IMG .pdf

File information


Original filename: IMG.pdf

This PDF 1.3 document has been generated by Canon / , and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 24/11/2016 at 02:49, from IP address 50.136.x.x. The current document download page has been viewed 314 times.
File size: 6.4 MB (10 pages).
Privacy: public file


Download original PDF file


IMG.pdf (PDF, 6.4 MB)


Share on social networks



Link to this file download page



Document preview


DOCKET NO: MMX-FA 12-4018627

SUPERIOR COURT

-S

J.D. of MIDDLESEX

TANYA A. TAUPIER

AT MIDDLETOWN

VS.

October 14,2016

EDWARD F. TAUPIER

MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY/VISITATION
(Post-judementl
The Plaintiff in the above captioned matter respectfully represents as
follows:

1.

On August 28, 2A75, the Court, Pinkus, J., entered Judgment (Ct. Doc.
#197.00) after trial in the above captioned matter by way of a
Memorandum of Decision (Ct. 19O.O0). Said Memorandum of Decision
awarded the Plaintiff mother sole legal and physical custody of the minor
children (Order # 2) with a detailed access plan for the Defendant father
(Order # 41. The Court further ordered the parties -inter alia- to refrain
from disparaging each other, estranging the children from the other party
and discussing the court proceedings with the children (Order #31.

2.

Since the time of the Court's order as aforesaid, circumstances have
changed in that despite the Court's orders and admonishments, the
Defendant has so psychologically damaged the children that it is not in
their best interests for them to be with the Defendant unsupervised.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff wife respectfully moves this Court for an
order of supervised visitation for the Defendant husband in a ciinical setting.

THE PLAINTIFF,
Office of the Cterk
Superior Court
RECEIVED

OcT

rs

Bv: f;'c't
"

201$

Judicial District of Middtesex

oral &tgeffiffiil@tfuponA

3 Schoies Lane
Essex, CT 06426
TeI. 860.767.83OO

ORDER
The foregoing motion having been heard, it is hereby Granted/Denied
and it is further ORDERED as follows:

BY THE COURT,

Judge/Asst. Clerk

DOCKET NO: MMX-FA 12-4018627-S

SUPERIOR COURT

TANYA A. TAUPIER

J.D. of MIDDLESEX
AT MIDDLETOWN

VS.

EDWARD F. TAUPIER

OCTOBER 14, 2016
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Whereas the foregoing post-judgment Motion for Modification has been
presented to this Court, and
Whereas, upon application of the Plaintiff TANYA A. TAUPIER, it appears
that an order should be issued directing the Defendant EDWARD F. TAUPIER,
of 6 Douglas Drive, Cromwell, Connecticut, to appear before the Court to show
cause why orders should not enter in accordance with the Plaintiff's Motion as
aforesaid.
Now, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant EDWARD F.
TAUPIER, appear before a session of this Court to be held within and for the rir,,F^*r^
J^Udicial Distr_ict, of Middlesex at 1 Court Street. Middletown, Connecticut 6n 'lo y
7lnvr^k, Zg ,2016, at n,SO - a.m. then and there to show cause
why the Plaintiffs Motion should not be granted; and tbaLsuch sprvice pe n /]
*-f,lV
made at least twelve days before the heaiing date, q"J1d"- ftfrte4-

,/ttt&,k/","^
Brex, Connecticut this

Dated at

1
2N
o^o-kr
+rffi3 day
o

BY THE COURT

'-&

DOCKET NO: MMX-FA 12-4018627-S

SUPERIOR COURT

TANYA A. TAUPIER

J.D. of MIDDLESEX

VS.

