This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by Acrobat PDFMaker 18 for Word / Adobe PDF Library 15.0, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 13/02/2018 at 20:03, from IP address 69.170.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 602 times.
File size: 95.85 KB (9 pages).
Privacy: public file
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
H. MARC RUPP #198871
HOWARD M. RUPP, APLC
615 N PAULINA AVE
REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277
Telephone: (310) 903-8497
Facsimile: (310) 733-5663
Marc@hmrupp.com
SCOTT S. BALBER (Pro Hac Vice Application To Be Filed)
HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS NEW YORK LLP
450 LEXINGTON AVENUE, 14TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10017
Telephone: (917) 542-7600
Facsimile: (917) 542-7601
Scott.balber@hsf.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IKE THOMAS KAVELADZE
10
11
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
12
COUNTY OF ORANGE
13
IKE THOMAS KAVELADZE,
Case No.:
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
COMPLAINT FOR:
vs.
(1) LIBEL; AND
(2) SLANDER
GEORGE LAKOFF, an individual; and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
18
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
COMPLAINT
1
COMES NOW Plaintiff IKE THOMAS KAVELADZE (“Plaintiff” or “Kaveladze”), who
2
complains of Defendants GEORGE LAKOFF (“Lakoff” or “Defendant”), and DOES 1 through
3
10 (collectively “Defendants”), inclusive, as follows:
PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
4
5
1.
Plaintiff Kaveladze is a Georgian-American business executive, and senior vice
6
president at Crocus Group, who resides in Orange County, California. At all times relevant to this
7
Complaint Plaintiff was (and is) a private figure who was injured by Defendant’s conduct in
8
Orange County, California.
9
2.
Defendant Lakoff is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a California resident.
10
Upon information and belief, Defendant Lakoff is a professor of linguistics and cognitive science
11
at the University of California.
12
3.
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise
13
of the Defendant DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues said
14
DOE Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will file DOE Amendments and/or will ask
15
leave of court to amend this Complaint to show their true names and capacities when the same have
16
been ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes and on such information and belief alleges that
17
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them are primarily responsible for the occurrences
18
herein alleged and that Plaintiff’s damages alleged herein were proximately caused by such DOE
19
Defendants. Each reference in this Complaint to “Defendant” or “Lakoff” refers also to all
20
Defendants sued under fictitious names.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
21
22
23
24
4.
Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through
3 above, as if fully set forth herein.
5.
This action arises from the reckless and malicious libel and slander committed by
25
Lakoff against Plaintiff, involving completely unfounded and false accusations that Plaintiff is a
26
“money launderer.” Kaveladze, a law-abiding American citizen, father and businessman, seeks by
27
this action to dispel the cloud created by Lakoff’s baseless and scurrilous accusations.
28
2
COMPLAINT
1
2
3
6.
Kaveladze is a senior vice president at a real estate development company called
Crocus Group.
7.
On January 3, 2018, George Lakoff, a linguistics professor from Berkeley,
4
participated in an interview with Chuck Todd on MSNBC (the “Chuck Todd Interview”), broadcast
5
live to the world, and permanently recorded in video and an online transcript, in which Lakoff
6
described Kaveladze as “the major person who has been responsible for money laundering from
7
Russian and other Soviet countries.”
8
9
10
8.
Lakoff is a frequent guest on MSNBC, appearing on the network multiple times in
the last year alone.
9.
Despite MSNBC’s frequent invitations to Lakoff, it is unclear why his background
11
in linguistics and cognitive science qualifies him to appear on television and opine about money
12
laundering.
13
14
15
10.
Lakoff’s statements regarding Kaveladze are absolutely and demonstrably false, and
were made with no factual basis whatsoever.
11.
Lakoff’s reckless, false, and damaging statements were completely unresponsive to
16
Todd’s question – which was about press coverage of President Trump’s social media
17
communications – as if Lakoff desperately and breathlessly needed to be sure to get his false
18
statements about Kaveladze out to the public.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
12.
Lakoff’s false statements have caused immense personal and professional damages
to Kaveladze.
13.
The false statements are available on the internet, so the damage caused to
Kaveladze is ongoing.
14.
The malicious and willful nature of Lakoff’s false statements warrants the
imposition of punitive damages.
15.
Kaveladze brings this action to recover all damages, including lost wages and
26
income, as well as for the professional, personal, and compensatory damages he has sustained, plus
27
interest, as well as punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the court.
28
3
COMPLAINT
1
FACTS
2
3
A.
Defendant Appeared on National Television and Blatantly Defamed Plaintiff.
4
16.
Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through
5
15 above, as if fully set forth herein.
17.
6
On January 3, 2018, Lakoff was interviewed as a guest of Chuck Todd on the
7
television program MTP Daily, a program which averages 1,180,000 viewers according to recent
8
polls.
