Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 03 December at 10:55 - Around 76000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «sugano»:


Total: 18 results - 0.036 seconds

Motion for Attorney's Fees Ex. 2 100%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/12/05/motion-for-attorney-s-fees-ex-2/

05/12/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Motion for Attorney's Fees and Sanctions 99%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/12/05/motion-for-attorney-s-fees-and-sanctions/

05/12/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Motion for Attorney's Fees and Sanctions 99%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/motion-for-attorney-s-fees-and-sanctions/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

97 - Sugano's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Sanctions 99%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/97-sugano-s-motion-for-attorney-s-fees-and-sanctions/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

118 - Order re reconsideration, contempt 99%

89.) 19 Afterwards, the Court granted Defendants Kelly Sugano and Taka-O’s unopposed 20 motion for attorney’s fees, finding that they were the prevailing parties in this 21 exceptional case under 15 U.S.C.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/04/10/118-order-re-reconsideration-contempt/

10/04/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

108 - Motion for Sanctions 99%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/108-motion-for-sanctions/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Motion for Attonrey's Fees Ex. 1 98%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/12/05/motion-for-attonrey-s-fees-ex-1/

05/12/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

107 - 1 Exhibit McLaughlin declaration 96%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/107-1-exhibit-mclaughlin-declaration/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

108 - 1 95%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/108-1/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

102 - Opposition to application for extension of time 95%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/01/05/102-opposition-to-application-for-extension-of-time/

05/01/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

109-1 proposed contempt order 94%

SUGANO AND TAKA-O FOR CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS Hearing Date:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/109-1-proposed-contempt-order/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

107 Response to Motion to Reconsider 91%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/107-response-to-motion-to-reconsider/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Moiton for extension of time to respond 90%

Sugano 24 and Taka-O for attorney fees and sanctions, nunc pro tunc, from Monday, 25 December 17, 2012, to Friday, December 21, 2012.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/01/05/moiton-for-extension-of-time-to-respond/

05/01/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

101 - Application for extension of time to file opposition 90%

Sugano 24 and Taka-O for attorney fees and sanctions, nunc pro tunc, from Monday, 25 December 17, 2012, to Friday, December 21, 2012.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/101-application-for-extension-of-time-to-file-opposition/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

102-1 supp dec. 84%

Sugano and Taka-O 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, vs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/01/05/102-1-supp-dec/

05/01/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

106 - 1 revamped motion 77%

7 This motion is made pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6), and, in the alternative, Rule 8 59(e), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and on the grounds that Defendants 9 Kelly Sugano and Taka-O are not the “prevailing party” as defined by the Ninth 10 Circuit Court of Appeals for the purposes of the fee-shifting provision contained in the 11 Lanham Act.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/106-1-revamped-motion/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

105 - Motion for Reconsidearation (Harrington) 75%

7 This motion is made pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6), and, in the alternative, Rule 8 59(e), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and on the grounds that Defendants 9 Kelly Sugano and Taka-O are not the “prevailing party” as defined by the Ninth 10 Circuit Court of Appeals for the purposes of the fee-shifting provision contained in the 11 Lanham Act.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/02/24/105-motion-for-reconsidearation-harrington/

24/02/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

104 - Order granting attorney's fees 60%

Sugano and Taka-O filed their Motion for Attorney’s Fees 17 and Sanctions on November 27, 2012.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/01/17/104-order-granting-attorney-s-fees/

17/01/2013 www.pdf-archive.com