Search


PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 26 February at 12:01 - Around 75000 files indexed.


Show results per page

Results for «threat»:


Total: 900 results - 0.073 seconds

art 1 100%

5, 463– 477 © 2015 American Psychological Association 0147-7307/15/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000140 Stereotype Threat and Racial Differences in Citizens’ Experiences of Police Encounters Cynthia J.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/12/22/art-1/

22/12/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Bid for MoD funding 140317 97%

The Integrity Initiative was set up in 2016 by The Institute for Statecraft in cooperation with the Free University of Brussels (VUB) to bring to the attention of policy-makers, military leaders and the general public the threat posed to democratic institutions in the United Kingdom and across Europe by Russia.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/12/13/bid-for-mod-funding-140317/

13/12/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

SC19950.Taupier.Brief.MSB 95%

10 THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY REJECTED A REQUIREMENT OF PROOF OF THE DEFENDANTS SPECIFIC INTENT TO COMMUNICATE A THREAT IN ITS ASSESSMENT OF WHETHER.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/08/09/sc19950-taupier-brief-msb/

09/08/2017 www.pdf-archive.com

Could Tokyo's Net-Equipped Drones 94%

SUGGESTED FOR YOU In response to the threat of drone attacks, Tokyo's Metropolitan Police Department has introduced a net­carrying drone designed to capture other unmanned aircraft that fly over restricted areas, Asian Review reports. The initiative is the first of its kind in Japan.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/12/13/could-tokyo-s-net-equipped-drones/

13/12/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

458087 IDC Tech Spotlight New DDoS Defense FINAL 91%

The Rise of DDoS and the Threat to Business The number of DDoS attacks has increased dramatically over the past several years.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/13/458087-idc-tech-spotlight-new-ddos-defense-final/

13/01/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

HP Cyber Risk Report 2015 91%

In this report we provide a broad view of the 2014 threat landscape, ranging from industry-wide data down to a focused look at different technologies, including open source, mobile, and the Internet of Things.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/03/16/hp-cyber-risk-report-2015/

16/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

BenghaziCoverup.Reveal 90%

September
10,
2012
–
“The
cable,
dispatched
from
Washington,
the
day
before
 protests
erupted,
advised
the
embassy
the
broadcasts
could
provoke
violence.
It
did
 not
direct
specific
measures
to
upgrade
security,”

 “most
of
the
Cairo
embassy
staff
had
been
instructed
to
 
stay
home
that
day
even
before
the
protests
began.”
 “we
had
alerted
the
EgypIans
as
well,”
she
told
a
news
briefing.”

 “State
Department
spokeswoman
Victoria
Nuland
said
staff

“well
aware”
 
video
was
being
used
to
whip
up
strong
feelings
and
could
lead
to
demonstraIons,”

 Sep
8
“THREAT
OF
 VIOLENCE”

 Egypt
TV
Show
Broadcast
 “there
was
actually
minimal
staff
in
the
building
because
we
were
already
alerted”

 Sep
9
Video
uploaded
 To
YouTube
&
US
BECOMES
 AWARE
OF
A
THREAT
 Sep
10‐
US
INITIATES
DEFENSE
 
VIA
CABLE
ORDERS
 Sep
10,
2012
‐No
cable
“dispatched”
 &
Benghazi
not
“advised”
 Sep11‐
US
DEFENSE
PLAN
 WORKS,
EVEN
SIGNALS
ITS
 READY
VIA
EMBASSY
 TWEET
AT
6AM
 AHEAD
CAIRO
PROTESTS
 Sep
11,
2012
‐No
cable
 “dispatched”
&
Benghazi
not
 “advised”
 CAIRO
US
 EMBASSY

 ZERO
 US
CASULTIES
 BENGHAZI
 EMBASSY
 DESTROYED
 Pre‐Sep8
US
Benghazi
 Consulate
already
a`acked +Significant
threats
&
 Warnings
of
more
a`acks
 before
Sep8
 Sep9,
“local
miliIa”
 Threaten
US
Ambassador
 Security
will
cease
if
 US
backed
PM
Jabril
 Wins
Sep12
ElecIon
 Sep
10‐
US
IGNORES
 REQUESTS.
SENDS
 NO
SECURITY
&
 REJECTS
AMBASSADOR
 REQUEST
TO
ORDER
 11
BODYGUARDS
FOR
 1
YEAR
FOR
$340,000
 Sep11,
US
Benghazi
 Cables
WH,
IdenIfies
 New
threats
&
Asks
 For
HELP
ahead
Sep12
 Libya
PM
elecIon
 4
US
 CASULTIES


https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/01/22/benghazicoverup-reveal/

22/01/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

libya-progress-report 90%

Prior to the Benghazi attacks, State Department officials in Libya made repeated requests for additional security that were denied in Washington despite ample documentation of the threat posed by violent extremist militias.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/05/01/libya-progress-report/

01/05/2013 www.pdf-archive.com

John Lux $300 Million Demand Letter 90%

(c) “Credible threat” means a verbal or nonverbal threat, or a combination of the two, including threats delivered by electronic communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the person who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely associated Page 3 of 36 with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat to cause such harm.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/04/02/john-lux-300-million-demand-letter/