9
18.
The video from the interview, as well as a transcript are publicly-available at
10
http://www.msnbc.com/mtp-daily/watch/why-does-trump-keep-tweeting-1128707651918 and
11
http://www.msnbc.com/transcripts/mtp-daily/2018-01-03.
12
19.
13
TODD: And you would like to see less coverage of the Twitter feed. You have made that
abundantly clear. How? How do you do that with the president?
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
The transcript reads, in relevant part:
LAKOFF: Let`s take it right now. Right now, President Trump is in a noose. It`s the
money laundering noose that`s tightening around his neck. It shows up not just in Bannon`s
point about money laundering and also in the fusion point about money laundering the New
York Times op-ed today, but also in the fact that the main money launderer, Irakly
Kaveladze, was at the Trump Junior meeting in Trump Tower. He's the eighth man there.
He is the major person who has been responsible for money laundering from Russia and
other Soviet countries. And in addition, he set up over 2,000, you know, phony shell
corporations with bank accounts and helped use that money in the bank accounts for the
people doing the money laundering from Russia to get luxury apartments and luxury
condos.
The fact that he was invited by Trump Junior to that meeting indicates that Trump Junior
knew him well.
TODD: Right. So what you're saying is on the tweet, not covering the tweets, so you
wanted to take an example. You're saying you believe all of the tweet storm in the last two
days is all about providing air cover to distract from this money laundering news?
LAKOFF: The whole thing is distracting from money laundering, and from the fact that
Kaveladze has been summoned by Mueller and by congressional committees.
26
TODD: Fair enough…
(Emphasis added).
27
20.
28
Thus, in response to a question from Todd regarding media coverage of President
4
COMPLAINT
1
Trump’s tweets, Lakoff took off on his bizarre flight of fancy regarding Plaintiff.
21.
2
He first claimed that Kaveladze is “the main money launderer,” then clarified his
3
statement by claiming that Kaveladze is “the major person who has been responsible for money
4
laundering from Russia and other Soviet countries.” These statements are false.
22.
5
Money laundering is defined by United States federal law as engaging in financial
6
transactions or moving money into or out of the United States, intending to promote the carrying on
7
of unlawful activity, knowing the transaction is designed to conceal or disguise the nature of the
8
unlawful activity or unlawfully to evade transaction reporting requirements. See 18 U.S.C. § 1956.
23.
9
The State of California defines money laundering as conducting financial
10
transactions exceeding $5,000 with specific intent to promote, or facilitate criminal activity, or
11
attempting transactions exceeding $5,000 with a monetary instrument that one knows represents the
12
proceeds of criminal activity. See Cal. Pen. Code § 186.10.
24.
13
14
Kaveladze has never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any money-
laundering or similar offense (or, for that matter, of any criminal offense at all).
25.
15
Even a layman's definition of money laundering – causing criminally obtained assets
16
to appear to have been lawfully obtained – has no relevance or application with regard to
17
Kaveladze.
18
26.
19
Lakoff's false statements, wholly unresponsive to the question Todd asked, were
completely lacking in factual basis, as Lakoff knew at the time, and were malicious in nature.
27.
20
Contrary to Lakoff's inexplicable accusations, Kaveladze is a proud, law-abiding
21
American citizen, businessman, family man, and private figure. Kaveladze has lived in the United
22
States for 26 years, working at Crocus Group for the last 14 years.
23
24
25
28.
Lakoff knew or should have known his statements were completely baseless and
29.
Lakoff did not make these statements in a moment of indiscretion in response to
untrue.
26
probing questions regarding Kaveladze’s history. Rather, he brought up Kaveladze out of thin air
27
and falsely alleged he had committed crimes in response to a wholly unrelated question (and
28
5
COMPLAINT
1
2
interview generally).
30.
Given Lakoff's apparent willingness to make assertions concerning Kaveladze on
3
national television, with minutes of research he could have found out that Kaveladze has never
4
been charged or convicted of money laundering, or any other crime. Nor is there any basis to
5
conclude that Kaveladze has ever engaged in money laundering.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
31.
Kaveladze would be injured thereby, and without any regard for their lack of truthfulness.
32.
16
17
18
19
To wit, Lakoff brought up Kaveladze unprompted, and provided no source for his
allegations that Kaveladze had committed a serious crime, nor could he, as the allegations are
completely fabricated.
33.
Lakoff also must not have investigated, or he would have quickly learned of the
falsity of his statements.
B.
Plaintiff Has Suffered Severe Professional and Financial Injury as a Result of
Defendant's False Statements
14
15
Lakoff made the above statements with actual malice, knowing and intending that
34.
Just days after Lakoff’s false statements on national television, Kaveladze’s
accounts were closed at Chase Bank, where he has banked for over 13 years.
35.
