Bubble Formation at an Orifice in a Viscous Liquid .pdf
File information
Original filename: Bubble Formation at an Orifice in a Viscous Liquid.pdf
This PDF 1.6 document has been generated by Adobe Acrobat 11.0.20 / Adobe Acrobat Pro 11.0.23 Paper Capture Plugin, and has been sent on pdfarchive.com on 06/03/2020 at 21:19, from IP address 152.89.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 292 times.
File size: 1.5 MB (11 pages).
Privacy: public file
Download original PDF file
Bubble Formation at an Orifice in a Viscous Liquid.pdf (PDF, 1.5 MB)
Share on social networks
Link to this file download page
Document preview
BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE
IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
By J. F. DAVIDSON, M.A., Ph.D., A.M.J.Mech. * and B. O. G. SCHULER, Ph.D.*
SUMl.VlARY
A theory of bubble fonnation based on the motion of a bubble in a viscous liquid has been developed. The
theory ghes the volume of gas bubbles formed at an orifice in a viscous liquid for both constant gas flow and
constant gas pressure.
Experiments were carried out with liquids of high viscosity (5001040 cp). Good agreement with theory was
obtained over a large range of gas flow rates (050 ml/s).
Introduction
Literature survey
When air is blown steadily through an orifice submerged
in a liquid it emerges as bubbles which are formed periodically
over a wide range of flow rates. This paper describes measurements of the frequency of the bubbles and also the calculation
of the frequency from first principles.
A comprehensive literature survey on the subject of the
formation of bubbles at submerged orifices was described by
Hughes, Handles, Evans, and Maycock1 in 1953. Several
publications dealing with various aspects of the problem have
subsequently appeared. Davidson and Amick 2 studied the
effect of the volume of the orificechamber on the size of the
bubbles, whilst Helsby and Tuson3 photographed different
modes of bubble formation. Benzing and Myers4 formed
bubbles of air in water at very small gas flow rates, and
found that the diameter of the bubble could conveniently be
calculated by means of a correlation which did not include a
viscosity term. Quigley, Johnson, and Harris 5 varied the
viscosity of the liquid between 1 and 400 cp and the density
between 1·00 and I ·57 g/ml, and concluded that the effect of
both these variables on bubblesize was small. Similarly the
effect of surface tension was negligible at higher flow rates. The
controlling factors appeared to be orifice diameter and gas flow
rate. Leibson, Holcomb, Cacoso, and Jacmic6 used larger
flow rates and found that at high Reynolds numbers the
formation was not periodic: the size distribution titted a
logarithmic normal probability distribution. Calderbank 7 • 8
used orifices and slots ranging in diameter from 1\ ! in., and
has suggested that for air bubbling into water at flow rates
between 20 and 250 rnl/s, the frequency is nearly constant
within the range 1520 bubblcs/s.
Further relevant data have been published in a series of
papers by Siemes and his coworkers. 9 14 Of particular
interest is the work of Siemes and Kaufmann, 11 who studied
the periodic formation of bubbles at single submerged orifices
under various physical conditions. They arrived at important
conclusions:
(i) With small gas flow rates and with liquids of low
viscosity the difference in volume between the bubble formed
at any particular flow rate and that formed at infinitely small
flow rates using the same orifice is independent of the vis* University of Cambridge, Department of Chemical Engineerng , Pembroke Street, Cambridge.
cosity, surface tension, and density of the liquid. The controlling factors arc gas flow rate and orifice diameter.
(ii) For liquids of high viscosity the effect of surface
tension and density is still negligible, but the viscosity becomes an additional factor controlling bubble size. It is at
this point worth noting that for viscous liquids the volume
of the bubble formed at infinitely small gas flow rates is
negligibly small compared with the total volume formed
at higher flow rates.
Siemes and Kaufmann suggested the following mechanism
of bubble formation. They postulated that a bubble forms in
two distinct stages. For inviscid liquids the initial stage is
presumed to be exactly analogous to the formation of a
bubble when the gas flow rate approaches zero. The second
stage is presumed to begin when the buoyancy forces exactly
balance the surface tension forces and the bubble proceeds to
detach itself. The detachment time is presumed to be constant, irrespective of the gas flow rate. Gas flows into the
bubble during this tin1e and hence the influence of gas flow
rate on bubble volume can be derived. For viscous liquids a
similar mechanism was suggested. Initially the bubble is
supposed to grow to a definite volume, which in this case is
to some extent dependent on the viscosity of the liquid but,
once again, not on the gas flow rate. As before, the bubble
then requires a constant period to detach itself, so that the
flow rate affects the bubble volume. The actual time for the
process of detachment to occur was calculated to be several
hundredths of a second.
The experimental conditions described by Siemes and
Kaufmann suggest that their apparatus delivered a constant
flow of gas, not as in the case where gas flows from a chamber
at constant pressure through an orifice into the forming bubble.
The difference between the two cases will be considered in
greater detail below.
Finally it should be noted that the mechanism put forward
by Siemes and Kaufmann is based entirely upon a description
of a suggested physical process. The explanation offers no way
of predicting the time of detachment, and for this reason the
theory caruiot be regarded as being derived from first
principles.
Present work
The present paper deals with the formation of bubbles in
liquids of high viscosity and with gas flow rates between 0
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
and 50 ml/s. Two distinct situations are considered, namely:(i) Jn the simplest case there is a constant flow of gas
throughout bubble formation, as when the gas is being fed _
through a long thin capillary. The surface of the bubble, as
it grows, is assumed to be spherical, so that the radius of
the bubble at any instant of time, t, is known. As the bubble
grows it tends to move upwards, the force being due to
buoyancy. This force has to overcome two resistances,
namely, viscous drag of the Stokes kind, and liquid inertia
due to the fact that as the bubble accelerates upward
some of the liquid also accelerates. The balance between
the upward force and the two resistances leads to a differential equation governing the motion, and the solution gives
the distance of the centre of the bubble above the orifice
at any time t. Initially, when the bubble is small, its centre
is at the orifice. The formation is complete when the bottom
of the bubble reaches the orifice, and at this instant the
bubble detaches and the process then repeats itself.
