PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 17 July at 11:24 - Around 76000 files indexed.

Show results per page

Results for «unincorporated»:

Total: 30 results - 0.028 seconds

4th Rep - Longo Petition 100%

County of Cook ) I, ___________________________(Circulator’s Name) do hereby certify that I reside at _____________________________________ in the City/Village/Unincorporated Area (circle one) of __________________________ (if unincorporated, list municipality that provides postal service) Zip Code __________, County of _________________, State of _________________that I am 18 years of age or older, that I am a citizen of the United States, and that the signatures on this sheet were signed in my presence, not more than 90 days preceding the last day for filing of the petitions and are genuine and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the persons so signing were at the time of signing the petition qualified voters of the Republican Party in the political division in which the candidate is seeking nomination/elective office, and that their respective residences are correctly stated, as above set forth.


AES Constitution 88%

(i) in the case of an unincorporated body that is registered as the association - a member of that unincorporated body immediately before the registration of the association, or (ii) in the case of an association that is amalgamated to form the relevant association -a member of that other association immediately before the amalgamation, or (iii) in the case of a registrable corporation that is registered as an association - a member of the registrable corporation immediately before that entity was registered as an association.


City Council Worksession Agenda - September 26, 2017 80%

(B) No business establishment within the unincorporated county limits may provide single use plastic carryout bags to its customers.


11517 Cumpston #3, North Hollywood, CA 91601 C 77%

unincorporated area [ X ] City of Los Angeles [ X ] [ I 1 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is herebyackooWledged.


11517 Cumpston #3, North Hollywood, CA 91601 Grand Deed1 75%

unincorporated area ,[ X ) City of Angeles (North HollyWood Area) ern £ } I 1 Los FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Doreen Doshay Russ"'l and Davrd Garrett Doshay, as Successor Trust&&s of The 'Ooshay Living Trust dat.ed September 20, 2006 hera~y GRANT(S) to Petsr Coeler and Barbara Coeler} Husband Survivorship - And Wife As Community Propedy Wlth Rlght Of - the following described real property in tt\e COunty or Los Angeles, State of California:


GBU Mountain News XLIV - Jan 27, 2014 75%

Resident Susan Kenyon (2nd from left) explains the fire situation to Ventura County Fire officials including Battalion Chief Todd Leake in front of her destroyed house #### Camp Scheideck is an unincorporated residential area in the middle of Los Padres National Forest in Ventura County a few miles northeast from the intersection of Highway 33 and Lockwood Valley Road.


Vex Complaint 70%

GUARDIANS OF THE TOWER, an unincorporated association;


PHC Book Final Draft 63%

Englewood, CO 80211 303- 789-0501 Non-governmental agency helping individuals, families and seniors who are residents of Centennial, Englewood, Glendale, Highlands Ranch, Littleton, Lone Tree, Sheridan and unincorporated Arapahoe County.


Spokane Regional Animal Shelter Levy Fact Sheet Final 63%

unincorporated Spokane County and the cities of Spokane Valley, Liberty Lake, Cheney, and Millwood.