02/04/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Black Earth Val Dame 89%

______ = _____ + _____ + _____ THREAT RANGE ORIGIN SKILL MAX RANKS SKILL NAME SUGGESTED ATTRIBUTES SKILL BONUS RANKS ATTRIBUTE MOD.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/03/28/black-earth-val-dame/

28/03/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

fortinet application control 88%

It is now both the highway for critical business applications, as well a common threat delivery mechanism.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/03/15/fortinet-application-control/

15/03/2011 www.pdf-archive.com

powercontrolwheelnoshading 88%

Although physical assaults may occur only once or occasionally, they instill threat of future violent attacks and allow the abuser to take control of the woman’s life and circumstances.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/12/15/powercontrolwheelnoshading/

15/12/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

SkillSharing Draft Nov1 2 87%

Across Europe and the Mediterranean, the threat to independent journalism is spreading, with mass detentions in Turkey, a murder in Malta and revelations on how fake news targeted voters in the UK’s Brexit referendum all underlining the need for vigilance.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/12/13/skillsharingdraft-nov12/

13/12/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

NuclearProliferationandSecurityConcerns 87%

      NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND SECURITY CONCERNS:   Accurately predicting future state proliferation by looking at various  factors outside the security model.                   Amanda Sewell  Sam Houston State University  September 2016              1  Why do states build nuclear weapons? This is the question that Scott  Sagan attempts to answer by in his research by looking at three different  theory models. In the past, the security concerns of the state were a positive  prediction to whether or not they would develop nuclear weapons, but the  same factors that pressured the states in the past, are no longer present  today. Without these factors, would security still be a reliable indicator?  Sagan argues that focusing only on the security considerations as the cause  of proliferation is “dangerously inadequate”.1  While the security model  accurately explains past cases of nuclear proliferation by states, it would not  be reliable in current times since the factors are no longer the same.  Therefore, if we want to predict which countries might develop nuclear  weapons in the future, underlying security concerns can not be the only area  we pay attention to. Recent proliferation cases have demonstrated that we  must take the other factors that play an important role in states decisions  regarding proliferation. These factors, along with security concerns, may  provide a much more accurate predictor of future proliferation.  First, let’s take a closer look at why the security model has  worked for past cases. Sagan describes the security model as “any state that  seeks to maintain its national security must balance against any rival state  that develops nuclear weapons by gaining access to a nuclear deterrent  itself.” 2 The overwhelming majority of nuclear programs were developed  1 2  Sagan, Scott D. 2012. Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. Pp.54   Ibid. pp 56      2  around WWII and the Cold War. The security model is better at predicting  these  behaviors of superpowers such as Russia and the United States where  there is an imminent threat to state’s security. The nuclear arms race  between the United States and the former Soviet Union provides a case  example of this security model and how it explains behavior towards nuclear  proliferation.  On July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested in the New  Mexico Desert.3  Less than a month later, an atomic bomb was dropped on  Hiroshima, Japan. The United States gained military superiority and a need  arose for other states to have acquire similar weaponry for security. “Stallin  wanted to be able to threaten the United States with atomic weapons, just  as the United States was able to threaten the Soviet Union”4   The Soviets  tested their first atomic bomb in 1949 after blueprints were leaked to them  by German physicist, ​Klaus Fuchs, who worked on the first United States  bomb.5   Now that the Soviet Union had comparable weapons, the United  States began tests on new types and designs of bombs in order to regain  their superiority. Each side continued to add to their arsenals as the tensions  rose. There was a verifiable need for the Soviets to gain a nuclear deterrent  to prevent an attack by the United States, thus the security model  accurately explains proliferation decisions by the state.    Davis, Watson. "Background of Atomic Bomb." ​The Science News­Letter 49.25 (1946): 394­395.   Zuberi, Matin. "Stalin and the bomb." ​Strategic Analysis 23.7 (1999): 1133­1153.  5  "Soviets explode atomic bomb ­ Aug 29, 1949 ­ HISTORY.com." 2010. 20 Sep. 2016  <​http://www.history.com/this­day­in­history/soviets­explode­atomic­bomb​>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/21/nuclearproliferationandsecurityconcerns/

21/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Mutant Registration Act 87%

In instances where an issue of public safety is believed to be at risk pending action from certain known Mutant extremists, law enforcement officials are authorized to suspend the process of issuing writs of Habeas Corpus in order to take said known extremists into custody early to prevent them from becoming a danger to others if a credible threat is exposed.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/05/19/mutant-registration-act/

