Search

Rhetorical Construction of Ecoterrorism 100%

Government’s Discourse of Fear Rachel Alexander1 May 7, 2012 ABSTRACT Since 2001, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has increasingly targeted radical environmental activists in domestic terror investigations.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/06/07/rhetorical-construction-of-ecoterrorism/

07/06/2012 www.pdf-archive.com

Bjorgo - Conclusions 99%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/27/bjorgo-conclusions/

27/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

The Muslim World Denouncing Terrorism 96%

We remember the support and solidarity of the French citizens from the recent history when we first-hand experienced fearmongering and terror.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/08/the-muslim-world-denouncing-terrorism/

08/04/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Letters to FBI and UWA Authorities 94%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/09/27/letters-to-fbi-and-uwa-authorities/

27/09/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

DefiningVictory-TheWarOnTerror 89%

The War On Terror David Stewart, dastewart85@gmail.com With the end of the Cold War resulting in the United States remaining as the only viable military superpower on earth, one could perhaps say that what happened in New York on Sept.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/04/01/definingvictory-thewaronterror/

01/04/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

a8a934 9d4c372bfb6944a58e7fd1af8f25a6bf 88%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/04/20/a8a934-9d4c372bfb6944a58e7fd1af8f25a6bf/

20/04/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Simon Fern Dissertation 88%

The ‘War on Terror’ is another similarly questionable term.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/18/simon-fern-dissertation/

18/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Pabmag.compressed 86%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/11/03/pabmag-compressed/

03/11/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

ESSAY FINAL 86%

11 Martin Randall, 911 and the Literature of Terror (Edinburgh:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/04/15/essay-final/

15/04/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

NYPD Report-Radicalization in the West 85%

Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat Prepared by:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/18/nypd-report-radicalization-in-the-west/