bitnationwhitepaperv2 60%

  In  return,  they  commonly  provide  various  degrees  of  governance   services  such  as  security,  dispute  resolution,  and  law  enforcement  to  their  subjects.  More  often  than  not,  they  also  claim  a  monopoly  on  these services, even  when  their own  services  are  poorly  executed or virtually non­existent.    Geographic Governance Monopolies Throughout History Governments  with  geographic  monopolies   have  been  the rule  through  most of human civilization,  their  borders determined largely by  the  reach of their weapons technology. Since  peoples within the borders of  a  city state, kingdom or nation state tended to have shared culture,  history, language and values, with little  means  of  communication  outside  their  own  communities,  cohesion  was   relatively  easy.  In  Europe, the  Treaty  of  Westphalia  (1648)  established the  nation  state construct as the standard  for  governance in  the  West  and  the  concept  spread  globally  in  the  19th  century.  By  the  20th  century,  the  nation  state  had  supplanted  vast  empires,  as  well  as  unincorporated   territories  and smaller ethnic states  such as  those  in  Italy  and  Germany,  creating  an  oligopoly  of  governance  and  claiming  nearly  every  square  meter  of  habitable land on the  globe. While  the  defined  borders  and  cultural  cohesion  of the nation state provided  some  relief from  the  near­constant  violence of the imperial wars,  in  our own  era  the borders themselves  continue to be a persistent source of conflict and instability.    Compounding ongoing property rights and other governance issues in most of the developing world is the  fact  that  nation  state  borders  continue  to  represent  oppression  to  millions.  The  tensions  created  by  arbitrarily  drawn  state  borders  are  perhaps   exemplified   by  the  ill­conceived  Sykes­Picot  agreement  (1916). During  the  last  years  of the  ailing Ottoman Empire, international borders in the Middle East were  crudely  drawn  pursuant  to  colonial  interests   of  the  period  and  have  exacerbated  ethnic  and  religious  conflict.  Even   though  the  ongoing  human  tragedy  facilitated  by  the  Sykes­Picot  borders  and  similar  conflicts in Sub­Saharan Africa and the Caucasus is clear to the world, changing decades­old international  boundaries  that  are  supported  by  political  interests   and  international  demand  for  stability  is  virtually  impossible.    The Myth of Choice   Some  suggest  that  individuals  living in deplorable conditions are free to “vote with their feet” and move  from  one country  to another to  avoid oppression, famine, and other  problems.  This obtuse and simplistic  remedy  rarely  proves  so  simple  in  reality,  primarily  because  truly  free  and  unencumbered  movement  between  countries   does  not  exist.  For  a  farmer  in  the  Central  African  Republic   or  a  fruit  vendor  in  Bangladesh, obtaining foreign visas or citizenship can be an insurmountable obstacle. Even when they do,  they often find little changes from one government to the next.    Even  in  more prosperous countries such  as the U.S., political stagnation may in large part be the result of  the confines of nation­statehood. Politicizing government services and forcing conflicting political visions  on  a  very  diverse   population  has  led  the U.S. and others down  the path  of  dysfunction,  inhibited  social  mobility,  higher  debt  and  lower  economic  growth, driving a  wedge between people who otherwise may  have little reason for animosity.    Enormous  swaths  of  the  global population are forced to support laws and policies they may detest  simply  because  political  leaders  can  convince  more  than  half  the  voting  population  of   a  nation  state   that   preserving a  miserable  status quo is  vital  to their security  or  interests. In response, hundreds of separatist  movements have gained traction and asserted a right to independence from central governments viewed as  despotic,  oppressive, or at least  ineffective. The Arab Spring, the Scottish independence referendum, the  Catalan  independence  movement,  protests  in  Hong  Kong,  the  growth  of  Islamic  insurrectionary  movements,  terrorist networks and  nativist movements in Europe have all been the diverse symptoms of a  global  power  struggle  exacerbated  by  ossified  nation  states  that  have   remained  unwilling  or  unable   to  ensure economic mobility and political choice.⁴         1.2​ The Change of Paradigm:​ ​ Governance 2.0 ​   Governance 2.0​ : We  refer to  governance 2.0 as the dissociation of geography  and governance, as well as  the voluntary choice between governance service providers. Governance 2.0 allows for a plurality of legal   systems to compete on a free market offering more fair services to its member­citizens.    Governance 2.0 is based on observations of the following general patterns of human behaviour:    ● The  majority  of people do  want various degrees of governance  services; some want  more  and  some  want less, or none at all  ● The  majority  of  people  want  an  easy  choice  of   governance  service  providers  ­  e.g.  an  end­to­end  solution  instead of having to chose between every single service provider themselves. Aggregation of  services is a key part of the solution.  ● Many  people  do not wish  to leave their  geographical area because of their attachment to their family,   friends,  work  situation,  and  culture.  Relocation  should  not  be  a  requirement  to  choose  your  governance service provider.  ● The  existing  blockchain  technology,  along  with  others still emerging, enables governance  2.0  in its  function of being a cryptographically secure public ledger.