18/05/2014 www.pdf-archive.com

NuclearProliferationandSecurityConcerns-AmandaSewell (3) 87%

      NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND SECURITY CONCERNS:   Accurately predicting future state proliferation by looking at various  factors outside the security model.                   Amanda Sewell  Sam Houston State University  Political Science 5367­International Relations  September 2016              1  Why do states build nuclear weapons? This is the question that Scott  Sagan attempts to answer by in his research by looking at three different  theory models. In the past, the security concerns of the state were a positive  prediction to whether or not they would develop nuclear weapons, but the  same factors that pressured the states in the past, are no longer present  today. Without these factors, would security still be a reliable indicator?  Sagan argues that focusing only on the security considerations as the cause  of proliferation is “dangerously inadequate”.1  While the security model  accurately explains past cases of nuclear proliferation by states, it would not  be reliable in current times since the factors are no longer the same.  Therefore, if we want to predict which countries might develop nuclear  weapons in the future, underlying security concerns can not be the only area  we pay attention to. Recent proliferation cases have demonstrated that we  must take the other factors that play an important role in states decisions  regarding proliferation. These factors, along with security concerns, may  provide a much more accurate predictor of future proliferation.  First, let’s take a closer look at why the security model has  worked for past cases. Sagan describes the security model as “any state that  seeks to maintain its national security must balance against any rival state  that develops nuclear weapons by gaining access to a nuclear deterrent  itself.” 2 The overwhelming majority of nuclear programs were developed  1 2  Sagan, Scott D. 2012. Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. Pp.54   Ibid. pp 56      2  around WWII and the Cold War. The security model is better at predicting  these  behaviors of superpowers such as Russia and the United States where  there is an imminent threat to state’s security. The nuclear arms race  between the United States and the former Soviet Union provides a case  example of this security model and how it explains behavior towards nuclear  proliferation.  On July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested in the New  Mexico Desert.3  Less than a month later, an atomic bomb was dropped on  Hiroshima, Japan. The United States gained military superiority and a need  arose for other states to have acquire similar weaponry for security. “Stallin  wanted to be able to threaten the United States with atomic weapons, just  as the United States was able to threaten the Soviet Union”4   The Soviets  tested their first atomic bomb in 1949 after blueprints were leaked to them  by German physicist, ​Klaus Fuchs, who worked on the first United States  bomb.5   Now that the Soviet Union had comparable weapons, the United  States began tests on new types and designs of bombs in order to regain  their superiority. Each side continued to add to their arsenals as the tensions  rose. There was a verifiable need for the Soviets to gain a nuclear deterrent  to prevent an attack by the United States, thus the security model  accurately explains proliferation decisions by the state.    Davis, Watson. "Background of Atomic Bomb." ​The Science News­Letter 49.25 (1946): 394­395.   Zuberi, Matin. "Stalin and the bomb." ​Strategic Analysis 23.7 (1999): 1133­1153.  5  "Soviets explode atomic bomb ­ Aug 29, 1949 ­ HISTORY.com." 2010. 20 Sep. 2016  <​http://www.history.com/this­day­in­history/soviets­explode­atomic­bomb​>

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/21/nuclearproliferationandsecurityconcerns-amandasewell-3/

21/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

HP Cyber Risk Report 2015 Executive Summary 86%

Report Cyber Risk Report 2015 Executive summary Report | Cyber Risk Report 2015 The cyber landscape The 2015 edition of HP’s annual security research Cyber Risk Report details a threat landscape still heavily populated by old problems and known issues, even as the pace of the security world quickens.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/03/16/hp-cyber-risk-report-2015-executive-summary/

16/03/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

nps71-070714-03 86%

Incomplete or ambiguous threat information may lead to inconsistency in physical security among HV transformer owners, inefficient spending of limited security resources at facilities that may not really be under threat, or deployment of security measures against the wrong threat.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/02/22/nps71-070714-03/

22/02/2015 www.pdf-archive.com

Active Measure Proposal 14.10.2018 86%

Proposal to understand and counter Russian Active Measures Russia poses a potential military threat and an actual (in most cases non-military) Active Measures threat.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/03/22/active-measure-proposal-14102018/

22/03/2019 www.pdf-archive.com

4D - FinalAssignmentSBP - Team4D (1) 85%

Low capital requirements in terms of start-up costs and low wages Experience and knowledge are important to build trust with clients Threat:

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/10/03/4d-finalassignmentsbp-team4d-1/

03/10/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

Ransome on high seas 85%

Ransom on high seas Cyber Security in Maritime Industry Abbas Sabuwala CONTENT ❖ Maritime Industry threat vectors ❖ How is the Maritime sector vulnerable ❖ Disruptive and Catastrophic events ❖ Technology Roadmap ❖ Closing the coverage gap ❖ Conclusion Maritime sector • About 90% of the world trade is carried by the international shipping industry.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/05/07/ransome-on-high-seas/

07/05/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

Black Earth Pitch 85%

5 + _____ +3 + _____ +8 = _____ ______ +6 ______ +6 ______ = = 5 _____ 5 _____ +1 + _____ +1 + _____ THREAT RANGE ORIGIN SKILL SKILL NAME SUGGESTED ATTRIBUTES FOCUSES RANKS ATTRIBUTE MOD.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2018/03/28/black-earth-pitch/

28/03/2018 www.pdf-archive.com

MultiRobotAdversarialCoverageAppendix 85%

Let l be the number of dangerous threat levels.

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/19/multirobotadversarialcoverageappendix/

19/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com

wada2 84%

https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/04/22/wada2/

22/04/2016 www.pdf-archive.com