18/01/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Product Outline 84%

  Online​ ​Privacy  ​ ​ and​ ​the​ ​Dangers​​ ​of​ ​Surveillance              ​​​   What​ ​is​ ​Government​ ​Surveillance​ ​of​ ​Technology?  As​ ​the​ ​name​ ​suggests,​ ​Government​ ​Surveillance​ ​of​ ​Technology​ ​is​ ​when  the​ ​Government​ ​has​ ​the​ ​authority​ ​to​ ​monitor​ ​all​ ​types​ ​of​ ​technology.​ ​This  includes​ ​phone​ ​calls,​ ​emails​ ​and​ ​text​ ​messages,​ ​webcams​ ​or​ ​microphones,  keystrokes,​ ​web​ ​searches,​ ​gps​ ​and​ ​much​ ​more.​ ​Every​ ​type​ ​of​ ​privacy​ ​you  thought​ ​you​ ​had​ ​is​ ​all​ ​gone​ ​when​ ​you​ ​can​ ​be​ ​spied​ ​on​ ​you​ ​at​ ​any​ ​time.    This​ ​is​ ​Edward​ ​Snowden​,​ ​if​ ​that​ ​name​ ​sounds​ ​familiar​ ​that’s​ ​because​ ​a  movie​ ​was​ ​made​ ​about​ ​him​ ​in​ ​2016.​ ​He​ ​is​ ​relevant​ ​to​ ​this​ ​topic  because​ ​he​ ​worked​ ​with​ ​the​ ​CIA​​ ​during​ ​the​ ​Obama​ ​administration​ ​and  leaked​ ​data​ ​being​ ​assembled​ ​to​ ​track​ ​all​ ​forms​ ​of​ ​digital  communications​ ​by​ ​the​ ​NSA​.​ ​Not​ ​just​ ​foreign​ ​Governments​ ​and  terrorist​ ​groups​ ​were​ ​subject​ ​to​ ​this​ ​surveillance​ ​but​ ​also​ ​regular  American​ ​citizens.​ ​He​ ​fled​ ​to​ ​an​ ​undisclosed​ ​location​ ​ ​in​ ​Moscow  Russia​ ​after​ ​this​ ​leak​ ​due​ ​to​ ​multiple​ ​charges​ ​by​ ​the​ ​American  Government.​ ​To​ ​some​ ​he​ ​is​ ​seen​ ​as​ ​a​ ​hero​ ​but​ ​to​ ​others​ ​as​ ​a​ ​terrorist.    Does​ ​this​ ​occur​ ​in​ ​Canada?  Bill​ ​C-51​ ​is​ ​an​ ​anti​ ​terrorist​ ​legislation​ ​put​ ​in​ ​place​ ​by​ ​the​ ​Harper  administration​ ​which​ ​gives​ ​the​ ​CSIS​​ ​(​Canadian​ ​Security​ ​Intelligence  Service)​ ​expanded​ ​power​ ​to​ ​monitor​ ​technology.​ ​Under​ ​this​ ​bill  promoting​ ​terroristic​ ​acts​ ​becomes​ ​an​ ​offence​ ​under​ ​the​ ​criminal​ ​code.​ ​A  larger​ ​crackdown​ ​on​ ​terrorist​ ​propaganda​ ​in​ ​the​ ​form​ ​of​ ​online​ ​and  computer​ ​files​ ​will​ ​happen.​ ​Police​ ​can​ ​now​ ​arrest​ ​people​ ​for​ ​suspicion  without​ ​warrant.​ ​CSIS​​ ​can​ ​interfere​ ​with​ ​terror​ ​plots.​ ​And​ ​finally,​ ​your  personal​ ​information​ ​is​ ​shared​ ​with​ ​more​ ​departments.   What​ ​type​ ​of​ ​message​ ​can​ ​lead​ ​to​ ​an​ ​arrest?    The​ ​vagueness​ ​of​ ​this​ ​bill​ ​doesn’t​ ​specifically​ ​state​ ​what​ ​is​ ​against​ ​the  criminal​ ​code.​ ​What​ ​is​ ​considered​ ​promotion​ ​of​ ​terrorism​ ​can​ ​be  considered​ ​differently​ ​between​ ​what​ ​you​ ​think​ ​and​ ​the​ ​Government  thinks.​ ​Therefore​ ​if​ ​you​ ​make​ ​a​ ​sarcastic​ ​threat​ ​online​ ​you​ ​could​ ​be  arrested​ ​without​ ​a​ ​warrant​ ​under​ ​suspicion​ ​of​ ​terrorism.​ ​The​ ​Government  doesn’t​ ​know​ ​the​ ​true​ ​intent​ ​behind​ ​a​ ​message.​ ​Because​ ​of​ ​this,​ ​society  has​ ​to​ ​conform​ ​to​ ​a​ ​restriction​ ​on​ ​free​ ​speech​ ​to​ ​avoid​ ​being​ ​imprisoned.              ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​Is​ ​the​ ​Government​ ​morally  justified​ ​when​ ​monitoring​ ​online  ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​activity​ ​and​ ​messages?                            ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​I​ ​feel​ ​as​ ​if​ ​the​ ​results​ ​of​ ​my​ ​research​ ​questions​ ​will   prove​ ​ ​that​ ​government​ ​surveillance​ ​of​ ​technology​ ​is​ ​on   average​ ​immoral​ ​and​ ​harmful.​ ​People​ ​don’t​ ​act​ ​the​ ​same   ​ ​ ​way​ ​they​ ​do​ ​online​ ​as​ ​in​ ​person.​ ​There​ ​for​ ​legal​ ​action   ​ ​ ​should​ ​not​ ​be​ ​put​ ​in​ ​place​ ​when​ ​people​ ​exercise​ ​their   ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​right​ ​to​ ​free​ ​speech​ ​online.​ ​For​ ​that​ ​reason​ ​it​ ​is   ​ ​ ​ ​ineffective​ ​in​ ​finding​ ​the​ ​actual​ ​criminals​ ​but​ ​instead   puts​ ​regular​ ​citizens​ ​at​ ​risk​ ​which​ ​is​ ​immoral​ ​and​ ​harmful.            Puts​ ​regular​ ​citizens​ ​at​ ​risk  With​ ​more​ ​power​ ​being​ ​put​ ​in​ ​the​ ​hands​ ​of​ ​the​ ​Government​ ​in​ ​terms​ ​of  online​ ​activity,​ ​the​ ​margin​ ​of​ ​error​ ​goes​ ​up​ ​as​ ​well.​ ​Whatever​ ​the  authorities​ ​deem​ ​“suspicious”​ ​online​ ​gives​ ​them​ ​the​ ​authority​ ​to​ ​now  arrest​ ​you​ ​immediately.​ ​These​ ​lack​ ​of​ ​precautions​ ​will​ ​cause​ ​a​ ​influx​ ​in  innocent​ ​citizens​ ​getting​ ​in​ ​trouble​ ​with​ ​the​ ​law​ ​even​ ​if​ ​not​ ​guilty​ ​in  intent.    The​ ​majority​ ​of​ ​citizens​ ​don’t​ ​want​ ​to​ ​be​ ​monitored   If​ ​most​ ​citizens​ ​don’t​ ​want​ ​laws​ ​inhibiting​ ​their​ ​privacy​ ​uselessly,​ ​it​ ​is  immoral​ ​to​ ​force​ ​legislation​ ​upon​ ​them.​ ​There​ ​hasn’t​ ​been​ ​shown​ ​to​ ​be​ ​a  need​ ​for​ ​Bill-C51​ ​in​ ​Canada​ ​and​ ​yet​ ​the​ ​Harper​ ​government​ ​in​ ​2015​ ​put​ ​it  in​ ​place.​ ​Because​ ​it​ ​isn’t​ ​needed​ ​and​ ​citizens​ ​disagree​ ​with​ ​it,​ ​it​ ​is  immoral.​ ​However​ ​if​ ​there​ ​was​ ​a​ ​clear​ ​problem​ ​with​ ​terrorism​ ​and​ ​there  was​ ​a​ ​strong​ ​correlation​ ​between​ ​terrorists​ ​and​ ​online​ ​activity​ ​then​ ​it  would​ ​be​ ​moral.   A​ ​random​ ​sample​ ​of​ ​1500​ ​Canadian​ ​adults​ ​of​ ​different​ ​races​ ​and​ ​provinces​ ​that  were​ ​phoned​ ​for​ ​these​ ​surveys.      92%​ ​of​ ​the​ ​participants​ ​are​ ​somewhat​ ​to  more​ ​concerned​ ​about​ ​their​ ​personal  privacy.            74%​ ​of​ ​the​ ​participants​ ​feel​ ​as​ ​if​ ​they​ ​have  less​ ​protection​ ​of​ ​personal​ ​info​ ​now​ ​than  they​ ​did​ ​10​ ​years​ ​ago.     