GBU Mountain News LIII - April 5, 2014 60%

One of the reasons for the lack of community preparedness, aside from the people’s apathy, is certainly the lack of governmental authority and leadership in the unincorporated county areas.


AA14-15 Roadwise 59%

Tax parcels 7745001900 and 7745001790, addressed as 9716-17th Avenue East, Tacoma, in unincorporated Pierce County.


SSEapplicationlatest 59%

[ [ [ [ [ ] None ] Sole trader ] Unincorporated association ] Incorporated association ] Cooperative [ [ [ [ [ ] Company limited by guarantee ] Company limited by shares ] Partnership ] Trust ] Other.


VOICE complaint 58%

 LAMONE           In  her  official  capacity  as         *       State  Administrator  of  Elections         Maryland  State  Board  of  Elections       *   151  West  Street,  Suite  200                   Annapolis,  Maryland  21401         *                             Defendant           *   ************************************************************************************     COMPLAINT  FOR  DECLATORY  AND  INJUNCTIVE  RELIEF  AND  MANDAMUS       NOW  COMES  Plaintiffs  Voters  Organized  for  the  Integrity  of  City  Elections   (VOICE),  an  unincorporated  association  of  citizens,  and  individual  Plaintiffs  Hassan   Giordano,  Cortly  D.


GBU Mountain News LXI - May 29, 2014 55%

Under the leadership of the elected Sheriff Donny Youngblood the office provides law enforcement throughout the 8,000 square miles of unincorporated areas and contract cities throughout the county.


DLD 666 53%

persons falling within Article 49 of the Order (‘‘high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.’’), iv.


GSC January 2019 Meeting Minutes PDF 52%

All in favor, no opposition, motion passes IAEM-GSC By-Laws The International Association of Emergency Managers – Global Student Council (hereinafter “Global SC”) is an unincorporated council operating within the International Association of Emergency Managers (“IAEM”).


Scheme Document 52%

(c) a reference to a person, corporation, trust, partnership, unincorporated body or other entity includes any of them;


GSC Meeting Agenda for January 2019 PDF 51%

Bylaws Name The International Association of Emergency Managers – Global Student Council (hereinafter “Global SC”) is an unincorporated council operating within the International Association of Emergency Managers (“IAEM”).


eve howell-tangiers petroleum 50%

a) b) in the UK, fall within the exemptions contained in Articles 19 (investment professionals) or 49 (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended, or are otherwise permitted by the laws of the jurisdiction (including Australia) in which they are resident to receive them.


Opinion - Christopher McCall & Raj Desai (2) 50%

incorporated company limited by guarantee, unincorporated association, or charitable incorporated organization (‘CIO’)).


