PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover PDF Search Help Contact


Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 14 August at 21:51 - Around 220000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «soviet»:


Total: 300 results - 0.065 seconds

HighRoadsofManeuver 100%

[​ Edited wording a bit from the original Red Thrust Star article for a better "Cold War feel"​ ] An operational focus is important because to truly understand the danger of Soviet forces, commanders and staffs must master Soviet operational doctrine.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/13/highroadsofmaneuver/

13/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Collapse of the Soviet Union 99%

Collapse of the Soviet Union Series 1.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/08/13/collapse-of-the-soviet-union/

13/08/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

The Rodnoverie Movement The Seach For P 96%

Prerevolutionary Roots and Early Soviet Manifestations 1.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/02/the-rodnoverie-movement-the-seach-for-p/

02/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

NuclearProliferationandSecurityConcerns 94%

      NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND SECURITY CONCERNS:   Accurately predicting future state proliferation by looking at various  factors outside the security model.                   Amanda Sewell  Sam Houston State University  September 2016              1  Why do states build nuclear weapons? This is the question that Scott  Sagan attempts to answer by in his research by looking at three different  theory models. In the past, the security concerns of the state were a positive  prediction to whether or not they would develop nuclear weapons, but the  same factors that pressured the states in the past, are no longer present  today. Without these factors, would security still be a reliable indicator?  Sagan argues that focusing only on the security considerations as the cause  of proliferation is “dangerously inadequate”.1  While the security model  accurately explains past cases of nuclear proliferation by states, it would not  be reliable in current times since the factors are no longer the same.  Therefore, if we want to predict which countries might develop nuclear  weapons in the future, underlying security concerns can not be the only area  we pay attention to. Recent proliferation cases have demonstrated that we  must take the other factors that play an important role in states decisions  regarding proliferation. These factors, along with security concerns, may  provide a much more accurate predictor of future proliferation.  First, let’s take a closer look at why the security model has  worked for past cases. Sagan describes the security model as “any state that  seeks to maintain its national security must balance against any rival state  that develops nuclear weapons by gaining access to a nuclear deterrent  itself.” 2 The overwhelming majority of nuclear programs were developed  1 2  Sagan, Scott D. 2012. Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. Pp.54   Ibid. pp 56      2  around WWII and the Cold War. The security model is better at predicting  these  behaviors of superpowers such as Russia and the United States where  there is an imminent threat to state’s security. The nuclear arms race  between the United States and the former Soviet Union provides a case  example of this security model and how it explains behavior towards nuclear  proliferation.  On July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested in the New  Mexico Desert.3  Less than a month later, an atomic bomb was dropped on  Hiroshima, Japan. The United States gained military superiority and a need  arose for other states to have acquire similar weaponry for security. “Stallin  wanted to be able to threaten the United States with atomic weapons, just  as the United States was able to threaten the Soviet Union”4   The Soviets  tested their first atomic bomb in 1949 after blueprints were leaked to them  by German physicist, ​Klaus Fuchs, who worked on the first United States  bomb.5   Now that the Soviet Union had comparable weapons, the United  States began tests on new types and designs of bombs in order to regain  their superiority. Each side continued to add to their arsenals as the tensions  rose. There was a verifiable need for the Soviets to gain a nuclear deterrent  to prevent an attack by the United States, thus the security model  accurately explains proliferation decisions by the state.    Davis, Watson. "Background of Atomic Bomb." ​The Science News­Letter 49.25 (1946): 394­395.   Zuberi, Matin. "Stalin and the bomb." ​Strategic Analysis 23.7 (1999): 1133­1153.  5  "Soviets explode atomic bomb ­ Aug 29, 1949 ­ HISTORY.com." 2010. 20 Sep. 2016  <​http://www.history.com/this­day­in­history/soviets­explode­atomic­bomb​>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/21/nuclearproliferationandsecurityconcerns/

21/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

NuclearProliferationandSecurityConcerns-AmandaSewell (3) 94%

      NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND SECURITY CONCERNS:   Accurately predicting future state proliferation by looking at various  factors outside the security model.                   Amanda Sewell  Sam Houston State University  Political Science 5367­International Relations  September 2016              1  Why do states build nuclear weapons? This is the question that Scott  Sagan attempts to answer by in his research by looking at three different  theory models. In the past, the security concerns of the state were a positive  prediction to whether or not they would develop nuclear weapons, but the  same factors that pressured the states in the past, are no longer present  today. Without these factors, would security still be a reliable indicator?  Sagan argues that focusing only on the security considerations as the cause  of proliferation is “dangerously inadequate”.1  While the security model  accurately explains past cases of nuclear proliferation by states, it would not  be reliable in current times since the factors are no longer the same.  Therefore, if we want to predict which countries might develop nuclear  weapons in the future, underlying security concerns can not be the only area  we pay attention to. Recent proliferation cases have demonstrated that we  must take the other factors that play an important role in states decisions  regarding proliferation. These factors, along with security concerns, may  provide a much more accurate predictor of future proliferation.  First, let’s take a closer look at why the security model has  worked for past cases. Sagan describes the security model as “any state that  seeks to maintain its national security must balance against any rival state  that develops nuclear weapons by gaining access to a nuclear deterrent  itself.” 2 The overwhelming majority of nuclear programs were developed  1 2  Sagan, Scott D. 2012. Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. Pp.54   Ibid. pp 56      2  around WWII and the Cold War. The security model is better at predicting  these  behaviors of superpowers such as Russia and the United States where  there is an imminent threat to state’s security. The nuclear arms race  between the United States and the former Soviet Union provides a case  example of this security model and how it explains behavior towards nuclear  proliferation.  On July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested in the New  Mexico Desert.3  Less than a month later, an atomic bomb was dropped on  Hiroshima, Japan. The United States gained military superiority and a need  arose for other states to have acquire similar weaponry for security. “Stallin  wanted to be able to threaten the United States with atomic weapons, just  as the United States was able to threaten the Soviet Union”4   The Soviets  tested their first atomic bomb in 1949 after blueprints were leaked to them  by German physicist, ​Klaus Fuchs, who worked on the first United States  bomb.5   Now that the Soviet Union had comparable weapons, the United  States began tests on new types and designs of bombs in order to regain  their superiority. Each side continued to add to their arsenals as the tensions  rose. There was a verifiable need for the Soviets to gain a nuclear deterrent  to prevent an attack by the United States, thus the security model  accurately explains proliferation decisions by the state.    Davis, Watson. "Background of Atomic Bomb." ​The Science News­Letter 49.25 (1946): 394­395.   Zuberi, Matin. "Stalin and the bomb." ​Strategic Analysis 23.7 (1999): 1133­1153.  5  "Soviets explode atomic bomb ­ Aug 29, 1949 ­ HISTORY.com." 2010. 20 Sep. 2016  <​http://www.history.com/this­day­in­history/soviets­explode­atomic­bomb​>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/21/nuclearproliferationandsecurityconcerns-amandasewell-3/

