robin J W49 13 #74 Miller, Bonnie W41 14 #93 Pizzuto-Sauve, Jean W44 15 #158 Fuller, Rose W43 16 #122 Urban, Stephanie L W47 17 #117 Stedman, Joan F W48 18 #75 Montminy, Susan W45 19 #87 Penfield, Jackie W42 20 #26 Dahlin, Colleen I W41 21 #53 Grant, Susie W49 22 #49 Geehrer, Jennifer W46 23 #19 Coller, Misty W40 24 #95 Preuss, Elizabeth W40 50-59 Results - Women 1 #13 Bready, Jean W54 2 #41 English-Bowers, Mol W53 3 #91 Piraino, Nancy W50 4 #150 Snepenger, Mary R W59 5 #73 Meyers, Marti W53 6 #85 Oswald, Marion L W57 60-69 Results - Women 1 #20 Collins, Kathleen M W67 2 #25 Crowley, Judy W63 3 #18 Ciccone, Connie R W69 70+ Results - Women 1 #101 Rider, Carol A W72 15 &

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/07/08/2014-sorted-resultsx/

07/07/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

can-model-averaging-solve-the-meese-rogoff-puzzle 95%

Jack Sellers A research dissertation (MSc Economics and Finance) 1 CONTENTS Abstract .........................................................................................................................................................1 Declaration ....................................................................................................................................................2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................5 1.1 The ‘Meese-Rogoff puzzle’ ...........................................................................................................5 1.2 The aim of this paper......................................................................................................................5 1.3 The main results of this paper ........................................................................................................7 Literature review ..................................................................................................................................8 2.1 International parity conditions .......................................................................................................8 2.2 The monetary approach to exchange rate determination ................................................................9 2.3 Theory ..........................................................................................................................................11 2.4 Evidence .......................................................................................................................................12 Data ......................................................................................................................................................15 3.1 Time-series data ...........................................................................................................................15 3.2 Limitations ...................................................................................................................................16 3.3 Descriptive statistics.....................................................................................................................17 Methodology........................................................................................................................................20 4.1 Hypotheses ...................................................................................................................................20 4.2 Multivariate cointegration ............................................................................................................20 4.3 Cointegrated regression ................................................................................................................21 4.3 Vector error correction models ....................................................................................................22 4.4 Univariate models ........................................................................................................................23 4.5 Lag length selection .....................................................................................................................24 4.6 Model averaging...........................................................................................................................25 4.7 Forecast evaluation.......................................................................................................................26 Empirical results .................................................................................................................................27 5.1 Unit root tests ...............................................................................................................................27 5.2 Cointegration tests........................................................................................................................27 5.2 Granger causality tests .................................................................................................................34 5.3 In-sample regression results .........................................................................................................34 5.4 Out-of-sample forecast results ..............................................................................................

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/14/can-model-averaging-solve-the-meese-rogoff-puzzle/

13/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

RT5-EMC-REPORT 95%

Report No.:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/10/22/rt5-emc-report/

22/10/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Opinion 95%

The results of the testing established that neither Echols, Baldwin, nor Misskelley was the source of any of the biological material tested, which included a foreign allele from a penile swab of victim Steven Branch;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/08/02/opinion/

02/08/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

Academic Calendar 2017-18 95%

-- To be announced Attendance Review before T1 Exam 01 September 2017 09 February 2018 Examination Schedule 04-09 September 2017 12-17 February 2018 Showing of Evaluated Answer Sheets to Students (Latest by) 16 September 2017 24 February 2018 Results Uploading on System (Latest by) 17 September 2017 26 February 2018 03 - 06 October 2017 12 - 15 March 2018 23-29 September 2017 21 - 27 February 2018 Result uploaded before T-2 Result uploaded before T-2 T1 Examination &

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/03/17/academic-calendar-2017-18/

17/03/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Results 2017 10 22 2295 94%

Saltwater sample The results of analysis:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/10/26/results-2017-10-22-2295/

26/10/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

tnt rider points winter blast 16 17 94%

Best Of is Best 3 results from rounds 1-4 7-8 Years 16 Riders 16 Qualified RANK NAME GROUP TOTAL After 3 of 4 Rounds RESULT POINTS BEST OF RACE 1 2 3 4 1 Harrison DAVIS TNT BMX Club S 143.5 143.5 47.0 50.0 46.5 - 2 Oliver KENDALL TNT BMX Club S 130.0 130.0 42.5 45.0 42.5 - 3 Zachary TIER Bexhill Burners BMX Club S 102.0 102.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 - 4 Harrison SCHOFIELD TNT BMX Club S 91.0 91.0 - 41.5 49.5 - 5 Emelia WARD TNT BMX Club S 87.0 87.0 31.0 30.5 25.5 - 6 Ben LONGLEY Runnymede Rockets S 75.5 75.5 - 37.5 38.0 - 7 Fraser KIRKLAND TNT BMX Club S 74.0 74.0 26.5 23.5 24.0 - 8 Jenson PICKERING Club Cyclopark S 56.0 56.0 - 27.0 29.0 - 9 William FRIEND TNT BMX Club S 56.0 56.0 23.5 - 32.5 - 10 Freya CHALLIS Braintree BMX Club e 50.0 50.0 50.0 - - - 11 Freddie DUDMAN Gosport BMX Club S 39.5 39.5 - - 39.5 - 12 Kieron ALTON Braintree BMX Club e 39.0 39.0 39.0 - - - 13 Rudi DOWNS Braintree BMX Club e 38.0 38.0 38.0 - - - 14 Heidi GILL Braintree BMX Club e 30.0 30.0 30.0 - - - 15 Oliver SWEETMAN Runnymede Rockets S 25.5 25.5 - - 25.5 - 16 George BOYD Braintree BMX Club e 25.0 25.0 25.0 - - - * = not yet qualified, # = can't qualify.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/02/01/tnt-rider-points-winter-blast-16-17/

01/02/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Biomedical-Semantic-Similarity 94%

In this article we propose a new approach which uses different existing semantic similarity methods to obtain precise results which are very close to human judgments in the biomedical domain.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/05/07/biomedical-semantic-similarity/

07/05/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Sheet-2-2015 93%

What are the results of the following expressions?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/11/05/sheet-2-2015/

05/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Implementing hybrid cars in Al Ain Hospital 93%

Test Results ............................................................................................................................................

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/02/22/implementing-hybrid-cars-in-al-ain-hospital/

22/02/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

BMG Quick Reference v1 93%

Starting the game Round phases Phase 0 :

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/02/04/bmg-quick-reference-v1/

04/02/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Sell More Spec Fast 93%

The Disclaimers, And Other Legal Stuff Income Disclaimer – This document contains business strategies, marketing methods and other business advice that, regardless of my own results and experience, may not produce the same results (or any results) for you.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/08/05/sell-more-spec-fast/

05/08/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

BMG Quick Reference v2 93%

if collateral die = result of one of the other dice from the Damage roll (except results of 1), target is Knocked Down - Critical (p54) :

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/02/06/bmg-quick-reference-v2/

06/02/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

Uniqueness in Lie Theory 93%

We wish to extend the results of [14] to nonnegative, null numbers.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/11/12/uniqueness-in-lie-theory/

12/11/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

l-bacon-mathgen 93%

On the other hand, in this context, the results of [5] are highly relevant.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/10/20/l-bacon-mathgen/

19/10/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

2015 Kids Get Active Triathlon results 93%

Kids Get Active Triathlon Age Group Results Race Date August 08, 2015 6 &

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/07/29/2015-kids-get-active-triathlon-results/

29/07/2017 www.pdf-archive.com