how to achieve artistic distance1055 .pdf
Original filename: how to achieve artistic distance1055.pdf
This PDF 1.4 document has been generated by / iTextSharp™ 5.4.1 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (AGPL-version), and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 20/09/2013 at 09:18, from IP address 122.162.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 451 times.
File size: 15 KB (6 pages).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
how to achieve artistic distance
The way to Achieve Artistic Distance in Web site design
All creative endeavours require timely engagement plus a degree of personal intimacy, thus
carrying the potential risk of developing a difficult and physical proximity involving the artist and
the work. Web design, despite its inherent practicality in function and purpose, is not totally free of
this predicament. Even as tripped taking care of our project's visual façade, Check This Out we
tend to rely on an "idea" with the final design formulated inside our minds, a collection of aesthetic
and emotional expectations serving as a compass inside our creative process. But when lines,
shapes and colors start to populate the screen and the design acquires a life of its, the original
guiding mental conceptualization won't simply die away. It lingers within the shadows individuals
subconscious. This leaves us which has a challenging question: exactly what do we actually
perceive? Would it be the target visualisation of our website or perhaps abstract entity produced
by your own ideas still operating in the back of our heads?
The complete answer regarding the degree of subjectivity inside our perception depends on our
"artistic distance". The term defies simple formalisation it could generally be understood to be a
chance to assess a thing on such basis as an extensive group of criteria that lacks a dominating
subjective psychological factor. Since artistic distance will have a fundamental effect on the
efficiency and effectiveness of web site design, below I propose four various ways which will help
create "space" relating to the designer and his work. Such as a "brain resetting" exercise, image
rendering, constructive criticism, as well as those happy to take life lightly to a totally new level,
Artistic Distance in Visual Arts
To improve understand methods to enhance our artistic distance we need to first begin with
considering an even more formal management of its definition. In academic literature, the usually
cited treatise on artistic distance can be an article by Edward Bullough, originally published from
the British Journal of Psychology in 1912.
Bullough employs an example of a fog cruising to show the intricacy of our perception. For most
people fog probably have an extremely negative connotation, often arousing anxiety or even a
similar type of unpleasant feeling. The writer attributes such psychological response to the "fears
of invisible dangers, strain of watching and listening for distant and unlocalised signals". In other
words, just occurrence of your fog can unleash a whole array of psychological and behavioural
associations which are carried with your memories that increase throughout our lives. However,
despite these practical considerations, that's not the only method through which we could
perceive the natural phenomenon, as wll as a fog at sea also is a method to obtain intense relish
and enjoyment. If we could abstract through the reality of the situation, along with its sense of
danger and unpleasantness, we'd have the ability to observe the more "objective" qualities in the
phenomenon. As Bullough eloquently puts it, we may for instance observe "the carrying-power of
the air", "curious creamy smoothness with the water, hypocritically denying if you'll any suggestion
of dancer" or "the strange solitude and remoteness from the world, as possible found only around
the highest mountains tops". Thus, releasing our habitual interpretations will give rise to a entirely
new experience with the phenomenon, shedding light on its otherwise unfathomable constituents.
This dramatic change in our thought of the fog may be attributed to the use of artistic distance.
Bullough describes the task the subsequent
[... ] the transformation by [aritistic] [d]istance is created in the very first instance by putting the
phenomenon, as it were, away from gear with the practical, actual self; by allowing it to stand
outside the context of our personal needs and ends - in short, by looking at it 'objectively,' mainly
because it has often been called, by getting only such reactions on our part as emphasise the
'objective' popular features of the ability, by interpreting even our 'subjective' affections
significantly less modes in our being but alternatively as characteristics of the phenomenon.
However, artistic distance does not necessarily mean that the relation involving the viewer and
also the object becomes impersonal or purely conceptual (note that Bollough puts the term
'objective' in quotes). Perception arises inside the viewer's mind, and therefore most commonly it
is inherently subjective. The goal of artistic distance is to distil our perception of the thing looking
at the conditioned mind-made interpretation without leaving its original constitution.
Even though following methods for allowing the coveted artistic distance may seem completely
unrelated within their application, the essential idea underpinning these approaches is actually the
same. They all allow us to realize the gap between "looking" and "seeing". Even without deeper
reflection some individuals might think that whatever information is passed via their visual senses
is the thing that they will really see. This isn't true. You will see without looking (consider dreams)
and check out things without seeing them (e.g. when do you think you're in the center of phone
conversation). Seeing arises inside the mind, not facing us, and is also depending our past
experiences, memories, habits, moods, as well as a number of other psychological factors.
Artistic distance serves to show the entire process of seeing, and therefore helps us refine it to
ensure we can achieve a less biased insight into objects that enter our perception, a skill
particularly useful when considering your own design work.