21/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Edward Hallett Carr - The Bolshevik Revolution, Volume 3 93%

A HISTORY OF SOVIET RUSSIA THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION 1917-1923 BY EDWARD HALLETT CARR * VOLUME TIIHEE LONDON MACMILLAN &

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/11/edward-hallett-carr-the-bolshevik-revolution-volume-3/

11/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

MARK VOYGER RUSSIAN LAWFARE 92%

RUS AND SOVIET LAWFARE (1654-1991) RUS and Soviet Experience with Nation-State System (18th–20th c.) • Partition of sovereign states (POL – 3 times in 18th c.) • Suppression of nationalist movements (POL, HUN) • Division of spheres of influence (along with other Great Powers) • Use of ethno-religious rifts to destabilize neighbors (Ottomans) • Limited sovereignty of Soviet satellites (HUN, CZE, POL) RUS Empire Lawfare:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/11/28/mark-voygerrussian-lawfare/

28/11/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Soviet Women in the work force 92%

Soviet Women in the Work Foree and Professions WILLIAM M.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/01/soviet-women-in-the-work-force/

01/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 w07 qp 1 91%

To what extent were relations between the United States and the Soviet Union more relaxed later in the 1960s?

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-w07-qp-1/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 s09 qp 1 91%

(b) the Soviet Union;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-s09-qp-1/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 s06 qp 1 91%

(c) the Nazi-Soviet pact (1939).

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-s06-qp-1/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Haas, The 1930s and the Origins of the Second World War 91%

Germany under Adolf Hitler's rule is described by almost all as a state driven by hegemonic ambitions, and British, French, and Soviet leaders are blamed for facilitating Germany's war plans by acts of omission and commission.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/02/18/haas-the-1930s-and-the-origins-of-the-second-world-war/

18/02/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 w13 qp 11 90%

3 Outline the main stages by which German power in Europe and the Mediterranean increased from the start of the Second World War in September 1939 to the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-w13-qp-11/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 s08 qp 1 90%

Describe how détente was developed between the United States and the Soviet Union during the years 1963-79.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-s08-qp-1/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 w10 qp 1 89%

4 Write an account of the main features in the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union during the course of the 1960s.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-w10-qp-1/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Edward Hallett Carr - The Bolshevik Revolution, Volume 1 88%

A HISTORY OF SOVIET RUSSIA THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION 1917-1923 BY EDWARD HALLETT CARR VOLUME ONE LONDON MACMILLAN &!

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/11/edward-hallett-carr-the-bolshevik-revolution-volume-1/

11/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

SuttonBones 88%

Roosevelt Trilaterals Over Washington - Volume 1-Volume 2 Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917—1930 Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1930-1945 Western -Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1945-1965 National Suicide:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/16/suttonbones/

16/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

0000 CND CV Short Aug 2017 88%

CHRIS DONNELLY CMG TD As a graduate of Manchester University and reserve officer in the British Army Intelligence Corps, Chris Donnelly helped to establish, and later headed, the British Army’s Soviet Studies Research Centre at RMA Sandhurst.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/12/13/0000-cnd-cv-short-aug-2017/

13/12/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

craven1969 87%

Soviet Phys.—JETP 16, 818 (1963)].

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/12/12/craven1969/

12/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Kolyma Tales - Shalanov, Varlan 87%

A prose writer and poet, he has become known chiefly for his Kolyma Tales , in which he describes life in the Soviet forced-labour camps in north eastern Siberia.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/03/07/kolyma-tales-shalanov-varlan/

07/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 s14 qp 13 87%

5 Describe the moves made during the 1980s towards reducing Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-s14-qp-13/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 w06 qp 1 87%

18 With reference to Stalin’s rule in the Soviet Union during the 1930s and 1940s, describe how he:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-w06-qp-1/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

2158 s14 qp 12 87%

5 Describe the moves made during the 1980s towards reducing Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/12/2158-s14-qp-12/

12/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Tableau des Blindages 86%

550 (more vs Soviet 1980s APFSDS) Glacis:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/08/10/tableau-des-blindages/

10/08/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

unlike mid afterward far eastern1566 86%

Creator from the facts, a left the workplace professor associated with Clean Research paper at the Humboldt Further education college participating in Berlin Heinrich Olschowsky recollects that the American House of representatives conversed in available several in the past with the establishment of the Europe-wide period of celebration of the document indicated with 23 Grand 1939 through the Next Reich along with the Soviet Union.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/08/25/unlike-mid-afterward-far-eastern1566/

25/08/2013 www.pdf-archive.com