AT MIDDLETOWN

EDWARD F. TAUPIER

ocToBER 14, 2016
SUMMONS RE: HEARING

TO ANY PROPER OFFICER:

By authority of the State of Connecticut you are hereby commanded to
summon the Defendant EDWARD F. TAUPIER, of 6 Douglas Drive, Cromwell,
Connecticut, in the foregoing action and to appear before a session of this
Court to be held within and for the Judicial District of Middlesex at 1 Court
, 2016, at
Street. Middletown, Connecticut on
a.m., then and there to show cause why Plaintiffs Motion for Modification
should not be granted, by serving in the manner provided by statute for the
service of process a true and attested copy of the foregoing on said Defendant
at least twelve days before the date of the hearing and file proof of -service with
the Court at least six days before the hearing.
Hereof fail not, but due service and return make.
Dated at Essex, Connecticut this 14th day of October 2016.

THE PLAINTIFF
TANYA TAUPIER,

qvt'
,uGeraldine
Ficarra Juris# 702516
3 Scholes Lane
pssex, CT 06426
Tel. 860.767.83OO

DOCKET NO: MMX-FA 12-4018627-S

SUPERIOR COURT

TANYA A. TAUPIER

J.D. of MIDDLESEX
AT MIDDLETOWN

VS.

EDWARD F. TAUPIER

October 14,2016

MOTION FOR CONTEMPT & ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH JUDGMENT
lre house salel / (Post-judsmentl
The Plaintiff in the above captioned matter respectfully represents as
follows:

1.

On August 28, 2015, the Court, Pinkus, J., entered Judgment (Ct. Doc.
#I9I.0O) after trial in the above captioned matter by way of a Memorandum of
Decision (Ct. 190.00). Said Memorandum of Decision included the following
order #9:

plaintiff shall transfer all of her interest in tLrc jointlg outned real estate
knoun as 6 Douglas Driue, Cromwell, Connecticut to tlrc defendant. Tlrc
defendant shall refinance or otlrcruise remoue the plaintiff from anA mortgages
or other liability regarding this propertg uithin tuo gears from tLrc date of
judgment. In the euent the defendant fails to refinance or othertaise remoue the
plaintiff from anA mortgage or other liabilitg regarding his propertg within tuo
gears from the date of judgment, the propertg shall be immediatelg placed on the
market for sale. AII proceeds from the sale shall belong to tLrc defendant. Ang
deficiency resulting from th.e sale shall be tlrc defendant's responsibilitg. The
defendant shall be responsible to make all mortaaoe pauments and, shall
be responsible for all expenses relating to said properau. In the eaent the
defendant fails to ma,ke anu required paunent. the propertu sh,o'll
immediatelu be placed on the market for sale. The plaintiff shall be entitled
to make ang missed mortgage paAments and deduct themfrom the alimony
pagment. The court shatl retain jurisdiction regarding tLrc propertg. (emphasis
The

supplied)

2.

The Defendant has missed three (3) mortgase paliments since the date of
Judgment. Moreover, the Plaintiffs alimony obligation has ended, so there are
no further alimony payments for her to apply to the Defendant's missed
mortgage

pavments.

"g,ff."#;;fi,*
RECEIVED

Argument/Testimong

OcT I

I 20ffi

Judicral District of Middtesex
\rtate of Connecticut

I

Wherefore, the Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court for an order
directing that the property be immediately placed on the market for sale with
the Plaintiff in charge of the sale.
THE PLAINTIFF,

wri

By:

e/-

Geraldine Ficarra #102516
3 Scholes Lane
Essex, CT 06426
Tel. 860.767.8300

ORDER
The foregoing motion having been heard,
and it is further ORDERED as follows:

it is hereby Granted/Denied

BY THE COURT,

Judge/Asst. Clerk

DOCKET NO: MMX-FA 12-4018627-S

SUPERIOR COURT

TANYA A. TAUPIER

J.D. of MIDDLESEX

VS.

AT MIDDLETOWN

EDWARD F. TAUPIER

October 14,2076

ON FOR FU

E WITH JUDGME
R IN ACCORD
(re escrow) / (Post--iudement)

The Plaintiff in the above captioned matter respectfully represents as
follows:

1.