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/11/03/product-outline/

03/11/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Most Repeated Question Current Affairs - 2000 to 2013 83%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/07/30/most-repeated-question-current-affairs-2000-to-2013/

30/07/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian 80%

(Incidentally, none of this is to suggest that price controls were the cause of the reign of terror instituted by the Nazis.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/01/27/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-is-totalitarian/

27/01/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

d13Hoare 77%

Unholy Terror:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/05/12/d13hoare/

12/05/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

IIPADpoll 76%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/08/23/iipadpoll/

23/08/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

kaushik pdf 76%

YEAR Rs.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/01/16/kaushik-pdf/

16/01/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Cyber Warfare and Terrorism Certificate of Achievement 76%

Certificate of Achievement Short Course:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/12/20/cyber-warfare-and-terrorism-certificate-of-achievement/

20/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Resolution denouncing White Nationalism 76%

Sponsored by:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/18/resolution-denouncing-white-nationalism/

18/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Writing CV 76%

CHRIS GILROY Tel: 01482 571845 E-mail:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/25/writing-cv/

25/02/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

SC19950.Taupier.Appx.MSB 76%

(a) A person is guilty of threatening in the first degree when such person (1) (A) threatens to commit any crime involving the use of a hazardous substance with the intent to terrorize another person, to cause evacuation of a building, place of assembly or facility of public transportation or othenwise to cause serious public inconvenience, or (B) threatens to commit such crime in reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror, evacuation or inconvenience;

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/09/sc19950-taupier-appx-msb/

09/08/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

CNA-23 Mearsheimer 2006 75%

Israel is thus seen as a crucial ally in the war on terror, because its enemies are America’s enemies.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/28/cna-23-mearsheimer-2006/

28/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

MORI Issues Index November 2016 - Charts 75%

November 2016 ECONOMIST/IPSOS MORI ISSUES INDEX Contacts:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/12/09/mori-issues-index-november-2016-charts/

09/12/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

GMMCPress Release 4th June 2017 75%

4th June 2017 PRESS RELEASE London Terror Attacks-3rd June 2017 __________________________________________________________________ We are grieved and in a utter state of shock that just a mere week after the Manchester terror attack that innocent people have lost their lives and have been injured in London.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/06/04/gmmcpress-release-4th-june-2017/

04/06/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

why we hate you 75%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/05/27/why-we-hate-you/

27/05/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

SBHS 75%

Situation Mod Morale Check Conditions Outnumbered -1 Op*  Friendly Gruesome Kill within Long range Attacking a Transfixed/ Fallen Foe +2 (Lethal)  Charge by opponent with Terror Ability Power Blow -1 Op Ambush Bonus +1  When any friendly Leader is killed Mounted Model attacking +1 non-Mounted Defending an obstacle or in an elevated position +1 Large model vs Smaller +1 *For each additional opponent beyond the first  Warband is reduced to half its original numbers (Just once) Morale Checks  Roll 3D6.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/06/19/sbhs/

19/06/2013 www.pdf-archive.com