(ii) In the second case the bubbles are formed above a
hole in a horizontal plate, with liquid above to a finite
depth and gas below at a constant pressure. In this case, which
is of greater practical importance, the gas flow through the
orifice varies during bubble formation. This has the effect
of making more complex the equations governing the motion
of the bubble. The basis on which the equations are formulated is, however, similar to that described in paragraph (i)
above.
The theory bears out several of the findings of Siemes and
Kaufmann. For a constant flow system the bubble size depends upon flow rate and viscosity, whilst surface tension has
no effect. However, with regard to the effects of liquid density
and orifice diameter, the theoretical results are in conflict with
the conclusions of Siemes and Kaufmann. The liquid density
is shown to affect the size of the bubble whilst the influence
of the orifice dimensions is negligible. The orifice diameter
becomes important only when the effective area is small and
the gas flow rate relatively large. Under these conditions the
gas receives a considerable amount of momentum which
affects the motion of the bubble and hence its final volume.
For a constant pressure system, both the surface tension of
the liquid and the orifice discharge coefficient have to be
included in the equations governing the motion of the bubble.
The predicted values of bubble volume for both constant
flow and constant pressure systems were found to be in good
agreement with results obtained experimentally.
Experimental Methods
A schematic diagram of the apparatus is shown in Fig. 1.
Gas from either a compressor or a cylinder was passed into a
25 litre vessel, A, which acted as a buffer. The pressure in A
was indicated by the manometer C and could be maintained
at any desired value by manipulating valve B. In most cases
the pressure was kept at about l ·5 atmospheres absolute.
Next the gas passed through an Edwards throttle valve, D,
by means of which the flow rate could be controlled. The
threeway tap, E, enabled the gas to pass either directly to the
drying tube, H, and the rotameter, I, or first through a soap
bubble meter, F. J was a 45 litre drum from which the gas
passed through the orifice, K, into the liquid contained in a
Perspex cylinder of 14·7 cm diameter. The latter was attached
directly to the drum and was surrounded by a thermostat.
L and M were helical coils immersed in the same liquid as
was circulated through the thermostat surrounding the Per
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
Fig. I .Schematic diagram
145
of the apparatus used for the formation of
bubbles
spex cylinder. Gas temperatures were measured at N and 0.
These were always within 0·2°C of the temperature of the
liquid in which the bubbles were forming. The temperature
of the liquid itself did not vary by more than O·l °C during a
run. The frequency of bubble formation was determined by
stroboscopic illumination and the pressure in J was given
approximately by the water manometer, G. More accurate
pressure determinations were made by means of a tilting
manometer connected to the drum J. A Ferranti viscometer
was used to determine the viscosity of the liquid, and the
surface tension was measured by the drop weight method.
The liquids used in most of the experiments were aqueous
solutions of glycerol for which density values were obtained
from the International Critical Tables. In the few cases where
viscous hydrocarbon oils were used, the densities were determined with the aid of a pyknometer. Provided the orifice was
immersed in liquid to a depth of more than a few bubble
diameters, this depth had no effect upon bubble frequency
but merely altered the pressure necessary to generate the
bubbles.
Perspex ring
Capillary
(0)
Sintered brass
plate
(c)
(b)
(a)= constant pressure systems
(b) = constant flow systems (large flow rates)
(c) = constant flow systems (small flow rates)
Fig. 2.0rifices used
The shapes of the orifices used in the experiments are shown
in Figs 2A, 2B, and 2c.
Fig. 2A represents the type of orifice used in the constant
pressure systems. The nozzle was made of brass and had a
146
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
Perspex ring fitted as shown. The purpose of the ring was to
eliminate as far as possible the effects of the circulation of
the liquid (see Appendix). In these experiments the pressure
drop across the orifice was of the order of a few centimetres
of water.
For the experiments in which a constant flow throughout
bubble formation is required, it is necessary to have a large
pressure drop across the orifice, which can be achieved simply
by making the diameter of the orifice very small. This, however, has the disadvantage that the neck of the bubble is short
at detachment and the bubble subsequently is in such a position that for certain critical flow rates the next bubble, which
rapidly expands in the in:itial stages, coalesces with it. The
larger the orifice diameter, the greater the gas flow rate at
which coalescence first occurs. For large flow rates, a small
orifice has the additional disadvantage of imparting a large
momentum to the gas, which, although it can be approximately accounted for, complicates the theoretical calculations.
On the other hand the theoretical boundary conditions are
more closely obeyed if the neck of the bubble is short. Bearing
these considerations in mind three types of orifice were
eventually used:
(i) For very small flow rates (02 ml/s) the orifices were
essentially the same as those used in the constant pressure
experiments, except that the orifice diameters were small
and hence the pressure drops large. Pressure fluctuations
within the bubbles due to changes in radius of curvature
had a negligible effect on the flow, especially as the latter
depends on the square root of the pressure difference.
(ii) Experiments were also performed in which the drum
J was bypassed and the gas fed directly into the liquid
through a length of capillary. A ring, as shown in Fig. 2c,
was attached to the end of the capillary and provided the
diameter of the capillary was small, the results were the
same as those obtained when the small diameter orifices,
described above, were used.
(iii) For larger constant flow rates the orifices used were
of the type shown in Fig. 2B. A piece of sintered brass was
welded to the lower side of the orifice which in other
respects was similar to that shown in Fig. 2A. The diameters
of the orifices were of the same order as those used in the
constant pressure experiments. A high pressure drop could
be maintained across the sintered brass, resulting in a
constant flow of gas into the bubble. The volume of the
cylindrical cavity between the sintered brass and the upper
plane of the nozzle was small compared with the volume of
the final bubble and its effect was neglected. The purpose
of the relatively large orifice diameter was twofold. Firstly
the bubble during detachment had a slightly longer neck.
