PDF Archive

Easily share your PDF documents with your contacts, on the Web and Social Networks.

Share a file Manage my documents Convert Recover Search Help Contact



DOJ Assessment Salinas PD (2016) .pdf



Original filename: DOJ Assessment Salinas PD (2016).pdf
Title: Collaborative Reform Initiative: An Assessment of the Salinas Police Department
Author: Roberto Santos, Rick Gregory, Leocadio Cordero, Gerald Richard

This PDF 1.6 document has been generated by Adobe InDesign CS6 (Windows) / Adobe PDF Library 10.0.1, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 26/03/2016 at 05:50, from IP address 71.202.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 333 times.
File size: 6.3 MB (192 pages).
Privacy: public file




Download original PDF file









Document preview


COLLABORATIVE
REFORM INITIATIVE
An Assessment of the Salinas
Police Department
Roberto Santos
Rick Gregory
Leocadio Cordero
Gerald Richard

COLLABORATIVE
REFORM INITIATIVE
An Assessment of the Salinas
Police Department
Roberto Santos, PhD
Rick Gregory
Leocadio Cordero
Gerald Richard, JD

This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 2014-CR-WX-K001 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented
Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or
services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are
illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues.
This document contains preliminary analysis that is subject to further review and modification. It may not be quoted or cited and
should not be disseminated further without the express permission of the Institute for Intergovernmental Research (IIR) or the U.S.
Department of Justice.
The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of this publication. Given that URLs and Web sites are in
constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity.
Recommended citation: Santos, Roberto, Rick Gregory, Leocadio Cordero, and Gerald Richard. 2016. An Assessment of the Salinas
Police Department. Collaborative Reform Initiative. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Copyright ©2016 IIR. The U.S. Department of Justice reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce,
publish, or otherwise use and authorize others to use this publication for federal government purposes. This publication may be
freely distributed and used for noncommercial and educational purposes only.
Published 2016

Contents
Letter From the Director. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Collaborative Reform Initiative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Key themes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
The city of Salinas, California. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
The Salinas Police Department. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
COPS Office Collaborative Reform Initiative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Organization of this report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Chapter 1. Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Document review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Interviews, focus groups, and listening sessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Direct observation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Data analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Analysis strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Developing findings and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Chapter 2. Use of Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Use of force policies and procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Key themes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Findings and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Chapter 3. Officer-Involved Shootings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Policy 310. Officer-Involved Shootings and Deaths. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Synopsis and review of the 2014 officer-involved shooting incidents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Findings and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

– iii –

COLLABORATIVE REFORM INITIATIVE
An Assessment of the Salinas Police Department

Chapter 4. Community Collaboration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Data collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Key themes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Findings and recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Chapter 5. Internal and External Communications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Data collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Key themes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Findings and recommendations—internal communications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Findings and recommendations—external communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Chapter 6. Resource Allocation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Data collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Key themes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Findings and recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Chapter 7. Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Data collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111
Key themes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Findings and recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Next steps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Initialisms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Appendix A—Salinas Police Department Policies 300, 306, 308, 309, and 310. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
Appendix B—Community Listening Sessions Flyers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
Appendix C—Community Outreach Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
Appendix D—Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers: Use of Force Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
Appendix E—Table of Findings and Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167

– iv –

Letter From the Director
Dear colleagues,
There is little doubt that we are at a defining moment in U.S. policing. The national discourse surrounding
police reform over the past few years reveals the need for changes in many of our operational policies and
practices. For some, this moment is viewed as a crisis. For others, especially progressive law enforcement
leaders, the national discourse and defining moment represent a unique opportunity to advance community policing and strengthen police and community relations.
The COPS Office Collaborative Reform Initiative for Technical Assistance (CRI-TA) was developed to support
those progressive leaderships that recognize the need for change and organizational transformation.
I applaud Salinas Chief Kelly McMillin for requesting participating in this process. As you can imagine,
asking the U.S. Department of Justice to evaluate your police department takes courageous leadership.
McMillin knew from the start that our assessment would be comprehensive, independent, and objective.
But more important, he knew that it would be candid. In that respect, McMillin knew he had exposed himself and his department to criticism. But McMillin also recognizes that while the truth often hurts,
selective ignorance is fatal to an organization.
Our report provides Chief McMillin, his department, and the community they serve hard truths about
deficiencies that exist within the police department. More important, it offers Salinas the opportunity
and tools to make its’ police department a model law enforcement agency, which every resident in
Salinas deserves.
I look forward to our continued work with the Salinas Police Department as we implement the recommendations outlined in this report. The future success of the police department will not only benefit the Salinas
community but also serve as a guide to police and communities across the country.
On behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice, I again want to thank Chief McMillin and the men and
women of the Salinas Police Department for their commitment to achieving excellence in policing.
Sincerely,

Ronald L. Davis
Director
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

–v–

Acknowledgements
The authors express their sincere appreciation to the many organizations and individuals who greatly
contributed to this report. At the top of the list is the dedicated team of people at the U.S. Department
of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) for supporting this project. We
especially want to thank COPS Office Director Ronald L. Davis, Deputy Director Robert E. Chapman, Senior
Social Science Analyst Jessica Mansourian, and Collaborative Reform Specialist George Fachner for their
leadership, guidance, and support. We also received valuable assistance, feedback, and critical support
from our colleagues at IIR.
We especially want to acknowledge and thank the Salinas community and the Salinas Police Department
and are grateful for the many community groups and community members who participated in the June
30 and July 23 listening sessions. We also sincerely appreciate the many members of the Salinas Police
Department for their professionalism, helpfulness, and cooperation during our many conversations about
the department and related matters.
Collaborative Reform Initiative Team

– vii –


Related documents


PDF Document doj assessment salinas pd 2016
PDF Document crj 305 week 3 dq 3
PDF Document crj 305 week 1 dq 3
PDF Document crj 305 week 4 dq 3
PDF Document crj 305 week 3 dq 1 rational choice and deterrence theory
PDF Document a4 women criminal justice system 26813 web


Related keywords