On August 28, 2OI5, the Court, Pinkus, J., entered Judgment (Ct. Doc.
#I7I.0O) after trial in the above captioned matter by way of a Memorandum of
Decision (Ct. 190.00). Said Memorandum of Decision included the foilowing
order #10:
From the escrout held bg Attoruteg Huruitz, the plaintilf shall receiue
$l+,O00.00 in full satisfaction of defendant's failure to pay the pendente
lite orders. The balance shall be applied to the September 2O15 mortgage
pagment on the Cromutell propertg.

2.

On July 2I,2016, the Court, Gould, J., entered orders (Ct. Doc. #2l7.OO)
directing the escrow agent Attorney Henry Huruitz to disburse the aforesaid
$ 14,000.00 to the Plaintiff in accordance with the Judgment herein. The
escrow agent has done so.

3.

Due perhaps to the undersigned's motion not specifically asking for the
escrow agent to be directed to reiease the "balance" of the escrow after the
$14,000.00 was released to the Plaintiff, the Court's order (Ct. Doc. #2I7.OO)
did not address the said "balance" which, on information and belief, is
$3,413. 12.
The Plaintiff, in accordance with the Judgment, has exercised her right
under the order to make any mortgage payments missed by the Defendant and
ded.uct from the alimony payment due to the Defendant. The Plaintiff paid the
September 2075 mortgage payment as well as most other mortgage payments
untii her alimony obligation was extinguished. In fact, the Plaintiff has made
mortgage payments in excess of her alimony obligations by $3,200.00.

4.

Argument/TestimonY

Wherefore, the Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court for an order
directing the escrow agent Attorney Henry H:uwitz to release the balance of the
escrow account ($9,+ I3.l2l to the Plaintiff to compensate her for making
mortgage payments in excess of her alimony obligations by $3,200.00.

THE PLAINTIFF,

"u,wf

Geraldine Ficarra #102516
3 Scholes Lane
Essex, CT 06426
Te1. 860.767.8300

ORDER
The foregoing motion having been heard, it is hereby Granted/Denied
and it is further ORDERED as follows:

BY THE COURT,

Judge/Asst. Clerk

A TRUE COPY

STATE MARSHAL, MIDDLESEX COJNTY
AN INDIFFERENT PERSON

DOCKET NO: MMX-FA 12-4018627-S

SUPERIOR COURT

TANYA A. TAUPIER

J.D. of MIDDLESEX

VS.

AT MIDDLETOWN

EDWARD F. TAUPIER

OCTOBER 14, 2016

ORDER ItlO SHOW CAUSE
Whereas the foregoing post-judgment Motions (Motion for Contempt &
Order re House Sale and Motion for Further Order re escrow) have been
presented to this Court, and
Whereas, upon application of the Plaintiff TANYA A. TAUPIER, it appears
that an order should be issued directing the Defendant EDWARD F. TAUPIER,
of 6 Douglas Drive, Cromwell, Connecticut, to appear before the Court to show
cause why orders should not enter in accordance with the Plaintiff's Motions as
aforesaid.
Now, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant EDWARD F.
TAUPIER, appear before a session of this Court to be held within and forJhe-;
t(4?
Judicial Oistiict of Middlesex at 1 Court Street. Middletown, Conne cticuf€ffiM*
Zg , 2016, at q : 30 - a.m. then and there to show cause
why the Plaintiff's Motions should not be granted; an{that suchopervice be n
^
made at least twelve days before the hearin e dateae

{h,,#tCo".,

Dated at E@<, Connecticut this

Ct"";e;t

Ztr
1th day of Mv^kr
Guekber 2016.

a;H^.z*r&

.


Related documents


img
motion to revoke
11 18 14 state v taupier transcript fpo
taupier motion in limine re protective order
taupieredward attyrachelbaird briefpo 102414 2
bruce freedmantanya taupier

Link to this page


Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)

HTML Code

Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog

QR Code

QR Code link to PDF file IMG.pdf