This meant that when the bubble detached, it was far enough
away from the orifice to avoid contact with the next bubble.
In this way the condition assumed in the theory, namely
the periodic formation of single bubbles, was satisfied.
Secondly the large crosssectional area of the orifice kept
the momentum of the gas low.
To help elucidate the mechanism of the formation of a
bubble it was decided to take cine photographs showing the
entire formation. The design of the vessel in which the bubbles
were being formed was slightly modified in order to eliminate
distortion of the picture due to the curvature of the Perspex
cylinder, and the stroboscope frequency adjusted until one
bubble appeared to be forming every 15 to 20 seconds. A
photograph of the bubble was then taken every 0·75 s using
an externally triggered 16 mm "Pathe" camera. "Kodak Plus
X" proved to be a convenient film for an exposure of 0·2 s.
The frequency of the stroboscopic illumination was usually
between 9 and 21 flashes/s, so that during each exposure between 1 and 5 pictures were superimposed upon each other.
The light output of the Dawe Strobotorch used was approximately constant, irrespective of the frequency, so that no
change of film was necessary when changing from one frequency to another.
Discussion and Results
The following theory attempts to describe the way in which
gas bubbles are formed at an orifice in a liquid. It is assumed
that the gas is supplied at a point source within the liquid and
that the bubbles, as they form, are spherical. Each bubble is
assumed to begin with its centre at the point source and the
upward motion is determined by a balance between the upward force due to buoyancy and the drag forces due to viscosity and inertia. Now initially the upward velocity of the
centre is small since it starts from rest, and because the
bubble is expanding the underside has a downward velocity
and the bubble therefore continues to envelop the source of
gas. Subsequently, when the bubble is larger, its base is brought
to rest when the outward velocity of the bubble surface relative to its centre is equal to the upward velocity of the centre
due to buoyancy. Thereafter the base has a net upward
velocity and detachment takei; place when it reaches the
source of the gas. The idealised sequence of events is indicated in Fig. 3, and this picture of formation and detachment
(a)
(b)
(C)
(a~= underside of bubble moving down
(b = bottom point of bubble at rest in lowest position
(c = bottom point of bubble reaches gas source
Fig. 3.fdea/ised sequence of events during bubble formation in a liquid.
Gas supplied from a point source P
was the basis of all the theoretical calculations, although in
some cases it was assumed that detachment was delayed until
the base of the bubble was somewhat above the source of gas.
The theory given below is in two sections. The first section
deals with the formation of bubbles at a constant gas flow rate
and the second with the case where gas flows through an
orifice from a vessel at constant pressure. Each section is
subdivided to distinguish between small and large flow rates.
The assumptions made and the relevant results obtained
both by calculation and experiment are given in each case.
Obviously the exact conditions assumed by the theory cannot
be realised experimentally, especially if the bubbles are formed
just above horizontal plates. Photographs (Fig. 4) show that.
the bubbles are pear shaped initially, this being due to the
fact that the base of the bubble cannot move downwards.
Also, some of the boundary conditions, to be discussed in
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID ·
147
.
····v.:···
. ·.
. :_.·
·lt.,.·:.
. ·
_.
Gas flow rate = 24 ml/s
Viscosity = 711 cp
Density= I ·25 g/ml
Radius of orifice = 0·096 cm
Bubble volume= 2·5 ml
Fig. 4.Cine photographs of bubble formation in a viscous liquid
detail below, are not exactly obeyed. Nevertheless, the predicted values are in good agreement with the experimental
results.
Also, if G is the gas flow rate, then, V, the bubble volwne
is given by
4nr 8
Gt= V=3(2)
IBubble formation at constant flow rates
Hence
v = 2g (3Gt) 213 = els
9v 4n
dt
ASMALL FLOW RATES
The theory is based on the following assumptions:
1. The bubble is spherical throughout formation.
2. Circulation of the liquid is negligible, so that the liquid
surrounding the orifice is at rest when the bubble starts to
form (see Appendix).
3. The motion of the bubble is not affected by the presence of another bubble immediately above it.
4. The momentum of the gas is negligible (see Appendix).
5. The bubble is at all instants moving at the Stokes
velocity appropriate to its size.
Consider the motion of a bubble forming at a point source
in an infinite liquid under the above conditions. In view of
assumption (5), the velocity of the centre of the bubble, v, at
time t after the start will be given by the equation:*
2r 2g
v = '9v
* Symbols have the meanings given to them on p.
(1)
162
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
(3)
where s is the distance between the centre of the bubble and
the point of gas supply. Integrating equation (3) we have
s
= 2g
15v
(3G)
4n
2 3
'
1013
'
(4)
The bubble will detach whens = r, and hence at detachment,
eliminating t from equations (2) and (4),
v=
(4;r'
4
(1;~ar4 •
(5)
Equation (5) gives the volume of the bubble in terms of the
properties of the liquid and the gas flow rate. A comparison
of theoretical and experimental results for aqueous solutions
of glycerol is presented in Fig. 5. Runs were also done for
similar flow rates using viscous hydrocarbon oils of varying
surface tension. In each case equation (5) was closely obeyed.
148
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
It should also be noted that the experimental results deviate
to some extent from the theoretical predictions as the flow
rates are increased. This is probably due to the fact that the
inertia of the surrounding liquid was ignored.
0·35
BLARGE FLOW RATES
0·30
0·2s
~
~
"'
:I
30·20
..,~
"'"'
~
~
"' O·l 5
O·IO
0·05
0'5
i·O
2·0
1·5
2·5
As mentioned above, for large flow rates it cannot be assumed that the inertia terms are negligible, and in the theory
which follows, an attempt has been made to allow for the
effect of inertia.