BITNATIONWhitepaper 50%

Governments with geographic monopolies  have been the rule  through most of human civilization,  their  borders  determined  largely  by  the  reach  of  their  weapons  technology.  Since  peoples  within  the   borders  of  a  city  state,  kingdom  or  nation  state  tended  to  have  shared  culture,  history,  language  and  values, with  little means  of communication outside  their own communities, cohesion was relatively easy.  In  Europe,  the  Treaty  of   Westphalia  (1648)   established  the  nation  state  construct  as  the  standard  for  governance  in the West; spreading globally in the 19th century largely through imperial expansion. By the  20th  century,  the  nation  state  had  supplanted  vast  empires,  as  well  as  unincorporated  territories  and  smaller  ethnic  states   such  as  those   in  Italy  and  Germany;   creating  an  of  oligopoly  of  governance  and  claiming  nearly every  square meter of  the  globe (apart from Antarctica). The initial intention was to have  mutually recognized  borders  and  international institutions to  resolve conflicts peacefully.  However good  the  intentions  may  have  been,  with  the  rise  of  political  elites  creating  just  a  semblance  of  political  stability, the borders themselves became a source of conflict and resulted in fueling instability.    Compounding  property   rights  and  other  governance  issues  is   the  fact  that  nation  state  borders  continue  to  represent  oppression  to  millions.  The tensions created  by arbitrarily drawn  state borders are  perhaps exemplified by the ill­conceived Sykes­Picot agreement (1916). During the last years of the ailing  Ottoman  Empire,  international  borders  in   the  Middle  East  were  crudely  drawn  pursuant   to  colonial  2    interests  of  the  period  and  have  exacerbated  ethnic  and  religious  conflict.1   Even  though  the  ongoing  human  tragedy  exacerbated  by  the  Sykes­Picot  borders  is  clear  to  the  world,  changing  decades­old  international boundaries  that  are  supported by political interests and international demand  for  stability  is  virtually impossible.    The Myth of Choice    Some  suggest that individuals living in deplorable conditions are free to “vote with their feet” and  move  from  one  country  to  another  to  avoid  oppression,  famine,  and  other  problems.  This  obtuse  and  simplistic  remedy  rarely  proves  so  simple  in  reality,  primarily  because  truly  free  and  unencumbered  movement  between  countries  does  not  exist.  For  a  farmer  in  the  Central  African  Republic  or  a  fruit  vendor  in  Bangladesh,  obtaining   foreign  visas  or  citizenship  can  be  an  insurmountable  obstacle.  Even  when they do, they often find little changes from one government to the next.    Even  in  more prosperous countries such  as the U.S.,  political  stagnation may in large part be the  result  of  the  confines  of   nation­statehood.  Politicizing  government  services  and  forcing  conflicting  political  visions  on  a  very  diverse  population  has  led  the  U.S.  down  the  path of dysfunction, inhibited  social  mobility,   higher  debt  and  lower  economic  growth;  it  has  driven  a  wedge  between  people  who  otherwise may have little reason for animosity.     Enormous  swaths  of the global population are forced to support laws and policies they may detest   simply because  political  leaders can  convince more  than  half  the voting  population  of  a nation state that  preserving a  miserable  status quo is  vital  to their security  or  interests. In response, hundreds of separatist  movements have gained traction and asserted a right to independence from central governments viewed as  despotic,  oppressive, or at least  ineffective. The Arab Spring, the Scottish independence referendum, the  Catalan  independence  movement,  protests  in  Hong  Kong,  the  growth  of  Islamic  terrorist networks  and  nativist  movements in  Europe  have all been the diverse symptoms of a global power struggle exacerbated  by ossified  nation states that have remained unwilling or unable to ensure economic mobility and  political   choice.⁴    1  ​­dexter­filkins­explains­bitter­consequences­of­iraq­war  ⁴​  ​ (enter ref to free world report)  3    The Impact of Globalization    The  geographical  monopoly  on  governance  was  perhaps  easier  to  maintain  in  a  time  and  age  before  industrialization and globalization happened. Now however, the course is largely irreversible; with  the  seemingly  unstoppable  move   towards  globalization,  the  world  has  become  increasingly  less  geographically  contingent  ­­  through  international  trade,  instant  and  borderless  connectivity  through  communication  channels  like  Internet,  cheap  transport,  and  large  migrant  movements.  People  are  increasingly  connected  across  borders,  resulting  in  desires  less  defined by  their  geographical origin or  location.  In essence,  this means  that over  time, nation  states and  their transnational counterparts  such as  the  United  Nations  (UN)  are  becoming  less  relevant,  and  transnational  institutions  such  as  the  United  Nations  (UN),  in  tandem  with  nation  states  due  to   being  built  on  the   same  outdated,  top­down  monopolistic  foundation. The  Westphalia  system  has a  “best  before”  date,  and that day has arrived. Why  should 7.125 billion  people  on Earth only be able to  choose between perhaps a handful of different  types  of  governance  and  without  freedom   of  movement  between  those  options?  The  limited  choice  of  governance   systems  does  not   necessarily  make  sense  to   the  modern  global  citizen.  Enter  the  birth  of  Decentralized Borderless Voluntary Nations (DBVNs).      Enter the blockchain technology    Technology is changing  human interaction almost faster than scholars, pundits and journalists can  keep  up  with,  resulting  in  the  uniting  of  humans around the globe  in  an  unfathomably complex  web of  relationships. New  “borderless”  nations are emerging:  communities of people who live all over the world  and  who  share  common values, interests,  and  cultures.  We believe that given the  right opportunity, these  new  nations will  thrive as geopolitical  turmoil  continues  to constrict  the  old. With the release  in 2009 of  Bitcoin’s blockchain technology, enabling for the first time a way to ​ verify transactions without a single  authoritative  third  party​ ,  now  may   be  the  best  time  in  human  history  to  reassess  our reliance  on the  traditional  nation state ­ a form of governance that is growing outdated, and which is holding back human  social and economic evolution.     The  reason  why  the  blockchain  matters is  because the blockchain transactional database  has the  basic  record­keeping properties  required  of  a governance  system. Once the information is online, it exists   forever  on the network. The  blockchain has  a rigorous  verification process that is virtually impossible to  4    crack  once  the  network  reaches  a  certain  critical  mass.  It  can record births, marriages,  deaths, property  ownership,  business  contracts  and  a  variety  of  other  records  traditionally  created  and  held  by  governments.  The  identities  of  individuals  on  the  network  can  be  established  definitively through  their  unique  “signatures”,  and  in   turn,  those  individuals  can  sign  and  verify  transactions  (e.g.  the  attending  physician  at your birth  or  the  priest officiating your wedding). Instead  of  a government official acting as  notary or other trusted third party verifier, the consensus of the blockchain now takes on that role.    It  is  well  established  that  free  markets  improve  quality  and  reduce  cost,  while  monopolies  are  generally  the  subject of  derision, a  centralization of resources and authority. We believe that it is possible  for  today’s  innovators  to   apply  the competitive  spirit  of  the  marketplace to  governance and  forever  end  the  power   of  monopolistic  bureaucracies  to  squander  resources,  abuse   authority,  and  oppress  the  powerless.  By  offering real  choices  rather than controlling  and determining the outcomes through central  government nation states, entrepreneurs can enable  the reclamation  of  personal  sovereignty  and enhance  their own autonomy.    A Better Future    To  that  end,  BitNation  proposes  the  creation  of  a  platform  that  will  enable  the  emergence  of  Decentralized  Borderless  Voluntary  Nations  (DBVNs).  This  platform  is  entirely  open  source   and  forkable,  allowing practically anyone to create their own DBVN. We hope that BitNation will be only the  first of many ​ alternatives to traditional monopolistic governance to use blockchain verification qualities as  a   replacement  for  the  “third  party”  authority  hitherto  monopolized  by  governments.  We  believe  the   establishment  of  property  rights,   marriage,  incorporation,  identification,  dispute  resolution  and  other  governance   services  can  be  accomplished  without  resorting  to  abhorrent  behavior  such  as  bribery,  exorbitant  fees, politicization and  coercion through  arbitrary authorities.  Beyond the aforementioned, the  possibilities with DBVNs are both encouraging and virtually limitless.          1.2 ​ The Change of Paradigm:​  Governance 2.0    5


NE1 Terms and Conditions for private individuals (01 07 16) 47%

and words denoting persons shall include bodies corporate, unincorporated associations and partnerships.


GBU Mountain News LIV - April 10, 2014 47%

Hall Ambulance Inc., founded in 1971, provides 9-1-1 paramedic service to the cities of Arvin, Bakersfield, California City, Shafter, Taft, Tehachapi, Wasco, and the unincorporated communities of Bear Valley Springs, Boron, Buttonwillow, Caliente, Dustin Acres, Fellows, Frazier Park, Golden Hills, Lamont, Lebec, Lost Hills, Maricopa, McKittrick, Mettler, Mojave, North Edwards, Pine Mountain Club, Rosamond, Valley Acres and Willow Springs, California.


AmericanNeedlevNFL 44%

The National Football League Properties, or “NFLP“, an unincorporated entity whose sole function is to develop, license, and market the NFL‟s intellectual property,3 opted to instead sign an exclusive, and lucrative deal with Reebok International, Ltd., for the manufacturing of all NFL apparel.4 The decision to grant an exclusive license to Reebok, a co-defendant to the complaint, was made by all 32 NFL teams.