Resetting the mind
Here's a little trick I learnt from the professional photographer. Photography, just like any other
outlet for creative expression, is no stranger to the problem of artistic distance. It is because the
search for a striking scene for any photo shoot involves identifying the main topic of the
photograph, maybe it's a person, object or landscape. Thus, before the photographer lifts up his
camera to consider a primary consider the subject through his viewfinder, an image with the
subject had already emerged in their mind. He's got an "idea" of the subject, which even without
professional skills and experience will blur his perception of the photographed scene. A frequent
inadvertent results of this issue is a form of photographic composition the place that the amateur
photographer attempts to have a photo of your friend or relative (the topic) against some form of a
landmark object, such as a castle (the setting), but winds up producing a picture which has no
discernible subject. This may be due to inappropriate depth of field (the castle is within sharp
focus), ill-chosen viewpoint (e.g. the photographer positioned himself past an acceptable limit
making the topic relatively smaller) or poorly composed scene that puts a lot of focus on the
castle. Precisely why some individuals might not realize these flaws is they already know exactly
what the subject of their photograph is. They have a preconception of the scene that prevents
them from seeing what their photograph is really showing.
This exercise aims to spur your brain into making fresh observations about objects entering your
visual view rather than depending on preconceived notions and judgements. For optimum results,
this practice must be done in an area that's very familiar for your requirements, e.g. your working
environment or home. To start out simply wake up from your desk and walk across the room,
stopping alongside objects that occur to catch your attention. Now point on the object, e.g. a
coffee mug, using your finger and say aloud its name (if you would rather avoid being called a
madman, be sure you're alone whenever you make this happen out). Here's the issue, though.
Don't say the name of the particular item which you see but use instead the a totally random
object. So for instance when pointing with the mug say "toaster", if you see your personal
machine mouse say "woman sunbathing", if you see a whiteboard say "cloud", etc. Continue
doing this for approximately 2 or 3 minutes.
If you are done take another browse around you to view how your perception is different. The
actual experience might differ from one individual to another. Some are able to see things in the
greater perspective, using the among near and far objects increasingly pronounced, although
some notice sharper contours around objects. The purpose of the workout is to undermine the
assumptions used by your head in the process of seeing, therefore making you more attentive to
your environment and cultivating a far more curious attitude towards things, quite like that relating
to newborn. Now you can resume your desk and possess another go at your design. You should
be able to see work in the new light, perhaps noticing that some elements are certainly not as
intuitive, consistent, or conspicuous as they previously seemed.
Rendering the look
A much more conventional method for creating artistic distance would be to render the picture
sufficiently enough to break the association between your design and our preconception of it by
tricking your head to take into account the style as a new image. The two most useful alternatives
for image rendering are desaturation and image flipping.
Colours are produced by the spectrum of sunshine perceived through the eye. They can be
considered a different information layer, independent through the image's composition or tones.
Therefore, removing colours through complete desaturation (rendering the style white and black)
simplifies the style without having affected its original constitution. This simplification can have a
significant effect on our artistic distance. Colours carry powerful emotional and behavioural
associations that will easily sidetrack our attention. Desaturation will force us to re-examine our
design, while will no longer burdened with the impact of colours. Great website designs retain
their integrity and hierarchy of elements even just in a monochrome format. Desaturation should
help you identify previously inconspicuous misalignments, deficiency of balance in composition,
along with undue prominence of secondary elements.
A likewise easy way to explore your design coming from a new angle is to flip you image. You'll
be able to flip it either vertically, horizontally or by 90 degrees. Negative credit web page design
this system could possibly want some additional consideration. Since many Western languages
are read from left to right and from top to bottom, our eye has a tendency to generally relocate
that direction. Even though the flipped design isn't likely to inspire the intended road to visual
exploration it might still reveal localized direction with the design flow. The rendered image may
also let reassess the strength of relationships between different elements about the page
manufactured by the design like prominence, grouping and nesting.
An alternate way to break in the shackles in our subjectivity is to find another mind involved.
Seeking critique from others is a good strategy to expand our creative horizon. Although by
"critique" we usually mean constructive criticism from a knowledgeable impartial observer, rather
than opinionated insults regarding your work, this doesn't imply mcdougal in the critique must
demonstrate perfect mastery of artistic distance. The clash of two disparate views needs to be
enough to expose their subjective nature. While the look for a more objective assessment from
the design showcased will require further investigation, the extraneous critique helps you to expel
your brain from the safe place and galvanize it to reassess its current perspective or seek an
alternative solution one.
Modern times have observed a proliferation of web communities focused on sharing creative
work. Maybe the perhaps most obviously is likely to be Dribbble, founded by Rich Thornett and
Dan Cederholm. But though Dribbble strives to attract mostly professional designers, the quality
of comments you find online is rather disappointing. Although I haven't seen any robust statistics
for this, my personal impression is the fact that 95 % coming from all comments say "wow",
"awesome", "great", as well as other expression of admiration that leaves zero clue as to the
reasons behind the positive "review". Even if this speaks well regarding the benevolent and
supportive nature of many designers, it includes no methods to improve your work.
To achieve our purpose we should, therefore, require better articulated critique that no less than
identifies the qualities of the design that produce a selected response. So when somebody says
that a design is "out of balance", such comment immediately begs the issue: precisely what is out
of kilter?. Can it be some specific aspects of the composition, colours, typography or weight of
highly symbolic elements? Sometimes abdominal muscles hint about not enough balance could
be sufficient to the designer to identify some obvious flaws as part of his work but often this isn't
Finally, the mandatory condition for almost any critique to operate can be an open-minded,
receptive attitude. This could be challenging. For the duration of creative work we produce a
strong attachment for the image that gradually unfolds facing us. It is not "a design" but "our
design". Our ego identifies itself with our work as well as any criticism of computer is way too
often interpreted being a personal attack. Inside the extreme case, other people's critique could
actually provoke us to wholeheartedly defend our creation, thus further undermining our artistic
distance. To some extent it is a catch-22. Only lack artistic distance (I'm emotionally attached with
my design) We are more prone to reject any try to criticize my work. For the reason that situation
the thing you need is often a more fundamental approach that will reach into the very nature with
the mind - meditation.
This last technique, though least conventional, is actually the strongest of all of the proposed
solutions because it directly addresses the foundation of the problem. The purpose of meditation
is always to develop awareness through direct attention to mental phenomena without judgement
or conceptual discrimination. Meditation is available in various forms depending on the tradition
from where it originated. After they emphasise awareness, however, they must all prove effective.
Below I explain the Buddhist Vipassana Meditation ("Vipassana" in Pali means "Insight"), which in
the western world is a bit more often called Mindfulness Meditation and is the practice most
commonly prescribed by psychologist to help remedy stress and depression. This is actually not
very completely different from might know about want to achieve here as depression could be
regarded as the lack of "artistic distance" towards your emotions and thoughts.
All that you should meditate can be a quiet spot where one can sit and use undisturbed. You may
either lay on a pillow inside a cross-legged position or over a chair. When you purchase the
second be certain that you're not leaning against the backrest. Whatever position you assume,
keep your back straight and chest erect to ensure optimal breathing. Shoulders and arms ought to
be relaxed plus your hands either folded together and resting facing your tummy or added to your
legs (the actual position does not matter providing with out is needed to keeping it).
Now close your vision and direct your mind's awareness of the breathing. Breath naturally, without
trying to control the pace or duration of each breath. Vipassana practice does not require forceful
attention to the breathing only simple understanding of the method. You just want to keep in mind
the breathing by sensing it directly (without the conceptualization or mental narration), and so all
that you should do is know when you find yourself sucking in when you're breathing out.
Sounds simple up to now but the fun doesn't stop here. You may invariably recognize that it's not
that simple to remain with all the breathing because the mind gets interested in other objects such
as sounds, bodily sensations (e.g. discomfort or pain), thoughts, memories, mental images, etc.
When that takes place recognize the newest object and slowly and mindfully move your attention
from the breathing and towards that object. In the context of meditation "mindfulness" means a
broad sort of awareness, in which the thoughts are not totally absorbed inside the object but is
capable of doing also observing itself in the process. The most essential thing in meditation is
usually to have a right point of view towards all objects of awareness, which means you aren't
labelling or judging anything, discriminating (e.g. between pleasant and unsightly), thinking of
getting gone things (e.g. distracting thoughts) or attain a particular state (e.g. a calm mind). You're
simply mindful of objects looking to eventually realize what's conditioning them, i.e. what factors
have to be within order for them to arise and die. You don't have for intellectualization because of
this understanding to arise, just awareness. After observing the item for a while (it's rather a
couple of seconds or minutes; there's no strict rule here and you ought to be capable of tell what
seems easiest) you then slowly and mindfully resume the breathing. When another object arises
you just repeat the full process again. Practice like this for 20-30 minutes daily.
Why is that this helpful? As mindfulness gains momentum and awareness grows you'll be able to
find out the more subtle functions of the mind. Poor our debate about artistic distance probably
the most relevant mental process is seeing. Mindfulness meditation doesn't try and eliminate the
psychological and intellectual noise that surrounds the thought of visual objects but merely lets
you notice what sort of image arises inside our consciousness. This provides that you simply
vantage point that you'll be able to penetrate every one of the mind-made abstraction and find out
what lies at night perception, thus better learning the object itself. If you need to learn more about
Buddhist meditation I strongly suggest reading this free booklet by Ven. Ashin Tejaniya, a
Burmese Buddhist master.
The issue of artistic distance isn't whether it is you aren't. It's about just how much distance
between yourself and your design you may create. The strategies discussed in this article should
help you find a better place by which to Web design Oxford judge your creative work. Understand
that we are not planning to attain emotionless objectivism or try to see things the best way an
ultra-rational machine would. We just wish to achieve a broader perspective and emotional and
aesthetic intelligence that can help us better channel our unending stream of imagination and
Trajan could be the author of several articles on website design and development. He or she is a
web designer in Oxford and an experienced Drupal developer. He is currently managing a small
team of web designers creating professional websites for businesses in Oxfordshire and also
other part of the UK.