If a sphere moves in a direction perpendicular to a wall the
virtual mass17 of the sphere is given by M,+ M/2 + Ma 3 (
16b3 •
If the sphere is a bubble, Ms is negligible, and the virtual
mass is M(l/2+3a3 /16b 3). When a = b the virtual mass is
llM/16, and this was taken as an average value of the virtual
mass for a bubble forming above a horizontal plate.
It should here be mentioned that the above considerations
regarding the virtual mass apply only if the liquid is completely
inviscid. This condition is not satisfied in the present work and
the calculations below can only be regarded as giving the
order of magnitude of the effect due to inertia. However, the
viscous forces outweigh the inertia forces.
Assumptions (1) to (4) listed in section I(A) remain unchanged and the equation governing the motion of the bubble
becomes
11 d(Mv)
(6)
Mg = 16 cif + 6nvp rv,
GAS FLOW RATE {mf/s)
+
Orifice radius= 0·0334 cm
= 764 cp
Ring radius= 1·10 cm
D = 695 cp
Liquid seal = 5·0 cm
t:, = 626 cp
X = 515 cp
O = 1040 cp
V= 915 cp
Fig. 5.Comparison of theoretical and experimental bubble volumes for
small constant gos flow rates. The lines give the theoretical values corresponding ta the nearest set of experimental points
A change in surface tension alone thus has no effect on the
bubble size.
At a gas fl.ow rate of about 1·5 ml/s, the apparent breakI in
the sequence of points corresponding to a viscosity of 515 cp
is due to the coalescence of a small secondary bubble with the
main one as the latter leaves the orifice (Fig. 6). The discontinuities in the curves of Siemes and Kaufmann are probably due to this phenomenon.
The assumption that the bubble is at all times moving at its
Stokes velocity is at best only an approximation. Garner and
Hammerton15 measured the ultimate velocities of small
bubbles and came to the conclusion that the drag on the
bubble depends on the Reynolds number, defined as R
= vdB(v where dB is the diameter of the equivalent sphere. For
glycerol, Stokes law was found to apply at R < 0·002. At higher
values (0·023<R<0·2) there was agreement with the Hadamard correction, while at still higher values a transition took
place in the opposite direction, the drag becoming considerably
larger than the Stokes drage at R = 10. 16 At these higher
Reynolds numbers, the shape of the bubble tends to deviate
from the spherical form.
If a bubble is formed as described above, the Reynolds
number will change with time, the range for these small flow
rates being from zero to about 1·5, and the Stokes drag was
in the first instance chosen because it represents an approximate average.
where p is the density of the liquid. Substitution in equation
(6) of pGt for Mand (3Gt/4n) 1 i 3 for r gives
gGt =
11 Gt dv
11
(3Gt)
u;dt + 16 vG + 6nv 4 n
113
v.
.
(7)
Equation (7) applies if the bubble is assumed to detach
when s = r, as when the bubble is forming at a point source.
If, however, the radius of the orifice is large, then a better
value of sat detachment is s = r + r 0, where r 0 is the radius
of the orifice. At detachment the bubble would then be in the
position indicated in Fig. 7, and equation (7) has to be modified to allow for the initial volume of the bubble, Vo
= 4nr 3 0 /3, at t = 0. The modified equation is
11
dv 11
( 3 ) l/3
g(Gt+ V0 ) = 16 (Gt+ V 0)dt + 16 vG+6nv 4 n
(Gt+ Vo) 113v
(8)
Rearranging and substituting A for 96nv(3/4n) 1 i 3/11 and
V for Gt+ Vo, equation (8) becomes
(G + vA
dv
G dV + V
)
213
v
16
(9)
= ll g,
which, on integrating from V = V0 to V and assuming that at
V= V 0 , v=O, gives
Gds
v
48g
= dV = llG X
v 213 5 V1' 20
(D
 r52 + D 3 3
60 v 113
~
120 v 213
+ U 
120 v 1 )
ns
L
Vexp (DV 113)
(10)
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
0
0.,,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J t
Q.
0
.·.·''/~··
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
f
0
"'
Q.
0
0
t
t, I t t
,...,
0
0
0
()
Q
Q
T
T
I
l
149
~r
0
0
t')
0
0
.. o
.· ·+·
0
:~~'~"'';
o, · . ·
<
i~1i1TJi~~;~'.
Fig. 6.Formation of a bubble with coalescence of a small secondary bubble immediately after detachment
~~~i
v
00
_!::. [1n v+ 3 "(Dvi~r].
~
G
n.n.
n=l
I
TABLE I.Formation of Air Bubbles in Aqueous Glycerol at Large
I
+: r o rI
Constant .£/ow Rates
I
Fig. 7.Assumed position of the bubble at detachment, using large orifice
diameters
where
Vo5 / 3
5Vo4 / 3
20Vo
60Vo 2 ' 3
120Vo113
( ~~+153~+~

Flow rate
(ml/s)
18
24
33
15
26
35
14
48g
L = l lG exp (D Vol/3)
and D
120)
D6
3A
=c;·
20
26
Bubble
Kinematic
volume
viscosity (experiment)
(Stokes)
(ml)
7·9
7·9
7·9
6·5
6·5
6·5
5·4
5·4
5·4
A further integration from V = V 0 , where s = 0, to V
gives
48g
s = 11G2
3V513
15V4 13
5D  4D 2
2·1
2·6
3·2
1 ·6
2·4
3·0
1·3
I· 8
2·2
r0
Bubble
volume
(theory)
(ml)
Theory
Experiment
1 ·9
2·5
3·3
1 ·6
2·4
3·1
1·3
1·7
2·2
0·90
0·96
l ·03
1·00
1·00
1 ·03
1·00
0·95
1·00
= 0·096 cm
IIBubble formation with a constant pressure supply
X
v
[
v,
Equation (11) enables a graph of s versus t to be constructed
and the time for the bubble to reach a volume such that
s = r + r 0 can thus be determined. This time multiplied by
the gas flow rate then gives the volume of the bubble that
detaches and moves away. Theoretical and experimental
values of the volumes of bubbles are compared in Table I.
r
I
(11)
+
20V
D3
90V 2 /3

360V113
ASMALL FLOW RATES
120lnV]
i>4 + ~ ~
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
10
v,
For each orifice considered, the flow of gas is proportional
to the square root of the pressure difference across the orifice.