Kaveladze has sustained severe professional and reputational damage by the false
and defamatory allegation that he is a money launderer.
36.
Kaveladze’s business depends on the sterling and forthright reputation he has
20
developed working in various roles over 30 years, and Lakoff’s false statements have cost him and
21
will continue to cost him untold future business and income.
22
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
23
(Libel per se)
24
25
37.
Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through
36 above, as if fully set forth herein.
26
38.
Defendant made false statements regarding Kaveladze being a money launderer.
27
39.
These statements are defamatory on their face as they amount to a charge of the
28
6
COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
commission of a crime.
40.
These false statements were published on national television, on the MSNBC
website, and continue to be publicly available on the internet.
41.
Defendant knows that these allegations are false and made them intentionally, with
malice, and with total disregard for their truth or for the impact they may have on Kaveladze.
42.
As a direct and proximate result of the above-described conduct by Defendant,
7
Plaintiff has suffered general and special damages in an amount to be determined at trial and in an
8
amount in excess of the minimum jurisdiction of the Superior Court, including without limitation,
9
damage to Plaintiff’s reputation, career, and standing in the community.
10
43.
Upon information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s conduct was done
11
with oppression, fraud and malice and that, therefore, the conduct of Defendant justifies an award
12
of punitive and exemplary damages.
13
44.
Upon information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that, unless enjoined and restrained by
14
the Court, Defendant will republish, repeat and continue to disseminate the false and defamtorty
15
statements he made in the Chuck Todd Interview, and their implications and impressions, all to the
16
continuing injury of Plaintiff; that such continued republication, repetition and dissemination of
17
Defendant’s defamatory and offensive falsehoods will cause irreparable harm to Plaintiff by
18
damaging his reputation and adversely affecting his career and business efforts as well as his
19
personal relationships. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that he lacks an adequate
20
remedy at law insofar as damages will be very difficult to calculate for such on-going injuries. By
21
reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction enjoining and restraining
22
Defendant, and all persons acting in concert with him, from republishing, repeating, distributing or
23
otherwise disseminating the false and defamatory statements he made in the Chuck Todd Interview.
24
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
25
(Slander per se)
26
27
28
45.
Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 through
42 above, as if fully set forth herein.
7
COMPLAINT
1
46.
Defendant made false statements regarding Kaveladze being a money launderer.
2
47.
These statements are defamatory on their face as they amount to a charge of the
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
commission of a crime.
48.
These false statements were published on national television, on the MSNBC
website, and continue to be publicly available on the internet.
49.
Defendant knows that these allegations are false and made them intentionally, with
malice, and with total disregard for their truth or for the impact they may have on Kaveladze.
50.
As a direct and proximate result of the above-described conduct by Defendant,
Plaintiff has suffered general and special damages in an amount to be determined at trial in an
10
amount in excess of the minimum jurisdiction of the Superior Court, including without limitation,
11
damage to Plaintiff’s reputation, career, and standing in the community.
12
51.
Upon information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that each Defendant’s conduct was
13
done with oppression, fraud and malice and that, therefore, the conduct of each Defendant justifies
14
an award of punitive and exemplary damages.
15
52.
Upon information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that, unless enjoined and restrained by
16
the Court, Defendant will republish, repeat and continue to disseminate the false and defamatory
17
statements he made in the Chuck Todd Interview, and their implications and impressions, all to the
18
continuing injury of Plaintiff; that such continued republication, repetition and dissemination of
19
Defendant’s defamatory and offensive falsehoods will cause irreparable harm to Plaintiff by
20
damaging his reputation and adversely affecting his career and business efforts as well as his
21
personal relationships. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff alleges that he lacks an adequate
22
remedy at law insofar as damages will be very difficult to calculate for such on-going injuries. By
23
reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction enjoining and restraining
24
Defendant, and all persons acting in concert with him, from republishing, repeating, distributing or
25
otherwise disseminating the false defamatory statements he made in the Chuck Todd Interview.
26
27
28
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant, as follows:
8
COMPLAINT
1
a.
For general damages according to proof;
2
b.
For compensatory damages according to proof;
3
c.
For special damages for pecuniary loss according to proof;
4
d.
For punitive damages;
5
e.
For an apology and retraction;
6
f.
For a permanent injunction;
7
g.
For pre-judgment interest as allowed by law;
8
h.
For costs of suit; and
9
i.
For such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
10
11
12
DATED:
January 30, 2018
H. MARC RUPP
HOWARD M. RUPP, APLC
SCOTT S. BALBER (Pro Hac Vice Application To Be Filed)
HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS NEW YORK LLP
13
14
15
16
By:
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IKE THOMAS KAVELADZE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
COMPLAINT
Ike Thomas Kaveladze Complaint.pdf (PDF, 95.85 KB)
Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..
Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)
Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog