PDF Archive search engine
Last database update: 17 July at 11:24 - Around 76000 files indexed.
County of Cook ) I, ___________________________(Circulator’s Name) do hereby certify that I reside at _____________________________________ in the City/Village/Unincorporated Area (circle one) of __________________________ (if unincorporated, list municipality that provides postal service) Zip Code __________, County of _________________, State of _________________that I am 18 years of age or older, that I am a citizen of the United States, and that the signatures on this sheet were signed in my presence, not more than 90 days preceding the last day for filing of the petitions and are genuine and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the persons so signing were at the time of signing the petition qualified voters of the Republican Party in the political division in which the candidate is seeking nomination/elective office, and that their respective residences are correctly stated, as above set forth.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/10/15/4th-rep-longo-petition/
15/10/2013 www.pdf-archive.com
(i) in the case of an unincorporated body that is registered as the association - a member of that unincorporated body immediately before the registration of the association, or (ii) in the case of an association that is amalgamated to form the relevant association -a member of that other association immediately before the amalgamation, or (iii) in the case of a registrable corporation that is registered as an association - a member of the registrable corporation immediately before that entity was registered as an association.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/07/21/aes-constitution/
21/07/2013 www.pdf-archive.com
(B) No business establishment within the unincorporated county limits may provide single use plastic carryout bags to its customers.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/09/21/city-council-worksession-agenda-september-26-2017/
21/09/2017 www.pdf-archive.com
unincorporated area [ X ] City of Los Angeles [ X ] [ I 1 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is herebyackooWledged.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/01/30/11517-cumpston-3-north-hollywood-ca-91601-c/
30/01/2014 www.pdf-archive.com
unincorporated area ,[ X ) City of Angeles (North HollyWood Area) ern £ } I 1 Los FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Doreen Doshay Russ"'l and Davrd Garrett Doshay, as Successor Trust&&s of The 'Ooshay Living Trust dat.ed September 20, 2006 hera~y GRANT(S) to Petsr Coeler and Barbara Coeler} Husband Survivorship - And Wife As Community Propedy Wlth Rlght Of - the following described real property in tt\e COunty or Los Angeles, State of California:
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/01/30/11517-cumpston-3-north-hollywood-ca-91601-grand-deed1/
30/01/2014 www.pdf-archive.com
Resident Susan Kenyon (2nd from left) explains the fire situation to Ventura County Fire officials including Battalion Chief Todd Leake in front of her destroyed house #### Camp Scheideck is an unincorporated residential area in the middle of Los Padres National Forest in Ventura County a few miles northeast from the intersection of Highway 33 and Lockwood Valley Road.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/01/27/gbu-mountain-news-xliv-jan-27-2014/
27/01/2014 www.pdf-archive.com
GUARDIANS OF THE TOWER, an unincorporated association;
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/02/12/vex-complaint/
12/02/2015 www.pdf-archive.com
Englewood, CO 80211 303- 789-0501 Non-governmental agency helping individuals, families and seniors who are residents of Centennial, Englewood, Glendale, Highlands Ranch, Littleton, Lone Tree, Sheridan and unincorporated Arapahoe County.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/25/phc-book-final-draft/
25/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
unincorporated Spokane County and the cities of Spokane Valley, Liberty Lake, Cheney, and Millwood.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/09/27/spokane-regional-animal-shelter-levy-fact-sheet-final/
27/09/2011 www.pdf-archive.com
In return, they commonly provide various degrees of governance services such as security, dispute resolution, and law enforcement to their subjects. More often than not, they also claim a monopoly on these services, even when their own services are poorly executed or virtually nonexistent. Geographic Governance Monopolies Throughout History Governments with geographic monopolies have been the rule through most of human civilization, their borders determined largely by the reach of their weapons technology. Since peoples within the borders of a city state, kingdom or nation state tended to have shared culture, history, language and values, with little means of communication outside their own communities, cohesion was relatively easy. In Europe, the Treaty of Westphalia (1648) established the nation state construct as the standard for governance in the West and the concept spread globally in the 19th century. By the 20th century, the nation state had supplanted vast empires, as well as unincorporated territories and smaller ethnic states such as those in Italy and Germany, creating an oligopoly of governance and claiming nearly every square meter of habitable land on the globe. While the defined borders and cultural cohesion of the nation state provided some relief from the nearconstant violence of the imperial wars, in our own era the borders themselves continue to be a persistent source of conflict and instability. Compounding ongoing property rights and other governance issues in most of the developing world is the fact that nation state borders continue to represent oppression to millions. The tensions created by arbitrarily drawn state borders are perhaps exemplified by the illconceived SykesPicot agreement (1916). During the last years of the ailing Ottoman Empire, international borders in the Middle East were crudely drawn pursuant to colonial interests of the period and have exacerbated ethnic and religious conflict. Even though the ongoing human tragedy facilitated by the SykesPicot borders and similar conflicts in SubSaharan Africa and the Caucasus is clear to the world, changing decadesold international boundaries that are supported by political interests and international demand for stability is virtually impossible. The Myth of Choice Some suggest that individuals living in deplorable conditions are free to “vote with their feet” and move from one country to another to avoid oppression, famine, and other problems. This obtuse and simplistic remedy rarely proves so simple in reality, primarily because truly free and unencumbered movement between countries does not exist. For a farmer in the Central African Republic or a fruit vendor in Bangladesh, obtaining foreign visas or citizenship can be an insurmountable obstacle. Even when they do, they often find little changes from one government to the next. Even in more prosperous countries such as the U.S., political stagnation may in large part be the result of the confines of nationstatehood. Politicizing government services and forcing conflicting political visions on a very diverse population has led the U.S. and others down the path of dysfunction, inhibited social mobility, higher debt and lower economic growth, driving a wedge between people who otherwise may have little reason for animosity. Enormous swaths of the global population are forced to support laws and policies they may detest simply because political leaders can convince more than half the voting population of a nation state that preserving a miserable status quo is vital to their security or interests. In response, hundreds of separatist movements have gained traction and asserted a right to independence from central governments viewed as despotic, oppressive, or at least ineffective. The Arab Spring, the Scottish independence referendum, the Catalan independence movement, protests in Hong Kong, the growth of Islamic insurrectionary movements, terrorist networks and nativist movements in Europe have all been the diverse symptoms of a global power struggle exacerbated by ossified nation states that have remained unwilling or unable to ensure economic mobility and political choice.⁴ 1.2 The Change of Paradigm: Governance 2.0 Governance 2.0 : We refer to governance 2.0 as the dissociation of geography and governance, as well as the voluntary choice between governance service providers. Governance 2.0 allows for a plurality of legal systems to compete on a free market offering more fair services to its membercitizens. Governance 2.0 is based on observations of the following general patterns of human behaviour: ● The majority of people do want various degrees of governance services; some want more and some want less, or none at all ● The majority of people want an easy choice of governance service providers e.g. an endtoend solution instead of having to chose between every single service provider themselves. Aggregation of services is a key part of the solution. ● Many people do not wish to leave their geographical area because of their attachment to their family, friends, work situation, and culture. Relocation should not be a requirement to choose your governance service provider. ● The existing blockchain technology, along with others still emerging, enables governance 2.0 in its function of being a cryptographically secure public ledger.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/09/07/bitnationwhitepaperv2/
07/09/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
One of the reasons for the lack of community preparedness, aside from the people’s apathy, is certainly the lack of governmental authority and leadership in the unincorporated county areas.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/04/05/gbu-mountain-news-liii-april-5-2014/
05/04/2014 www.pdf-archive.com
Tax parcels 7745001900 and 7745001790, addressed as 9716-17th Avenue East, Tacoma, in unincorporated Pierce County.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/03/03/aa14-15-roadwise/
03/03/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
[ [ [ [ [ ] None ] Sole trader ] Unincorporated association ] Incorporated association ] Cooperative [ [ [ [ [ ] Company limited by guarantee ] Company limited by shares ] Partnership ] Trust ] Other.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/02/12/sseapplicationlatest/
12/02/2014 www.pdf-archive.com
LAMONE In her official capacity as * State Administrator of Elections Maryland State Board of Elections * 151 West Street, Suite 200 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 * Defendant * ************************************************************************************ COMPLAINT FOR DECLATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND MANDAMUS NOW COMES Plaintiffs Voters Organized for the Integrity of City Elections (VOICE), an unincorporated association of citizens, and individual Plaintiffs Hassan Giordano, Cortly D.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/06/02/voice-complaint/
02/06/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
Under the leadership of the elected Sheriff Donny Youngblood the office provides law enforcement throughout the 8,000 square miles of unincorporated areas and contract cities throughout the county.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/05/29/gbu-mountain-news-lxi-may-29-2014/
29/05/2014 www.pdf-archive.com
persons falling within Article 49 of the Order (‘‘high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.’’), iv.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/12/29/dld666/
29/12/2019 www.pdf-archive.com
All in favor, no opposition, motion passes IAEM-GSC By-Laws The International Association of Emergency Managers – Global Student Council (hereinafter “Global SC”) is an unincorporated council operating within the International Association of Emergency Managers (“IAEM”).
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/03/05/gsc-january-2019-meeting-minutes-pdf/
05/03/2019 www.pdf-archive.com
(c) a reference to a person, corporation, trust, partnership, unincorporated body or other entity includes any of them;
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/01/22/scheme-document-1/
22/01/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
Bylaws Name The International Association of Emergency Managers – Global Student Council (hereinafter “Global SC”) is an unincorporated council operating within the International Association of Emergency Managers (“IAEM”).
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2019/03/05/gsc-meeting-agenda-for-january-2019-pdf-1/
05/03/2019 www.pdf-archive.com
a) b) in the UK, fall within the exemptions contained in Articles 19 (investment professionals) or 49 (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations etc.) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended, or are otherwise permitted by the laws of the jurisdiction (including Australia) in which they are resident to receive them.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/10/19/eve-howell-tangiers-petroleum/
19/10/2013 www.pdf-archive.com
incorporated company limited by guarantee, unincorporated association, or charitable incorporated organization (‘CIO’)).
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/11/07/opinion-christopher-mccall-raj-desai-2/
07/11/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
Governments with geographic monopolies have been the rule through most of human civilization, their borders determined largely by the reach of their weapons technology. Since peoples within the borders of a city state, kingdom or nation state tended to have shared culture, history, language and values, with little means of communication outside their own communities, cohesion was relatively easy. In Europe, the Treaty of Westphalia (1648) established the nation state construct as the standard for governance in the West; spreading globally in the 19th century largely through imperial expansion. By the 20th century, the nation state had supplanted vast empires, as well as unincorporated territories and smaller ethnic states such as those in Italy and Germany; creating an of oligopoly of governance and claiming nearly every square meter of the globe (apart from Antarctica). The initial intention was to have mutually recognized borders and international institutions to resolve conflicts peacefully. However good the intentions may have been, with the rise of political elites creating just a semblance of political stability, the borders themselves became a source of conflict and resulted in fueling instability. Compounding property rights and other governance issues is the fact that nation state borders continue to represent oppression to millions. The tensions created by arbitrarily drawn state borders are perhaps exemplified by the illconceived SykesPicot agreement (1916). During the last years of the ailing Ottoman Empire, international borders in the Middle East were crudely drawn pursuant to colonial 2 interests of the period and have exacerbated ethnic and religious conflict.1 Even though the ongoing human tragedy exacerbated by the SykesPicot borders is clear to the world, changing decadesold international boundaries that are supported by political interests and international demand for stability is virtually impossible. The Myth of Choice Some suggest that individuals living in deplorable conditions are free to “vote with their feet” and move from one country to another to avoid oppression, famine, and other problems. This obtuse and simplistic remedy rarely proves so simple in reality, primarily because truly free and unencumbered movement between countries does not exist. For a farmer in the Central African Republic or a fruit vendor in Bangladesh, obtaining foreign visas or citizenship can be an insurmountable obstacle. Even when they do, they often find little changes from one government to the next. Even in more prosperous countries such as the U.S., political stagnation may in large part be the result of the confines of nationstatehood. Politicizing government services and forcing conflicting political visions on a very diverse population has led the U.S. down the path of dysfunction, inhibited social mobility, higher debt and lower economic growth; it has driven a wedge between people who otherwise may have little reason for animosity. Enormous swaths of the global population are forced to support laws and policies they may detest simply because political leaders can convince more than half the voting population of a nation state that preserving a miserable status quo is vital to their security or interests. In response, hundreds of separatist movements have gained traction and asserted a right to independence from central governments viewed as despotic, oppressive, or at least ineffective. The Arab Spring, the Scottish independence referendum, the Catalan independence movement, protests in Hong Kong, the growth of Islamic terrorist networks and nativist movements in Europe have all been the diverse symptoms of a global power struggle exacerbated by ossified nation states that have remained unwilling or unable to ensure economic mobility and political choice.⁴ 1 http://www.npr.org/2014/06/25/325503790/journalistdexterfilkinsexplainsbitterconsequencesofiraqwar ⁴ (enter ref to free world report) 3 The Impact of Globalization The geographical monopoly on governance was perhaps easier to maintain in a time and age before industrialization and globalization happened. Now however, the course is largely irreversible; with the seemingly unstoppable move towards globalization, the world has become increasingly less geographically contingent through international trade, instant and borderless connectivity through communication channels like Internet, cheap transport, and large migrant movements. People are increasingly connected across borders, resulting in desires less defined by their geographical origin or location. In essence, this means that over time, nation states and their transnational counterparts such as the United Nations (UN) are becoming less relevant, and transnational institutions such as the United Nations (UN), in tandem with nation states due to being built on the same outdated, topdown monopolistic foundation. The Westphalia system has a “best before” date, and that day has arrived. Why should 7.125 billion people on Earth only be able to choose between perhaps a handful of different types of governance and without freedom of movement between those options? The limited choice of governance systems does not necessarily make sense to the modern global citizen. Enter the birth of Decentralized Borderless Voluntary Nations (DBVNs). Enter the blockchain technology Technology is changing human interaction almost faster than scholars, pundits and journalists can keep up with, resulting in the uniting of humans around the globe in an unfathomably complex web of relationships. New “borderless” nations are emerging: communities of people who live all over the world and who share common values, interests, and cultures. We believe that given the right opportunity, these new nations will thrive as geopolitical turmoil continues to constrict the old. With the release in 2009 of Bitcoin’s blockchain technology, enabling for the first time a way to verify transactions without a single authoritative third party , now may be the best time in human history to reassess our reliance on the traditional nation state a form of governance that is growing outdated, and which is holding back human social and economic evolution. The reason why the blockchain matters is because the blockchain transactional database has the basic recordkeeping properties required of a governance system. Once the information is online, it exists forever on the network. The blockchain has a rigorous verification process that is virtually impossible to 4 crack once the network reaches a certain critical mass. It can record births, marriages, deaths, property ownership, business contracts and a variety of other records traditionally created and held by governments. The identities of individuals on the network can be established definitively through their unique “signatures”, and in turn, those individuals can sign and verify transactions (e.g. the attending physician at your birth or the priest officiating your wedding). Instead of a government official acting as notary or other trusted third party verifier, the consensus of the blockchain now takes on that role. It is well established that free markets improve quality and reduce cost, while monopolies are generally the subject of derision, a centralization of resources and authority. We believe that it is possible for today’s innovators to apply the competitive spirit of the marketplace to governance and forever end the power of monopolistic bureaucracies to squander resources, abuse authority, and oppress the powerless. By offering real choices rather than controlling and determining the outcomes through central government nation states, entrepreneurs can enable the reclamation of personal sovereignty and enhance their own autonomy. A Better Future To that end, BitNation proposes the creation of a platform that will enable the emergence of Decentralized Borderless Voluntary Nations (DBVNs). This platform is entirely open source and forkable, allowing practically anyone to create their own DBVN. We hope that BitNation will be only the first of many alternatives to traditional monopolistic governance to use blockchain verification qualities as a replacement for the “third party” authority hitherto monopolized by governments. We believe the establishment of property rights, marriage, incorporation, identification, dispute resolution and other governance services can be accomplished without resorting to abhorrent behavior such as bribery, exorbitant fees, politicization and coercion through arbitrary authorities. Beyond the aforementioned, the possibilities with DBVNs are both encouraging and virtually limitless. 1.2 The Change of Paradigm: Governance 2.0 5
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/02/26/bitnationwhitepaper/
26/02/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
and words denoting persons shall include bodies corporate, unincorporated associations and partnerships.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2016/07/01/ne1-terms-and-conditions-for-private-individuals-01-07-16/
01/07/2016 www.pdf-archive.com
Hall Ambulance Inc., founded in 1971, provides 9-1-1 paramedic service to the cities of Arvin, Bakersfield, California City, Shafter, Taft, Tehachapi, Wasco, and the unincorporated communities of Bear Valley Springs, Boron, Buttonwillow, Caliente, Dustin Acres, Fellows, Frazier Park, Golden Hills, Lamont, Lebec, Lost Hills, Maricopa, McKittrick, Mettler, Mojave, North Edwards, Pine Mountain Club, Rosamond, Valley Acres and Willow Springs, California.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/04/10/gbu-mountain-news-liv-april-10-2014/
10/04/2014 www.pdf-archive.com
The National Football League Properties, or “NFLP“, an unincorporated entity whose sole function is to develop, license, and market the NFL‟s intellectual property,3 opted to instead sign an exclusive, and lucrative deal with Reebok International, Ltd., for the manufacturing of all NFL apparel.4 The decision to grant an exclusive license to Reebok, a co-defendant to the complaint, was made by all 32 NFL teams.
https://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/08/01/americanneedlevnfl/
01/08/2011 www.pdf-archive.com