150
DAVIDSON AND
scHiiL:ER.
BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
Suppose now that an orifice of this kind is submerged in a
liquid and that a bubble is forming on the upper surface. Let
the gauge pressure on the lower side of the orifice be P 1 • The
gauge pressure on the upper side of the orifice will be
pgh + 2a/r  pgs, where h is the head of the liquid and a
the surface tension.
The rate at which gas will flow into the forming bubble
will thus at any instant be given by:
G
= k(P 1

pgh 
r2a + pgs) t
dV
= dt'
1 2
(12)
where k is an experimental constant depending on the orifice
and the gas flowing through it.
Theeffect of the kinetic energy of the liquid on the pressure
within the bubble has been neglected; an expression derived
in the Appendix shows that this effect is small. It is also shown
in the Appendix that the viscosity of the liquid has only a
small effect upon the pressure within the bubble.
For small gas flow rates, r and s will be small and as a
first approximation the term pgs can be neglected and equation (12) becomes
2a)11
(
dV
dt .
2
G = k P 1  pgh  ;
=
(13)
Substituting r = (3 V/4n) 1 13 and writing P for P 1  pgh,
equation (13) becomes
~=
dt
k[P _ 2
a(4:rt)1/a]
3V
112
'
which can be integrated by substituting cos 2 0 for (4n/3 V) 113
2a/P and using the boundary condition V = 4:rir 03/3 at
t = 0 to give
kPl/2t
=
~:rte~r x
[tan O(sec5 0 +
~ sec 0 + ~5 sec 0) +
3
r + r 0 then gives the volume of the bubble when s = r + r 0 •
A comparison of experimental and theoretical results for air
and aqueous solutions of glycerol is given in Table II.
The orifice coefficient k was determined with air on both
sides of the orifice plate; k was assumed to be the same with
air bubbling into liquid.
Table II shows that the theoretical and experimental values
of bubble volumes are in reasonable agreement in view of the
assumptions made in deriving the theory. Jn these constantpressure experiments, the flow rate is a dependent variable,
and it is therefore appropriate to compare theoretical and
experimental values of the flow rate. This comparison is
given in Table II, and the last column of figures shows good
agreement between theory and experiment, except for the
first figure, I · 66. In this case the pressure, 4860 g/cm s 2 , is
almost exactly equal to 2a/r 0 , and it is thought that in the
experiments there was an appreciable delay period between
the completion of the bubble and the beginning of the expansion of the next bubble. In the theory it was assumed that
there was no delay period between bubbles, so the theoretical
flow should be higher, as shown in the first line of Table II.
This leads to the concept of a critical flow for continuous
bubble formation which will be discussed in a subsequent
paper.
Experiments were also carried out using carbon dioxide
instead of air. The orifice coefficient was redetermined, and as
in the case of air, the size of the bubbles formed was in good
agreement with theory.
1: ln
tan(~+
i)]
(14)
BLARGE FLOW RATES
For large flow rates the assumption that the change in
hydrostatic head does not affect the flow of gas into the
bubble is no longer valid. The bubbles formed are large and
the effect of the term pgs on the pressure difference becomes
appreciable. Also, as in section IB, the inertia terms become
important, and must be allowed for in the equation of motion
of the bubble.
The two simultaneous equations to be solved are equation
(12) and
3V) 1' 3 ds
Vg = 6 nv ( 4 n
dt
the limits of integration being
0
= cos 1
[
(~~ra ~aJ1'
2
and 0 = cos1(!;J
llV d 2s
dt 2
+ 16
11 ds dV
+ 16 dt dt ' 0 5)
112
,
V and r can thus be calculated for any value of t.
The assumptions listed in section IA are applicable, and
equations (1) and (14) enable a plot of v versus t to be constructed, from which by means of graphical integration the
distance s can be computed for any time, t. A plot of s versus
Equations (12) and (15) cannot be solved analytically and
values of s, V, and ds/dt were calculated on the electronic
computer "Edsac 2" for regularly increasing values oft, and
Table III gives a typical set of results in detail, showing how
s and V vary with time. The initial values of s, V, and ds/dt
fort= 0 were taken to be 0, 4nr 0 3/3, and 0 respectively. The
volume of the bubble moving away from the orifice was taken
TABLE ILFormation of Air Bubbles in Aqueous Glycerol at Small Flow Rates and Constant Pressure
Orifice
constant k
Bubble volume
Flow rate
0·0414
0·0414
0·0414
Orifice
radius
(cm)
0·0260
0·0260
0·0260
0·0414
0·0414
0·0260
0·0260
3·6
3·6
64·7
64·7
6110
8290
0·26
0·30
0·24
0·28
0·92
0•93
2·7
3·4
3·12
3•78
1·15
1·11
0·0901
0·0901
0·0323
0·0323
4·6
4·6
64·5
64·5
4530
6920
0·56
0·67
0·47
0·57
0·84
0·85
5·1
7·1
5·88
7·60
1·15
1·07
(cm1t•/gl!•)
Kinematic Surface
viscosity tension
(Stokes) (dyn/cm)
7·8
63·9
7·8
63·9
7·8
63·9
Pressure
(g/cm s2)
4860
7080
8930
Expt.
(ml)
0·46
0·51
0·55
Theory
(ml)
0·39
0·49
0·53
Theory
Expt.
0·85
0·96
0·96
(ml/s)
1·7
3·1
3·6
Theory
(ml/s)
2·82
3·86
4·24
Theory
Expt.
Expt.
l ·66
1·24
1·18
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
Ill.11zeoretical Calculation of Bubble Volume with constant
Gas Pressure and Viscous Liquids. Results from "Edsac 2"
kinematic viscosity of the liquid. The dimensions of the orifice
are of minor importance.
For constant gas pressure, however, the orifice dimensions
become important and the volume of the bubble is a function
of a constant depending on the size and shape of the orifice,
the density of the gas, the kinematic viscosity and surface
tension of the liquid and the pressure of the gas supply. In
this case of constant pressure supply, the average gas flow rate
is a dependent variable which is affected by all tl;te factors
which influence the bubble volume.
The effects of the physical variables are summarised below.
TABLE
v = 7·4 S, P = 2250 g/cm s2 , rJ = 63·9 dyn/cm, k
cm 712/g1 i', r0 = 0·0975 cm, p = 1·256 g/ml.
v
s
t
(s)
0·000
0·005
0·010
0·015
0·020
0·025
0·030
0·035
0·040
0·045
0·050
0·055
0·060
0·065
0·070
0·075
0·080
0·085
0·090
0·095
0·100
(cm)
0·0000
0·0051
0·0181
0·0380
0·0642
0·0964
0·1341
0·1773
0·2257
0·2792
0·3376
04008
0·4688
0·5414
0·6187
0·7004
0·7866
0·8772
0·9722
1·0716
l · 1752
=
0·856
t/>
(cm 8)
0·0039
0· 1812
0·3697
0·5617
0·7564
0·9537
1·1537
1·3565
1·5622
1·7711
1. 9832
2· 1988
2·4181
2·6411
2·8680
3·0990
3·3342
3·5737
3. 8176
4·0662
4·3193
>1 ·000
>1 ·000
0·394
0·240
0·162
0·126
0·103
0·086
0·074
0·064
0·055
0·049
0·044
0·038
0·035
0·033
0·029
0·027
0·026
0·023
0·021
Viscosity
According to Stokes' law the velocity of a bubble rising in a
viscous liquid is inversely proportional to the viscosity and
since the volume of a bubble forming above an orifice depends
on the tin1e it is in contact with the orifice, the viscosity has a
major effect on bubble size.
Gas flow rate
At any particular viscosity, the frequency of bubble formation is nearly constant, and changes in gas flow rate merely
change the volumes of the individual bubbles.
Orifice dimensions
The orifice dimensions are not important for constant gas
flow rates. With constant pressure gas supply, however, the
flow through the orifice is proportional to its crosssectional
area, making the latter very important.
to be the total volume at s = r + r 0 minus the initial volume
4:rcr 03/3 = Vo. The volume V0 remained to fonn the nucleus
of the next bubble. Table IV gives a comparison of theoretical
and experimental values of bubble volume, and of flow rate.
The agreement between theory and experiment is satisfactory,
except at the lowest pressures.
Liquid density
With constant gas flow rates, an increase in the density of
the liquid has the effect of increasing the velocity with which
the bubble rises and a smaller bubble results. With constant
pressure the density of the liquid also has an effect on the gas
flow rate into the bubble. As the bubble rises, the hydrostatic
head, which depends on the density of the liquid, decreases.
The pressure in the bubble becomes less, and the gas flow
rate into it increases.
Conclusions
The volume of a bubble formed at an orifice submerged in
a viscous liquid can be calculated by assuming that the orifice
acts as a point source of gas supply and that the motion and
position of the bubble is governed by viscous, inertia and
buoyancy forces.
Two cases can be distinguished, namely constant gas flow
rate and constant supply pressure of the gas. In both cases the
forces due to inertia are negligible if the overall gas flow rate
is small.
If the gas flow rate is constant, then the volume of the
bubble that detaches is a function of the gas flow rate and
TABLE
Surface tension
If the gas flow rate is constant, the surface tension has no
effect other than that due . io the small forces arising from
contact round the edge of the orifice. With constant gas
IV.Formation of Air Bubbles in Aqueous Glycerol at Large Flow Rates and Constant Pressure
Orifice constant k
=
O· 856 ml cm7i 2/g1 ' 2
Orifice radius = 0·0975 cm
Bubble Volume
Flow Rate
Kinematic
viscosity
(Stokes)
7·4
7·4
7·4
Surface
tension
(dyn/cm)
63·9
63·9
63·9
Pressure
(g/cm s')
2250
3120
5360
Expt.
(ml)
4·5
5·0
5·8
Theory
(ml)
4· 1
4·7
5·9
Theory
Expt.
0·91
0·94
1 ·02
Theory
(ml/s)
42·7
50·0
64·9
Theory
(ml/s)
32
42
57
6·2
6·2
6·2
64·0
64·0
64·0
1750
2310
3350
3·9
4·1
4·6
3·4
3·8
4·5
0·87
0·93
0·98
29
35
46
37·8
43·2
52·3
1·30
1 ·24
l · 14
5·4
5·4
5·4
64·1
64·1
64·1
2680
3650
4940
3·9
4·3
4·7
3·8
4·4
5·0
0·97
1·02
1·06
38
47
56
45·8
53·6
61·8
1·20
1·14
HO
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
151
ExpC
ExPL
1·33
1·19
1·14
152
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
pressure, however, the surface tension has an appreciable
effect on the pressure in the bubble and so to some extent
governs the flow into the bubble.
Gas density
Gas density is important only with constant pressure supplies, where it affects the discharge of gas through the orifice.
The effect of the momentum of the emerging gas is small, over
the range of variables considered in this paper.
The effect of the gas momentum on bubble size
Acknowledgments
One of the authors (B.O.G.S.) would like to acknowledge
the support given by a Shell Company Scholarship. The
authors also wish to acknowledge the assistance of Mr
H. P. F. SwinnertonDyer of the Mathematical Laboratory,
Cambridge, who programmed the work for Edsac 2.
APPENDIX
Effect of the Perspex ring on bubble frequency
At the outset of the investigation it was decided that the
bubbles should be formed in as stagnant a region of the
liquid as possible. It is clear that if bubbles are periodically
formed at a rapid rate, the liquid will circulate and this will
influence the bubble volume. This effect is difficult to account
for theoretically, and a ring to reduce circulation, in the region
where the bubble is actually formed, was therefore fitted to the
orifice as shown in Fig. 2. The effect of such a ring is best
illustrated by means of an example.
Air at the rate of 12·5 ml/s was passed into a liquid of
viscosity 480 cp, and the frequency of bubble formation
determined for various diameters of the Perspex ring. Fig. 8
eso~~~
0
830
fo
\
i,,..
~ SIO ,_
I o
~
"
g
!\
"'
~
"'
,J
::
~
790
I
I
:
o
'o ......._o_
0
I
I
I
o
I
770 
I
t81Jbbl1 diomtbr
I
I
I
I
I
750 .___ _ _
0·0
___,_,__.i_ _ __,__ _ _ _,___ _ ___,
l·O
In the experiments described above, gas was blown from a
small orifice and it thus had a certain amount of upward
momentum which was neglected in the theoretical treatment.
The force due to the rate of change of momentum is ·
G 2pa/ A 0 , where A 0 is the effective area of the orifice and pa
the density of the gas. In the present experiments this force
acts in the same direction as the buoyancy force, and, if it is
to be taken into account, the equation of motion of a bubble
forming at small constant flow rates can be rewritten in the
form:
4:nr 3g = 6:nrv ds _ G2pa.
(16)
3
dt
AoP
Rearranging and substituting r
ds
dt
2·0
RING OLA.METER
3·0
,.0
(cm)
Gas flow rate= 12·5 ml/s
Liquid viscosity= 480 cp
Orifice radius= 0·0975 cm
Liquid seal = 7·9 cm
Fig. 8.Bubb/e frequency as a function of orifice ring diameter
=
2g
9v
(3Gt)
4:n
213
=
+
(3Gt/4:n) 1 13 gives
4n: )
G 2pa (
6:n:A 0 pv 3Gt
1 3
1 ,
which upon integration and substitution of V/G for
8
=
2g
15v
t
gives
(3G) (!:.) 1+ G2pa (4:n)11s (~)a;s.
4:rt G
4nA pv 3G
G
2 3
t
0 3
0
(17)
If the bubble is asslUiled to detach when s = r then from
equation (17) the condition prevailing at detachment will be
1=
!\
;c
shows a graph of bubble frequency versus ring diameter from
which it can be seen that the frequency approaches an almost
constant value when the ring diameter is greater than about
1·5 times the bubble diameter.
All the results quoted in the present paper were obtained
using rings with diameters at least one and a half times as
large as the diameters of the bubbles. In each case a preliminary experiment was carried out to ensure that the results
conformed to the fiat section of the curve.
2g (]._) 1/3 V'f3
15vG 4n
+
Gpa
4nA 0 pv
(4:n:) z;a
v113.
(18)
3
The first of the two terms on the right hand side of equation
(18) is due to viscous forces and the second to momentum
forces. If G = 1·0 ml/s, v = 640 cS, p = 1·25 g/ml, Pa
= 0·0012 g/ml and Ao= 0·0035 cm2, then the momentum
accounts for only 0·5 % of the right hand side and its effect
can thus be neglected.
For high gas flow rates equation (16) has to be modified
to allow for the effect of liquid inertia. If G = 17 ml/s,
v = 586 cS, p = 1·254 g/ml, and A 0 = 0·0175 cm2 , then the
theory predicts that the volume of an air bubble is 1·0 %
greater than a carbon dioxide bubble. The theory has been
tested experimentally for this viscosity and Fig. 9 shows that
for a flow rate of 17 ml/s the air bubbles are 1·8 %larger than
the carbon dioxide bubbles. In the theoretical calculations,
the actual__ and effective orifice areas were assumed equal.
For constant flow systems the difference in bubble size can
thus be accounted for in terms of the momentum of the gas
For constant pressure systems the effect of the density of the
gas on the orifice discharge coefficient must also be taken
into account.
Pressure necessary to generate a bubble in a viscous liquid
Suppose that a gas is being blown from a source into an
infinite liquid in the absence of gravity. The resulting bubble
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
DAVIDSON AND scHliLER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
will be spherical, and its centre will be stationary. Under these
conditions Poritsky18 has shown that the viscous terms vanish
from the NavierStokes equation, and therefore the mean
pressure within the liquid at any point is the same as it would
be in an inviscid liquid. However, the pressure within a
viscous liquid in motion is not the same in all directions, and
153
formation PGt to the kinetic energy given by equation (22).
Calculations showed that, for the cases considered in the
present paper, P is negligible in comparison with the other
pressures involved.
Note on the formation of bubbles in an inviscid liquid
In the discussion on the formation of bubbles at small
constant flow rates in liquids of high viscosity it was assumed
that inertia forces were negligible in comparison with viscous
forces. For the case of an inviscid liquid, the viscous forces
are negligible in comparison with the inertia forces.
The equation of motion is then
1·8,~
I •6
(23)
".:'
5,
...
which on integrating twice, using the condition that at
t = 0, ds/dt = s = 0, gives
~ 1·4
'
0
>
'.'!
~
(24)
i:
At detachment r = s = (3Gt/4n) 1 i 3 and hence the final
bubble volume Vis given by
V =Gt= (~)
4n
l·O~~'
l·O
15
20
GAS FLOW RATE (ml/1)
Flow rate= 17 ml/s
Liquid viscosity= 735 cp
Orifice radius= 0·0745 cm
Fig. 9.Bubb/e sizes compared for carbon dioxide and air
at the surface of the bubble the radial pressure differs from
the mean pressure by 4pv(dV/dt)/3V. 18 This term gives the
amount of the increase of pressure within the bubble due to
the viscosity of the liquid, and in the constant pressure experiments the flow into the bubble would be reduced by including
the term within the square root in equation (12).
The last column in Table III gives the term:
r/>
= 1  [1  4 pv (dV/dt)/3 V(P
+ pgs 
2a/r)]
112 ,
Pressure due to kinetic energy imparted to the liquid
If a gas is blown into a liquid the latter will acquire kinetic
energy due to the expansion of the resulting bubble. The total
kinetic energy generated during the formation of a bubble is
given by the equation:
CIO
Kinetic energy =
J2pnu R, dR,
2
2
(21)
r
.
G2p
metic energy = Snr.
K'
(22)
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
315
G6i 5
=
615
1·378 G
g3/5
•
(25)
Gs1s
= 1·722 g3/5
(26)
Symbols Used
A
Ao
b
D
dn
G
= [96nv(3/4n) !3]/11.
1
= effective orifice area.
= sphere radius.
= distance of centre of sphere from wall.
= 3A/G.
= diameter of equivalent sphere.
= gas flow rate.
g
= acceleration due to gravity.
h
= depth of liquid seal.
k
= orifice constant.
L
=parameter in equation (10).
M = mass of liquid displaced by sphere.
M, = mass of sphere.
P
= P1
P
= mean pressure due to kinetic energy.
= pressure in drum.
= pressure at radius R,.
=Reynolds number.
=radius of shell enveloping source of gas supply,
= bubble radius.
= orifice radius.
= distance of centre of bubble from point of gas supply.
= time bubble has been growing.
= radial velocity of liquid surrounding bubble.
= bubble volume at any instant.
P1
p
R
r0
s
t
P, the mean pressure due to the kinetic energy of the radial
motion, is obtained by equating the work done during bubble
(_!!)
4g
(72)3/s G6/5
V = 6nl/5 ga1s
R,
r
Substituting G/4n R. 2 for u and integrating we have
'
It is interesting to note that, except for the numerical constant, equation (25) is identical with the empirical expression
given by van Krevelen and Hoftijzer19 to predict the volume
of a bubble in terms of gas flow rate. Van Krevelen and
Hoftijzer found that, provided the gas den8ity was negligible
in comparison with the liquid density, the volume of a bubble
was given by the expression:
a
which is the fractional variation in the flow into the bubble'
caused by liquid viscosity. These figures show that although
the liquid viscosity has a very large effect at the start of the
motion, the overall effect on the flow is likely to be about
6%. From Table IV it follows that the effect on the final
bubble volume is likely to be about 3 %.
15
u
V
pgh.
154
DAVIDSON AND SCHULER. BUBBLE FORMATION AT AN ORIFICE IN A VISCOUS LIQUID
V0 = bubble volume at t = 0.
= velocity of bubble centre.
= liquid density.
PG = gas density.
a .= surface tension.
6
= cos 1 [(4n/3 V) 1/32u/P] 1 f 2•
v
= kinematic viscosity of the liquid.
</>
= 1  [1  4pv(dV/dt)/3V(P + pgs  2a/r))1 f 2 •
v
p
The above quantities may be expressed in any set of consistent units in which force and mass are not defined independently.
References
Hughes, R. R., Handlos, A. E., Evans, H. D., and Maycock,
R. L. Publication of the Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics
!11stir11te, 1953 (Los Angeles: The University).
2 Davidson, L. and Amick E. H. A.I.Ch.£. Journal, 1956, 2, 337.
3 Helsby, F. W. and Tuson, K. R. Research, 1955, 8, 270.
•Benzing, R. J. and Myers J. E. Industr. Engng Chem., 1955, 47,
2087.
6 Quigley, C. J., Johnson, A. I., and Harris, B. L.
Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series 16, 1955, p. 31.
1
Leibson, I., Holcomb, E. G., Cacoso, A. G., and Jacmic, J. J.
A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 1956, 2,.296.
7 Calderbank, P. H. Trans. lnstn chem. Engrs, 1956, 34, 79.
8 Calderbank, P.H. British Chemical Engineering, 1956, 1, 267.
9 Siemes, W. Chem.lng.Tech., 1954, 26, 479.
10 Siemes, W. Chem.lng.Tech., 1954, 26, 614.
u Siemes, W. and Kaufmann, J. F. Chemical Engineering Science,
1956, 5, 127.
12 Siemes, W. and Gunther, K. Chem.lng.Tech., 1956, 28, 389.
13 Siemes, W. Chem.Ing.Tech., 1956, 28, 727.
14 Siemes, W. and Kaufmann, J. F. Chem.Ing.Tech., 1957, 29, 32.
15 Garner, F. H. and Hammerton, D. Chemical Engineering Science,
1954, 3, 1.
16 Moore, D. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1959, 6, 113.
17 Milne Thomson, L. N.
Theoretical Hydrodynamics, 3rd edition
1955. (London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.)
18 Poritsky, H.
Proceedings of the First National Congress of
Applied Mechanics, 1952. (New York: American Society of
Mechanical Engineers.)
19 van Krevelen, D. W. and Hoftijzer, P. J. Chem. Engng Progr.,
1950, 46, 29.
6
The manuscript of this paper was received on 30 September, 1959.
TRANS. INSTN CHEM. ENGRS, Vol. 38, 1960
Link to this page
Permanent link
Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by eMail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..
Short link
Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)
HTML Code
Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog